Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access June 5, 2020

A novel low-cost electrode for recording the local field potential of freely moving rat’s brain

  • Xue-Feng Ding , Yan Gao , Hui Zhang , Yuan Zhang , Shao-Xia Wang , Yong-Qi Zhao , Yi-Zheng Wang EMAIL logo and Ming Fan EMAIL logo

Abstract

Local field potentials (LFPs) are involved in almost all cognitive activities of animals. Several kinds of recording electrodes are used for recording LFPs in freely moving animals, including commercial and homemade electrodes. However, commercial recording electrodes are expensive, and their relatively fixed size often causes a steric hindrance effect, especially when combining deep brain stimulation (DBS) with LFP recording, which may not always satisfy the aim of researchers. Currently, an increasing number of researchers are designing their own recording electrodes to lower research costs. Nevertheless, there is no simple universal method to produce low-cost recording electrodes with a specific size according to the target brain area. Thus, we developed a simple method for quickly producing low-cost multiple-channel recording electrodes. To inspect the effectiveness of our self-designed electrode, LFPs were recorded in a Parkinson’s disease (PD) rat model, and an electrical stimulation electrode was implanted into the subthalamic nucleus to verify the space-saving ability of the self-designed recording electrode. The results showed that <30 min was needed to prepare an electrode and that the electrode materials cost <5 dollars. Further investigations showed that our electrode successfully recorded the beta oscillations (12–40 Hz) in the PD rat model. Thus, this method will greatly reduce the cost of recording electrodes and save time for researchers. Additionally, the small size of the electrode will further facilitate DBS research.

Graphical Abstract

1 Introduction

Multiple channel electrodes work as a highly efficient tool to investigate the neuronal population activities, including local field potentials (LFPs) and single units, which greatly facilitate the neural circuit of brain diseases and animal behavior research [1,2,3]. The phases of oscillatory LFPs are involved in cognitive, perceptual, and motor processing. LFP recording and analysis has been widely used to characterize various brain disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), schizophrenia, and Parkinson’s disease (PD) [4,5,6]. Among these brain disorders, numerous LFP data were recorded from the PD patient and animal model to decode its brain circuit. It has been found that the beta-band (12–40 Hz) oscillations are consistently strengthened with dopamine loss both in PD patients and parkinsonian animal models, while levodopa and deep brain stimulation (DBS) have been witnessed to improve PD symptoms and decrease the beta oscillations [7,8,9,10]. Thus, a good recording electrode will be a powerful tool to investigate LFPs and reveal the mechanisms underlying brain disorders. Several commercial recording electrodes are available and widely used all over the world, such as products from Plexon Inc, Blackrock Microsystems LLC, and Neuralynx Corp. A large number of reports have demonstrated their effectiveness in recording the LFP and spike firing in the brain [11,12,13,14,15]. However, all of them are very expensive, with a 16-channel implantable recording electrode costing at least approximately 100 dollars, which has undoubtedly greatly increased the cost of the research work. Particularly, the implantable recording electrode is usually one-off and thus will incur a high cost to finish a project concerning in vivo electrophysiological experiments. Moreover, the size of the commercial recording electrode is usually fixed, and researchers are unable to modify its structure by themselves, which limits its flexibility and may cause a steric hindrance effect in combination with other recording or stimulation electrodes, especially when performing DBS-related research, considering the limited surface area of the rodent brain. For the aforementioned reasons, many labs worldwide prepare the recording electrode by themselves to lower costs and reduce steric hindrance, which has also contributed to growing research on neuronal population activities [16,17,18,19,20]. Nevertheless, there is no universal and reproducible protocol for quickly producing such a low-cost recording electrode with a small size, which is especially important to save time and money. For this purpose, here, we utilize some typical low-cost materials in the neuroscience lab to prepare a recording electrode using a very simple procedure. Due to our extensive experience in recording beta oscillation in the PD rat model, we chose the PD rat model to verify the effectiveness of our self-designed recording electrode [21,22,23,24]. We hope that this simple and reproducible method is effective in quickly preparing electrodes to record LFPs of freely moving animals and can overcome the aforementioned limitations of the commercial recording electrode to further facilitate LFP-related behavioral research.

2 Materials and methods

A connector (20 pin, 2 × 10) was used as the framework structure (as shown in Figure 1a). As shown in Figure 1b, the syringe needle (diameter = 0.45 mm) of a 1 mL injection syringe was cut with pliers and fixed with forceps, and the blunt end was polished with a knife grinder to expose the cavity, which was used as the supporter tube of the tungsten filament. Soldering tin or hot melt glue was used to fix the supporter tubes on the fixed framework structure. The tungsten filament (diameter = 0.1 mm, Figure 1d) was used to record the filament and reference. A copper wire (length = 2–5 cm, diameter = 0.2 mm) was used as ground (G) wire.

Figure 1 
          The procedure for producing the recording electrode (a bilateral recording electrode is shown as an example). (a) The procedure for preparing the framework structure of the bilateral recording electrode. A 20 pin connector (2 × 10) was used as a framework material, and each pin of the connector was bent to attach it to the major structure of the connector. (b) The procedure for preparing the supporter tube. The syringe needle (diameter = 0.45 mm) of a 1 mL injection syringe was cut with pliers and fixed with forceps, and the blunt end was polished with a knife grinder to expose the cavity. (c and d) The method for connecting the supporter tube and framework structure. The connector was fixed horizontally, and the two supporter tubes were placed on the framework structure and fixed with a soldering tin or a transparent rubber. The distance between the two tubes was determined according to the distance of the two target brain regions. Next, the tungsten filament was placed in the supporter tubes, and super glue was slowly and carefully added to the tip of the supporter tube to fix the tungsten filament. (e) The recording end was cut using sharp eye scissors, and the other end was connected to the reference (R) channel and recording channels. A copper wire (length = 2–3 cm) was connected to the ground (G) channel for use as the ground electrode. (f) A schematic diagram of the recording end. One was used as a reference line, and the others were used for recording.
Figure 1

The procedure for producing the recording electrode (a bilateral recording electrode is shown as an example). (a) The procedure for preparing the framework structure of the bilateral recording electrode. A 20 pin connector (2 × 10) was used as a framework material, and each pin of the connector was bent to attach it to the major structure of the connector. (b) The procedure for preparing the supporter tube. The syringe needle (diameter = 0.45 mm) of a 1 mL injection syringe was cut with pliers and fixed with forceps, and the blunt end was polished with a knife grinder to expose the cavity. (c and d) The method for connecting the supporter tube and framework structure. The connector was fixed horizontally, and the two supporter tubes were placed on the framework structure and fixed with a soldering tin or a transparent rubber. The distance between the two tubes was determined according to the distance of the two target brain regions. Next, the tungsten filament was placed in the supporter tubes, and super glue was slowly and carefully added to the tip of the supporter tube to fix the tungsten filament. (e) The recording end was cut using sharp eye scissors, and the other end was connected to the reference (R) channel and recording channels. A copper wire (length = 2–3 cm) was connected to the ground (G) channel for use as the ground electrode. (f) A schematic diagram of the recording end. One was used as a reference line, and the others were used for recording.

2.1 The design of a recording electrode

As shown in Figure 1a, a 20 pin connector (2 × 10) was used as a framework structure. Each pin of the connector was bent to attach it to the major structure of the connector. As shown in Figure 1b, the syringe needle (diameter = 0.45 mm) of a 1 mL injection syringe was cut with pliers and fixed with forceps, and the blunt end was polished with a knife grinder to expose the cavity, which was used as the supporter tube of the tungsten filament. Next, the connector was fixed horizontally, and the supporter tubes were fixed on the connector using soldering tin or hot melt glue (Figure 1c and supplement Figure 1b). The number of supporter tubes was determined according to the number of target areas, and the distance between the two tubes was determined according to the distance of the two target brain regions. However, we found that the hot melt glue was better than soldering tin in fixing the supporter tube, which also saved additional space (Supplemental Figure 1). Next, the tungsten filament was placed in the supporter tubes, and super glue was slowly and nominally added to the tip of the supporter tube to fix the tungsten filament (diameter = 100 µm, Figure 1d). According to the purpose of the research, the number of tungsten filaments in each supporter tube should range from 2 to 5 (the size of the supporter tube can accommodate five tungsten filaments at most); one of the tungsten filaments was used as a reference, and the others were used as recording channels. Thus, each supporter tube would be a single-channel electrode (two tungsten filaments, one as a reference electrode and the other as a recording electrode) or multiple-channel electrode (3–5 tungsten filaments) according to the number of tungsten filaments. After the super glue was fully set, the recording end of the tungsten filament was quickly cut with eye scissors to expose the tungsten filament core. The other end of the tungsten filament was cut to a proper length, the insulating layer was removed with a subtle tweezer, and it was connected to the reference (R) and recording channels, respectively. A copper wire (diameter = 200 µm, length = 2–3 cm) was connected to the ground (G) channel for use as the ground wire (Figure 1e).

2.2 Defining the channel map of the recording electrode

As shown in Figure 2a, the definition of the channel was determined by the headstage of Blackrock Microsystems (Blackrock Microsystems LLC, Salt Lake City, USA). To adapt our designed bilateral electrode, a converter (shown in Figure 2b) was created according to the channel definition of headstage; specifically, the even channels (2, 4, 6,…,32) of the headstage were connected to the corresponding channels (2, 4, 6,…,32) of the converter. Thus, the channel definition of the recording electrode was determined as even channels (2, 4, 6,…,32). As shown in Figure 2d, the converter was used to connect the headstage to the recording electrode when recording the LFPs and single units. Additionally, we detected the impedance of the electrode. As shown in Figure 2e, the impedance value of a three-channel recording electrode with one recording end was examined, and the impedance of each channel was 131 kOhm, 134 kOhm, and 114 kOhm, respectively, which is appropriate for recording LFPs.

Figure 2 
            Definition of the recording channels. (a) The channel map of the headstage. (b) The channel map of the converter. (c) The channel map of the recording electrode. (d) Schematic diagram of the combinatory headstage, converter, and recording electrode. (e) Impedance of the self-designed recording electrode.
Figure 2

Definition of the recording channels. (a) The channel map of the headstage. (b) The channel map of the converter. (c) The channel map of the recording electrode. (d) Schematic diagram of the combinatory headstage, converter, and recording electrode. (e) Impedance of the self-designed recording electrode.

2.3 Animals

Male Sprague Dawley (SD) rats weighing 200 ± 10 g were used in this study (all the rats were purchased from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China). The animals were housed up to two rats per cage with a 12-hour light/dark cycle at constant temperature and humidity, and food and water were freely available.

  1. Ethical approval: The research related to animal use has been complied with all the relevant national regulations and the guidelines on animal welfare of the Institute of Military Cognition and Brain Sciences, and all efforts were made to ameliorate animal suffering.

2.4 Preparation of the PD rat model

The hemi-parkinsonian rat model was prepared by injecting 2,4,5-trihydroxyphenylalanine (6-OH DA; Sigma, USA; total volume = 3 µL, 5 µg/µL) into the right medial forebrain bundle (4.3 mm posterior and 1.5 mm lateral to the bregma, 7.6 mm depth from the skull surface) of SD rats (200 g ± 10 g). After injection, the needle was left in place in the target for 5 min to allow the drug solution to diffuse completely. Two weeks after injection, apomorphine (1 mg/kg body weight; Sigma, USA) was intraperitoneally injected to induce contralateral rotations to evaluate establishment of the model. The lesion was considered successful in those animals that made ≥15 net counterclockwise rotations in 3 min [24,25]. Madopar (purchased from Roche [40 mg levodopa + 12.5 mg benserazide]/kg body weight) was injected into the enterocoelia of the PD rat to eliminate the beta oscillations.

2.5 Surgery and electrode placement

Male SD rats were fully anesthetized and then fixed in a stereotaxic frame. The skull was exposed, burr holes were created above the electrode placement using a micro bone drill, and a small amount of dura mater was removed. Bone nails (5–6 μ) were fixed at the none-target site on the skull to further fix the electrode with dental cement. Next, the recording electrode was placed in the target brain areas with stereotaxic micromanipulators (David Kopf Instruments, Tujunga, CA, USA) and then fixed with dental cement. To prevent the holes from stimulating the electrode, subthalamic nucleus (STN) was blocked with dental cement in advance using a bone nail. Subsequently, the recording electrode was fixed, and the stimulating electrode was placed at STN and fixed with dental cement. In this study, both sides of M1 (2.5 mm anterior and 2.5 mm lateral to the bregma, at a depth of 2 mm from the skull surface) were target area of the recording electrode; a stimulating electrode was implanted at the STN, and the ground filament was inserted randomly in a non-target region [26,27].

2.6 Recording and stimulating parameters and signal processing

LFPs were recorded using a Blackrock detecting system (Blackrock Microsystems LLC, Salt Lake City, USA), and continuous data were analyzed using NeuroExplorer 5.0 software (NeuroExplorer, Colorado Springs, USA). The spectrum and power spectral density of continuous data were calculated. The LFP was extracted from the raw broadband signal recorded in the M1 zone by bandpass filtering between 1 and 250 Hz. Band-limited LFP signals were generated with the following bandwidth settings: beta (12–40 Hz) [26,28]. A constant current-isolated stimulator (Digitimer, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, UK) delivered continuous electrical pulses to the STN electrodes at an intensity below the threshold for induced movement (50–250 mA) [29].

3 Results

3.1 The self-designed recording electrode is low cost and easy to prepare

As described in Section 2, the procedure is simple and easy to master (as shown in Figure 1 and the graphical abstract), and the preparation of such a recording electrode requires <30 min, saving large amounts of time for researchers. Moreover, all the materials used for our electrode are common and cheap, and they can easily be purchased from the electrical market. As shown in Table 1, a recording electrode costs <5 dollars, which is much cheaper than the commercial recording electrode (approximately 100 dollars each), greatly reducing the costs for researchers.

Table 1

The cost of the materials in preparing the recording electrode

Item Quantity Unit price ($) Total ($)
Connect or (2 × 10 pin) 1 <0.7 <0.7
Syringe needle 1 <0.1 <0.5
Tungsten filament (d = 0.1 mm) 1 cm <0.2 <2.0
Polyurethane rubber 1 cm3 <0.2 <0.4
Copper wire (d = 0.2 mm) 1 cm <0.1 <0.6
Super glue 50 µL <0.2 <0.4
Soldering tin <0.2 <0.4
Total ($) <5.0

d: diameter

3.2 The self-designed recording electrode successfully acquires LFP data from freely moving rat’s brain

Beta oscillations (12–40 Hz) were usually found in the primary motor cortex (M1 zone) of the hemi-parkinsonian rat induced by 6-OH DA [26,28,29]. Thus, to test our self-designed recording electrode, LFPs in the M1 zone of the cortex in the freely moving PD rat model were examined using our designed bilateral electrode combined with the Blackrock detection system (Blackrock Microsystems LLC, Salt Lake City, USA). Ten minutes of continuous data at a time were recorded for 100 min. The Cereplex system showed that the continuous data were successfully recorded. As shown in Figure 3, by analyzing the continuous data using NeuroExplorer 5.0 software (NeuroExplorer, Colorado Springs, USA), including the spectrum and power spectral density of continuous data, we found that our designed electrode successfully recorded the beta oscillation on both sides of the M1 cortex and the beta band was located approximately 30 Hz, though the beta oscillation on the lesion side was significantly stronger than on the non-lesion side (Figure 3a). Further analysis of the power spectral density showed that the peak frequency of beta oscillation was located at 30 Hz, which is consistent with the results of the spectrum calculations [7]. To further confirm the beta oscillations, l-dopa, which is widely used in PD patient therapy and therapeutic studies in the PD rat model, was injected into the abdomen in the PD rat model (40 mg/kg body weight), and continuous data were recorded 40 min after injection. As shown in Figure 3c, the beta peak was removed, which demonstrated that the beta oscillation was eliminated by l-dopa, which is consistent with previous work [26,30,31].

Figure 3 
            The self-designed electrode successfully acquired LFPs in the freely moving PD rat model. (a) The spectrum analysis of continuous data showed that the beta band was found approximately 31 Hz on both the sides of M1, and the intensity of the beta band was much weaker on the non-lesion side than the lesion side. (b) Power spectral density analysis showed that the peak frequency value of beta oscillations was found to be approximately 31 Hz. (c) Madopar remarkably decreased the peak of the beta band 40 min after injection.
Figure 3

The self-designed electrode successfully acquired LFPs in the freely moving PD rat model. (a) The spectrum analysis of continuous data showed that the beta band was found approximately 31 Hz on both the sides of M1, and the intensity of the beta band was much weaker on the non-lesion side than the lesion side. (b) Power spectral density analysis showed that the peak frequency value of beta oscillations was found to be approximately 31 Hz. (c) Madopar remarkably decreased the peak of the beta band 40 min after injection.

3.3 The self-designed electrode displays a good space-saving effect when combined with STN stimulation

A paradox between the relatively large size of the recording electrode and limited area of the rodent brain is consistently observed in most neuroscience labs. The smaller the size of the electrode, the less the steric hindrance produced, when recording more than two target areas close together. Due to previous reports showing that high-frequency STN electric stimulation can remove the beta oscillation in the M1 cortex in the PD rat model [7,29,32,33], to test the effectiveness of our designed recording electrode in reducing steric hindrance, we implanted our self-designed recording electrode in the M1 cortex and a stimulating electrode in the STN (the distance between M1 and STN was 5 mm in our experiment). The results showed that at least 3 mm is present between the recording electrode and stimulating electrode, and the LFP data for M1 were successfully acquired before electrical stimulation (3 min, pre-sti), during stimulation (3 min, during-sti), and after stimulation (3 min, post-sti) continuously. As shown in Figure 4a, power spectral density analysis showed that 100 Hz STN stimulation successfully removed the beta oscillations in the PD rat model. The spectrum analysis also demonstrated the same result (Figure 4b), which is consistent with previous reports. In contrast, both power spectral density analysis and spectrum analysis showed that 10 Hz STN stimulation failed to remove the beta oscillations in the PD rat model [29]. These results showed that our self-designed recording electrode displayed good space saving specialty, which also confirmed the beta oscillations found before using our self-designed recording electrode.

Figure 4 
            The self-designed recording electrode displays good space saving ability combined with STN stimulation. (a) Power spectral density analysis of LFPs acquired before stimulation, during stimulation, and after stimulation using 100 Hz electric stimulation. The beta oscillation band (31 Hz) was eliminated by the 100 Hz electric stimulation. (b) Spectrum analysis of LFPs before stimulation, during stimulation, and after stimulation using 10 Hz electric stimulation. The 10 Hz electric stimulation could not remove the beta band. (c and d) Power spectral density spectrum analysis of LFPs acquired before stimulation, during stimulation, and after stimulation using 10 Hz electric stimulation.
Figure 4

The self-designed recording electrode displays good space saving ability combined with STN stimulation. (a) Power spectral density analysis of LFPs acquired before stimulation, during stimulation, and after stimulation using 100 Hz electric stimulation. The beta oscillation band (31 Hz) was eliminated by the 100 Hz electric stimulation. (b) Spectrum analysis of LFPs before stimulation, during stimulation, and after stimulation using 10 Hz electric stimulation. The 10 Hz electric stimulation could not remove the beta band. (c and d) Power spectral density spectrum analysis of LFPs acquired before stimulation, during stimulation, and after stimulation using 10 Hz electric stimulation.

4 Discussion

LFPs are generated by the extra-cellular electric fields that are induced by neural activity, mainly by transmembrane currents. The phases of oscillatory LFPs were involved in cognitive, perceptual, and motor processing [34,35,36,37]. To further understand how neural oscillations contribute to cognition, it is crucial to understand how LFP phases are related to those of the underlying neural activity. Thus, to capture the LFP signal, the implantable recording electrode for capturing LFPs from freely moving animals plays a crucial role. Currently, increasing amounts of LFP data are obtained from patients with various brain disorders and in related animal models, such as AD and PD. Among these diseases, LFP recording and analysis play a key role in decoding PD, and levodopa and DBS have been widely used to modulate beta oscillations in PD patients and to treat PD symptoms [7,8,9,10]. However, commercial implantable recording electrodes are expensive and one-off in recording LFPs in freely moving animals, forcing more and more neuroscientists to prepare an implantable electrode by themselves. Nevertheless, there is no universal efficient method to prepare low-cost recording electrodes. In this study, we developed a simple method to design and prepare an implantable electrode with a small size. The specific procedure is shown in Figure 1, and it is very simple such that even a beginner can grasp it easily. Additionally, according to our experiences, preparing a recording electrode requires <30 min, saving time for researchers. Moreover, all the materials used in the electrode are common and rather low cost (Table 1), so they can be acquired easily, which will undoubtedly save large amounts of money for researchers. Because only 16 channels can be used for recording in our self-designed electrode, there were 32 channels or more in the commercial headstage in our detection system. Thus, we needed to design a converter to connect the headstage and recording electrode when capturing LFP signals. As shown in Figure 2, the even channels (2,4,6,…,32) of the headstage were connected to the relevant channels of the recording electrode with the converter. Though only 16 channels at most can be used in our self-designed electrode, this is sufficient to simultaneously capture the LFP signals from two or more areas of the animal brain. Researchers can design two or more recording ends in the recording electrode according to their needs. In addition, the impedance of each channel is approximately 120 kOhm, which is sufficient to capture the LFPs. Because beta oscillations are present in the M1 cortex of PD patients, the PD monkey model, and the PD rat model [38,39,40,41], we wanted to test our self-designed recording electrode by capturing beta oscillations in a freely moving PD rat model. Analysis of the unilateral lesion PD rat model showed that our self-designed recording electrode successfully acquired the beta oscillations from M1 in a freely moving PD rat model, confirming the effectiveness of the self-designed electrode (Figure 3). Furthermore, using our homemade recording electrode, we also successfully observed spike firing at the anterovent thalamic nucleus in the PD rat model (Supplemental Figure 2). To test the capacity to save space when combined with other electrodes, we simultaneously implanted our self-designed recording electrode targeting the M1 zone and a stimulating electrode targeting STN, and we found a distance of at least 3 mm between the recording and stimulating electrodes, which demonstrated that the self-designed recording electrode was able to save sufficient space for performing DBS at the other target area close to the recording electrode. LFP analysis showed that 100 Hz rather than 10 Hz STN stimulation could remove the beta oscillations, which also confirmed that our self-designed electrode could successfully acquire LFP signals from freely moving animals [29,32,33,34].

In summary, this study has outlined the design and verification of a simple and cheap electrode capable of recording multichannel LFP signals from freely moving rodents. The materials used in the electrode are common and cheap, and the electrode preparation procedure is simple and can be easily grasped even by beginners, which will greatly lower research costs, including money and time. The small size of the electrode makes it easy to implant. We believe that this method will further facilitate LFP-related research and decode the basis of animal behavior and neural circuits.


1

These authors contributed equally to this work.

tel: +86-10-66931317, fax: + 86-10-68213039
tel: + 86-10-66931301, fax: +86-10-68213039

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 31771146). We thank Yu-Juan Su and Zhong-Wei Qu for their help in preparation of the PD rat model.

  1. Author contributions: Ding XF, Fan M, and Wang YZ designed the experiments. Ding XF and Gao Y performed the experiments. Ding XF prepared the manuscript. Gao Y, Zhang H, Zhang Y, and Zhao YQ provided constructive suggestions in revising the manuscript.

  2. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

References

[1] Mallet N, Pogosyan A, Márton LF, Bolam JP, Brown P, Magill PJ. Parkinsonian beta oscillations in the external globus pallidus and their relationship with subthalamic nucleus activity. J Neurosci. 2008;28(52):14245–58.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4199-08.2008Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[2] McCracken CB, Kiss ZH. Time and frequency-dependent modulation of local field potential synchronization by deep brain stimulation. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e102576.10.1371/journal.pone.0102576Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[3] Delaville C, Cruz AV, McCoy AJ, Brazhnik E, Avila I, Novikov N, Walters JR. Oscillatory activity in basal ganglia and motor cortex in an awake behaving rodent model of Parkinson’s disease. Basal Ganglia. 2014;3(4):221–7.10.1016/j.baga.2013.12.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[4] Beker S, Goldin M, Menkes-Caspi N, Kellner V, Chechik G, Stern EA. Amyloid-β disrupts ongoing spontaneous activity in sensory cortex. Brain Struct Funct. 2016;221(2):1173–88.10.1007/s00429-014-0963-xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Furth KE, McCoy AJ, Dodge C, Walters JR, Buonanno A, Delaville C. Neuronal correlates of ketamine and walking induced gamma oscillations in the medial prefrontal cortex and mediodorsal thalamus. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0186732.10.1371/journal.pone.0186732Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[6] Kogan M, McGuire M, Riley J. Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2019;30(2):137–46.10.1016/j.nec.2019.01.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Geng X, Zhang J, Jiang Y, Ashkan K, Foltynie T, Limousin P, et al. Comparison of oscillatory activity in subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson’s disease and dystonia. Neurobiol Dis. 2017;98:100–7.10.1016/j.nbd.2016.12.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[8] Cole SR, van der Meij R, Peterson EJ, de Hemptinne C, Starr PA, Voytek B. Nonsinusoidal beta oscillations reflect cortical pathophysiology in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurosci. 2017;37(18):4830–40.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2208-16.2017Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[9] Fox SH, Katzenschlager R, Lim SY, Barton B, de Bie RMA, Seppi K, et al. International Parkinson and movement disorder society evidence-based medicine review: update on treatments for the motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2018;33(8):1248–66.10.1002/mds.27372Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Koelman LA, Lowery MM. Beta-band resonance and intrinsic oscillations in a biophysically detailed model of the subthalamic nucleus-globus pallidus network. Front Comput Neurosci. 2019;13:1–24.10.3389/fncom.2019.00077Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[11] Hansen BJ, Eagleman S, Dragoi V. Examining local network processing using multi-contact laminar electrode recording. J Vis Exp. 2011;55(2806):1–8.10.3791/2806Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[12] Pancrazio JJ, Gopal K, Keefer EW, Gross GW. Botulinum toxin suppression of CNS network activity in vitro. J Toxicol. 2014;2014:732913.10.1155/2014/732913Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[13] Lee G, Matsunaga A, Dura-Bernal S, Zhang W, Lytton WW, Francis JT, et al. Towards real-time communication between in vivo neurophysiological data sources and simulator-based brain biomimetic models. J Comput Surg. 2014;3(12):1–23.10.1186/s40244-014-0012-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[14] Rey HG, De Falco E, Ison MJ, Valentin A, Alarcon G, Selway R, et al. Encoding of long-term associations through neural unitization in the human medial temporal lobe. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):4372.10.1038/s41467-018-06870-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[15] Monaghan CK, Chapman GW, Hasselmo ME. Systemic administration of two different anxiolytic drugs decreases local field potential theta frequency in the medial entorhinal cortex without affecting grid cell firing fields. Neuroscience. 2017;364:60–70.10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.08.056Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[16] Butler WN, Taube JS. Oscillatory synchrony between head direction cells recorded bilaterally in the anterodorsal thalamic nuclei. J Neurophysiol. 2017;117(5):1847–52.10.1152/jn.00881.2016Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[17] Chung T, Wang JQ, Wang J, Cao B, Li Y, Pang SW. Electrode modifications to lower electrode impedance and improve neural signal recording sensitivity. J Neural Eng. 2015;12(5):056018.10.1088/1741-2560/12/5/056018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Kozai TD, Du Z, Gugel ZV, Smith MA, Chase SM, Bodily LM, et al. Comprehensive chronic laminar single-unit, multi-unit, and local field potential recording performance with planar single shank electrode arrays. J Neurosci Methods. 2015;242:15–40.10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.12.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[19] Rolston JD, Gross RE, Potter SM. A low-cost mutielectrode system for data acquisition enabling real-time closed-loop processing with rapid recovery from stimulation artifacts. Front Neuroeng. 2009;2:12.10.3389/neuro.16.012.2009Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[20] Budai D, Vizvári AD, Bali ZK, Márki B, Nagy LV, Kónya Z, et al. A novel carbon tipped single micro-optrode for combined optogenetics and electrophysiology. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0193836.10.1371/journal.pone.0193836Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[21] Brazhnik E, Cruz AV, Avila I, Wahba MI, Novikov N, Ilieva NM, et al. State-dependent spike and local field synchronization between motor cortex and substantia nigra in hemiparkinsonian rats. J Neurosci. 2012;32(23):7869–80.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0943-12.2012Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[22] Quiroga-Varela A, Walters JR, Brazhnik E, Marin C, Obeso JA. What basal ganglia changes underlie the parkinsonian state? The significance of neuronal oscillatory activity. Neurobiol Dis. 2013;58:242–8.10.1016/j.nbd.2013.05.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[23] Leventhal DK, Gage GJ, Schmidt R, Pettibone JR, Case AC. Basal ganglia beta oscillations accompany cue utilization. Neuron. 2012;73(3):523–36.10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.032Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[24] Sharott A, Vinciati F, Nakamura KC, Magill PJ. A Population of indirect pathway striatal projection neurons is selectively entrained to parkinsonian beta oscillations. J Neurosci. 2017;37(41):9977–98.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0658-17.2017Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[25] Ramos-Moreno T, Castillo CG, Martínez-Serrano A. Long term behavioral effects of functional dopaminergic neurons generated from human neural stem cells in the rat 6-OH-DA Parkinson’s disease model. Effects of the forced expression of BCL-X(L). Behav Brain Res. 2012;232(1):225–32.10.1016/j.bbr.2012.04.020Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] Delaville C, McCoy AJ, Gerber CM, Cruz AV, Walters JR. Subthalamic nucleus activity in the awake hemiparkinsonian rat: relationships with motor and cognitive networks. J Neurosci. 2015;35(17):6918–30.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0587-15.2015Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[27] Li M, Zhou M, Wen P, Wang Q, Yang Y, Xiao H, et al. The net work of causal interactions for beta oscillations in the peduncupontine nucleus primary motor cortex and subthalamic nucleus of walking parkinsonian rats. Exp Neurol. 2016;282:27–36.10.1016/j.expneurol.2016.05.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Grandi LC, Kaelin-Lang A, Orban G, Song W, Salvadè A, Stefani A, et al. Oscillatory activity in the cortex, motor thalamus and nucleus reticularis thalami in acute TTX and Chronic 6-OHDA dopamine-depleted animals. Front Neurol. 2018;9:663.10.3389/fneur.2018.00663Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[29] Li Q, Ke Y, Chan DC, Qian ZM, Yung KK, Ko H, Arbuthnott GW, et al. Therapeutic deep brain stimulation in Parkinsonian rats directly influences motor cortex. Neuron. 2012;76(5):1030–41.10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.032Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] Kühn J, Haumesser JK, Beck MH, Altschüler J, Kühn AA, Nikulin VV, et al. Differential effects of levodopa and apomorphine on neuronal population oscillations in the cortico-basal ganglia loop circuit in vivo in experimental parkinsonism. Exp Neurol. 2017;298(Pt A):122–33.10.1016/j.expneurol.2017.09.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] Salvadè A, D’Angelo V, Di Giovanni G, Tinkhauser G, Sancesario G, Städler C, et al. Distinct roles of cortical and pallidal β and γ frequencies in hemiparkinsonian and dyskinetic rats. Exp Neurol. 2016;275(Pt 1):199–208.10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.11.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] Yang AI, Vanegas N, Lungu C, Zaghloul KA. Beta-coupled high-frequency activity and beta-locked neuronal spiking in the subthalamic nucleus of Parkinson’s disease. J Neurosci. 2014;34(38):12816–27.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1895-14.2014Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[33] Tan H, Pogosyan A, Ashkan K, Green AL, Aziz T, Foltynie T, et al. Decoding gripping force based on local field potentials recorded from subthalamic nucleus in humans. Elife. 2016;5:e19089.10.7554/eLife.19089.020Search in Google Scholar

[34] Neumann WJ, Staub-Bartelt F, Horn A, Schanda J, Schneider GH, Brown P, et al. Long term correlation of subthalamic beta band activity with motor impairment in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;128(11):2286–91.10.1016/j.clinph.2017.08.028Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[35] Dupre KB, Cruz AV, McCoy AJ, Delaville C, Gerber CM, Eyring KW, et al. Effects of l-dopa priming on cortical high beta and high gamma oscillatory activity in a rodentmodel of Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2016;86:1–15.10.1016/j.nbd.2015.11.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[36] Guidera JA, Taylor NE, Lee JT, Vlasov KY, Pei J, Stephen EP, et al. Sevoflurane induces coherent slow-delta oscillations in rats. Front Neural Circuits. 2017;11:36.10.3389/fncir.2017.00036Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[37] Brazhnik E, McCoy AJ, Novikov N, Hatch CE, Walters JR. Ventral medial thalamic nucleus promotes synchronization of increased high beta oscillatory activity in the basal ganglia-thalamocortical network of the hemiparkinsonian rat. J Neurosci. 2016;36(15):4196–208.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3582-15.2016Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[38] Moran RJ, Mallet N, Litvak V, Dolan RJ, Magill PJ, Friston KJ, et al. Alterations in brain connectivity underlying beta oscillations in Parkinsonism. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7(8):e1002124.10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002124Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[39] Cole SR, van der Meij R, Peterson EJ, de Hemptinne C, Starr PA, Voytek B. Nonsinusoidal beta oscillations reflect cortical pathophysiology in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurosci. 2017;37(18):4830–40.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2208-16.2017Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[40] Chan JL, Koval MJ, Womelsdorf T, Lomber SG, Everling S. Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex deactivation in monkeys reduces preparatory beta and gamma power in the superior colliculus. Cereb Cortex. 2015;25(18):4704–14.10.1093/cercor/bhu154Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[41] Little S, Brown P. The functional role of beta oscillations in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014;20(Suppl 1):S44–8.10.1016/S1353-8020(13)70013-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2019-11-24
Revised: 2020-03-22
Accepted: 2020-03-24
Published Online: 2020-06-05

© 2020 Xue-Feng Ding et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 28.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/tnsci-2020-0104/html
Scroll to top button