Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improving wetland connectivity through the promotion of wet arable land

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Wetlands Ecology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modern agricultural practices have rendered habitat scarce and isolated for wetland species throughout the Swiss lowlands. The targeted promotion of practices that embrace wet arable land rather than drain it may be the key to establishing a robust and thriving wetland network. We test the ability of a recently developed national wetness-potential map (WP-map) to predict the spatial distributions of wetland species of open environments (OW-species), and use the map to model dispersal corridors between Switzerland’s protected wetlands. We first defined a set of OW-species by examining the occurrence of wetland species in relation to land cover types across Switzerland. Using Circuitscape, we then validated a cost raster derived from the WP-map by examining the correlation between OW-species presence and areas with a high probability of movement. Finally, we used the cost raster to generate a Swiss-wide map of least-cost corridors. Overall, OW-species were not only more likely to be found within wet zones of the WP-map, but the effect was amplified in well-connected regions. The pattern was strongest amongst fauna, flora, and bryophytes but mostly absent from fungi and lichens. Our resulting corridor map highlights and ranks potential routes between protected wetland sites according to their permeability and centrality, allowing spatially-explicit prioritization of re-wetting initiatives. When combined with its logistical value in identifying suitable areas for the restoration of wet habitat, the WP-map’s ability to explain the dispersal patterns of the very species suitable to these habitats makes it an invaluable tool for land-use planners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altenfelder S, Raabe U, Albrecht H (2014) Effects of water regime and agricultural land use on diversity and species composition of vascular plants inhabiting temporary ponds in northeastern Germany. Tuexenia 34:145–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MG, Clark M, Sheldon AO (2012) Resilient sites for terrestrial conservation in the northeast and Mid-Atlantic region. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Béguin J, Smola S (2010) Stand der Drainagen in der Schweiz - Bilanz der Umfrage 2008. Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft, Bundesamt für Landwirtschaft (BLW), Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Beier P, Majka DR, Newell SL (2009) Uncertainty analysis of least-cost modeling for designing wildlife linkages. Ecol Appl 19:2067–2077

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beier P, Spencer W, Baldwin RF, McRae BH (2011) Toward best practices for developing regional connectivity maps. Conserv Biol 25:879–892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell M, Pilgrim E (2011) Ecosystem services delivered by small-scale wetlands. Hydrol Sci J 56:1467–1484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinson MM, Malvarez AI (2002) Temperate freshwater wetlands: types, status and threats. Environ Conserv 29:115–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunn AG, Urban DL, Keitt TH (2000) Landscape connectivity: a conservation application of graph theory. J Environ Manag 59:265–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie JF, Giordano AJ, Dickson B, Hebblewhite M, Bernard H, Mohd-Azlan J, Anderson J, Ambu L (2015) Evaluating multispecies landscape connectivity in a threatened tropical mammal community. Conserv Biol 29:122–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll C, McRae BH, Brookes A (2012) Use of linkage mapping and centrality analysis across habitat gradients to conserve connectivity of gray wolf populations in western North America. Conserv Biol 26(1):78–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cowardin LM, Carter V, Golet FC, LaRoe ET (1979) Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Pub. FWS/OBS-79/31, Washington, DC

  • Cushman SA, Landguth EL (2012) Multi-taxa population connectivity in the Northern Rocky Mountains. Ecol Model 231:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson NC (2014) How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area. Mar Freshw Res 65:934–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deil U (2005) A review on habitats, plant traits and vegetation of ephemeral wetlands—a global perspective. Phytocoenologia 35:533–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delarze R, Eggenberg S, Steiger P, Bergamini A, Fivaz F, Gonseth Y, Guntern J, Hofer G, Sager L, Stucki P (2016) Rote Liste der Lebensräume der Schweiz. Aktualisierte Kurzfassung zum technischen Bericht 2013 im Auftrag des Bundesamtes für Umwelt (BAFU), Bern: 33 S

  • ESRI (2016) ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.4. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimmi U, Lachat T, Bürgi M (2011) Reconstructing the collapse of wetland networks in the Swiss lowlands 1850–2000. Landsc Ecol 26:1071–1083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1998) Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396:41–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hugonnot V, Celle J, Vergne T (2012) Ephemerum cohaerens, an exquisite survivor of functional alluvial habitats. Field Bryol 108:20–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindlmann P, Burel F (2008) Connectivity measures: a review. Landsc Ecol 23(8):879–890

    Google Scholar 

  • Koen E, Bowman J, Sadowski C, Walpole A (2014) Landscape connectivity for wildlife: development and validation of multispecies linkage maps. Methods Ecol Evol 5(7):626–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss J, Bommarco R, Guardiola M, Heikkinen RK, Helm A, Kuussaari M, Lindborg R, Ockinger E, Pärtel M, Pino J, Pöyry J, Raatikainen KM, Sang A, Stefanescu C, Teder T, Zobel M, Steffan-Dewenter I (2010) Habitat fragmentation causes immediate and time-delayed biodiversity loss at different trophic levels. Ecol Lett 13(5):597–605

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler JJ, Ruesch AS, Older JD, McRae BH (2013) Projected climate-driven faunal movement routes. Ecol Lett 16:1014–1022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindborg R, Eriksson O (2004) Historical landscape connectivity affects present plant species diversity. Ecology 85(7):1840–1845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukács BA, Sramkó G, Molnár VA (2013) Plant diversity and conservation value of continental temporary pools. Biol Conserv 158:393–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McRae BH, Kavanagh DM (2011) Linkage Mapper Connectivity Analysis Software. The Nature Conservancy, Seattle. https://www.circuitscape.org/linkagemapper. Accessed 17 Jan 2019

  • McRae BH, Dickson BG, Keitt TH, Shah VB (2008) Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Ecology 89:2712–2724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McRae BH, Shah VB, Mohapatra TK (2013) Circuitscape 4 User Guide. The Nature Conservancy. https://www.circuitscape.org. Accessed 9 July 2018

  • R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/

  • Rayfield B, Pelletier D, Dumitru M, Cardille JA, Gonzalez A (2015) Multipurpose habitat networks for short-range and long-range connectivity: a new method combining graph and circuit connectivity. Methods Ecol Evol 7:222–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saura S, Bodin Ö, Fortin MJ (2014) Stepping stones are crucial for species’ long-distance dispersal and range expansion through habitat networks. J Appl Ecol 51:171–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt B, Zumbach S, Tobler U, Lippuner M (2015) Amphibien brauchen temporäre Gewässer. Z Feldherpetol 22:137–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Szerencsits E (2008) Gewässerschonstreifen - wie viel Fläche ist betroffen? Agrarforschung 15:236–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Szerencsits E, Prasuhn V, Churko G, Herzog F, Utiger C, Zihlmann U, Walter T, Gramlich A (2018) Karte potentieller Feucht-(Acker-)Flächen in der Schweiz. Agroscope Sci

  • Taylor PD, Fahrig L, Henein K, Merriam G (1993) Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 68:571–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tischendorf L, Fahrig L (2000) On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos 90:7–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban DL, Minor ES, Treml EA, Schick RS (2009) Graph models of habitat mosaics. Ecol Lett 12:260–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walter T, Eggenberg S, Gonseth Y, Fivaz F, Hedinger C, Hofer G, Klieber-Kühne A, Richner N, Schneider K, Szerencsits E, Wolf S (2013) Operationalisierung der Umweltziele Landwirtschaft: Bereich Ziel- und Leitarten, Lebensräume (OPAL). Forschungsanstalt Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon ART, Ettenhausen

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettstein W, Schmid B (1999) Conservation of arthropod diversity in montane wetlands: effect of altitude, habitat quality and habitat fragmentation on butterflies and grasshoppers. J Appl Ecol 36:363–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacharias I, Zamparas M (2010) Mediterranean temporary ponds. A disappearing ecosystem. Biodivers Conserv 19:3827–3834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeller K, McGarigal K, Whiteley A (2012) Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review. Landsc Ecol 27:777–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We dedicate this paper to Thomas Walter, Co-author and Project Leader, who all too suddenly passed away on the 26th of September, 2019. This research was conducted as part of a larger project, spearheaded and passionately driven by Thomas, which aims to improve prospects for wetland biodiversity in Switzerland’s agricultural landscape through the promotion of wet arable land. The project is jointly funded by the Federal Office for Agriculture and the Federal Office for the Environment. We also would like to thank the associated members of Info Species for their substantial contribution of species occurrence data in Switzerland.

Funding

This study was jointly funded by Switzerland’s Federal Office for the Environment and Federal Office for Agriculture.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Greg Churko.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 14 kb)

Supplementary file2 (XLSX 27 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Churko, G., Walter, T., Szerencsits, E. et al. Improving wetland connectivity through the promotion of wet arable land. Wetlands Ecol Manage 28, 667–680 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-020-09739-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-020-09739-8

Keywords

Navigation