Supercritical CO2 extraction of V. vinifera leaves: Influence of cosolvents and particle size on removal kinetics and selectivity to target compounds

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2020.104959Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Measurement and modeling of SFE curves from V. vinifera leaves.

  • Relevant extractives are long chain aliphatic alcohols, α-tocopherol, β-sitosterol, and triterpenes.

  • Influence of CO2 cosolvents and particle size upon SFE kinetics and selectivity.

  • Results comprise 40 experimental SFE curves, modeled using broken plus intact cells model.

  • Remarkable selectivities were obtained for triterpenes (lupeol and β-amyrin).

Abstract

Leaves from Vitis vinifera L. contain potential bioactive compounds, namely: long chain aliphatic alcohols (e.g., 1-hexacosanol, 1-octacosanol and 1-triacontanol), α-tocopherol, β-sitosterol, and the triterpenes β-amyrin and lupeol. Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) runs were measured at lab scale using: crushed and ground biomass; pure CO2 at 300 bar and 40−80 °C; and CO2 modified with 5 and 10 wt.% of ethanol or ethyl acetate. Total SFE yields ranged from 1.86 to 7.52 wt.%. The broken plus intact cells model (BICM), provided a good fitting of the SFE curves with 4.06 % error for total yield and 1.98–5.49 % for the individual yields of the said compounds. The BICM results revealed that the SFE is limited by intraparticle diffusion. Remarkable experimental and calculated selectivities were obtained for triterpenes (lupeol and β-amyrin), starting with a score of 1.7 and increasing along time to 10−100.

Introduction

Among the high-volume agricultural crops farmed in Europe, grape vine (Vitis vinifera L.) is one of the most important species. Since the fruit (grape) is extensively explored for wine production, by-products (roots, stalks, bark and leaves) are inherently produced in huge amounts. For example, in Europe, 6.2 million hL of wine were produced in 2015 [1] leaving behind 14.5 million tons of waste [2].

Vine leaves are one of the least investigated by-products and are generally considered organic wastes. However, previous works addressing the composition of the extracts of V. vinifera leaves identified several compounds with possible economic interest. For instance, Fernandes et al. [3] showed that ethanolic extracts of grape leaves are rich in phenolic compounds with biological activity, mainly hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives and quercetin glycosides. Pensec et al. [4] focused on triterpenoids extracted with chloroform, namely, β-amyrin, lupeol, taraxerol, α-tocopherol and β-sitosterol. For example, α-tocopherol is a liposoluble antioxidant belonging to the Vitamin E class and is important for protecting biological membranes (such as cell walls) [5]. β-sitosterol is an anticholesteremic drug and also an antioxidant [6]. As for the triterpenes, lupeol is a known bioactive compound used to treat cancer and malaria [7], β-amyrin (a precursor of oleanolic acid) exhibits antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory properties [8], and taraxerol evidences anti-inflammatory properties [9].

Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) is a mature high-pressure technology that in most cases relies on carbon dioxide (CO2) as the working solvent [10,11]. For the particular case of SFE of V. vinifera biomass, the solvent can be synergistically obtained from fermentative processes (e.g, wine production [12]), which adds value to the universal advantages of this technology, namely the preservation of the natural label on ensuing products due to the innocuousness of the CO2, mild critical conditions (Tc=31.1 ºC and Pc=73.8 bar), the null solvent surface tension and inertness, and the dismissal or reduction of distillation/drying units to isolate the extract from the solvent and both from the exhausted solid matrix. The last decades have been marked by prolific research activity on natural extracts produced by SFE from plants such as aloe vera [13,14], cork [15,16], eucalypt [17,18], hemp [19,20], water hyacinth [21,22], stevia [23,24], and many others [[25], [26], [27], [28]]. The most important operating conditions/parameters under investigation have been pressure, temperature, flow rate, cosolvent type and concentration, particle size, and extraction time [28]. The usual responses are total extraction yield, specific/individual yields (of molecules or families of molecules), concentration of target compounds in the extracts, and much more rarely selectivities [16,28]. An important variable influencing selectivity is frequently cosolvent type and/or concentration, which leads to a trade-off between higher total yields and individual yields of target compounds [16,29,30].

The SFE of grape seeds has been a hot investigation topic devoted to bulk vegetal oil [[31], [32], [33], [34], [35]], phenolics [36], flavonols [37] or phytosterols [38]. In this work, SFE technology was used for the first time to investigate natural extracts of leaves from Vitis vinifera L. The novelty of the study also encompasses the mapping of selectivity profiles for different target compounds and the identification of conditions for kinetic enhancement of the process. The influence of green cosolvents addition (ethanol and ethyl acetate) at two concentration levels, biomass particle size and temperature is accomplished and analysed using the broken plus intact cells model.

Section snippets

Chemicals

Carbon dioxide (CO2, purity 99 %) was supplied by Air Liquide (Algés, Portugal). Dichloromethane (DCM, purity 99.9 %) and ethanol (E, purity 99.5 %) were supplied by Fisher Scientific (Leicestershire, United Kingdom). Ethyl acetate (EA, purity 99.9 %) was purchased from VWR International (Fontenay-sous-Bois, France). The chemicals used for silylation (preparation of samples for the GC–MS analysis – [39]) were pyridine (purity 99 %), N,O-Bis(trimethylsilyl)-trifluoroacetamide (purity 99 %) and

Characterization of the biomass / Soxhlet extractions

The total extraction yield (ηtotal) results ranged from 4.41 wt.% (Run Sox EA) to 16.09 wt.% (Run Sox E), as illustrated in Fig. 3 (top). The polarity of the extraction solvent played a remarkably important role on the Soxhlet performance with the more polar solvent (i.e., higher Hildebrand solubility parameter, δ) providing a much higher ηtotal. In detail, the amount of extract recovered by dichloromethane (δ=20.2MPa1/2 @ 25 °C [50]), ethyl acetate (δ=18.2MPa1/2 @ 25 °C [50]), and ethanol (δ

Conclusions

The supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) of grape leaves (Vitis vinifera L.) was investigated for the first time. GC–MS characterization of the extracts allowed the identification and quantification of long chain aliphatic alcohols (LCAA; namely, 1-hexacosanol, 1-octacosanol and 1-triacontanol) plus interesting bioactive compounds such as α-tocopherol, β-sitosterol and the triterpenes β-amyrin and lupeol.

The SFE experiments were performed using crushed (< 10 mm) and ground (< 1 mm) biomass, and

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work was developed within the scope of the project CICECO-Aveiro Institute of Materials, UIDB/50011/2020 & UIDP/50011/2020, financed by national funds through the FCT/MEC and when appropriate co-financed by FEDER under the PT2020 Partnership Agreement. Authors want to thank the funding from Project AgroForWealth (CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-000001), funded by Centro2020, through FEDER and PT2020.

References (54)

  • V.H. Rodrigues et al.

    Extraction of Eucalyptus leaves using solvents of distinct polarity. Cluster analysis and extracts characterization

    J. Supercrit. Fluids

    (2018)
  • C. Da Porto et al.

    Response surface optimization of hemp seed (Cannabis sativa L.) oil yield and oxidation stability by supercritical carbon dioxide extraction

    J. Supercrit. Fluids

    (2012)
  • A.C. Gallo-Molina et al.

    Extraction, isolation and purification of tetrahydrocannabinol from the Cannabis sativa L. Plant using supercritical fluid extraction and solid phase extraction

    J. Supercrit. Fluids

    (2019)
  • M.M.R. de Melo et al.

    Valorization of water hyacinth through supercritical CO2 extraction of stigmasterol

    Ind. Crops Prod.

    (2016)
  • M.M.R. De Melo et al.

    Measurement and modeling of supercritical fluid extraction curves of Eichhornia crassipesfor enhanced stigmasterol production: Mechanistic insights of the process

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2016)
  • K. Ameer et al.

    Optimization of supercritical fluid extraction of steviol glycosides and total phenolic content from Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) leaves using response surface methodology and artificial neural network modeling

    Ind. Crops Prod.

    (2017)
  • S. Zhao et al.

    Supercritical fluid extraction and characterisation of Moringa oleifera leaves oil

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2013)
  • A. Rai et al.

    Modeling and response surface analysis of supercritical extraction of watermelon seed oil using carbon dioxide

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2015)
  • M.M.R. De Melo et al.

    Supercritical fluid extraction of vegetable matrices: applications, trends and future perspectives of a convincing green technology

    J. Supercrit. Fluids

    (2014)
  • S. Li et al.

    Influence of co-solvents on solubility and selectivity in extraction of xanthines and cocoa butter from cocoa beans with supercritical CO2

    J. Supercrit. Fluids

    (1992)
  • C.P. Passos et al.

    Supercritical fluid extraction of grape seed (Vitis vinifera L.) oil. Effect of the operating conditions upon oil composition and antioxidant capacity

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2010)
  • K.S. Duba et al.

    Supercritical CO2 extraction of grape seed oil: effect of process parameters on the extraction kinetics

    J. Supercrit. Fluids

    (2015)
  • L. Fiori

    Grape seed oil supercritical extraction kinetic and solubility data: critical approach and modeling

    J. Supercrit. Fluids

    (2007)
  • C.P. Passos et al.

    Enhancement of the supercritical fluid extraction of grape seed oil by using enzymatically pre-treated seed

    J. Supercrit. Fluids

    (2009)
  • L. Fiori

    Supercritical extraction of grape seed oil at industrial-scale: plant and process design, modeling, economic feasibility

    Chem. Eng. Process. Process. Intensif.

    (2010)
  • C. Da Porto et al.

    Supercritical fluid extraction of polyphenols from grape seed (Vitis vinifera): study on process variables and kinetics

    J. Supercrit. Fluids

    (2017)
  • R.M.A. Domingues et al.

    Optimization of the supercritical fluid extraction of triterpenic acids from Eucalyptus globulus bark using experimental design

    J. Supercrit. Fluids

    (2013)
  • Cited by (23)

    • Modeling of supercritical fluid extraction bed: A critical review

      2023, Chemical Engineering Research and Design
    • Experimental optimization of the supercritical fluid extraction of triterpenoids from Acacia dealbata Link. Leaves

      2023, Separation and Purification Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, while all experiments in this work were performed for a final point at 6 h, a kinetic study will reveal the period where these compounds are preferentially extracted and if there is an optimum time region in terms of selectivity. As observed for the kinetic study of SFE of vine leaves [18], the extraction of triterpenoids occurs mostly during the first 2 h, with a local selectivity peak at the first point of 0.5 h. Then it is necessary to establish the scale-up criterium which requires the already mentioned kinetic experiments, measuring and modelling several supercritical extraction curves [12].

    • Simultaneous integration of supercritical fluid extraction and mechanical cold pressing for the extraction from Baru seed

      2022, Journal of Supercritical Fluids
      Citation Excerpt :

      Among them, we can highlight three types of modifications: 1) modifications based on the extraction solvent, 2) modifications based on the raw material, and 3) modifications based on extraction equipment. In the first type of modification, the polarity of sCO2 is improved using a non-toxic co-solvent such as water or ethanol for polyphenol extraction [8,9] as an alternative to the conventional extraction process [10]. The modifier concentration is strongly depended on the raw material and the type of modifier [8,11].

    • Supercritical fluid extraction of phytosterols from sugarcane bagasse: Evaluation of extraction parameters

      2022, Journal of Supercritical Fluids
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is not detected in our study. Total phytosterols concentration obtained in our study was lower than that found in other matrices extracted by SFE such as lotus bee pollen (0.462 mg g−1 dry basis at 300 bar and 50 °C) [34], Kalahari melon seeds (1.56–1.75 mg g−1 d.m at 300 bar and varying temperature) [38], roselle seeds (0.664–1.142 mg g−1 d.m. at 300 bar and varying temperature) [39], but similar to the results reported to leaves from Vitis vinifera L (0.1–0.2 mg g−1 dry leave at 300 bar with variations of temperature) [40]. Although the temperature improves the extraction of phytosterols, some authors such as, Martins et al. [21], Xu et al. [34] and Nyam et al. [38] suggest the use of low temperatures in order to avoid degradation in other compounds within the matrix.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text