Elsevier

Physics Letters A

Volume 384, Issue 27, 28 September 2020, 126691
Physics Letters A

Square well/barrier resonances in the potentiodynamic plane

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2020.126691Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A fully completed study of resonances and anti-resonances of a square potential; both well and barrier cases are considered.

  • A detailed analysis of how bound states of the well evolve from the original pairs of the resonant and antiresonant states.

  • An illustration of the behavior of the resonance/antiresonance flows in the complex wave number and potentiodynamic planes.

Abstract

The complex wave number plane equips us with an elegant mathematical construct which can be used to display and classify the different types of states which arise from solution of the time-independent Schrödinger equation for a quantum mechanical potential. The complex wave number plane is also useful for tracking the trajectories of these solutions as the potential is perturbed in some way, often resulting in profound dynamical structure. In this work we propose an alternative coordinate system, which we call the potentiodynamic plane, which has the useful property that the trajectories stay bounded, and apply this to the square well/barrier potential to reveal some new insights.

Introduction

Resonances and resonant phenomena appear in many branches of mathematics, physics, and engineering. They are especially important in the fields of semiconductor nanostructures, microcavity lasers, and biosensing, see Refs. [1], [2], [3], [4].

In quantum mechanics the concept of a resonant state (resonance) is a natural extension of the idea of a bound state. It was introduced in Refs. [5], [6] and it is sometimes referred as the Gamow vector. The coordinate parts of resonant states ψn(r) are solutions of the time-independent Schrödinger equation,[Δ+V(r)]ψ(r)=Eψ(r) with complex eigenvaluesEn=En12iΓn,Γn>0, on which the outgoing boundary conditions are imposed, see Eqs. (5), (6) for details. The overall wave functions Ψn(r,t) of resonant states decay in time in accordance withΨn(r,t)=ψn(r)exp(iEnt)exp(Γn/2t).

In obeyance with time-reversal invariance, the above resonant states should be accompanied by another set of solutions of Eq. (1), which have the form ψn(r)=ψn(r), with the corresponding eigenvalues En=En, and the overall wave functions Ψn(r,t)=Ψn(r,t), i.e.En=En+12iΓn,Γn>0,Ψn(r,t)=ψn(r)exp(iEnt)exp(Γn/2t). These states grow in time and are often referred as antiresonant states (antiresonances). In the above and further in this paper, Rydberg units, i.e. ħ=1 and m=1/2, where m is the particle mass (for example, the effective mass of an electron in a semiconductor) are used.

As mentioned, the states given by Eqs. (3) are indeed resonant states, provided that ψn(r) satisfy the outgoing boundary conditions. To impose these conditions, it is convenient to characterize the resonant states by the complex eigenwavenumber kn=αn+iβn, where αn=Re(kn) and βn=Im(kn), related to the complex energy En asEn=kn2=αn2βn2+2iαnβn. The outgoing boundary conditions select from a pool of functions ψn(r), satisfying Eq. (1), only those obeyingψn(r)eiαnreβnr,αn>0,r. The resonant states ψn(r) have then βn<0 as Γn>0 in Eq. (2), i.e. their eigenwavenumbers kn are located in the fourth quadrant of the complex wave number plane. The states are not orthogonal and not normalizable in the usual way, see Refs. [7], [8], [9].

The antiresonant states ψn(r)=ψn(r) satisfy the asymptotic conditionψn(r)eiαnreβnr,r. Their eigenwavenumbers kn=αn+iβn=αn+iβn are located in the third quadrant of the complex wave number plane.

A special case αn=0 corresponds to real negative energies En=En=βn2<0. It includes either the bound states with βn>0 and coordinate wave functions ψn(r) vanishing far from the potential, or antibound states with βn<0 and purely growing functions ψn(r) outside of the potential.

As one can see, we defined the resonant/antiresonant states as explicit solutions of the Schrödinger equation with complex eigenvalues and eigenfunctions subject to the boundary conditions given by Eqs. (6), (7). This is an approach illustrated in Refs. [8], [9], [10], [11]. Another way to introduce these states is to associate them with the poles of the outgoing Green's function, see Refs. [8], [9], or with the poles of the scattering matrix S, see Refs. [12], [13].

The purpose of this paper is to understand how the resonant/antiresonant states evolve, develop and possibly transform into bound states of a quantum mechanical system. This is an interesting and useful exercise, especially in the context of a newly-adopted resonant-state expansion method, see Refs. [14], [15], [16], [17]. The complex wave number plane provides one option of a natural setting in which to pursue this, see Refs. [11], [12], [13], [18] for the 1D quantum problem and Refs. [19], [20] for the 2D quantum problem. In this paper, however, using a square well/barrier as an example, we present an alternative complex plane, which we call the potentiodynamic wave number coordinate system. In this plane we can learn more about the behavior of the full spectrum of eigenstates of Eq. (1), especially in the limit of large potentials. As a result, the square well/barrier potential system will serve as a proof of concept for potentiodynamic coordinates before applying the technique in a more complicated setting where special functions often feature, obfuscating the details.

Section snippets

Resonant states of square well potential

The square well potential of width 2a is defined asV(z)={0,|z|>a,V0,|z|<a, where V0>0. Eq. (1) takes the formψ(z)+k2ψ(z)=0,k=E,|z|>a,ψ(z)+κ2ψ(z)=0,κ=k2+V0,|z|<a, where all three parameters involved, E, k, and κ, have in general complex values. A general solution of Eq. (9) can be represented asψ(z)=Aexp(ikz)+Bexp(ikz),z<a,ψ(z)=Fcos(κz)+Gsin(κz),a<z<a,ψ(z)=Cexp(ikz)+Dexp(ikz),z>a. The boundary conditions given by Eqs. (6), (7), where for the 1D case, r should be replaced by z,

Flows

In this section, first, we numerically solve Eq. (11) to find the locations of the resonances/antiresonances k±n in the complex wave number (ka) plane and then follow their trajectories in response to varying the depth of the well. The trajectories traced out in this procedure are known as flows, and a plot of all flows we call the flow portrait. As mentioned in the introduction, in this paper we also intend to reveal new features of flow behavior using an alternative (potentiodynamic) complex

Square barrier

To complete considerations of 1D square potentials, we also treat the case of a 1D square barrier, which is actually much simpler to interpret. The square barrier potential of width 2a is defined asV(z)={0,|z|>a,V0,|z|<a,V0>0. To find and analyze its resonances one needs to follow all steps in Section 2. In particular, Eqs. (9) - (17) are also applicable to the barrier case, if the potentiodynamic parameter κ is redefined asκ=k2V0,V0>0.

The overall flow portrait in ka coordinates is shown in

Conclusions

In this paper we studied the flows of resonances (antiresonances) for the square well potential. In particular, beginning with a very shallow well, it was illustrated how these states appear, develop, and possibly transform into bound states in response to increasing the depth of the well. Along with the complex wave number plane, the results were illustrated in a newly introduced potentiodynamic complex plane. We have shown that the potentiodynamic plane is a useful new addition to the tools

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (22)

  • H.M. Nussenzveig

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1959)
  • R.P. Meeten et al.

    Physica E, Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct.

    (2020)
  • A.B. Matsko

    Practical Applications of Microresonators in Optics and Photonics

    (2009)
  • N. Jokerst et al.

    J. Biophotonics

    (2009)
  • J. Zhu et al.

    Nat. Photonics

    (2010)
  • M.F. Limonov et al.

    Nat. Photonics

    (2017)
  • G. Gamow

    Z. Phys.

    (1928)
  • A.F.J. Siegert

    Phys. Rev.

    (1939)
  • R.M. More et al.

    Phys. Rev. A

    (1973)
  • R. Madrid et al.

    Am. J. Phys.

    (2002)
  • G. Garcia-Calderon et al.

    Phys. Rev. A

    (2019)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text