Abstract
With the importance of forecasting with a high degree of accuracy, the increasing attention has been evolved to combine individual models, especially statistical and intelligent ones. The main aim of such that hybrid models is to extract unique modeling strengths in linear and nonlinear pattern recognition, respectively. Therefore, different hybridization methods are proposed in recent literature for time series forecasting. One of the most widely-used combination strategies applied for numerous forecasting problems to yield more accurate results is the series hybrid strategy. In this hybridization methodology, components of a time series are separated and then modeled sequentially by choosing appropriate single models. However, the most accurate series hybrid model developed by determining the proper arrangement of single models. Thus, one of the critical issues in constructing series hybrid models is how to choose the appropriate sequence of individual models in a sequential modeling procedure. Although it is critically affecting on obtaining more accurate forecasting results, it has not been appropriately discussed in the literature of time series forecasting. Thus, in this paper, the performance of two possible sequence modeling procedures, including linear–nonlinear and nonlinear–linear, are evaluated. For this purpose, autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), support vector machines (SVM), and multilayer perceptrons (MLP) models are chosen due to the popularity of these approaches for developing statistical/intelligent series hybrid models. Five well-known real data sets, e.g., Wolf’s Sunspot, Canadian Lynx, British pound/US dollar exchange rate, Nikkei 225 stock price, and the Colorado wind speed, are considered to distinguish better sequences. In this way, the main objective of this paper is to response this unanswered question in the literature that which sequence of single models can lead to obtain much better accuracy in constructing bi-component series hybrid models. Empirical results indicate that choosing the nonlinear intelligent model as first component in sequential modeling procedure can lead to yield more accurate results. Both SVM–ARIMA and MLP–ARIMA models can improve the performance of the ARIMA–SVM and ARIMA–MLP, respectively. Therefore, it can be concluded that the nonlinear–linear series hybrid models may produce more accurate results than linear–nonlinear hybrid models for time series forecasting.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clemen RT, Winkler RL (1986) Combining economic forecasts. J Bus Econ Stat 4(1):39–46
Winkler RL, Makridakis S (1983) The combination of forecasts. J R Stat Soc Ser A (Gen) 146(2):150–157
Schnaars Steven P (1984) Situational factors affecting forecast accuracy. J Mark Res 21(3):290–297
Haji Rahimi Z, Khashei M (2018) A least squares-based parallel hybridization of statistical and intelligent models for time series forecasting. Engineering 118:44–53
Zhang G, Patuwo BE, Hu MY (1998) Forecasting with artificial neural networks: the state of the art. Int J Forecast 14:35–62
Wang JJ, Wang J-Z, Zhang Z-G, Guo S-P (2012) Stock index forecasting based on a hybrid model. Omega 40:758–766
Khashei M, Bijari M (2012) A new class of hybrid models for time series forecasting. Expert Syst Appl 39:4344–4357
Wang J, Hu J, Ma K, Zhang Y (2015) A self-adaptive hybrid approach for wind speed forecasting. Renew Energy 78:374–385
Haji Rahimi Z, Khashei M (2019) Hybrid structures in time series modeling and forecasting: a review. Eng Appl Artif Intell 86:83–106
Zhang Y, Luo L, Yang J, Liu D, Kong R, Feng Y (2019) A hybrid ARIMA–SVR approach for forecasting emergency patient flow. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 10:3315–3323
Singh PK, Singh N, Negi R (2019) Wind power forecasting using hybrid ARIMA–ANN technique. In: Hu Y-C et al (eds) Ambient communications and computer systems. Springer, Singapore, pp 209–220
Chakraborty T, Chattopadhyay S, Ghosh I (2019) Forecasting dengue epidemics using a hybrid methodology. Physica A 527:121266
Mousavi-Mirkalaei P, Banihabib ME (2019) An ARIMA–NARX hybrid model for forecasting urban water consumption (case study: Tehran metropolis). Urban Water J 16:365–376
Camelo HN, Lucio PS, Leal Junior JBV, Cesar Marques de Carvalho P, von Glehn dos Santos D (2018) Innovative hybrid models for forecasting time series applied in wind generation based on the combination of time series models with artificial neural networks. Energy 151:347–357
Wang Y, Li L, Xu X (2017) A piecewise hybrid of ARIMA and SVMs for short-term traffic flow prediction. In: International conference on neural information processing, pp 493–502
Moeeni H, Bonakdari H (2016) Forecasting monthly inflow with extreme seasonal variation using the hybrid SARIMA–ANN model. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 31:1997–2010
Banihabib ME, Ahmadian A, SadatJamali F (2017) Hybrid DARIMA-NARX model for forecasting long-term daily inflow to Dez reservoir using the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and rainfall data. GeoResJ 13:9–16
Gairaa K, Khellaf A, Messlem Y, Chellali F (2016) Estimation of the daily global solar radiation based on Box–Jenkins and ANN models: a combined approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 57:238–249
Kavousi-Fard A (2016) A hybrid accurate model for tidal current prediction. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 55:112–118
Katris Christos, Daskalaki Sophia (2015) Comparing forecasting approaches for Internet traffic. Expert Syst Appl 42:8172–8183
Chaâbane N (2014) A hybrid ARFIMA and neural network model for electricity price prediction. Electr Power Energy Syst 55:187–194
Ruiz-Aguilar JJ, Turias IJ, Jiménez-Come MJ (2014) Hybrid approaches based on SARIMA and artificial neural networks for inspection time series forecasting. Transp Res Part E 67:1–13
Box GP, Jenkins GM (1976) Time series analysis: forecasting and control. Holden-Day, San Francisco
Pereira EN (2015) Hybrid wavelet model for time series prediction. Appl Math Sci 9:7431–7438
Haji Rahimi Z, Khashei M (2019) Weighted sequential hybrid approaches for time series forecasting. Physica A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.121717
Hipel KW, McLeod AI (1994) Time series modelling of water resources and environmental systems. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Stone L, He D (2007) Chaotic oscillations and cycles in multi-trophic ecological systems. J Theor Biol 248:382–390
Meese RA, Rogoff K (1983) Empirical exchange rate models of the seventies: do they/t out of samples? J Int Econ 14:3–24
Kao L-J, Chiu C-C, Lu C-J, Chang C-H (2013) A hybrid approach by integrating wavelet-based feature extraction with MARS and SVR for stock index forecasting. Decis Support Syst 54:1228–1244
Azimi R, Ghofrani M, Ghayekhloo M (2016) A hybrid wind power forecasting model based on data mining and wavelets analysis. Energy Convers Manag 127:208–225
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hajirahimi, Z., Khashei, M. Sequence in Hybridization of Statistical and Intelligent Models in Time Series Forecasting. Neural Process Lett 54, 3619–3639 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-020-10294-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-020-10294-9