Review
Nematode endosymbiont competition: Fortune favors the fittest

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molbiopara.2020.111298Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Entomopathogenic nematodes and their bacteria colonize insects as a complex.

  • Bacterial preference confers reproductive advantage to certain nematodes.

  • Co-evolutionary fitness determines the success of the nematode-bacteria complex.

  • Nematode-bacteria competition is a model to study vector-parasite competition.

Abstract

Endosymbiotic bacteria that obligately associate with entomopathogenic nematodes as a complex are a unique model system to study competition. These nematodes seek an insect host and provide entry for their endosymbionts. Through their natural products, the endosymbionts nurture their nematodes by eliminating secondary infection, providing nutrients through bioconversion of the insect cadaver, and facilitating reproduction. On one hand, they cooperatively colonize the insect host and neutralize other opportunistic biotic threats. On the other hand, inside the insect cadaver as a fighting pit, they fiercely compete for the fittest partnership that will grant them the reproductive dominance. Here, we review the protective and nurturing nature of endosymbiotic bacteria for their nematodes and how their selective preference shapes the superior nematode-endosymbiont pairs as we know today.

Graphical abstract

Schematic drawing of three life stages of endosymbiotic bacteria and two life stages of entomopathogenic nematodes.

  1. Download : Download high-res image (142KB)
  2. Download : Download full-size image

Introduction

Terrestrial nematodes that are symbiotically associated with bacteria have been used for nearly 60 years as commercial biological control agents for pest management in agricultural crops and combatting the mosquitos Culex pipiens [1] and Aedes sp. [2]. Two nematode genera that stand out for this purpose are Heterorhabditis and Steinernema, harboring Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus symbiotic bacteria, respectively [3]. Apart from their usage as biological insecticides, the unique interaction of these nematode-endosymbiont complexes offers an invaluable tool as a model system to study the dynamics of competition interweaved with the evolution of mutualism.

The life cycle of Heterorhabditis and Steinernema nematodes involves two different phases: a non-feeding phase, in which the nematode infective juveniles (IJs) are seeking environmental cues to find a host, and a parasitic phase, in which the IJs develop into adults and reproduce inside the insect host (Fig. 1). On the other hand, the life cycle of endosymbionts are divided into three phases: (i) phoretic phase, where the endosymbionts are slowly replicating inside their nematode; (ii) pathogenic phase, after they reach the insect hemolymph and start invading the insect host; and (iii) saprophytic phase, where they bioconvert the insect cadaver for their nematode and re-associate with the new generation of nematode IJs as the food depletes [4].

In general, the interactions between nematodes and their native symbionts are mutualistic. The nematodes provide entry to the insect host [5], while the endosymbionts offer protection and allow nematode replication within the insect host [6]. However, during the non-feeding stage, the nematode IJs must modulate the distribution of their stored energy to sustain themselves while supporting the replication of their endosymbiotic bacteria until they can find a suitable insect host to parasitize and exploit for their own benefit [7].

During the parasitic phase, entomopathogenic nematodes aim to colonize the insect host for reproduction. For them, the degree of fitness, and therefore benefits, brought by the symbiotic bacteria can confer competitive advantage in the success rate of insect host infection and the replication of the parasite [8]. For the symbiont, enabling development and high proliferation for their preferred nematodes mean the “champion” bacteria will be transmitted and re-associate with the new generation of IJs emerging from the insect cadaver. Thereby, the entomopathogenic nematode life cycle is re-started as a non-feeding IJ.

A recent publication challenged the notion of the monoxeny of endosymbiotic bacteria and identified various frequently-associated microbiota (FAM) carried by the nematodes emerging from the insect cadaver [9]. The bacteria identified as FAM were found to be cultivatable Proteobacteria that are pathogenic to insect larvae. This mini review, however, will focus on the endosymbiotic bacteria that have been characterized partners of the entomopathogenic nematodes Heterorhabditis and Steinernema. In particular, the bacteria that enable sexual reproduction of the nematodes on top of their roles in insect host pathogenicity and bioconversion.

We will review the molecular tools used by endosymbiotic bacteria to overcome the harsh biotic threats to emerge from the insect cadaver as a complex with their nematodes. In addition, this review will also explore the competition dynamics among endosymbionts and the biological basis underlying the co-evolution of natural partnership with their cognate nematodes.

Section snippets

Enfeebling the unfavored

Nematodes can degrade the host insect tissues in the absence of their symbiotic bacteria [10] and circumvent the host immune response by suppression [11,12] or evasion [13] through myriad of venomous excreted/secreted products [14,15]. To release the Photorhabdus endosymbionts inside the insect body, Heterorhabditis IJ uses the contact with the hemolymph as a cue for pharyngeal pump to regurgitate the bacteria [16]. In contrast, Xenorhabdus endosymbionts of Steinernema exit the vesicle into the

Endosymbiont’s favorite “friends”

In the soil, multi-infection of insects by different nematodes carrying different endosymbiotic bacteria may occur. Thus, within the insect cadaver, after exiting the nematodes, all the endosymbionts are physically separated from their nematode and can freely select a ‘champion’ nematode species to associate with. After the all-out chemical war through NP bombardment, only those with the AMP resistance will remain.

In the insect host, endosymbionts of the same species may come from different

“Friends” with benefits

Ecologically, the selection pressure for the maintenance of a certain nematode- endosymbiont pair is incentivized by their greater benefits as a complex [34]. Upon contact with the insect hemolymph, Heterorhabditis bacteriophora nematodes were found to produce excretion-secretion (ES) proteins that are involved in insect pathogenicity [11]. These ES products of H. bacteriophora not only interfered with the insect immune response, but also facilitated the proliferation of Photorhabdus luminescens

Conclusions and perspectives

In this review, we categorized the molecular strategy employed by endosymbiotic bacteria during the pathogenic stage in the insect host. The sweeping eradication of insect host and various competing organisms is firstly mediated by NPs with antimicrobial action. Subsequently, with only the NP-resistant nematodes and bacteria remaining, the endosymbiotic bacteria are then free to confer competitive reproductive advantage to the nematode of their choice before associating and exiting the insect

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Department of Biological Sciences and Columbian College of Arts and Science at The George Washington University for providing support to our research.

References (37)

  • T.A. Ciche et al.

    A Phosphopantetheinyl transferase homolog is essential for Photorhabdus luminescens to support growth and reproduction of the entomopathogenic nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora

    J. Bacteriol.

    (2001)
  • E.C. Martens et al.

    Early colonization events in the mutualistic association between Steinernema carpocapsae nematodes and Xenorhabdus nematophila bacteria

    J. Bacteriol.

    (2003)
  • M. Sicard et al.

    When mutualists are pathogens: an experimental study of the symbioses between Steinernema (entomopathogenic nematodes) and Xenorhabdus (bacteria)

    J. Evol. Biol.

    (2004)
  • J.-C. Ogier et al.

    Entomopathogenic nematode-associated microbiota: from monoxenic paradigm to pathobiome

    Microbiome

    (2020)
  • J.M. Peña et al.

    Variation in the susceptibility of Drosophila to different entomopathogenic nematodes

    Infect. Immun.

    (2015)
  • E. Kenney et al.

    Heterorhabditis bacteriophora excreted-secreted products enable infection by Photorhabdus luminescens through suppression of the imd pathway

    Front. Immunol.

    (2019)
  • D. Toubarro et al.

    A serpin released by an entomopathogen impairs clot formation in insect defense system

    PLoS One

    (2013)
  • D. Toubarro et al.

    A pathogenic nematode targets recognition proteins to avoid insect defenses

    PLoS One

    (2013)
  • Cited by (5)

    View full text