Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-objective cross-sectional shape and size optimization of S-rail using hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method

  • Industrial Application Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study proposes a multi-objective lightweight and crashworthiness optimization design of complex cross-sectional shape and size of S-rail employing a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (HMCDM) method. Several S-rails with special cross-sectional shapes of the reinforcement plate are established and compared. Response surface models with different orders are established considering the complex cross-sectional shapes and sizes. The objective function chosen for the two objectives is the specific energy absorption (SEA) and the peak force (PF). Meanwhile, the metrics for the three-objective are the PF, the total mass (M), and the energy absorption (EA). Two-objective Pareto fronts are obtained by the three-objective optimization confronting. Different multi-criteria decision-making methods are used to find the trade-off optimum points from the Pareto fronts. Results indicate that the proposed HMCDM method, including the technique for order preferences by similarity to ideal solution, gray relational analysis, and entropy weight, demonstrates a good trade-off frontier solution. In the case of a slight increase in M, the EA and SEA performances of the optimal model are greatly improved compared with the S-rail without a stiffener. Compared with the initial optimization model, the M of the optimal model is reduced by 25.62%, and the performance is improved. Therefore, the design of the cross-sectional shape and size of the S-rail and hybrid method can improve the crashworthiness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (number 51975244) and Jilin Province and Jilin University Jointly Sponsor Special Foundation (number SXGJSF2017-2-1-5).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dengfeng Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Replication of results

The results of the proposed HCDM method presented in Fig. 12 are obtained in accordance with the detailed formula in Section 3, where Tables 8 and 9 show the process in the supplementary material.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Mehmet Polat Saka

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictionalclaims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Multi-objective cross-sectional shape and size optimization of S-rail using hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 213 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, C., Wang, D. Multi-objective cross-sectional shape and size optimization of S-rail using hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method. Struct Multidisc Optim 62, 3477–3492 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02651-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02651-y

Keywords

Navigation