Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Multimodel Ensemble Projection of Hydro-climatic Extremes for Climate Change Impact Assessment on Water Resources

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Projected changes in climatic extremes, compared to the mean climate, exhibit a greater negative impact on the natural environment. Several studies reported that multi-model ensemble approach can improve the reliability of hydro-climatic extreme projection by extracting important information from a large number of general circulation models (GCMs). However, most of the available multi-model assembling methods do not consider both the spatial and temporal variabilities. Thus, this study reflects both the spatial and temporal climate characteristics during multi-model averaging through the Taylor diagram skill metrics. The capability of the proposed multi-model assembling approach was evaluated for reproducing the multitude of climate extreme indices. Moreover, the reliability of a multi-model assembling approach was assessed for preserving the maximum variability of the GCMs output. In general, the results showed that multi-model assembling approach outperformed the individual climate models for reproducing the hydro-climatic extremes; however, it artificially corrupted and narrowed the projected climate extremes variability of the GCMs output. Thus, it is worthwhile to consider both the individual climate models and multi-model ensemble projections toward an improved projection of hydro-climatic extremes. In general, the study proved that the impacts of climate change on the hydro-climatic extremes are more amplified compared to the changes in mean climate. Hence, this study suggests that meaningful efforts should be put in the future to proactively manage the risks of climate extremes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbaspour KC, Johnson C, Van Genuchten MT (2004) Estimating uncertain flow and transport parameters using a sequential uncertainty fitting procedure. Vadose Zone J 3(4):1340–1352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34(1):73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai A (2011) Drought under global warming: a review. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 2(1):45–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi F, Mearns LO (2002) Calculation of average, uncertainty range, and reliability of regional climate changes from AOGCM simulations via the “reliability ensemble averaging” (REA) method. J Clim 15(10):1141–1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi F, Coppola E, Raffaele F, Diro GT, Fuentes-Franco R, Giuliani G, Mamgain A, Llopart MP, Mariotti L, Torma C (2014) Changes in extremes and hydroclimatic regimes in the CREMA ensemble projections. Clim Chang 125(1):39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Mitra A, Bohra A, Iyengar G, Durai V (2012) Multi-model ensemble (MME) prediction of rainfall using neural networks during monsoon season in India. Meteorol Appl 19(2):161–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed R, Scholz M (2019) Climate variability impact on the spatiotemporal characteristics of drought and Aridityin arid and semi-arid regions. Water Resour Manag 33(15):5015–5033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50(3):885–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy JM, Sexton DM, Barnett DN, Jones GS, Webb MJ, Collins M, Stainforth DA (2004) Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations. Nature 430(7001):768–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer T, Alessandri A, Andersen U, Cantelaube P, Davey M, Delécluse P, Déqué M, Diez E, Doblas-Reyes FJ, Feddersen H (2004) Development of a European multimodel ensemble system for seasonal-to-interannual prediction (DEMETER). Bull Am Meteorol Soc 85(6):853–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raftery AE, Gneiting T, Balabdaoui F, Polakowski M (2005) Using Bayesian model averaging to calibrate forecast ensembles. Mon Weather Rev 133(5):1155–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sansom PG, Stephenson DB, Ferro CA, Zappa G, Shaffrey L (2013) Simple uncertainty frameworks for selecting weighting schemes and interpreting multimodel ensemble climate change experiments. J Clim 26(12):4017–4037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo SB, Kim Y-O, Kim Y, Eum H-I (2018) Selecting climate change scenarios for regional hydrologic impact studies based on climate extremes indices. Clim Dyn:1–17

  • Sillmann J, Kharin V, Zwiers F, Zhang X, Bronaugh D (2013) Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: part 2. Future climate projections. J Geophys Res Atmos 118(6):2473–2493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smakhtin VU (2001) Low flow hydrology: a review. J Hydrol 240(3–4):147–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stéfanon M, Martin-StPaul NK, Leadley P, Bastin S, Dell’Aquila A, Drobinski P, Gallardo C (2015) Testing climate models using an impact model: what are the advantages? Clim Chang 131(4):649–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor MM, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (2014) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of IPCC the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge University Press

  • Taylor KE (2001) Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram. J Geophys Res Atmos 106(D7):7183–7192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tegegne G, Kim Y-O (2020) Strategies to enhance the reliability of flow quantile prediction in the gauged and ungauged basins. River Res Appl:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3603

  • Tegegne G, Kim YO, Lee JK (2019) Spatiotemporal reliability ensemble averaging of multimodel simulations. Geophys Res Lett 46(21):12321–12330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tegegne G, Melesse AM, Worqlul AW (2020) Development of multi-model ensemble approach for enhanced assessment of impacts of climate change on climate extremes. Sci Total Environ 704:135357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Loon AF, Stahl K, Di Baldassarre G, Clark J, Rangecroft S, Wanders N, Gleeson T, Van Dijk AI, Tallaksen LM, Hannaford J (2016) Drought in a human-modified world: reframing drought definitions, understanding, and analysis approaches. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 20(9):3631–3650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vuuren DP, Edmonds J, Kainuma M, Riahi K, Thomson A, Hibbard K, Hurtt GC, Kram T, Krey V, Lamarque J-F, Masui T, Meinshausen M, Nakicenovic N, Smith SJ, Rose SK (2011) The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim Chang 109(1–2):5–31

  • Vavrus SJ, Notaro M, Lorenz DJ (2015) Interpreting climate model projections of extreme weather events. Weather Clim Extremes 10:10–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velázquez J, Schmid J, Ricard S, Muerth M, St-Denis BG, Minville M, Chaumont D, Caya D, Ludwig R, Turcotte R (2013) An ensemble approach to assess hydrological models’ contribution to uncertainties in the analysis of climate change impact on water resources. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17(2):565–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viney NR, Bormann H, Breuer L, Bronstert A, Croke BF, Frede H, Graeff T, Hubrechts L, Huisman JA, Jakeman AJ (2009) Assessing the impact of land use change on hydrology by ensemble modelling (LUCHEM) II: ensemble combinations and predictions. Adv Water Resour 32(2):147–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Wang D, Trenberth KE, Erfanian A, Yu M, Bosilovich MG, Parr DT (2017) The peak structure and future changes of the relationships between extreme precipitation and temperature. Nat Clim Chang 7(4):268–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Alexander L, Hegerl GC, Jones P, Tank AK, Peterson TC, Trewin B, Zwiers FW (2011) Indices for monitoring changes in extremes based on daily temperature and precipitation data. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 2(6):851–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth and Environment, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 33199, USA

    Getachew Tegegne & Assefa M. Melesse

Authors
  1. Getachew Tegegne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Assefa M. Melesse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Getachew Tegegne.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tegegne, G., Melesse, A.M. Multimodel Ensemble Projection of Hydro-climatic Extremes for Climate Change Impact Assessment on Water Resources. Water Resour Manage 34, 3019–3035 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02601-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02601-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation