Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A New Model Based on Artificial Neural Networks and Game Theory for the Selection of Underground Mining Method

  • Mineral Mining Technology
  • Published:
Journal of Mining Science Aims and scope

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the applicability of artificial neural networks (ANN) and game theory in the development of an underground mining method selection model. To realize this, six different ANN models that can evaluate geometric and rock mass properties of an underground mine, environmental factors and ventilation conditions to determine mining methods that satisfy the safety conditions for an underground mine were developed. Among the mining methods determined by ANNs, the optimal mining method was determined by the ultimatum games, in which a compromise between safety and economic conditions was simulated. By using a combination of developed ANN models and ultimatum games, a new model based on artificial neural networks and game theory for the selection of underground mining method was developed. This model can make predictions in the presence of lack of information by following technological developments and new findings obtained in scientific/sectoral studies if learning is continuous. Moreover, the model can evaluate all selection criteria and provide literature-based solutions. In the light of findings obtained within this study, it is revealed that artificial neural networks and game theory can be used in the selection of underground mining methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adeli, H. and Wu, M., Regularization Neural Network for Construction Cost Estimation, J. Construction Eng. and Managern, 1988, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 18–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Leu, S., Chen, C., and Chang, S., Data Mining for Tunnel Support Stability: Neural Network Approach, J. Automation in Construction, 2001, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 429–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ambrozic, T. and Turk, G., Prediction of Subsidence due to Underground Mining, J. Computers and Geosciences, 2003, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 627–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee, S., Park, I., and Choi, J.K., Spatial Prediction of Ground Subsidence Susceptibility Using an Artificial Neural Network, Environ. Manag., 2012, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 347–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hu, D.H., Analysis on Coal Mine Safety Accident Causes and Forewarning Management Research, Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liu, Q.L. and Li, X.C., Modeling and Evaluation of the Safety Control Capability of Coal Mine Based on System Safety, J. Cleaner Production, 2014, vol. 84, pp. 797–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Khandelwal, M. and Singh, T.N., Prediction of Blast Induced Ground Vibrations and Frequency in Opencast Mine: A Neural Network Approach, J. Sound Vib., 2006, vol. 289, no. 4–5, pp. 711–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Singh, T.N., Dontha, L.K., and Bharadwa, J.V., A Study into Blast Vibration and Frequency Using ANFIS and MVRA, Min. Techn. (TIMM A), UK, 2008, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 116–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohammad, M.T., Artificial Neural Network for Prediction and Control of Blasting Vibration in Assiut (Egypt) Limestone Quarry, J. Rock Mech. and Min. Sci, 2009, vol. 46, pp. 426–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng, L., Yang, Y., and Xiong, Y., Study of Mine Ventilation System Assessment Based on Artificial Neural Network, China Safety Sci. J., 2005. Issue 5, pp. 88–91.

  11. Oztemel, E., Artificial Neural Networks, Papatya, Yayincilik, 2016.

  12. Bakhshandeh Amnieh, H., Siamaki, A., and Soltani, S., Design of Blasting Pattern in Proportion to the Peak Particle Velocity (PPV): Artificial Neural Networks Approach, J. Safety Sci., 2012, vol. 50, issue 9, pp. 1913–1916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, W., Gelder, P., and Vrijling, J.K., Comparing Bayesian Regularization and Cross-Validated Early Stopping for Streamflow Forecasting with ANN Models, Proc. of the 2nd Int. Symp. on Methodology in Hydrology, China, IAHS Publ., 2007, vol. 311, pp. 216–221.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kisi, O. and Uncuoglu, E., Comparison of Three Backpropagation Training Algorithms for Two Case Studies, Indian J. Eng. and Mater. Sci., 2005, vol. 12, pp. 434–442.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Payal, A., Rai, C.S., and Reddy, B.V.R., Comparative Analysis of Bayesian Regularization and Levenberg-Marquardt Training Algorithm for Localization in Wireless Sensor Network, The 15thInt. Conf. on Advanced Communications Technology-ICACT-2013, 2013, pp. 191–194.

  16. Kayri, M., Predictive Abilities of Bayesian Regularization and Levenberg-Marquardt Algorithms in Artificial Neural Networks: A Comparative Empirical Study on Social Data, J. Mathem. and Computat. Appl., 2016, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Baghirli, B., Comparison of Lavenberg-Marquardt, Scaled Conjugate Gradient and Bayes Regularization Backpropagation Algorithms for Multistep Ahead Wind Speed Forecasting Using Multilayer Perception Feedforward Neural Network, Thesis, Ippsala University Department of Earth Sci., Campus Gotland, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yilmaz, E., Game Theory, Literatur Yayinlari, Istanbul, 2016.

  19. Ozyurt, M.C., The Investigation of Using Artificial Neural Networks and Game Theory on Underground Mining Method Selection, PHD Thesis, Institute of Sciences, Istanbul University, 2018.

  20. Alpay, S. and Yavuz, M., A Decision Support System for Underground Mining Method Selection, New Trends in Applied Artificial Intelligence, 2007, pp. 334–343.

  21. Guray, C., Celebi, N., Atalay, V., and Gunhan, A., Ore-Age: A Hybrid System for Assisting and Teaching Mining Method Selection, Middle East Technical University, Turkey, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Azadeh, A., Osanloo, M., and Ataei, M., A New Approach to Mining Method Selection Based on Modifying the Nicholas Technique, J. Appl. Soft Computing, 2010, vol. 10, pp. 1040–1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Karadogan, A., Kahriman, A., and Ozer, U., Application of Fuzzy Set Theory in the Selection of Underground Mining Method, J. of the South African Institute of Min. and Metal., 2008, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 73–79.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kose, K. and Tatar, C., Underground Mining Methods, Publications of Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Eng., Izmir, 2011, no. 014.

  25. Miller, L., Pakalnis, R., and Poulin, R., UBC Mining Method Selection, Int. Symp. on Mine Planning and Equipment Selection, Balkema, Rotterdam, 1995, pp. 163–168.

  26. Kahriman, A., Selection of Optimal Underground Mining Method for Kayseri Pinarbasi-Pulpinar Chrome Ore, Middle East Technical University, Turkey, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bitarafan, M. and Ataei, M., Mining Method Selection by Multiple Criteria Decision Making Tool, J. of the South African Institute of Min. and Metal., 2004, pp. 493–498.

  28. Gélvez, J.I.R., Aldana, F.A.C., and Sepúlveda, G.F., Mining Method Selection Methodology by Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis—Case Study In Colombian Coal Mining, Int. Symp. of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Washington D. C., USA, 2014.

  29. Samimi Namin, F., Shahriar, K., Bascetin, A., and Ghodsy Poor, S., Practical Applications from Decision-Making Techniques for Selection of Suitable Mining Method in Iran, Gospodarku Surowcami Mineralnymi, 2009, pp. 57–77.

  30. Anon, An Underground Iron Mine in Progress in Turkey, 2018.

  31. Nicholas, D.E., Method Selection—A Numerical Approach, Design and Operation of Caving and Sublevel Stoping Mines, 1981, pp. 39–51.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Executive Secretariat of Scientific Research Projects of Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Executive Secretariat of Scientific Research Projects of Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, codes of projects 35526, 19484.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mining Engineering, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey

    M. C. Özyurt & A. Karadogan

Authors
  1. M. C. Özyurt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Karadogan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. C. Özyurt.

Additional information

Published in Fiziko-Tekhnicheskie Problemy Razrabotki Poleznykh Iskopaemykh, 2020, No. 1, pp. 74–86.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Özyurt, M.C., Karadogan, A. A New Model Based on Artificial Neural Networks and Game Theory for the Selection of Underground Mining Method. J Min Sci 56, 66–78 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062739120016491

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062739120016491

Keywords

Search

Navigation