Fracture and fatigue behavior of carbon/epoxy laminates modified by nanofibers

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106015Get rights and content

Abstract

This research focused on fracture and fatigue response of carbon/epoxy laminates modified with electrospun nylon 66 nanofibers. For this purpose, AS4/8552 composite laminates interleaved by nanofibrous mat were considered under mode-I quasi-static and fatigue loading conditions. According to test outcomes, the fracture toughness increased about 133% under quasi-static tests. On the other hand, the plotted fatigue curves showed that the crack growth rate significantly decreased in modified samples and the threshold energy release rate enhanced about 128%. Finally, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was also conducted to investigate the damage mechanisms.

Introduction

High-strength carbon/epoxy laminates are being applied in various industrial applications, such as automotive and aerospace structures. One of the most widespread matrices used in these type of materials is thermoset polymers like epoxy. Notwithstanding many advantages, such as low density and perfect mechanical performance, laminated composites can be delaminated easily under mechanical loadings which is because of the brittle nature of thermosets [1], [2]. They can be failed by interlaminar cracks, which lead to the initiation of delamination and its propagation, resulting in final fracture.

Although the application of thermoplastics in the form of very thin film can be regarded as one of the most common toughening methods [3], [4], the associated penalty of sacrificing the elastic modulus of the final product has limited their use in many industries [5]. Consequently, thermoplastic polymers in the form of nanofibers have gained rapid acceptance since 2001 which is introduced for the first time to increase fracture toughness of thermosets-based laminates [6]. High surface-to-volume ratio and high porosity of nanofibrous mat increased their capability in comparison with the film layers, and on the other hand remove their mentioned problem [7], [8]. Various types of polymers, such as polysulfone [9], [10], phenoxy [11], polyvinylidene fluoride [12], [13], polyethersulfone (PES) [14], [15], polyvinyl butyral [16], [17], aramid [18], polycaprolactone [19], [20], [21], carbon [22], [23], [24], [25], [26] and nylon [15], [27] have been applied as the toughener between composite layers, but the most attractive one is the latest, i.e. nylon [28].

Different types of nylon, i.e. 6, 66, and 69, have been used for toughening composite laminates [2], [29], [30]. Most researchers have focused on the nylon 66 and its effect during mode-I and mode-II fracture tests [29], [31], [32]. Brugo and Palazzetti [33] considered the influence nanomat thickness and also the laminate type, unidirectional or plain-woven, on fracture toughness. The outcomes showed that increasing the thickness led to enhancement of fracture toughness and, on the other hand, samples made of woven type were more affected by nanofibers. Gholizadeh et al. [32] investigated the effect of nylon 66 nanofibers on different damage modes using the acoustic emission method. The results showed that matrix cracking, debonding, and fiber breakage reduced about 82%, 53%, 64%, respectively, by interleaving nanofibers. Some researchers also conducted low-velocity impact tests on the reference and nanomodified laminates [2], [34], [35]. Akangah et al. [2] interleaved AS4/3501-6 composite laminates by nylon 66 and impacted under 0.46–1.8 J. According to the outcomes: threshold impact force increased about 60% and the rate of impact damage growth rate decreased to one-half with impact height. In another study, Saghafi et al. [35] conducted tests on the curved glass/epoxy laminates. Their results showed adding nanofibers did not change impact parameters like maximum load and displacement, but could reduce the delaminated area significantly (about 60%).

Although many papers have been published regarding fracture and impact behavior of nanomodified laminates, the study about fatigue response of these laminates is very limited [36], [37], [38]. For instance, Polat et al. [36] examined the influence of graphene nanoplates/nylon 66 nanofiber mats on the fatigue life of composite to aluminum single-lap joint. The tests were done with various maximum stress levels as 20%, 30%, 40%, 50% and 60% of breaking shear tensile strength, and the results showed that the nanomaterial could increase the life cycle incredibly. In this study, pure nylon 66 nanofibers are used as the toughener of carbon/epoxy to consider the toughening mechanism under mode-I fracture and fatigue loadings. The fatigue tests were conducted under constant displacement ratio and various ratios of fracture toughness, (GIimax/GIC). On the other hand, the aim is to assess the constant crack growth rate section of the Paris law diagrams for the reference and nanomodified specimens and also determining physical strain energy release rate (G*) for both samples. Finally, scanning electron microscope (SEM) was applied for investigating the fractured surface of laminates.

Section snippets

Electrospinning method

In order to produce nanofibers, the electrospinning method was applied. Fig. 1 shows the schematic picture of the electrospinning apparatus and its process. The electrospinning setup consists of four major components namely, high voltage power supply, a syringe with metal needle, injection feed rate system, and a conductive collector. By applying a high voltage electric field between needle and collector, the polymer solution is wrapped around the collector as nanofibers. To obtain nylon 66

Quasi-static fracture tests

The fracture tests were conducted according to ASTM D5528 [42] using Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) specimens. The fracture specimens were loaded under displacement control with constant displacement rate, 1 mm/min. The values of load and displacement were continuously measured and the crack length was also recorded using a digital camera (Fig. 4). Four samples for each type of specimens were tested to investigate the repeatability. V and N represent the reference and nanomodified laminates,

Fatigue test procedure

ASTM D6115 [43] standard was employed to conduct fatigue tests. According to this standard method, specimens were tested under the sinusoidal cyclic loading condition at a frequency of 5 Hz and a cyclic displacement ratio R = δmin/δmax = 0.3. Eq. (2) was used for obtaining of maximum displacement (δmax) for GIimax/GIC ratios of 0.5, 0.7, and 0.8.GIimaxGIC=(δmaxδcr)2where GIC is the mode-I fracture toughness which is 0.181 and 0.423 kJ/m2 for the reference and modified specimens, respectively. G

Physical strain energy release rate method

Some researchers [46], [47] have used physical strain energy release rate (PSERR, called by G*) to assess fatigue resistance of composite materials. This parameter is the actual strain energy release rate that achieved from measured data, not from the theoretical method. Eq. (9) is used to calculate the G*:G=1BdU/dNda/dN=dUdAwhere U is the potential strain energy and dU/dN is the dissipation of the potential energy rate per cycle obtained from Eq. (10):dUdN=Ui+1-UiNi+1-Niwhere Ui and Ui+1 are

Quasi-static test

SEM micrographs of the fractured surfaces are illustrated in Fig. 14, for the reference, and Fig. 15, for the nanomodified laminates. Fig. 14-A shows the area near the initial crack tip. As seen, matrix cracking is the dominant damage mechanism because of the resin-rich area. With increasing the crack propagation, the fiber bridging phenomenon appears; so the fracture surface becomes rougher compared to the last stage (onset of crack growth) (Fig. 14-B). “Scarp” is one of the most important

Conclusion

In this study, the influence applying nylon 66 nanofibers on fatigue and fracture behavior of carbon/epoxy laminates is investigated. In the first step, the nanofibrous mat was interleaved between mid-layers of the laminate, then mode-I quasi-static and cyclic loadings were conducted under load-displacement condition. The fatigue tests were done with the same ratio of displacement (δminmax = 0.3) and three various GIimax/GIC (0.5, 0.7, 0.8). The following results can be concluded:

  • 1.

    The results

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Reza Mohammadi: Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Writing - original draft, Visualization, Writing - review & editing. Mehdi Ahmadi Najafabadi: Supervision, Resources, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Writing - review & editing. Hamed Saghafi: Conceptualization, Investigation, Resources, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing - review & editing. Dimitrios Zarouchas: Supervision, Resources, Project administration, Funding acquisition,

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (48)

  • H. Saghafi et al.

    The effect of nanofibrous membrane thickness on fracture behaviour of modified composite laminates–A numerical and experimental study

    Compos B Eng

    (2016)
  • C. Cheng et al.

    Simultaneously improving mode I and mode II fracture toughness of the carbon fiber/epoxy composite laminates via interleaved with uniformly aligned PES fiber webs

    Compos A Appl Sci Manuf

    (2020)
  • G.W. Beckermann et al.

    Mode I and Mode II interlaminar fracture toughness of composite laminates interleaved with electrospun nanofibre veils

    Compos A Appl Sci Manuf

    (2015)
  • P.K. Barzoki et al.

    The outstanding effect of nanomat geometry on the interlaminar fracture toughness behavior out of autoclave made glass/phenolic composites under mode-I loading

    Eng Fract Mech

    (2019)
  • P.K. Barzoki et al.

    Effect of nanofiber diameter and arrangement on fracture toughness of out of autoclave glass/phenolic composites – experimental and numerical study

    Thin-Walled Struct

    (2019)
  • B. Yuan et al.

    Flexure and flexure-after-impact properties of carbon fibre composites interleaved with ultra-thin non-woven aramid fibre veils

    Compos A Appl Sci Manuf

    (2020)
  • S. van der Heijden et al.

    Interlaminar toughening of resin transfer molded laminates by electrospun polycaprolactone structures: effect of the interleave morphology

    Compos Sci Technol

    (2016)
  • S. van der Heijden et al.

    Interlaminar toughening of resin transfer moulded glass fibre epoxy laminates by polycaprolactone electrospun nanofibres

    Compos Sci Technol

    (2014)
  • L. Daelemans et al.

    Interdiffusing core-shell nanofiber interleaved composites for excellent Mode I and Mode II delamination resistance

    Compos Sci Technol

    (2019)
  • Y. Wang et al.

    Strain and damage self-sensing of basalt fiber reinforced polymer laminates fabricated with carbon nanofibers/epoxy composites under tension

    Compos A Appl Sci Manuf

    (2018)
  • D.R. Bortz et al.

    Mechanical characterization of hierarchical carbon fiber/nanofiber composite laminates

    Compos A Appl Sci Manuf

    (2011)
  • Q. Chen et al.

    Hybrid multi-scale epoxy composite made of conventional carbon fiber fabrics with interlaminar regions containing electrospun carbon nanofiber mats

    Compos A Appl Sci Manuf

    (2011)
  • K.-T. Hsiao et al.

    Effect of carbon nanofiber z-threads on mode-I delamination toughness of carbon fiber reinforced plastic laminates

    Compos A Appl Sci Manuf

    (2016)
  • A.R. Ravindran et al.

    Synergistic mode II delamination toughening of composites using multi-scale carbon-based reinforcements

    Compos A Appl Sci Manuf

    (2019)
  • Cited by (10)

    • A quantitative assessment of the damage mechanisms of CFRP laminates interleaved by PA66 electrospun nanofibers using acoustic emission

      2021, Composite Structures
      Citation Excerpt :

      According to the review paper published by Saghafi et al. [29], it was shown that Polyamide 66 (PA66) is one of the best choices for the toughening of CFRPs. Many studies have been conducted in this field, and the influence of nanofibers on fracture response of composite laminates has been investigated in different aspects [30–33]. Brugo and Palazzetti [34] considered the effect of nanomat thickness on modes I and II of unidirectional (UD) and woven carbon/epoxy laminates.

    • The effect of mode II fatigue crack growth rate on the fractographic features of CFRP composite laminates: An acoustic emission and scanning electron microscopy analysis

      2021, Engineering Fracture Mechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Composite laminates have been widely applied in aerospace, marine, transportation, and other industries, because of their excellent mechanical properties and weight-saving potential. However, due to their low interfacial strength along the thickness direction, and the mismatch of the Poisson's ratios between the adjacent plies with different fiber orientations, delamination often occurs and it is one of the major damage modes found in these structures [1–5]. When this type of structure is subjected to fatigue loading, delamination can initiate and propagate due to the presence of manufacturing defects, free edge effect, external or internal ply drop, and impacts caused by foreign objects [6–10].

    • Investigation of Effect of Nanoparticle Reinforcement Woven Composite Materials on Fatigue Behaviors

      2023, Iranian Journal of Science and Technology - Transactions of Mechanical Engineering
    • Effect of composite to aluminum single lap joints reinforced with graphene doped nylon 6.6 nanofibers

      2021, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text