Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2020; 33(05): 316-326
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1709728
Original Research

How Do the Locking Screws Lock? A Micro-CT Study of 3.5-mm Locking Screw Mechanism

Jakub Kaczmarek
1   AniCura Kleintierspezialisten Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
,
Tomasz Bartkowiak 
2   Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, Poland
,
Piotr Paczos
2   Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, Poland
,
Bartosz Gapinski
2   Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, Poland
,
Hanna Jader
2   Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, Poland
,
Martin Unger
1   AniCura Kleintierspezialisten Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
› Author Affiliations Funding This study was financially supported by the AniCura GmbH - AniCura Research Fund. Implants for this study were donated by Aesculap B. Braun Vet Care and DePuy Synthes.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective To quantify the amount of the screw head thread and the plate hole thread connection in two 3.5 mm locking plates: Locking Compression Plate (LCP) and Polyaxial Locking System (PLS).

Materials and Methods A micro - CT scan of a screw head - plate hole connection was performed pre- and post destructive tests. Tests were performed on bone surrogates in a fracture gap model. The 3.5 LCP and 3.5 PLS plates, with 3 perpendicular screws per segment were used in a destructive static test. The 3.5 PLS plates with mono- and polyaxial screws were compared in a cyclic fatigue tests in two orthogonal directions. Pre - and post - test scan datasets were compared. Each dataset was converted into serial images depicting sections cut orthogonally to locking screw axis. The amount of engagement was detected through automated image postprocessing.

Results The mean amount of the thread connection for the LCP was 28.85% before and 18.55% after destructive static test. The mean amount of the connection for the PLS was 16.20% before and 14.55% after destructive static test. When inserted monoaxially, the mean amount of the connection for the PLS screws was 14.4% before and 19.24% after destructive cyclic test. The mean amount of the connection for the polyaxial inserted PLS screws when loaded against plate thickness was 2.99% before and 2.08% after destructive cyclic test. The mean amount of the connection for the polyaxial inserted PLS screws when loaded against plate width was 3.36% before and 3.93% after destructive cyclic test. The 3D visualization of the thread connection showed that the initial interface points between screw head and plate hole are different for both LCP and PLS after the destructive testing. Depending on the type of applied force, there was either loss or increase of the contact.

Clinical Relevance Micro-CT offers news possibilities in locking implant investigation. It might be helpful in better understanding the nature of locking mechanism and prediction of possible mode of failure in different systems.

Keywords

micro-ct - locking screw - locking plate - polyaxial - LCP

Authors' Contributions

Jakub Kaczmarek, Tomasz Bartkowiak and Martin Unger contributed to conception of study, study design, acquisition of data and data analysis and interpretation. Bartosz Gapinski, Piotr Paczos and Hanna Jąder contributed to acquisition of data, data analysis and interpretation. All authors drafted, revised and approved the submitted manuscript.




Publication History

Received: 23 May 2019

Accepted: 17 March 2020

Article published online:
26 June 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 

  • References

  • 1 Carmignato S, Dewulf W, Leach R. Industrial X-ray computed tomography. Springer; Switzerland: 2017
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Boudreau B, Benamou J, von Pfeil DJ, Guillou RP, Beckett C, Déjardin LM. Effect of screw insertion torque on mechanical properties of four locking systems. Vet Surg 2013; 42 (05) 535-543
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kääb MJ, Frenk A, Schmeling A, Schaser K, Schütz M, Haas NP. Locked internal fixator: sensitivity of screw/plate stability to the correct insertion angle of the screw. J Orthop Trauma 2004; 18 (08) 483-487
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Boero Baroncelli A, Reif U, Bignardi C, Peirone B. Effect of screw insertion torque on push-out and cantilever bending properties of five different angle-stable systems. Vet Surg 2013; 42 (03) 308-315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Gueorguiev B, Lenz M. Why and how do locking plates fail?. Injury 2018; 49 (June, Suppl 1): S56-S60
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Schneider K, Oh JK, Zderic I. , et al. What is the underlying mechanism for the failure mode observed in the proximal femoral locking compression plate? A biomechanical study. Injury 2015; 46 (08) 1483-1490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gautier E, Sommer C. Guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP. Injury 2003; 34 (Suppl. 02) B63-B76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Malenfant RC, Sod GA. In vitro biomechanical comparison of 3.5 string of pearl plate fixation to 3.5 locking compression plate fixation in a canine fracture gap model. Vet Surg 2014; 43 (04) 465-470
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Blake CA, Boudrieau RJ, Torrance BS. , et al. Single cycle to failure in bending of three standard and five locking plates and plate constructs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24 (06) 408-417
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Cabassu JB, Kowaleski MP, Skorinko JK, Blake CA, Gaudette GR, Boudrieau RJ. Single cycle to failure in torsion of three standard and five locking plate constructs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24 (06) 418-425
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Eid C, Martini FM, Bonardi A, Lusetti F, Brandstetter de Belesini A, Nicoletto G. Single cycle to failure in bending of three titanium polyaxial locking plates. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2017; 30 (03) 172-177
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Tomlinson AW, Comerford EJ, Birch RS, Innes JF, Walton MB. Mechanical performance in axial compression of a titanium polyaxial locking plate system in a fracture gap model. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28 (02) 88-94
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Bufkin BW, Barnhart MD, Kazanovicz AJ, Naber SJ, Kennedy SC. The effect of screw angulation and insertion torque on the push-out strength of polyaxial locking screws and the single cycle to failure in bending of polyaxial locking plates. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26 (03) 186-191
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Lenz M, Wahl D, Gueorguiev B, Jupiter JB, Perren SM. Concept of variable angle locking--evolution and mechanical evaluation of a recent technology. J Orthop Res 2015; 33 (07) 988-992
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Lenz M, Wahl D, Zderic I, Gueorguiev B, Jupiter JB, Perren SM. Head-locking durability of fixed and variable angle locking screws under repetitive loading. J Orthop Res 2016; 34 (06) 949-952
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lin ASP, Fechter CM, Magill M, Wipf F, Moore T, Guldberg RE. The effect of contouring on fatigue resistance of three types of fracture fixation plates. J Orthop Surg Res 2016; 11 (01) 107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Niederhäuser SK, Tepic S, Weber UT. Effect of screw position on single cycle to failure in bending and torsion of a locking plate-rod construct in a synthetic feline femoral gap model. Am J Vet Res 2015; 76 (05) 402-410
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Hallbauer J, Klos K, Gräfenstein A. , et al. Does a polyaxial-locking system confer benefits for osteosynthesis of the distal fibula: a cadaver study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2016; 102 (05) 645-649
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Pearson T, Glyde MR, Day RE, Hosgood GL. The effect of intramedullary pin size and plate working length on plate strain in locking compression plate-rod constructs under axial load. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2016; 29 (06) 451-458
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Demner D, Garcia TC, Serdy MG, Hayashi K, Nir BA, Stover SM. Biomechanical comparison of mono- and bicortical screws in an experimentally induced gap fracture. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2014; 27 (06) 422-429
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kaczmarek J, Bartkowiak T, Schuenemann R. , et al. Mechanical performance of a polyaxial locking plate and the influence of screw angulation in a fracture gap model. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2020; 33 (01) 36-44
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Hammel SP, Pluhar EG, Novo RE, Bourgeault CA, Wallace LJ. Fatigue analysis of plates used for fracture stabilization in small dogs and cats. Vet Surg 2006; 35 (06) 573-578
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hudson CC, Lewis DD, Cross AR. , et al. A biomechanical comparison of three hybrid linear-circular external fixator constructs. Vet Surg 2012; 41 (08) 954-965
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard Specification and Test Method for Metallic Bone Plates, ASTM F382–99 (Reapproved 2003). In: 2003 Annual Book of ASTM Standards. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Craig A, Witte PG, Moody T, Harris K, Scott HW. Management of feline tibial diaphyseal fractures using orthogonal plates performed via minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis. J Feline Med Surg 2018; 20 (01) 6-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Sandriesser S, Rupp M, Greinwald M, Heiss C, Augat P, Alt V. Locking design affects the jamming of screws in locking plates. Injury 2018; 49 (June, Suppl 1): S61-S65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Rotne R, Bertollo N, Walsh W, Dhand NK, Voss K, Johnson KA. Influence of plate-bone contact on cyclically loaded conically coupled locking plate failure. Injury 2014; 45 (03) 515-521
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar