Abstract
This study proposes a multi-objective lightweight and crashworthiness optimization design of complex cross-sectional shape and size of S-rail employing a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (HMCDM) method. Several S-rails with special cross-sectional shapes of the reinforcement plate are established and compared. Response surface models with different orders are established considering the complex cross-sectional shapes and sizes. The objective function chosen for the two objectives is the specific energy absorption (SEA) and the peak force (PF). Meanwhile, the metrics for the three-objective are the PF, the total mass (M), and the energy absorption (EA). Two-objective Pareto fronts are obtained by the three-objective optimization confronting. Different multi-criteria decision-making methods are used to find the trade-off optimum points from the Pareto fronts. Results indicate that the proposed HMCDM method, including the technique for order preferences by similarity to ideal solution, gray relational analysis, and entropy weight, demonstrates a good trade-off frontier solution. In the case of a slight increase in M, the EA and SEA performances of the optimal model are greatly improved compared with the S-rail without a stiffener. Compared with the initial optimization model, the M of the optimal model is reduced by 25.62%, and the performance is improved. Therefore, the design of the cross-sectional shape and size of the S-rail and hybrid method can improve the crashworthiness.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bai J, Li Y, Zuo W (2017) Cross-sectional shape optimisation for thin-walled beam crashworthiness with stamping constraints using genetic algorithm. Int J Veh Des 73:76–95
Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation 6:182–197
Duan LB, Xiao NC, Hu ZH, Li GY, Cheng AG (2017) An efficient lightweight design strategy for body-in-white based on implicit parameterization technique Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 55:1927–1943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1621-0
Esmaeili-Marzdashti S, Pirmohammad S, Esmaeili-Marzdashti S (2017a) Crashworthiness analysis of s-shaped structures under axial impact loading. Lat Am J Solids Struct 14:743–764
Esmaeili-Marzdashti S, Sebaey TA, Pirmohammad S, Esmaeili-Marzdashti S (2017b) Crash analysis and design of multi-cell octagonal S-shape members under axial and oblique impacts. Int Refereed J Eng Sci 6:37–50
Fang JG, Gao YK, Sun GY, Zhang YT, Li Q (2014) Crashworthiness design of foam-filled bitubal structures with uncertainty. Int J Non-Linear Mech 67:120–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2014.08.005
Fang JG, Gao YK, Sun GY, Qiu N, Li Q (2015) On design of multi-cell tubes under axial and oblique impact loads. Thin-Walled Structures 95:115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2015.07.002
Fang JG, Qiu N, An XZ, Xiong FF, Sun GY, Li Q (2017) Crashworthiness design of a steel-aluminum hybrid rail using multi-response objective-oriented sequential optimization. Adv Eng Softw 112:192–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.05.013
Gorgij AD, Kisi O, Moghaddam AA, Taghipour A (2017) Groundwater quality ranking for drinking purposes, using the entropy method and the spatial autocorrelation index. Environ Earth Sci 76:269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6589-6
Hilmann J, Paas M, Haenschke A, Vietor T (2007) Automatic concept model generation for optimisation and robust design of passenger cars. Adv Eng Softw 38:795–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2006.08.031
Hosseini SM, Arjomandi Rad M, Khalkhali A, Saranjam MJ (2019) Optimal design of the S-rail family for an automotive platform with novel modifications on the product-family optimization process. Thin-Walled Struct 138:143–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2019.01.046
Hosseini-Tehrani P, Nikahd M (2006) Two materials S-frame representation for improving crashworthiness and lightening. Thin-Walled Struct 44:407–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2006.04.002
Huang TL, Song XW, Liu M (2017) The multi-objective optimization of the loading paths for T-shape tube hydroforming using adaptive support vector regression. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88:3447–3458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9055-9
Hunkeler S, Duddeck F, Rayamajhi M, Zimmer H (2013) Shape optimisation for crashworthiness followed by a robustness analysis with respect to shape variables. Struct Multidiscip Optim 48:367–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0903-z
Khakhali A, Nariman-zadeh N, Darvizeh A, Masoumi A, Notghi B (2010) Reliability-based robust multi-objective crashworthiness optimisation of S-shaped box beams with parametric uncertainties. Int J Crashworthiness 15:443–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/13588261003696458
Khalkhali A, Masoumi A, Darvizeh A, Jafari M, Shiri A (2011) Experimental and numerical investigation into the quasi-static crushing behaviour of the S-shape square tubes. J Mech 27:585–596. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmech.2011.61
Kim HS, Wierzbicki T (2001) Effect of the cross-sectional shape of hat-type cross-sections on crash resistance of an “S”-frame. Thin-Walled Struct 39:535–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0263-8231(01)00020-9
Liu S-T, Tong Z-Q, Tang Z-L, Zhang Z-H (2014) Design optimization of the S-frame to improve crashworthiness. Acta Mech Sin 30:589–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-014-0032-y
Nguyen VS, Wen GL, Yin HF, Van TP (2014) Optimisation design of reinforced S-shaped frame structure under axial dynamic loading. Int J Crashworthiness 19:385–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2014.904598
Pan F, Zhu P, Zhang Y (2010) Metamodel-based lightweight design of B-pillar with TWB structure via support vector regression. Comput Struct 88:36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.07.008
Rayamajhi M, Hunkeler S, Duddeck F (2014) Geometrical compatibility in structural shape optimisation for crashworthiness. Int J Crashworthiness 19:42–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2013.832720
Schneider F, Jones N (2003) Influence of spot-weld failure on crushing of thin-walled structural sections. Int J Mech Sci 45:2061–2081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2003.11.004
Shyu GS, Cheng BY, Chiang CT, Yao PH, Chang TK (2011) Applying factor analysis combined with kriging and information entropy theory for mapping and evaluating the stability of groundwater quality variation in Taiwan. Int J Environ Res Public Health 8:1084–1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8041084
Standard SAE (1995) J211: instrumentation for impact test. Technical Report, Safety Test Instrumentation Stds Comm
Tian LL, Gao YK, Fang JG, An XZ (2015) Multi-objective optimisation of hybrid S-shaped rails under oblique impact loading. Int J Heavy Veh Syst 22:137–156. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijhvs.2015.070450
Viana FAC, Haftka RT, Steffen V (2009) Multiple surrogates: how cross-validation errors can help us to obtain the best predictor Structural and Multidisciplinary. Optimization 39:439–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-008-0338-0
Wang P, Meng P, Zhai J-Y, Zhu Z-Q (2013) A hybrid method using experiment design and grey relational analysis for multiple criteria decision making problems. Knowledge-Based Systems 53:100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.08.025
Wang CQ, Wang DF, Zhang S (2016a) Design and application of lightweight multi-objective collaborative optimization for a parametric body-in-white structure. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D-J Automob Eng 230:273–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407015581937
Wang P, Zhu ZQ, Wang YH (2016b) A novel hybrid MCDM model combining the SAW, TOPSIS and GRA methods based on experimental design. Inf Sci 345:27–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.01.076
Xiong F, Wang D, Ma Z, Chen S, Lv T, Lu F (2017) Structure-material integrated multi-objective lightweight design of the front end structure of automobile body Structural and Multidisciplinary. Optimization 57:829–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1778-1
Xu FX, Sun GY, Li GY, Li Q (2014) Experimental study on crashworthiness of tailor-welded blank (TWB) thin-walled high-strength steel (HSS) tubular structures. Thin-Walled Struct 74:12–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2013.08.021
Zhang C, Saigal A (2007) Crash behavior of a 3D S-shape space frame structure. J Mater Process Technol 191:256–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.03.093
Zhang HH, Peng Y, Hou L, Tian GD, Li ZW (2019) A hybrid multi-objective optimization approach for energy-absorbing structures in train collisions. Inf Sci 481:491–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.12.071
Zhou YJ, Lan FC, Chen JQ (2011) Crashworthiness research on S-shaped front rails made of steel-aluminum hybrid materials. Thin-Walled Struct 49:291–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2010.10.007
Zimmer H, Hövelmann A, Schmidt H, Umlauf U, Frodl B, Hänle U (2000) Entwurfstool zur Generierung parametrischer, virtueller Prototypen im. Fahrzeugbau VDI-Berichte:1559
Zuo W, Lu Y, Zhao X, Bai J (2018) Cross-sectional shape design of automobile structure considering rigidity and driver’s field of view. Adv Eng Softw 115:161–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.09.006
Funding
This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (number 51975244) and Jilin Province and Jilin University Jointly Sponsor Special Foundation (number SXGJSF2017-2-1-5).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Replication of results
The results of the proposed HCDM method presented in Fig. 12 are obtained in accordance with the detailed formula in Section 3, where Tables 8 and 9 show the process in the supplementary material.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Mehmet Polat Saka
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictionalclaims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Multi-objective cross-sectional shape and size optimization of S-rail using hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 213 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xie, C., Wang, D. Multi-objective cross-sectional shape and size optimization of S-rail using hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method. Struct Multidisc Optim 62, 3477–3492 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02651-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02651-y