Carbon dioxide mitigation using renewable power
Section snippets
CO2 Utilization with fossil energy source
Stevenson examines the thermodynamics of making fuels or chemicals, comparing fossil-only feedstock routes with those that consume CO2 [2••]. He gives specific examples of methanol and acrylic acid synthesis. An abbreviated version of his argument is presented here, using his example of methanol synthesis from methane, versus synthesis from methane and CO2. For the methane-only case, the overall stoichiometry and enthalpy of the reaction are:
It is assumed that
Alternate CO2 mitigation strategies using renewable power
Electroreduction of CO2 and/or water is one approach that uses renewable power to mitigate CO2, but other approaches are also available. These include:
- 1
Displacement of fossil fuels for light duty transportation in Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles (ICEV), via:
- a
Electroreduction of water to hydrogen using renewable power, with use of hydrogen in a Fuel Cell Vehicle (FCV).
- b
Renewable power to a Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) or Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV). Note that a PHEV is equivalent
- a
Discussion
Table 2 compiles the calculation results for the CO2 emissions mitigated from one mega-Joule of renewable power. It is probably no surprise that replacement of coal-fired power with renewable power has the greatest CO2 mitigation, at 291 g CO2 per MJ power. The next best scheme is to use renewable power for light duty transportation with battery electric vehicles, with 189 g CO2 mitigated per MJ. Next is replacement of natural gas-fired open cycle gas turbine power plants, with 141 g CO2
Conclusions
Thermodynamic arguments can be made to show that ‘utilization’ of CO2 requires energy, and if fossil feedstock is burned to provide the required energy, it is not possible to consume more CO2 than is produced. Rather, renewable energy must be used to provide the energy for conversion of CO2 into useful products, such that a net reduction in CO2 occurs. Renewable energy in the form of power can be used for the electroreduction of CO2/H2O to hydrocarbons, the electroreduction of H2O to hydrogen,
Conflict of interest statement
Nothing declared.
References and recommended reading
Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as
• of special interest
•• of outstanding interest
References (18)
- et al.
A review of catalysts for the electroreduction of carbon dioxide to produce low-carbon fuels
Chem Soc Rev
(2014) Global EV Outlook 2019
(2019)Rice Scientists Develop Clean Tech for Turning Carbon Dioxide into Fuel
(2019)- et al.
Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) Power Flow
(2012) How to make the most of carbon dioxide
Nature
(2015)Thermodynamic considerations in CO2 utilization
AICHE J
(2019)- et al.
Catalytic bi-reforming of methane: from greenhouse gases to syngas
Curr Opin Chem Eng
(2015) - et al.
Water splitting by electrolysis at high current densities under 1.6 volds
Energy Environ Sci
(2018) - et al.
Selective conversion of CO2 to methanol by catalytic hydrogenation over promoted copper catalyst
Energy Convers Manag
(1992)
Cited by (4)
Recent advances in metal-doped defective TiO<inf>2</inf> for photocatalytic CO<inf>2</inf> conversion
2024, Current Opinion in Chemical EngineeringThe chemical engineering aspects of CO<inf>2</inf> capture, combined with its utilisation
2023, Current Opinion in Chemical EngineeringCitation Excerpt :A wide range of aspects, from specific (related to a class of materials) to more general technological assessment, were covered in these reviews. An illustrative selection is given in Refs. [1–11]. Notwithstanding this impressive number of reviews and publications, assessments and evaluations, it is still difficult, and thus a matter of debate in meetings and discussions, to have a consensus on critical questions as summarised below:
Sensitivity analysis on thermophysical properties efficacy on PCM-based heat sink usefulness: effects of solid particles versus liquid phase fraction
2021, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry