Elsevier

Cortex

Volume 132, November 2020, Pages 473-478
Cortex

Viewpoint
Twos in human visual perception

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.06.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Human vision serves the social function of detecting and discriminating with high efficiency conspecifics and other animals. The social world is made of social entities as much as the relations between those entities. Recent work demonstrates that vision encodes visuo-spatial relations between bodies with the same efficiency and high specialization of face/body perception. Specifically, perception of face-to-face (vs. non-facing) bodies evokes effects compatible with the most robust markers of face-specificity such as the behavioral inversion effect and increased activity in selective visual areas. Another set of results suggests that face-to-face bodies are processed as a grouped unit, analogously to facial features in a face. The facing dyad in the visual cortex may be the earliest rudimentary representation of social interaction.

Section snippets

Sociality shapes perception

A decade ago, vision scientist, Ken Nakayama, announced that vision science was going social (Nakayama, 2011). The social function of vision appears clear from the highly specialized mechanisms for face and body perception. Embracing the idea that vision has been massively shaped by the requirements of social life, Nakayama anticipated the discovery of perceptual adaptations for other aspects of the social world.

Faces and bodies are the physical actors of social life; but social life is only

Visual tuning for facing dyads

A face is attended to, detected and discriminated in terms of identity much better than an inverted face (e.g., Bruyer, 2011; Jiang, Costello, & He, 2007; Purcell & Stewart, 1988; Rezlescu, Susilo, Wilmer, & Caramazza, 2017). The cost of inversion, or face inversion effect (FIE), is higher for faces than for other familiar objects. The FIE denotes neural tuning to the face configuration, which makes perception particularly efficient, though particularly susceptible to spatial perturbation.

Attentional advantage of facing dyads

The interpretation of the inversion effect as an index of visual tuning to face and body configurations meshes well with the ability of those stimuli to recruit attention more strongly than other objects, as documented with, among others, visual search and change detection tasks (Cohen, Alvarez, Nakayama, & Konkle, 2017; Downing, Bray, Rogers, & Childs, 2004; Hershler & Hochstein, 2005; New, Cosmides, & Tooby, 2007). Recently, an attentional advantage has been reported for facing body dyads,

Neural tuning and representational sharpening

Compared with their scrambled version or other familiar objects, faces and bodies increase activity in specific areas of the visual cortex. A recent functional magnetic resonance imaging study shows that face- and body-selective cortices also respond to facing bodies more strongly than to identical but not facing bodies (Abassi & Papeo, 2020, Fig. 1). The same brain areas do not distinguish between interacting and noninteracting people based on contextual cues (e.g., accessories or clothing) or

Grouping of bodies: effects of access versus encoding

Faster/better stimulus detection and recognition of stimuli encompassing multiple parts (or objects) has often been linked to perceptual grouping, that is the representation of parts as a structure unit, or a group. Perceptual grouping is invoked across different levels of vision and types of stimuli: It applies to dots and lines in gestalt perception, as well as to facial features in a face, and parts in a body –although the relationship between gestalt-like grouping and configural processing,

Multiple-body versus multiple-object perception

Markers of face specificity, such as attentional advantage, inversion effect, and increased activity in visual areas specifically linked to configural processing, suggest analogous visual specificity for facing dyads. But, are multiple bodies (or dyads, at least) special relative to other multiple-object sets?

Object pairs in regular, meaningful configurations (e.g., a lamp above a table) are recognized particularly efficiently, suggesting that they too might be processed as a grouped unit (

Conclusions

Research on multiple-body perception suggests that spatial relations among objects matter in visual perception, so much that a body is represented in profoundly different ways depending on whether or not it faces toward another, and is reciprocated. If it does, a new attentional/perceptual unit is formed, larger and more complex than a single object.

This research defines a new class of stimuli that, I propose, can be better described and understood by analogy with faces. Like faces, facing

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to Jean-Rémy Hochmann and Alfonso Caramazza for valuable discussion on an early version of this article. This work was supported by the European Research Council (Horizon2020, Project THEMPO, Starting Grant 758473).

References (49)

  • J. Walbrin et al.

    Neural responses to visually observed social interactions

    Neuropsychologia

    (2018)
  • M.F. Wurm et al.

    Lateral occipitotemporal cortex encodes perceptual components of social actions rather than abstract representations of sociality

    Neuroimage

    (2019)
  • E. Abassi et al.

    The representation of two-body shapes in the human visual cortex

    The Journal of Neuroscience: the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience

    (2020)
  • S. Baron-Cohen

    How to build a baby that can read minds: Cognitive mechanisms in mindreading

    The maladapted mind: Classic readings in evolutionary psychopathology

    (1997)
  • E. Birmingham et al.

    Human social attention

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

    (2009)
  • T. Brandman et al.

    Interaction between scene and object processing revealed by human fMRI and MEG decoding

    The Journal of Neuroscience: the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience

    (2017)
  • R. Bruyer

    Configural face processing: A meta-analytic survey

    Perception

    (2011)
  • S. Carey

    Becoming a face expert

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B Biological Scienceshilos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci

    (1992)
  • S. Carey

    Concept innateness, concept continuity, and bootstrapping

    The Behavioral and Brain Sciences

    (2011)
  • M.A. Cohen et al.

    Visual search for object categories is predicted by the representational architecture of high-level visual cortex

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (2017)
  • S.M. Collishaw et al.

    Featural and configurational processes in the recognition of faces of different familiarity

    Perception

    (2000)
  • X. Ding et al.

    Two equals one: two human actions during social interaction are grouped as one unit in working memory

    Psychological Science

    (2017)
  • C. Firestone et al.

    Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects

    The Behavioral and Brain Sciences

    (2016)
  • A. Hafri et al.

    Getting the gist of events: Recognition of two-participant actions from brief displays

    Journal of Experimental Psychology. General

    (2013)
  • Cited by (44)

    • Moral thin-slicing: Forming moral impressions from a brief glance

      2024, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
    • Seeing social interactions

      2023, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text