Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Electrical current generation from a continuous flow macrophyte biocathode sediment microbial fuel cell (mSMFC) during the degradation of pollutants in urban river sediment

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new type of sediment microbial fuel cell (SMFC) with floating macrophyte Limnobium laevigatum, Pistia stratiotes, or Lemna minor L. biocathode was constructed and assessed in three phases at different hydraulic retention time (HRT) for electrical current generation during the degradation of urban river sediment. The results showed a highest voltage output of 0.88 ± 0.1 V, maximum power density of 80.22 mW m−3, highest columbic efficiency of 15.3%, normalized energy recovery of 0.030 kWh m−3, and normalized energy production of 0.005 kWh m−3 in the Lemna minor L. SMFC during phase 3 at HRT of 48 h, respectively. Highest removal efficiencies of total chemical oxygen demand of 80%, nitrite of 99%, ammonia of 93%, and phosphorus of 94% were achieved in Lemna minor L. system, and 99% of nitrate removal and 99% of sulfate removal were achieved in Pistia stratiotes and Limnobium laevigatum system during the SMFC operation, respectively. Pistia stratiotes exhibited the highest growth in terms of biomass and tap root system of 29.35 g and 12.2 cm to produce the maximum dissolved oxygen of 16.85 ± 0.2 mg L−1 compared with other macrophytes. The predominant bacterial phylum Proteobacteria of 62.86% and genus Exiguobacterium of 17.48% were identified in Limnobium laevigatum system, while the class Gammaproteobacteria of 28.77% was observed in the control SMFC. The integration of technologies with the continuous flow operation shows promising prospect in the remediation of polluted urban river sediments along with the generation of electrical current.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APHA (2012) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 22nd edn. In: Rice EW, Baird RB, Eaton AD, Clesceri LS (eds) American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA) and Water Environment Federation (WEF), Washington, D.C., USA

  • Azari MAG, Gheshlaghi R, Mahdavi MA, Abazarian E (2017) Electricity generation from river sediments using a partitioned open channel sediment microbial fuel cell. Int J Hydrog Energy 42(8):5252–5260

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya A, Majumder NS, Basak P, Mukherji S, Roy D, Nag S, Haldar A, Chattopadhyay D, Mitra S, Bhattacharyya M (2015) Diversity and distribution of Archaea in the mangrove sediment of Sundarbans. Archaea 2015:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Białowiec A, Albuquerque A, Randerson PF (2014) The influence of evapotranspiration on vertical flow subsurface constructed wetland performance. Ecol Eng 67:89–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Brix H (1994) Functions of macrophytes in constructed wetlands. Water Sci Technol 29(4):71–78

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brix H (1997) Do macrophytes play a role in constructed treatment wetlands? Water Sci Technol 35(5):11–17

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cervantes-Alcalá R, Arrocha-Arcos A, Peralta-Peláez L, Ortega-Clemente L (2012) Electricity generation in sediment plant microbial fuel cells (SPMFC) in warm climates using Typha domingensis Pers. Int Res J Biotechnol 3(9):166–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang W, Um Y, Hoffman B, Holoman TRP (2005) Molecular characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-degrading methanogenic communities. Biotechnol Prog 21(3):682–688

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Huang YC, Liang JH, Zhao F, Zhu YG (2012) A novel sediment microbial fuel cell with a biocathode in the rice rhizosphere. Bioresour Technol 108:55–59

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clauwaert P, Van der Ha D, Boon N, Verbeken K, Verhaege M, Rabaey K, Verstraete W (2007) Open air biocathode enables effective electricity generation with microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 41(21):7564–7569

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Commault A, Lear G, Novis P, Weld R (2014) Photosynthetic biocathode enhances the power output of a sediment-type microbial fuel cell. N Z J Bot 52(1):48–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook CD, Urmi-König K (1983) A revision of the genus Limnobium including Hydromystria (Hydrocharitaceae). Aquat Bot 17(1):1–27

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Schamphelaire L, Boeckx P, Verstraete W (2010) Evaluation of biocathodes in freshwater and brackish sediment microbial fuel cells. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 87(5):1675–1687

    Google Scholar 

  • Debuy S, Pecastaings S, Bergel A, Erable B (2015) Oxygen-reducing biocathodes designed with pure cultures of microbial strains isolated from seawater biofilms. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 103:16–22

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty L, Zhao Y, Zhao X, Hu Y, Hao X, Xu L, Liu R (2015) A review of a recently emerged technology: constructed wetland–microbial fuel cells. Water Res 85:38–45

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez-Garay A, Esteve-Núñez A (2018) Designing strategies for operating microbial electrochemical systems to clean up polluted soils under non-flooded conditions. Bioelectrochemistry 124:142–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan C, Dewan A, Heo D, Beyenal H (2008) Batteryless, wireless sensor powered by a sediment microbial fuel cell. Environ Sci Technol 42(22):8591–8596

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan C, Dewan A, Heo D, Lewandowski Z, Beyenal H (2013) Sediment microbial fuel cell powering a submersible ultrasonic receiver: new approach to remote monitoring. J Power Sources 233:79–85

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan C, Dewan A, Peng H, Heo D, Beyenal H (2011) Power management system for a 2.5 W remote sensor powered by a sediment microbial fuel cell. J Power Sources 196(3):1171–1177

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Du Y, Feng Y, Qu Y, Liu J, Ren N, Liu H (2014) Electricity generation and pollutant degradation using a novel biocathode coupled photoelectrochemical cell. Environ Sci Technol 48(13):7634–7641

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gajda I (2016) Self-sustainable cathodes for microbial fuel cells (Thesis). University of the West of England, Bristol, UK

  • Gajda I, Greenman J, Melhuish C, Ieropoulos I (2013) Photosynthetic cathodes for microbial fuel cells. Int J Hydrog Energy 38(26):11559–11564

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Habibul N, Hu Y, Wang Y-K, Chen W, Yu H-Q, Sheng G-P (2016) Bioelectrochemical chromium (VI) removal in plant-microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 50(7):3882–3889

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He Q, Zhou J, Wang H, Zhang J, Wei L (2016) Microbial population dynamics during sludge granulation in an A/O/A sequencing batch reactor. Bioresour Technol 214:1–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He Z, Angenent LT (2006) Application of bacterial biocathodes in microbial fuel cells. Electroanalysis 18(19–20):2009–2015

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helder M, Strik D, Hamelers H, Kuhn A, Blok C, Buisman C (2010) Concurrent bio-electricity and biomass production in three plant-microbial fuel cells using Spartina anglica, Arundinella anomala and Arundo donax. Bioresour Technol 101(10):3541–3547

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hong SW, Chang IS, Choi YS, Kim BH, Chung TH (2009) Responses from freshwater sediment during electricity generation using microbial fuel cells. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 32(3):389–395

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs SW, Pickard J (1981) Plants of New South Wales: a census of the cycads, conifers and angiosperms. Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney, Australia, 226 pp

  • Juang D-F, Lee C-H, Hsueh S-C, Chou H-Y (2012) Power generation capabilities of microbial fuel cells with different oxygen supplies in the cathodic chamber. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 167(4):714–731

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kabutey FT, Antwi P, Ding J, Zhao Q-l, Quashie FK (2019) Enhanced bioremediation of heavy metals and bioelectricity generation in a macrophyte-integrated cathode sediment microbial fuel cell (mSMFC). Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(26):26829–26843

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim M, Bae SS, Seol M, Lee J-H, Oh Y-S (2008) Monitoring nutrient impact on bacterial community composition during bioremediation of anoxic PAH-contaminated sediment. J Microbiol 46(6):615–623

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Qu Y, Tian Y, Feng Y (2019) The plant-enhanced bio-cathode: root exudates and microbial community for nitrogen removal. J Environ Sci 77:97–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Ji M, Zhai H (2018) Anodic potentials, electricity generation and bacterial community as affected by plant roots in sediment microbial fuel cell: effects of anode locations. Chemosphere 209:739–747

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Logan BE (2004) Electricity generation using an air-cathode single chamber microbial fuel cell in the presence and absence of a proton exchange membrane. Environ Sci Technol 38(14):4040–4046

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Logan BE, Regan JM (2006) Electricity-producing bacterial communities in microbial fuel cells. Trends Microbiol 14(12):512–518

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf & Eddy Inc. (1991) Wastewater engineering: treatment disposal reuse (3rd Ed.). McGraw-Hill Inc.

  • Mohan SV, Mohanakrishna G, Chiranjeevi P, Peri D, Sarma P (2010) Ecologically engineered system (EES) designed to integrate floating, emergent and submerged macrophytes for the treatment of domestic sewage and acid rich fermented-distillery wastewater: evaluation of long term performance. Bioresour Technol 101(10):3363–3370

    Google Scholar 

  • Muratova A, Hübner T, Tischer S, Turkovskaya O, Möder M, Kuschk P (2003) Plant–rhizosphere-microflora association during phytoremediation of PAH-contaminated soil. Int J Phytoremed 5(2):137–151

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noori MT, Ghangrekar M, Mukherjee C (2018a) Sediment microbial fuel cell and constructed wetland assisted with it: challenges and future prospects. In: microbial fuel cell: a bioelectrochemical system that converts waste to watts, Springer International Publishing, 335–352

  • Noori MT, Paul D, Ghangrekar M, Mukherjee C (2018b) Enhancing the performance of sediment microbial fuel cell using graphene oxide–zeolite modified anode and V2O5 catalyzed cathode. J Clean Energy Technol 6(2):150–154

  • Oon Y-L, Ong S-A, Ho L-N, Wong Y-S, Dahalan FA, Oon Y-S, Lehl HK, Thung W-E, Nordin N (2017) Role of macrophyte and effect of supplementary aeration in up-flow constructed wetland-microbial fuel cell for simultaneous wastewater treatment and energy recovery. Bioresour Technol 224:265–275

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad J, Tripathi RK (2018) Scale up sediment microbial fuel cell for powering led lighting. Int J Renew Energy Develop 7(1):53

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ren Y, Pan D, Li X, Fu F, Zhao Y, Wang X (2013) Effect of polyaniline-graphene nanosheets modified cathode on the performance of sediment microbial fuel cell. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 88(10):1946–1950

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sajana T, Ghangrekar M, Mitra A (2016) In situ bioremediation using sediment microbial fuel cell. J Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste 21(2):04016022

    Google Scholar 

  • San Juan MRF, Albornoz CB, Larsen K, Najle R (2018) Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in Limnobium laevigatum and Ludwigia peploides: their phytoremediation potential in water contaminated with heavy metals. Environ Earth Sci 77(11):404

    Google Scholar 

  • Santoro C, Arbizzani C, Erable B, Ieropoulos I (2017) Microbial fuel cells: from fundamentals to applications. A review. J Power Sources 356:225–244

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schievano A, Colombo A, Grattieri M, Trasatti SP, Liberale A, Tremolada P, Pino C, Cristiani P (2017) Floating microbial fuel cells as energy harvesters for signal transmission from natural water bodies. J Power Sources 340:80–88

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simonsen R (1968) SCULTHORPE, C. D.: the biology of aquatic vascular plants. 610 S. London: Edward Arnold Ltd. 1967, £ 66 s. net. Internationale Revue der gesamten Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie 53(2):353–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Song TS, Tan WM, Wu XY, Zhou CC (2012) Effect of graphite felt and activated carbon fiber felt on performance of freshwater sediment microbial fuel cell. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 87(10):1436–1440

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sooknah RD, Wilkie AC (2004) Nutrient removal by floating aquatic macrophytes cultured in anaerobically digested flushed dairy manure wastewater. Ecol Eng 22(1):27–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Srikanth S, Mohan SV (2012) Change in electrogenic activity of the microbial fuel cell (MFC) with the function of biocathode microenvironment as terminal electron accepting condition: influence on over potentials and bio-electro kinetics. Bioresour Technol 119:241–251

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun H, Hou Y, Huang M (2015). Ecological strategy of water landscape planning: Harbin as a case study. 5th International Conference on Information Engineering for Mechanics and Materials, Atlantis Press.

  • Wang D-B, Song T-S, Guo T, Zeng Q, Xie J (2014) Electricity generation from sediment microbial fuel cells with algae-assisted cathodes. Int J Hydrog Energy 39(25):13224–13230

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Song X, Wang Y, Bai J, Li M, Dong G, Lin F, Lv Y, Yan D (2017) Bioenergy generation and rhizodegradation as affected by microbial community distribution in a coupled constructed wetland-microbial fuel cell system associated with three macrophytes. Sci Total Environ 607:53–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Hu Y, Xie H, Yang Z (2018) Constructed wetlands: a review on the role of radial oxygen loss in the rhizosphere by macrophytes. Water 10(6):678

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss RF (1970) The solubility of nitrogen, oxygen and argon in water and seawater. Deep-Sea Research 17:721–735

  • Wu X, Song T, Zhu X, Zhou C, Wei P (2013) Research on different wetland plants to construct the plant-sediment microbial fuel cell. Kezaisheng Nengyuan/Renew Energy Resourc 31(9):78–82

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Wen Y, Zhou J, Wu Y (2014) Phosphorus release from lake sediments: effects of pH, temperature and dissolved oxygen. KSCE J Civ Eng 18(1):323–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu F, Cao F-q, Kong Q, Zhou L-l, Yuan Q, Zhu Y-j, Wang Q (2018) Electricity production and evolution of microbial community in the constructed wetland-microbial fuel cell. Chem Eng J 339:479–486

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, Zhao Q, Wu M (2015) Improved biodegradation of total organic carbon and polychlorinated biphenyls for electricity generation by sediment microbial fuel cell and surfactant addition. RSC Adv 5(77):62534–62538

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav AK, Dash P, Mohanty A, Abbassi R, Mishra BK (2012) Performance assessment of innovative constructed wetland-microbial fuel cell for electricity production and dye removal. Ecol Eng 47:126–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Lu Z, Lin X, Xia C, Sun G, Lian Y, Xu M (2015) Enhancing the bioremediation by harvesting electricity from the heavily contaminated sediments. Bioresour Technol 179:615–618

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshie S, Makino H, Hirosawa H, Shirotani K, Tsuneda S, Hirata A (2006) Molecular analysis of halophilic bacterial community for high-rate denitrification of saline industrial wastewater. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 72(1):182–189

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, He Z (2012) Integrated organic and nitrogen removal with electricity generation in a tubular dual-cathode microbial fuel cell. Process Biochem 47(12):2146–2151

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Tian L, He Z (2011) Powering a wireless temperature sensor using sediment microbial fuel cells with vertical arrangement of electrodes. J Power Sources 196(22):9568–9573

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Collum S, Phelan M, Goodbody T, Doherty L, Hu Y (2013) Preliminary investigation of constructed wetland incorporating microbial fuel cell: batch and continuous flow trials. Chem Eng J 229:364–370

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zou S and He Z (2017) Efficiently "pumping out" value-added resources from wastewater by bioelectrochemical systems: a review from energy perspectives, Water Res 131:62–73

Download references

Funding

This research was financially supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Project 51778176) and the State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology (2019DX07).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingliang Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Weiming Zhang

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOC 2666 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kabutey, F.T., Ding, J., Zhao, Q. et al. Electrical current generation from a continuous flow macrophyte biocathode sediment microbial fuel cell (mSMFC) during the degradation of pollutants in urban river sediment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 35364–35380 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09812-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09812-y

Keywords

Navigation