Adhesive wear law at the single asperity level
Introduction
Decades of engineering-scale wear experiments (Burwell and Strang, 1952a, b; Vakis et al., 2018) affirmed the existence of a simple empirical wear law: the wear volume (i.e. the total volume of wear debris) linearly scales with the macroscopic load acting normally to the interface and sliding distance. To rationalize this relation at the asperity level, (Archard, 1953) argued that the only possible mechanism to recover this relation at the asperity level is the removal of lumps from contact areas formed by plastic deformation. He accordingly developed an adhesive wear model by considering that adhesive sliding between two asperities of size a results in the removal of volume ~a3 over an effective sliding distance ~a, resulting in the wear rate ~a2. The model recovered a linear correlation between the wear rate (i.e. wear volume per unit of sliding distance) and the load carried by the junction, assuming fully plastic deformation at the asperity tip. Recent atomic force microscope (AFM) wear experiments (Bhaskaran et al., 2010; Gotsmann and Lantz, 2008; Jacobs and Carpick, 2013; Liu et al., 2017; Maw et al., 2002; Schirmeisen, 2013; Shao et al., 2017) and atomistic simulations (Chandross et al., 2008; Sha et al., 2013; Sorensen et al., 1996; Yang et al., 2016) have questioned this picture by reporting breakdown of the linear wear relation at the asperity level (Bhaskaran et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2010; Vahdat et al., 2013). This discrepancy poses the fundamental question whether the linearity between the wear volume and the applied load is a collective result of wear events at the multi-asperity contact or a phenomenon that can be recovered at the single asperity level.
Contrary to Archard's assumption (i.e. material detachment by fully plastic deformation), microscopic analysis of wear at small scales (Jacobs and Carpick, 2013) showed that the breakdown of linear wear relation is associated with the existence of other wear mechanisms at the asperity level such as atom-by-atom removal (i.e. atomic attrition mechanism) (Bhaskaran et al., 2010; Gotsmann and Lantz, 2008; Jacobs and Carpick, 2013) and asperity cleavage fracture (Chung et al., 2005; Liu et al., 2010). Nanoscale wear experiments (Bhaskaran et al., 2010; Gotsmann and Lantz, 2008; Jacobs and Carpick, 2013) revealed that the atomic attrition mechanism is favored within the very low applied force and adhesion regime. However, it is diminished for larger applied loads and adhesion (Gotsmann and Lantz, 2008). A recent in-situ nanoscale wear experiment (Bernal and Carpick, 2019) showed that all aforementioned wear mechanisms coexist during an AFM wear test, but a longstanding question is how and to what extent each individual mechanism controls the overall wear relation.
In our recent study (Aghababaei et al., 2017), we confirmed Archard's hypothesis that the size of debris and the effective sliding distance (i.e. sliding distance to form a debris from an asperity collision) are both proportional to the size of the junction, formed between colliding asperities. This leads to a linear relation between the wear rate and junction area for a single isolated wear particle. A linear correlation between the applied normal force and the debris volume, however, was not recovered as the applied normal force at the asperity level cannot accurately represent the contact area where a high degree of adhesion and plastic shearing is present. Alternatively, it was shown (Aghababaei et al., 2017) that the wear relation at the debris level can be accurately described as a linear correlation between the debris volume and the work done by frictional (tangential) force, a correlation which was first hypothesized at the macroscopic level by Reye in 1860 (Reye, 1860) and intermittently discussed and observed experimentally (Agrawal et al., 2009; Burwell and Strang, 1952b; Rabinowicz, 1995; Reye, 1860; Uetz and Fohl, 1978; Whittaker, 1947). We refer to this correlation (i.e. Vwear ~ ∫FdS) as Reye's wear relation in this study.
This study aims to examine the wear law at the asperity level in the presence of sequential wear events. We perform systematic large-scale atomistic simulations and conduct in-situ tracking of wear mechanisms at the asperity tip during adhesive sliding. Our simulations reveal that the wear mechanism dictates the validity or breakdown of the linear wear relation at the asperity level. Our results confirm Archard's longstanding theoretical hypothesis that the only possible mechanism to recover a linear wear relation at the asperity level is the removal of material from contact areas formed by plastic deformation. Additionally, it is shown that while Archard's representation of the wear law, which is based on the applied normal force, cannot accurately present wear at the asperity level, Reye's representation well characterizes plasticity-driven wear at the single asperity level. Considering that contact occurs at tiny asperity junctions where the local pressure is extremely high and a high degree of ductility is expected, this finding suggests that the linear wear relation at the macroscopic length scales is a direct result of plasticity-dominated removal of material at the asperity level. This finding also highlights the importance of wear characterization methodology on examining wear relations at the asperity level in atomistic simulations and AFM wear experiments.
Section snippets
Methods
To examine wear relations in the presence of sequential adhesive wear events we performed a systematic set of large-scale atomistic simulations using recently developed coarse-grained interatomic potentials (Aghababaei et al., 2016). The coarse-grained nature of these model potentials allows us to tune the degree of ductility by controlling the competition between dislocation plasticity and cleavage fracture through modifying the shape of potential tail.
adhesive wear relation at the single asperity level
First, we present the simulation results where strong adhesion presents (i.e. adhesion coefficient of 0.8, see the snapshot of two simulations in Fig. 1(a1) and Fig. 1(b1) with the ductile and brittle potentials respectively). The examination of Archard-type relation, i.e. the cumulative wear volume (Vwear) versus the product of the applied normal force (N) and sliding distance (S), is presented for a wide range of applied loads in Fig. 1(a2) for the ductile and in Fig. 1(b2) for the brittle
Conclusions
Our simulations demonstrated three disparate adhesive wear mechanisms (i.e. atomic cluster detachment, cleavage fracture and plasticity followed by ductile fracture), all of which may occur during sliding contact between an asperity and a flat substrate. The overall wear relation is dictated by the dominant mechanism through which the tangential work is dissipated. As shown, a linear wear behavior can be recovered at the asperity level, only if plastic deformation (by dislocation activity or
Data availability
All the data supporting the findings of this study are available from the authors upon request.
Author contributions
R.A. proposed and supervised the research. K.Z. carried out the simulations and data processing. Both authors discussed the results and implications at all stages and prepared the manuscript.
Declaration of Competing Interest
None.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Aarhus University Research Foundation, AUFF through project “Microscopic origins of adhesive wear” (Grant No. 27236). This work was made possible by usage of computing resources at ETAIS (Estonian Scientific Computing Infrastructure) through the NeIC Dellingr resource sharing pilot. R.A. acknowledge Prof. Jean-Francois Molinari for the helpful discussion.
References (57)
On the origins of third-body particle formation during adhesive wear
Wear
(2019)- et al.
Visualization of nanoscale wear mechanisms in ultrananocrystalline diamond by in-situ TEM tribometry
Carbon N Y
(2019) - et al.
An explanation of the different regimes of friction and wear using asperity deformation models
Wear
(1979) - et al.
Characteristics of fracture during the approach process and wear mechanism of a silicon AFM tip
Ultramicroscopy
(2005) Shearing of junctions between metal surfaces
Wear
(1966)Theoretical analysis of dry friction in brittle and ductile materials
Wear
(1987)- et al.
Adhesion of nanoscale asperities with power-law profiles
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
(2013) Contact mechanics and the wear of metals
Wear
(1995)- et al.
An elastic–plastic asperity interaction model for sliding friction
Tribol. Int.
(2011) - et al.
Adhesion and micromechanical properties of metal surfaces
Wear
(1984)
Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics
J. Comput. Phys.
Wear as an Energy Transformation Process
Wear
Modeling and simulation in tribology across scales: an overview
Tribol. Int.
Adhesion suppresses atomic wear in single-asperity sliding
Wear
Effect of adhesion on material removal during adhesive wear
Phys. Rev. Mater.
Asperity-level origins of transition from mild to severe wear
Phys. Rev. Lett.
Critical length scale controls adhesive wear mechanisms
Nat. Commun.
On the debris-level origins of adhesive wear
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
An energy-based model to predict wear in nanocrystalline diamond atomic force microscopy tips
J. Appl. Phys.
Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces
J. Appl. Phys.
Ultralow nanoscale wear through atom-by-atom attrition in silicon-containing diamond-like carbon
Nat. Nanotechnol.
Removal of pressure and free energy artifacts in charged periodic systems via net charge corrections to the Ewald potential
J. Chem. Phys.
Adhesive wear mechanisms in the presence of weak interfaces: insights from an amorphous model system
Phys. Rev. Mater.
Metallic wear
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A
On the empirical law of adhesive wear
J. Appl. Phys.
Simulations of nanotribology with realistic probe tip models
Langmuir
Experimental study of the plastic interaction of model surface asperities during sliding
J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
Atomic force microscopy study of an ideally hard contact: the diamond(111)/tungsten carbide interface
Phys. Rev. Lett.
Cited by (34)
Effect of grain boundary on scratch behavior of polycrystalline copper
2024, International Journal of Mechanical SciencesEffects of abrasive filler size and crosslinking treatment on airborne particle emissions of brake composites
2024, Tribology InternationalPhase transformation and incidental effects of metastable crystalline TiAlN on the material removal mechanism
2024, Mechanics of MaterialsNumerical assessment of transition in cutting mode and its effect on roughness creation
2024, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences