Abstract
The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration is one of the most water-scarce regions in China, because of the frequent human activities. Water scarcity and pollution have weakened the service functions of water ecosystems and hindered the regional economic development. As the “lifeline” of the economic development of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, the water quality of Beiyun River has been widely concerned. River water quality assessment is one of the most important aspects to enhance water resources management plans. Water quality index (WQI), as one of the most frequently used evaluation tools, was used to comprehensively analyze the water quality in the Beiyun River. Between January 2017 and October 2018, we collected samples from 16 typical sampling sites along the main rivers of the watershed, covering four seasons. Seventeen water quality parameters, including temperature, pH, conductivity, dissolved oxygen (DO), chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), total phosphorus (TP), oil, volatile phenol (VP), fluoride, sulfide, surfactant, lead (Pb), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), and arsenic (As), were used to calculate WQI. The average WQI values of Beiyun River in winter, spring, summer, and autumn were 88.15, 71.70, 78.92, and 90.12, respectively, explaining the water quality was “good” generally. There were significant differences in the spatial distribution of WQI values from Beiyun River, and water quality of upstream and downstream was better than that of midstream. In addition, correlation analysis was applied to explore the correlation between land use types and water quality. Water quality was significant negatively correlated with agriculture land and rural residential land, and a positive relationship between urban land and water quality. Generally, we believe that people’s related activities on different land use are major elements impacting the water quality. Water environment improvement ought to increase the wastewater collection rate and sewage treatment capacity in rural areas, especially in the midstream of the Beiyun River.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adimalla N, Li P, Venkatayogi S (2018) Hydrogeochemical evaluation of groundwater quality for drinking and irrigation purposes and integrated interpretation with water quality index studies. Environ Process 5:363–383
Adimalla N, Qian H, Li P (2019) Entropy water quality index and probabilistic health risk assessment from geochemistry of groundwaters in hard rock terrain of Nanganur County. South India Geochemistry 125544
Adimalla N, Taloor AK (2020) Hydrogeochemical investigation of groundwater quality in the hard rock terrain of South India using geographic information system (GIS) and groundwater quality index (GWQI) techniques. Groundw Sustain Dev 10:100288
Ahmed W, Payyappat S, Cassidy M, Besley C, Power K (2018) Novel crAssphage marker genes ascertain sewage pollution in a recreational lake receiving urban stormwater runoff. Water Res 145:769–778
Aldrich AP, Kistler D, Sigg L (2002) Speciation of Cu and Zn in drainage water from agricultural soils. Environ Sci Technol 36:4824–4830
Allan JD (2004) Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:257–284
Alver A (2019) Evaluation of conventional drinking water treatment plant efficiency according to water quality index and health risk assessment. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 26:27225–27238
Ayvaz MT, Elçi A (2018) Identification of the optimum groundwater quality monitoring network using a genetic algorithm based optimization approach. J Hydrol 563:1078–1091
Beck DA, Johnson GR, Spolek GA (2011) Amending greenroof soil with biochar to affect runoff water quantity and quality. Environ Pollut 159:2111–2118
Borin JBM, Carmona FC, Anghinoni I, Martins AP, Jaeger IR, Marcolin E, Hernandes GC, Camargo ES (2016) Soil solution chemical attributes, rice response and water use efficiency under different flood irrigation management methods. Agric Water Manag 176:9–17
Bouaroudj S, Menad A, Bounamous A, Ali-Khodja H, Gherib A, Weigel DE, Chenchouni H (2019) Assessment of water quality at the largest dam in Algeria (Beni Haroun dam) and effects of irrigation on soil characteristics of agricultural lands. Chemosphere 219:76–88
Bu H, Meng W, Zhang Y, Wan J (2014) Relationships between land use patterns and water quality in the Taizi River basin, China. Ecol Indic 41:187–197
Chabukdhara M, Gupta SK, Kotecha Y, Nema AK (2017) Groundwater quality in Ghaziabad district, Uttar Pradesh, India: multivariate and health risk assessment. Chemosphere 179:167–178
Chassiot L, Francus P, De Coninck A, Lajeunesse P, Cloutier D, Labarre T (2019) Spatial and temporal patterns of metallic pollution in Quebec City, Canada: sources and hazard assessment from reservoir sediment records. Sci Total Environ 673:136–147
China MOHPR (2006) Standards for drinking water quality. GB5749–2006, Standards Press of China
Dai G, Wang B, Huang J, Dong R, Deng S, Yu G (2015) Occurrence and source apportionment of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the Beiyun River of Beijing, China. Chemosphere 119:1033–1039
Gu X, Xu Z, Wang M, Yin X, Liu L, Zhang X, Zuo D (2017) Macroinvertebrates community structure and water quality assessment in the North Canal River Basin, Beijing, China. J Lake Sci 29:1444–1454
Hollis GE, Ovenden JC (1983) The quantity of stormwater runoff from ten stretches of road, a car park and eight roofs in Hertfordshire, England during Hydrological Processes 2: 227–243
Hong B, Limburg KE, Erickson JD, Gowdy JM, Nowosielski AA, Polimeni JM, Stainbrook KM (2009) Connecting the ecological-economic dots in human-dominated watersheds: models to link socio-economic activities on the landscape to stream ecosystem health. Landsc Urban Plan 91:78–87
Horton RK (1965) An index number system for rating water quality. J Water Pollut Control Fed 37:300–306
Huang H, Zeng S, Dong X, Li D, Zhang Y, He M, Du P (2019) Diverse and abundant antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in an urban water system. J Environ Manag 231:494–503
Huang J, Xu C-c, Ridoutt BG, Wang X-c, Ren P-a (2017) Nitrogen and phosphorus losses and eutrophication potential associated with fertilizer application to cropland in China. J Clean Prod 159:171–179
Hurley T, Sadiq R, Mazumder A (2012) Adaptation and evaluation of the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment Water Quality Index (CCME WQI) for use as an effective tool to characterize drinking source water quality. Water Res 46:3544–3552
Ismail NAH, Wee SY, Aris AZ (2017) Multi-class of endocrine disrupting compounds in aquaculture ecosystems and health impacts in exposed biota. Chemosphere 188:375–388
Jena V, Dixit S, Shrivastava R, Gupta S (2013) Study of pond water quality by the assessment of physicochemical parameters and water quality index.[J], 2013, (4):2739. J Acoust Soc Am 125:47–52
Jha DK, Devi MP, Vidyalakshmi R, Brindha B, Vinithkumar NV, Kirubagaran R (2015) Water quality assessment using water quality index and geographical information system methods in the coastal waters of Andaman Sea, India. Mar Pollut Bull 100:555–561
Lee S-W, Hwang S-J, Lee S-B, Hwang H-S, Sung H-C (2009) Landscape ecological approach to the relationships of land use patterns in watersheds to water quality characteristics. Landsc Urban Plan 92:80–89
Li LF, Li GX, Liao XY (2004) Assessment on the pollution of nitrogen and phosphorus of Beijing surface water based on GIS system and multivariate statistical approaches. J Environ Sci 16:981–986
Liu L, Dong Y, Kong M, Zhou J, Zhao H, Tang Z, Zhang M, Wang Z (2020) Insights into the long-term pollution trends and sources contributions in Lake Taihu, China using multi-statistic analyses models. Chemosphere 242:125272
Liu S, Pan G, Zhang Y, Xu J, Ma R, Shen Z, Dong S (2019) Risk assessment of soil heavy metals associated with land use variations in the riparian zones of a typical urban river gradient. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 181:435–444
Liu Y, Lou J, Ni M, Song C, Wu J, Dasgupta NP, Tao P, Shang W, Deng T (2016) Bioinspired Bifunctional membrane for efficient clean water generation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:772–779
Lu W, Xu C, Wu J, Cheng S (2019) Ecological effect assessment based on the DPSIR model of a polluted urban river during restoration: a case study of the Nanfei River, China. Ecol Indic 96:146–152
Ma R, Wang B, Yin L, Zhang Y, Deng S, Huang J, Wang Y, Yu G (2017) Characterization of pharmaceutically active compounds in Beijing, China: occurrence pattern, spatiotemporal distribution and its environmental implication. J Hazard Mater 323:147–155
Mano H, Takeda F, Kitamura T, Okamoto S, Suzuki Y, Park CB, Yasui N, Kobayashi K, Tanaka Y, Yamashita N, Minamiyama M (2017) Water quality comparison of secondary effluent and reclaimed water to ambient river water of southern Okinawa Island via biological evaluation. Environ Monit Assess 189:442
Marmonier P, Maazouzi C, Foulquier A, Navel S, François C, Hervant F, Mermillod-Blondin F, Vieney A, Barraud S, Togola A, Piscart C (2013) The use of crustaceans as sentinel organisms to evaluate groundwater ecological quality. Ecol Eng 57:118–132
Neal C, Jarvie HP, Neal M, Love AJ, Hill L, Wickham H (2005) Water quality of treated sewage effluent in a rural area of the upper Thames Basin, southern England, and the impacts of such effluents on riverine phosphorus concentrations. J Hydrol 304:103–117
Niyogi D, Kishtawal C, Tripathi S, Govindaraju RS (2010) Observational evidence that agricultural intensification and land use change may be reducing the Indian summer monsoon rainfall. Water Resour Res 46
Norris RH, Thoms MC (2001) What is river health? Freshw Biol 41:197–209
Old G, Leeks G, Packman J, Smith B, Lewis S, Hewitt E, Holmes M, Young A (2003) The impact of a convectional summer rainfall event on river flow and fine sediment transport in a highly urbanised catchment: Bradford, West Yorkshire. Sci Total Environ 314-316:495–512
Pesce SF, Wunderlin DA (2000) Use of water quality indices to verify the impact of Córdoba City (Argentina) on Suquı́a River. Water Res 34:2915–2926
Ravikumar P, Aneesul Mehmood M, Somashekar RK (2013) Water quality index to determine the surface water quality of Sankey tank and Mallathahalli lake, Bangalore urban district, Karnataka, India. Appl Water Sci 3:247–261
Sener S, Sener E, Davraz A (2017) Evaluation of water quality using water quality index (WQI) method and GIS in Aksu River (SW-Turkey). Sci Total Environ 584–585:131–144
Sotomayor G, Hampel H, Vazquez RF (2018) Water quality assessment with emphasis in parameter optimisation using pattern recognition methods and genetic algorithm. Water Res 130:353–362
Sun S, Barraud S, Castebrunet H, Aubin JB, Marmonier P (2015) Long-term stormwater quantity and quality analysis using continuous measurements in a French urban catchment. Water Res 85:432–442
Taufiq A, Effendi AJ, Iskandar I, Hosono T, Hutasoit LM (2019) Controlling factors and driving mechanisms of nitrate contamination in groundwater system of Bandung Basin, Indonesia, deduced by combined use of stable isotope ratios, CFC age dating, and socioeconomic parameters. Water Res 148:292–305
Tian Y, Jiang Y, Liu Q, Dong M, Xu D, Liu Y, Xu X (2019) Using a water quality index to assess the water quality of the upper and middle streams of the Luanhe River, northern China. Sci Total Environ 667:142–151
von Freyberg J, Radny D, Gall HE, Schirmer M (2014) Implications of hydrologic connectivity between hillslopes and riparian zones on streamflow composition. J Contam Hydrol 169:62–74
Wang M, Zheng Q, Shen Q, Guo S (2013) The critical role of potassium in plant stress response. Int J Mol Sci 14:7370–7390
Wei XUE, Shao-yong LU (2014) Effects of inactivation agents and temperature on phosphorus release from sediment in Dianchi Lake, China. Environ Earth Sci 74:3857–3865
Williams M, Longstaff B, Buchanan C, Llanso R, Dennison W (2009) Development and evaluation of a spatially-explicit index of Chesapeake Bay health. Mar Pollut Bull 59:14–25
Wu Z, Wang X, Chen Y, Cai Y, Deng J (2018) Assessing river water quality using water quality index in Lake Taihu Basin, China. Sci Total Environ 612:914–922
Xiao J, Wang L, Deng L, Jin Z (2019) Characteristics, sources, water quality and health risk assessment of trace elements in river water and well water in the Chinese Loess Plateau. Sci Total Environ 650:2004–2012
Zhai Y, Xia X, Yang G, Lu H, Ma G, Wang G, Teng Y, Yuan W, Shrestha S (2020) Trend, seasonality and relationships of aquatic environmental quality indicators and implications: an experience from Songhua River, NE China. Ecol Eng 145:105706
Zhang R, Li M, Yuan X, Pan Z (2019) Influence of rainfall intensity and slope on suspended solids and phosphorus losses in runoff. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 26:33963–33975
Zhao MM, Chen YP, Xue LG, Fan TT, Emaneghemi B (2018) Greater health risk in wet season than in dry season in the Yellow River of the Lanzhou region. Sci Total Environ 644:873–883
Funding
This research was supported by the Water Pollution Control and Treatment of the National Science and Technology Major Project (2018ZX07111003).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Xianliang Yi
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Highlight
• We assessed water quality and its spatiotemporal variations of Beiyun River.
• The water quality of the upstream and downstream was better than that of the midstream.
• Water quality was significant positively correlated with urban land (%).
• Water quality was significant negatively correlated with agriculture land (%) and rural residential land (%).
• Rural life was the main source of water pollution.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 19 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, H., Yang, W., Yao, R. et al. Evaluating surface water quality using water quality index in Beiyun River, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 35449–35458 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09682-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09682-4