Skip to main content
Log in

Strategic planning as inter-unit coordination: An in depth case study in Thailand

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We extend strategy-as-practice and strategy process studies of strategic planning by detailing empirically how its execution can take on an inter-unit coordination role in multi-business, multi-unit firms. In our case study of a firm in Bangkok, Thailand, we show how practitioners in diverse business and functional units coordinate their respective internal planning processes in a differentiated network of inter-unit strategic planning links. We specify four types of inter-unit planning link according to relative hierarchical level and function of the interacting units. Based on interviews covering 125 of these links, we analyse interactions between managers during the planning process, focusing on the practices they adopt including a newly identified practice we refer to as facilitating. We articulate patterns of interaction by link type, and ultimately show how managers combined these practices in four generic interaction patterns: bilateral, cohesive facilitation, ambassadorial coordination, and supervisory. These interaction patterns vary in the degree of horizontal and vertical inter-unit coordination they contribute to the business. We analyse how usage of the patterns varied across the firm, and hence set out more fully than prior literature how interactions driven by individual managers enable strategic planning to enrich inter-unit coordination through and across a business.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdallah, C., & Langley, A. 2014. The double edge of ambiguity in strategic planning. Journal of Management Studies, 51: 235-264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D. 2010. Innovation and growth: How business contributes to society. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3): 11-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D. 2014. The hidden reason why the First World War matters today: The development and spread of modern management. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 21(1): 201-218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosini, V., Bowman, C., & Burton-Taylor, S. 2007. Inter-team coordination activities as a source of customer satisfaction. Human Relations, 60: 59-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T. J. 2004. Integrating decentralized strategy making and strategic planning processes in dynamic environments. Journal of Management Studies, 41: 1271-1299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balogun, J., & Johnson, G. 2004. Organisational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking, Academy of Management Journal, 47: 523-549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C. A. & Ghoshal, S. 1993. Beyond the M-Form: toward a managerial theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2): 23-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, S., Bloom, N., Card, D., Van Reenen, J., & Wolter, S. 2018. Management practices, workforce selection, and productivity. Journal of Labor Economics, 36(S1): S371-S409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J. M., & Morrison, A. J. 1995. Configurations of strategy and structure in subsidiaries of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 26: 729-753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, E., & Helfat, C. 2001. Does corporate strategy matter? Strategic Management Journal, 22: 1-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. 1999. Horizontal mechanisms under differing IS organization contexts. MIS Quarterly, 23: 421-454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. 1991. Organizational learning and communities of practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1): 40-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. 2001. Knowledge and organization: a social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2): 198-213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavana, R. Y., Delahaye, B. L., & Sekaran, U. 2001. Applied business research: Qualitative and quantitative methods. Milton, AU: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarthy, B., & Henderson, J. 2007. From a hierarchy to a heterarchy of strategies: Adapting to a changing context, Management Decision, 45: 642-652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarthy, B., & Lorange, P. 1991. Managing the strategy process: a framework for a multi-business firm. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D. 1990. Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D. 1991. The functions of the HQ unit in the multibusiness firm. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 31-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, M., Ko, Y., & Kim, J. 2020. Group power structure, inter-subgroup cross-dependency, and work group performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37: 297-323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007), Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges, Academy of Management Journal, 50: 25-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, S.W., & Lane, P.J. 2000. Strategizing throughout the organization: managing role conflict in strategic renewal, Academy of Management Review, 25: 154-177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J., Downey, D., & Kates, A. 2002. How networks undergird the lateral capability of an organization - where the work gets done. Global Business and Organisational Excellence, 21(2): 67-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R., & Ahlstrom, D. 1997. Technology assessment: a socio-cognitive perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 14(1): 25-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehman, J., Glaser, V., Eisenhardt, K.M., Gioia, D., Langley, A., Corley, K.G. 2018. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(3): 284-300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. 2002. Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. The Business History Review, 76: 37-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbert, M., Ruigrok, W., & Wicki, B. 2008. What passes as a rigorous case study? Strategic Management Journal, 29: 1465-1474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. 2003. Strategic planning in a turbulent environment: evidence from the oil majors. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 491-517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. 2000. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 473-496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedlund, G. 1986. The hypermodern MNC – a heterarchy? Human Resource Management, 25: 9-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, L. C., Ahlstrom, D., Lee, A. Y. P., Chen, S. Y., & Hsieh, M. J. 2016. High performance work systems, employee well-being, and job involvement: An empirical study. Personnel Review, 45(2): 296-314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, P., Hodgkinson, I. R., Arshad, D., Hughes, M., & Leone, V. 2018. Planning to improvise? The role of reasoning in the strategy process: Evidence from Malaysia, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35: 449-470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, K., & Bazeley, P. 2019. Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P., & Balogun, J. 2009. The practice and process of delivering integration through strategic planning. Journal of Management Studies, 46: 1255-1288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J., & Seidl, D. 2007. Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective. Human Relations, 60(1): 5-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P., & Seidl, D. 2008. The role of meetings in the social practice of strategy. Organization Studies, 29(11): 1391–1426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G., Langley, A., Melin, L., & Whittington, R. 2007. Strategy as practice: Research directions and resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketokivi, M., & Castañer, X. 2004. Strategic planning as an integrative device. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49: 337-365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loon, M., Otaye-Ebede, L., & Stewart, J. 2020. Thriving in the New Normal: The HR microfoundations of capabilities for business model innovation. An integrated literature review. Journal of Management Studies, 57(3): 698-726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantere, S., & Ketokivi, M. 2013. Reasoning in Organization Science. Academy of Management Review, 38(1): 70–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. A., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 2010. Rewiring: cross-business-unit collaborations in multibusiness organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 265-301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2 ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. 1979. The structuring of organizations: A synthesis of the research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. 1994. The rise and fall of strategic planning. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D. 2010. Alfred Chandler and knowledge management within the firm. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(2): 483-507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohria, N., & Ghoshal, S. 1994. Differentiated fit and shared values: Alternatives for managing headquarters-subsidiary relations. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 491-502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordqvist, M., & Melin, L. 2008. Strategic planning champions: Social craftspersons, artful interpreters and known strangers. Long Range Planning, 41: 326-344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocasio, W., & Joseph, J. 2008. Rise and fall - or transformation? The evolution of strategic planning at the General Electric company, 1940-2006. Long Range Planning, 41: 248-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paroutis, S., & Pettigrew, A. 2007. Strategizing in the multi-business firm: strategy teams at multiple levels and over time. Human Relations, 60: 99-135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. 1992. Understanding power in organizations. California Management Review, 34: 29-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruigrok, W., Pettigrew, A., Peck, S., & Whittington, R. 1999. Corporate restructuring and new forms of organizing: evidence from Europe. Management International Review, 39(2): 41-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. 1980. Organisational psychology (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, N., Au, K., & Weiwen, L. 2019. Strategic alignment of intangible assets: The role of corporate social responsibility. Asia Pacific Journal of Management https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09681-1.

  • Spee, P., & Jarzabkowski, P. 2011. Strategic planning as communicative process, Organization Studies 32: 1217-1245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby, R. 2006. From the editors: What grounded theory is not, Academy of Management Journal, 49: 633-642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, H. 2017. Making impact through industry-focused research: An Asia Pacific perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34: 487-503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L., & Ambrosini, V. 2015. Materializing strategy: the role of comprehensiveness and management controls in strategy formation in volatile environments. British Journal of Management, 26: S105-S124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomizawa, A., Zhao, L., Bassellier, G., & Ahlstrom, D. 2020. Economic growth, innovation, institutions, and the Great Enrichment. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37(1): 7-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M., & Nadler, D. 1978. Information processing as an integrating concept in organisational design. Academy of Management Review, 3: 613-613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uchida, D. 2019. The consequence of differences: How heterogeneity in practice adaptations affects the diffusion process. Asia Pacific Journal of Management https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9624-6.

  • Vilà, J., & Canales, J. I. 2008. Can strategic planning make strategy more relevant and build commitment over time? The case of RACC. Long Range Planning, 41: 273-290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. 1999. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity (1st ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, R. 1996. Strategy as practice. Long Range Planning, 29(5): 731-735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, R. 2006. Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 27: 613-634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, R., Cailluet, L., & Yakis-Douglas, B. 2011. Opening strategy: evolution of a precarious profession. British Journal of Management 22: 531-544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, C., & Floyd, S. W. 2017. Strategic planning research: toward a theory-driven agenda. Journal of Management, 43: 1754-1788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, B., Schmid, T., & Floyd, S. W. 2008. The middle management perspective on strategy process: Contributions, synthesis, and future research. Journal of Management, 34(6): 1190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. 2009 Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. N., Tsai, T., Wang, X., Liu, S., & Ahlstrom, D. 2014. Strategy in emerging economies and the theory of the firm. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(2): 331-354.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Knott.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Knott, P., Thnarudee, C. Strategic planning as inter-unit coordination: An in depth case study in Thailand. Asia Pac J Manag 39, 201–224 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-020-09726-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-020-09726-w

Keywords

Navigation