Crustal structure across the Deccan Volcanic Province and Eastern Dharwar craton in south Indian shield using receiver function modelling

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2020.106543Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Different crustal thickness and composition beneath the DVP and EDC

  • Underplated layer below the DVP crust

  • DVP is highly affected by the Reunion mantle plume-crust interaction.

  • EDC is un-affected by any major tectono-thermal event for long geological time.

Abstract

The south Indian shield, primarily consisting of Archean cratons and Cretaceous-Tertiary Deccan Volcanic Province (DVP), has undergone several major tectonic episodes during its evolution. The Deccan volcanism at Cretaceous-Tertiary (~65 Ma) is the last major tectono-thermal event, which influenced a substantial part of the south Indian shield. To understand the influence of the Deccan volcanism on the evolution of the south Indian shield, we study the crustal seismic structure of the ~65 Ma Deccan Volcanic Province and the adjacent ~2.6 Ga Eastern Dharwar Craton (EDC), which forms the basement of the volcanic terrain. We calculate teleseismic receiver functions for 18 broadband seismic stations along a ~1000 km long seismological profile that cut across both the EDC and DVP. The analysis and modelling, using H-Vp/Vs stacking and generalized neighbourhood algorithm inversion of the receiver functions show distinct crustal structure (crustal thickness, average composition, shear wave velocity variation, nature of crust-mantle boundary, etc.) across the EDC and DVP. The results clearly indicate that the crustal structure is heterogeneous beneath the DVP compared to a relatively uniform structure below the EDC. Using results from this study along with earlier results, we infer that the present Eastern Dharwar Craton terrain is not affected by any tectono-thermal event for a long geological time, including the Deccan volcanism. Whereas, the present Deccan Volcanic Province is highly affected by the Reunion mantle plume-crust interaction.

Introduction

The south Indian shield consists of the Archean Dharwar craton, Archean-Proterozoic Southern Granulite Terrain (SGT) and Cretaceous-Tertiary (~65 Ma) Deccan volcanic Provinces (DVP). To understand the evolution of the south Indian shield, the knowledge of evolution of its different constituents is important and essential. While evolution of the Dharwar craton and Southern Granulite Terrain are quite well understood (e.g., Naqvi, 2005 and references within), the evolution of the Deccan Volcanic Province is a matter of debate between various theories proposed for the Deccan magma formation viz., by melting of a massive mantle plume, normal plate tectonic processes, or impact of a large extra-terrestrial bolide (e.g., Subba Rao and Sukheswala, 1981; Pandey and Negi, 1987; Duncan and Pyle, 1988; Mahoney, 1988; Sheth, 2005; Sen and Chandrasekharam, 2011).

The seismic methods, which provide detailed information on the seismic crustal structure (crustal thickness, composition, presence or absence of the basal cumulate layer in the lowermost crust, thickness of the basal layer, etc.) and upper mantle structure, also give insightful clues for the nature of the evolution of different tectonic terrains, when integrated with other geological and geophysical information. Various earlier seismic and seismological studies in the EDC suggest the presence of a simple, uniform crustal structure with Moho depth at ~35 km. The EDC crust is basically of felsic-intermediate composition with the absence of the basal layer (Kaila et al., 1979; Kumar et al., 2001; Rai et al., 2003; Gupta and Rai, 2005; Julia et al., 2009; Borah et al., 2014). However, the seismic and seismological studies, mostly in the western-most or NW part of the DVP suggest varying seismic crustal structure in terms of Moho depth, composition and presence or absence of the basal layer within the DVP (Krishna et al., 1991; Mohan and Kumar, 2004; Julia et al., 2009; Kumar and Mohan, 2014; Deshpande and Mohan, 2016). Moreover, based on the seismological investigations at randomly distributed seismic stations in the EDC and DVP there are differences in the opinion about the DVP crust, whether the DVP has altered crust due to the Deccan volcanism or the DVP crust is akin to the simple and uniform EDC crust (Das et al., 2015; Kumar and Mohan, 2014). Therefore, to understand the effect of the Deccan volcanism on the evolution of the south Indian shield, we study the crustal seismic structure of the DVP with reference to the crustal structure of the EDC through analysis and modelling of the teleseismic receiver function along a ~1000 km seismological profile across the EDC and DVP [Fig. 1a].

Section snippets

Tectonic setting

The Eastern Dharwar Craton (EDC) and Deccan Volcanic Province (DVP) occupies a significant part within the Precambrian south Indian shield (Fig. 1a). The EDC terrain in the NE part of the south Indian shield is largely comprised of 2.5–2.6 Ga young K-rich granitoid intrusions [e.g., Naqvi, 2005; Chadwick et al., 2000]. With a thrusted contact with the crescent-shaped Proterozoic Cuddapah Basin (CB) and the Eastern Ghats belt (EG) further east, the entire region east of the Cuddapah basin is

Data

We analyze nearly 900 three-component seismograms of the earthquakes of magnitude ≥5.5 and from epicenteral distance 30°-95°. These teleseismic seismograms were recorded on twenty broadband seismic stations, which were placed at an average 50 km interval along the transect passing through the EDC and DVP, operated by us during May-2015 to Oct-2016 [Fig. 1a]. Each seismic station was equipped with Guralp CMG-3T seismometer with 24-bit REFTEK storage system. Due to technical problems, two coastal

Receiver function (RF) analysis and modelling

The receiver function (RF) analysis is one of the effective, well-known and wildly used methods to investigate the deep structure of the Earth. The method utilizes the P-to-S converted phase and its multiples from a discontinuity present in the Earth and provides the S-wave velocity structure, beneath the seismic station, which can be interpreted in terms of composition and structure over a range of depths extending from shallow levels to the upper mantle. The three-components of seismograms

Results

The Moho converted P-to-S (Ps) phase times, estimated crustal thickness (H) and Vp/Vs ratio using H-Vp/Vs stacking, and Moho depths using NA modelling are presented in Fig. 7 (a, b, c) and Table 1. The Moho converted Ps phase times across the profile vary between 3.81 s and 5.15 s [Fig. 7a, Table 1]. The stations over the Eastern Ghats (STP) and Western Ghats (VSD) exhibits more Ps times 5.15 s and 4.65 s, respectively. The Ps time for the stations in the EDC (~3.88 s) is lesser than the

Discussions

The obtained variation in the crustal structure (crustal thickness, average composition through Vp/Vs, shear velocity variation, upper mantle velocity) across the EDC-DVP, clearly shows distinct nature of the crust-upper mantle beneath both the regions. The crust is thicker (34–40 km) in the DVP than in the EDC (32–34 km). The crust is ~40 km and ~35–39 km thick in the Eastern and Western Ghats, respectively [Fig. 7; Table 1]. The transition of the Eastern Ghats-EDC (STP-DPL stations), EDC-DVP

Conclusion

The analysis and modelling of the teleseismic receiver functions from 18 broadband seismological stations across Archean Eastern Dharwar Craton (EDC) and Cretaceous-Tertiary Deccan Volcanic Province (DVP) show significantly different crustal structure beneath both the regions. The obtained results show that the crustal thickness is more in DVP (34–40 km) than in the EDC (32–34 km). The average crustal composition is felsic-intermediate in the EDC and intermediate-mafic in the DVP. The upper

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Sudesh Kumar:Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Methodology, Software, Writing - original draft.Sandeep Gupta:Funding acquisition, Supervision, Project administration, Data curation, Validation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing.Nagaraju Kanna:Software, Formal analysis, Validation, Methodology, Writing - original draft.K. Sivaram:Data curation.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgement

Seismological data used in this study was collected under CSIR-NGRI projects INDEX (PSC-0204) and MLP-6401-28 (SKG). Most of the data was processed by Seismic Analyses Code (SAC) and all the figures were generated by Generic Mapping Tools (GMT) version 4.5.0 (www.soest.hawaii.edu/gmt). We sincerely acknowledge the critical and constructive comments by two anonymous reviewers, which significantly improved the quality of work and manuscript. We are grateful to Prof. Vernon Cormier for editorial

References (45)

  • R.L. Rudnick et al.

    Composition of the continental crust

    Treat. Geochem.

    (2003)
  • V.M. Tiwari et al.

    Density in homogeneities beneath Deccan Volcanic Province, India as derived from gravity data

    J. Geodyn.

    (2001)
  • R. Venkatakrishnan et al.

    The Cuddapah salient: a tectonic model for the Cuddapah Basin, India, based on Landsat image interpretation

    Tectonophys.

    (1987)
  • N.I. Christensen

    Poisson’s ratio and crustal seismology

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (1996)
  • R. Das et al.

    The deep geology of South India inferred from Moho depth and Vp/Vs ratio

    Geophys. J. Int.

    (2015)
  • K.G. Dueker et al.

    Mantle discontinuity structure beneath the Colorado, Rocky Mountains and High Plains

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (1998)
  • R.A. Duncan et al.

    Rapid eruption of the Deccan flood basalts at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary

    Nature

    (1988)
  • R.J. Durrheim et al.

    Archean and Proterozoic crustal evolution: evidence from crustal seismology

    Geology

    (1991)
  • B. Efron et al.

    Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy

    Stat. Sci.

    (1986)
  • S. Gupta et al.

    Structure and evolution of South Indian Crust using teleseismic waveform modelling

    Himal. Geol.

    (2005)
  • S. Gupta et al.

    The nature of the crust in south India: implication for Precambrian crustal evaluation

    Geophys. Res. Lett.

    (2003)
  • S. Gupta et al.

    Magmatic underplating of crust beneath the Laccadive Island, NW Indian Ocean

    Geophys. J. Int.

    (2010)
  • Cited by (9)

    • Upper mantle seismic anisotropy beneath the Deccan Volcanic Province and the adjacent Eastern Dharwar Craton in south Indian shield from shear wave splitting analysis

      2022, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors
      Citation Excerpt :

      On the whole, we summarize that EDC and DVP have well delineated and divergent upper mantle structures as imaged through seismic anisotropy. Our recent work using receiver function analysis (Kumar et al., 2020), shows clearly the differentiated structure beneath the DVP and EDC, similar to the distinct splitting patterns observed here. However, multiple layers of anisotropy may be investigated further through future works to bring out deeper knowledge of the mantle deformations beneath DVP and EDC.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text