Abstract
3D grinding temperature field can be simulated by the finite difference method. When the finite difference method is used to calculate the temperature field, the boundary conditions need to be considered. Unfortunately, the difference equations for internal nodes and boundary nodes are not the same. For cuboid computing domains, there are twenty-six types of boundary nodes. This reduces the calculation efficiency to a certain extent. An improved finite difference method for the 3D grinding temperature field was proposed to solve this problem in this paper. By adding auxiliary nodes, the boundary nodes are converted into internal nodes, and the difference equations of the boundary nodes and internal nodes are unified. In this paper, the improved algorithm was used to simulate the 3D grinding temperature field. The temperature distribution characteristics of the grinding temperature field were analyzed. Then, the effects of heat source type, space step size, and convective heat transfer coefficient on the temperature field were studied. The results show that the improved algorithm can well simulate the 3D grinding temperature field. Finally, compared with the original algorithm, the calculation results were completely consistent, and the efficiency is improved by about 20%.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- T :
-
is the temperature field (°C)
- \( {T}_{i,j,k}^{(n)} \) :
-
is the temperature of the node (i, j, k) at time τ (τ = nΔτ) (°C)
- T ′ :
-
is the extended temperature field (°C)
- τ :
-
is the time (s)
- Δτ :
-
is the time step (s)
- n :
-
is the count of time step
- λ :
-
is the thermal conductivity coefficient of the workpiece material (W/(m K))
- ρ :
-
is the density of the workpiece material (kg/m3)
- c :
-
is the specific heat capacity of the workpiece material (J/(kg K))
- x, y, z :
-
are the coordinates of the workpiece (m)
- ∆x, ∆y, ∆z :
-
are the space steps in three coordinate directions of the workpiece respectively (m)
- i, j, k :
-
are order numbers of node in there coordinates respectively
- I, J, K :
-
are the maximum order numbers
- Φ:
-
is the heat flow (W)
- q :
-
is the heat flux (W m−2)
- \( {q}_x^{+},{q}_x^{-},{q}_y^{+},{q}_y^{-},{q}_z^{+},{q}_z^{-} \) :
-
are the heat flux in the six faces of the calculation domain. x, y, z denote the axis directions and +, − denote the forward and reverse (W m−2)
- q m :
-
is the average heat flux (W m−2)
- M :
-
is a binary coefficient matrix
- h :
-
is the convective heat transfer coefficient (W/(m2 °C))
- T f :
-
is the fluid temperature (°C)
- ε :
-
is the energy distribution coefficient
- x c :
-
is the distance in x-axis direction from the lowest point of grinding zone (m)
- F t :
-
is the tangential grinding force (N/s)
- vs :
-
is the wheel speed (m/s)
- v w :
-
is the feed rate (m/s)
- l c :
-
is the length of contact arc (m)
- b :
-
is the width of grinding wheel (m)
References
Jackson MJ, Davis CJ, Hitchiner MP, Mills B (2001) High-speed grinding with CBN grinding wheels - applications and future technology. J Mater Process Technol 110:78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00869-4
Malkin S (2008) Grinding technology : theory and application of machining with abrasives. Industrial Press Inc., New York
He B, Wei C, Ding S yuan, Shi Z yao (2019) A survey of methods for detecting metallic grinding burn. Measurement 134:426–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.10.093
Malkin S, Guo C (2007) Thermal analysis of grinding. CIRP Ann 56:760–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2007.10.005
Brinksmeier E, Heinzel C, Wittmann M (1999) Friction, cooling and lubrication in grinding. CIRP Ann 48:581–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63236-3
Nélias D, Boucly V (2008) Prediction of grinding residual stresses. Int J Mater Form 1:1115–1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-008-0175-0
Kopac J, Krajnik P (2006) High-performance grinding—a review. J Mater Process Technol 175:278–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.04.010
Jaeger JC (1942) Moving surfaces of heat and temperature at sliding contacts. J Proc R Soc New South Wales 76:203–224
Guo C, Wu Y, Varghese V, Malkin S (1999) Temperatures and energy partition for grinding with vitrified CBN wheels. CIRP Ann 48:247–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63176-X
Lyu Y, Yu H, Wang J, Chen C, Xiang L (2017) Study on the grinding temperature of the grinding wheel with an abrasive phyllotactic pattern. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91:895–906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9811-x
Li H, Axinte D (2017) On a stochastically grain-discretised model for 2D/3D temperature mapping prediction in grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 116:60–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.01.004
González-Santander JL, Isidro JM, Martín G (2014) An analysis of the transient regime temperature field in wet grinding. J Eng Math 90:141–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-014-9713-6
Fang C, Xu X (2014) Analysis of temperature distributions in surface grinding with intermittent wheels. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71:23–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5472-1
Dai S, Li X, Zhang H (2019) Research on temperature field of non-uniform heat source model in surface grinding by cup wheel. Adv Manuf 7:326–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-019-00272-3
Mahdi M, Zhang L (1995) The finite element thermal analysis of grinding processes by ADINA. Comput Struct 56:313–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(95)00024-B
Gu R, Shillor M, Barber G, Jen T (2004) Thermal analysis of the grinding process. Math Comput Model 39:991–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7177(04)90530-4
Yang JJ, Wang ZX, Adetoro OB, Wen PH, Bailey CG (2019) The thermal analysis of cutting/grinding processes by meshless finite block method. Eng Anal Bound Elem 100:68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2018.03.003
Wang Z, Li Y, Yu T, Zhao J, Wen PH (2019) Prediction of 3D grinding temperature field based on meshless method considering infinite element. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100:3067–3084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2801-4
Wang Z, Yu T, Wang X, Zhang T, Zhao J, Wen PH (2019) Grinding temperature field prediction by meshless finite block method with double infinite element. Int J Mech Sci 153–154:131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.01.037
Guo C, Malkin S (1995) Analysis of transient temperatures in grinding. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME 117:571–577. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2803535
Shen B, Shih AJ, Xiao G (2011) A heat transfer model based on finite difference method for grinding. J Manuf Sci Eng 133:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4003947
Tsai HH, Hocheng H (1998) Analysis of transient thermal bending moments and stresses of the workpiece during surface grinding. J Therm Stress 21:691–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/01495739808956169
Wang X, Yu T, Sun X, Shi Y, Wang W (2015) Study of 3D grinding temperature field based on finite difference method: considering machining parameters and energy partition. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 84:915–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7757-z
Lan S, Jiao F (2019) Modeling of heat source in grinding zone and numerical simulation for grinding temperature field. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103:3077–3086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03662-w
Wang D, Ge P, Sun S, Jiang J, Liu X (2017) Investigation on the heat source profile on the finished surface in grinding based on the inverse heat transfer analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92:1201–1216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0189-1
Wang D, Sun S, Jiang J, Liu X (2017) The profile analysis and selection guide for the heat source on the finished surface in grinding. J Manuf Process 30:178–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.09.023
Jiang J, Ge P, Sun S, Wang D, Wang Y, Yang Y (2016) From the microscopic interaction mechanism to the grinding temperature field: an integrated modelling on the grinding process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 110:27–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2016.08.004
Moulik PN, Yang HTY, Chandrasekar S (2001) Simulation of thermal stresses due to grinding. Int J Mech Sci 43:831–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7403(00)00027-8
Jin T, Stephenson DJ (2008) A study of the convection heat transfer coefficients of grinding fluids. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57:367–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.074
Bergman TL, Lavine AS, Incropera FP, DeWitt DP (2011) Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken
Funding
This work is supported by the Key Project of National Nature Science Foundation of China [Grant No. U1508206], the Major State Basic Research Development Program of China [Grant No. 2017YFA0701200], the Science and Technology Planning Project of Shenyang [Grant No. 18006001], and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [Grant No. N180306002].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, H., Zhao, J., Dai, Y. et al. Simulation of 3D grinding temperature field by using an improved finite difference method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 108, 3871–3884 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05513-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05513-5