Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative transcriptomic analysis of resistant and susceptible tea cultivars in response to Empoasca onukii (Matsuda) damage

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Planta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Main conclusion

Transcriptomic studies in resistant and susceptible tea cultivars have been performed to reveal the different defense molecular mechanisms of tea after E. onukii feeding.

Abstract

The molecular mechanism by which tea plants respond to small green leafhopper Empoasca onukii (Matsuda) damage is unclear. Using the resistant tea plant cultivar Juyan (JY) and the susceptible tea plant cultivar Enbiao (EB) as materials, this study performed RNA-seq on tea leaf samples collected at three time points (6 h, 12 h, 24 h) during exposure of the plants to leafhopper to reveal the molecular mechanisms that are activated in susceptible and resistant tea plant cultivars in response to leafhopper damage. The numbers of DEGs in the susceptible tea cultivar during early (6 h) and late (24 h) stages of leafhopper induction were higher than those in the resistant cultivar at the same time points. The stress responses to leafhopper were most intense at 12 h in both tea cultivars. Pathway enrichment analysis showed that most up-regulated DEGs and their related metabolic pathways were similar in the two tea cultivars. However, during the early stage of leafhopper induction (6 h), jasmonic acid (JA)-related genes were significantly up-regulated in the resistant cultivar. The terpenoid biosynthetic pathway and the α-linolenic acid metabolic pathway were activated earlier in the resistant cultivar and remained activated until the late stage of leafhopper damage. Our results confirmed that after leafhopper damage, the resistant tea cultivar activated its defense responses earlier than the susceptible cultivar, and these defense responses were mainly related to terpenoid metabolism and JA biosynthetic pathway. The results provide important clues for further studies on resistance strategy of tea plants to pest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DEG:

Differentially expressed gene

EB:

Enbiao

GO:

Gene Ontology

JA:

Jasmonic acid

JY:

Juyan

KEGG:

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

TF:

Transcription factor

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the technical staff and students at Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences including Ms. Zhaona Meng, Mr. Bo Chu and Mr. Long Jiao for their useful discussions.

Funding

Funding was provided by the State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian and Taiwan Crops 2019 Open Fund (SKL20190010); Fu Jian Province “2011 Collaborative Innovation Center”; Chinese Oolong Tea Industry Innovation Center (Cultivation) special project (J2015-75); Industry-University Cooperation Project of Fujian Province (2016N5010); National Natural Science Foundation of China (31702052); Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang province, China (2019C02033).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wei Liu or Zongmao Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest has been declared.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jin, S., Ren, Q., Lian, L. et al. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of resistant and susceptible tea cultivars in response to Empoasca onukii (Matsuda) damage. Planta 252, 10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-020-03407-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-020-03407-0

Keywords

Navigation