Abstract
Zagaria, Andó́ and Zennaro (in this issue) have offered that the discipline of psychology is fraught with conceptual chaos and a multiplicity of constructs. They have also assessed psychology to be a soft science, with much potential to be a hard science, should it allow itself to be unified by the principles offered by evolutionary psychology. With this approach, psychology would transition from its pre-paradigmatic to a paradigmatic status. In this commentary, we question their premise, method and conclusion, and finally submit that the preoccupation with paradigm is connected with a positivist view of scientific knowledge production. Psychological constructs are not ostensive in nature and cannot be treated as matter is in the hard sciences. This is neither possible, nor desirable. Additionally, such constructs are located in various theoretical perspectives, necessary to understand their multifaceted nature. We question the proposal of evolutionary psychology as an alternative meta-theory. Psychology is essentially a human endeavor, and we must step out of our need to follow the acultural Euro-American vision of positivist science, and instead build an enterprise that can be plural, contextually sensitive and incorporate the complexity and interdisciplinarity needed to be truly successful at approaching the human condition.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asma, S. T., & Gabriel, R. (2019). The emotional mind: The affective roots of culture and cognition. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Bansal, P. (2019). Psychology: Debates and controversies. New Delhi: Sage.
Bhatia, S., & Priya, K. R. (2018a). Decolonizing culture: Euro-American psychology and the shaping of neoliberal selves in India. Theory & Psychology, 28, 645–668.
Bhatia, S., & Priya, K. R. (2018b). From representing culture to fostering ‘voice’: Toward a critical indigenous psychology. In Y. Kuang-Hui (Ed.), Asian Indigenous Psychologies in the Global Context (pp. 19–46). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Brock, A. C. (Ed.). (2006). Internationalizing the history of psychology. New York: State University of New York.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.
Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. London: Sage.
Frazer, J. G. (1926). The worship of nature. Volume I. London: Macmillan.
Gergen, K. J. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 309–320.
Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40, 266–275.
Gergen, K. J. (1997). Social psychology as social construction: The emerging vision. In C. McCarty & A. Haslam (Eds.), The message of social psychology: Perspectives on mind in society (pp. 113–128). Oxford: Blackwell.
Gergen, K. J. (2016). Toward a visionary psychology. The Humanistic Psychologist, 44, 3–17.
Harre, H., & Moghaddam, F. M. (2012). Psychology for the third millennium. London: Sage.
James, W. (1895). The knowing of things together. Psychological Review, 2, 105–124.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Leahey, T. H. (1992). The mythical revolutions of American psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 308–318.
Marsella, A. J. (2009). Some reflections on potential abuses of psychology’s knowledge and practices. Psychological Studies, 54, 23–27.
Misra, G. (2003). Implications of culture for psychological knowledge. In J. W. Berry, R. C. Mishra & R. C. Tripathi (Eds.), Psychology in human and social development (pp, 31–67). New Delhi: Sage.
Misra, G., & Gergen, K. J. (1993). On the place of culture in psychological science. International Journal of Psychology, 23, 225–253.
Misra, G., & Pirta, R. S. (2019). Facing the challenge understanding mind and behaviour. In G. Misra (Ed.), Psychology (Vol. 5) Explorations into psyche and psychology: Some emerging perspectives (pp. 246–304). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Pickren, W. E., & Rutherford, A. (2010). A history of modern psychology in context. New Jersey: John Wiley.
Pirta, R. S. (2009). Biological and ecological bases of behaviour. In G. Misra (Ed.), Psychology in India. Volume 1. Basic psychological processes and human development (pp. 1–67). Delhi: Pearson.
Rao, K. R. (2019). On the nature of mind. In G. Misra (Ed.), Psychology (Vol.5) Explorations into psyche and psychology: Some emerging perspectives (pp. 1–91). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Robinson, D. N. (1995). An intellectual history of psychology. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
Robinson, D. N. (2008). Consciousness and mental life. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rosa, A., & Valsiner, J. (2018). The human psyche lives in semiospheres. In A. Rosa & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (2nd ed., pp. 13–34). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Siegert, R. J., & Ward, T. (2002). Clinical Psychology and Evolutionary Psychology: Toward a Dialogue. Review of General Psychology, 6(3), 235–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.6.3.235.
Smedslund, J. (1988). Psycho-logic. New York: Springer.
Sternberg, R. S. (1990). Metaphors of mind: Conceptions of the nature of intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tripathi, R. C. (2011). In search of a glocal psychology. In G. Misra (Ed.), Handbook of psychology in India (pp. 370–373). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Valsiner, J. (2013). A guided science history of psychology in the mirror of its making. New York: Routledge.
Valsiner, J. (Ed.). (2019). Social philosophy of science for the social sciences. New York: Springer.
Valsiner, J., & Rosa, A. (2007). The myth, and beyond: Ontology of Psyche and epistemology of psychology. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (pp. 23–39). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zagaria, A., Ando, A., & Zennaro, A. (this issue). Psychology: A giant with feet of clay. Integrative Psychological and Behavioural Sciences.
Acknowledgements
Comments by Preeti Kapur, Parul Bansal, Kumar Ravipriya and Arvind K. Mishra on an earlier draft of the paper are gratefully acknowledged.
Funding
No financial support has been received from any agency.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
There is no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This is a theoretical paper and ethical approval was not required for it.
Informed Consent
This is a theoretical paper and informed consent is not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Misra, G., Pirta, R.S., Misra, I. et al. The Game of Science and Puzzles of Paradigm. Integr. psych. behav. 55, 167–180 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09563-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09563-y