Abstract
In everyday life, we often use graphical interfaces where the visual space is mapped to the motor space with a visuomotor gain called the control display gain. One of the key objectives in the field of Human Computer Interaction is to design this control display gain so as to enhance users’ performance. Although the control display gain involved in operating systems has been found to improve users’ pointing performance, the reasons for this improvement have not yet been fully elucidated, especially because the control display gains on operating systems are both non-constant and non-linear. Here, we tested non-constant but linear velocity-based control display gains to determine which parameters were responsible for pointing performance changes based on analyses of the movement kinematics. Using a Fitts’ paradigm, constant gains of 1 and 3 were compared with a linearly increasing gain (i.e., the control display gain increases with the motor velocity) and a decreasing gain (i.e., the control display gain decreases with the motor velocity). Three movements with various indexes of difficulty (ID) were tested (3, 5 and 7 bits). The increasing gain was expected to increase the velocity of the initial impulse phase and decrease that of the correction phase, thus decreasing the movement time (MT), and the contrary in the case of the decreasing gain. Although the decreasing gain increased MT at ID3, the increasing gain was found to be less efficient than the constant gain of 3, probably because a non-constant gain between the motion and its visual consequences disrupted the sensorimotor control. In addition, the kinematic analyses of the movements suggested that the motion profile was planned by the central nervous system based on the visuomotor gain at maximum motor velocity, as common features were observed between the constant gain of 1 and the decreasing gain, and between the constant gain of 3 and the increasing gain. By contrast, the amplitude of the velocity profile seemed to be specific to each particular visuomotor mapping process.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Accot J, Zhai S (2001) Scale effects in steering law tasks. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems—CHI ’01. ACM Press, Seattle, Washington, United States, pp 1–8
Balakrishnan R (2004) “Beating” Fitts’ law: virtual enhancements for pointing facilitation. Int J Hum Comput Stud 61:857–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.09.002
Blanch R, Guiard Y, Beaudouin-Lafon M (2004) Semantic pointing: improving target acquisition with control-display ratio adaptation. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 519–526
Blouin J, Bard C, Teasdale N, Fleury M (1993) On-line versus off-line control of rapid aiming movements. J Mot Behav 25:275–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1993.9941648
Bohan M, McConnell DS, Chaparro A, Thompson SG (2010) The effects of visual magnification and physical movement scale on the manipulation of a tool with indirect vision. J Exp Psychol Appl 16:33–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018501
Boyle J, Kennedy D, Shea CH (2012) Optimizing the control of high ID movements: rethinking the obvious. Exp Brain Res 223:377–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3266-6
Brenner E, Smeets JBJ (2011) Quickly ‘learning’ to move optimally. Exp Brain Res 213:153–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2786-9
Card SK, English WK, Burr BJ (1978) Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics 21:601–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140137808931762
Casiez G, Roussel N (2011) No more Bricolage! Methods and tools to characterize replicate and compare pointing transfer functions. ACM Press, New York, pp 603–614
Casiez G, Vogel D, Balakrishnan R, Cockburn A (2008) The impact of control-display gain on user performance in pointing tasks. Hum Comput Interact 23:215–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370020802278163
Casiez G, Roussel N, Vanbelleghem R, Giraud F (2011) Surfpad: riding towards targets on a squeeze film effect. In: Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems-CHI ’11. ACM Press, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp 2491
Coello Y, Milleville-Pennel I, Orliaguet JP (2004) Position coding in a video-controlled pointing task with a rotated visual display: evidence for individual differences in visuo-proprioceptive interaction. Neurosci Lett 369:214–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2004.07.066
Desmurget M, Rossetti Y, Prablanc C et al (1995) Representation of hand position prior to movement and motor variability. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 73:262–272. https://doi.org/10.1139/y95-037
Elliott D, Lyons J, Dyson K (1997) Rescaling an acquired discrete aiming movement: specific or general motor learning? Hum Mov Sci 16:81–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9457(96)00041-3
Elliott D, Binsted G, Heath M (1999) The control of goal-directed limb movements: correcting errors in the trajectory. Hum Mov Sci 18:121–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9457(99)00004-4
Elliott D, Helsen WF, Chua R (2001) A century later: Woodworth’s (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. Psychol Bull 127:342–357
Elliott D, Hansen S, Grierson LEM et al (2010) Goal-directed aiming: two components but multiple processes. Psychol Bull 136:1023–1044. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020958
Fernandez L, Bootsma RJ (2008) Non-linear gaining in precision aiming: making Fitts’ task a bit easier. Acta Psychol (Amst) 129:217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.06.001
Ferrel C, Leifflen D, Orliaguet J-P, Coello Y (2000) Pointing movement visually controlled through a video display: adaptation to scale change. Ergonomics 43:461–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401300184341
Fitts PM (1954) The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 47:381–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055392
Fitts PM, Peterson JR (1964) Information capacity of discrete motor responses. J Exp Psychol 67(2):103–112
Fradet L, Lee G, Dounskaia N (2008) Origins of submovements during pointing movements. Acta Psychol (Amst) 129:91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.04.009
Khan MA, Lawrence G, Fourkas A et al (2003) Online versus offline processing of visual feedback in the control of movement amplitude. Acta Psychol (Amst) 113:83–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-6918(02)00156-7
Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ, Langseth S (2003) Watching a cursor distorts haptically guided reproduction of mouse movement. J Exp Psychol Appl 9:228–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.9.4.228
Kovacs AJ, Buchanan JJ, Shea CH (2008) Perceptual influences on Fitts’ law. Exp Brain Res 190:99–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1497-3
Krakauer JW, Pine ZM, Ghilardi M-F, Ghez C (2000) Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. J Neurosci 20:8916–8924. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-23-08916.2000
Levesque V, Oram L, MacLean K, et al (2011) Enhancing physicality in touch interaction with programmable friction. In: Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems-CHI ’11. ACM Press, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp 2481
MacKenzie IS (1992) Fitts’ law as a research and design tool in human–computer interaction. Hum Comput Interact 7:91–139. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0701_3
MacKenzie CL, Marteniuk RG, Dugas C et al (1987) Three-dimensional movement trajectories in Fitts’ task: implications for control. Q J Exp Psychol Sect A 39:629–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748708401806
Meyer DE, Smith JE, Wright CE (1982) Models for the speed and accuracy of aimed movements. Psychol Rev 89:449–482
Rossetti Y, Koga K, Mano T (1993) Prismatic displacement of vision induces transient changes in the timing of eye-hand coordination. Percept Psychophys 54:355–364
Sainburg RL, Ghilardi MF, Poizner H, Ghez C (1995) Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception. J Neurophysiol 73:820–835. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1995.73.2.820
Sarlegna FR, Mutha PK (2015) The influence of visual target information on the online control of movements. Vis Res 110:144–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2014.07.001
Scott SH (2012) The computational and neural basis of voluntary motor control and planning. Trends Cogn Sci 16:541–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.09.008
Seidler RD, Bloomberg JJ, Stelmach GE (2001) Context-dependent arm pointing adaptation. Behav Brain Res 119:155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4328(00)00347-8
van Doorn RRA, Unema PJA, Hendriks EJ (2005) The locus of adaptation to altered gain in aimed movements. Hum Mov Sci 24:31–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2005.03.001
Woodworth RS (1899) Accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychol Rev Monogr Suppl 3:i-114. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092992
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the ANR ‘TurboTouch’ project (ANR-14-CE24-0009). We thank Sébastien Poulmane for his assistance in developing the experimental application and Stephen Mari for his help in testing the participants in the pilot study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Francesco Lacquaniti.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scotto, C.R., Vu, V.H., Casiez, G. et al. Sensorimotor control and linear visuomotor gains. Exp Brain Res 238, 1997–2007 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-05856-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-05856-1