Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A qualitative assessment of solid waste management in Peleng township in Lobatse, Botswana considering spatial aspects

  • Article
  • Published:
Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 27 August 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Even though solid waste management is widely researched, there is scanty literature addressing the influence of physical environmental attributes on solid waste management service provision in informal settlements. The aim of this study was to investigate the nexus between physical infrastructural planning and waste management service. To obtain relevant results, this study used the case study of Peleng township in Botswana. The study relied on empirical data collected from 91 randomly selected households. ArcGIS was used for mapping 550 purposively selected households, and for visualization of the physical infrastructure. This study concluded that the community is at the forefront of dealing with waste problems in their settlement. However, their interventions have fallen short of becoming profitable and sustainable due to a failure of the government to integrate solid waste management into mainstream urban development planning. The findings revealed that there is minimal government intervention for improved solid waste management in the area. It recommends that adequate attention must be given to road infrastructure and physical developments in order solid waste management in Peleng, Lobatse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

(Source: Designed by the first author)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Subbash A. Solid waste management. New Delhi: Khrishan Mittal; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sharholy M, Ahmad K, Vaishya RC, et al. Municipal solid waste characteristics and management in Allahabad, India. Waste Manage. 2007;27(4):490–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mmereki D. Current status of waste management in Botswana. Waste Manage Res. 2018;36(7):555–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hagos D, Mekonneni A, Gebreegziabher Z. Households’ willingness to pay for improved urban waste management in Mekelle City, Ethiopia. Environ Dev. 2012;12(06):1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Thomas-Hope EM. Solid waste management: critical issues for developing countries. Kingston: Canoe Press University of West Indies; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Manaf LA, Samah MA, Ilya N. Municipal solid waste management in Malaysia: practices and challenges. Waste Manage. 2009;29:2902–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Besen GR, Fracalanza AP. Challenges for the sustainable management of municipal solid waste in Brazil. disP Plan Rev. 2016;52:45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cointreau S, Hornig C. Global review of economic instruments for solid waste management in Latin America and the Caribbean: executive summary. Washington: Inter-American Development Bank; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang H, He J, Kim J, et al. Municipal solid waste management in rural areas and small counties: an economic analysis using contingent valuation to estimate willingness to pay for Yunnan, China. Waste Manage Res. 2014;32(8):695–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schubeler P, Wehrle K, Christen J. Conceptual framework for municipal solid waste in low income countries. 1st ed. St. Gallen: Swiss Centre for Development Cooperation in Technology and Management; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Subhan M, Ghani AB, Joarder MH. Urban community willingness to pay for improved solid waste management in malaysian municipality: a choice modeling. Asian Social Sci. 2014;10(18):122–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Asnani PU. Solid waste management. India Infrastructure Report, 570; 2006.

  13. Dika G, Nemie A, Birhane E. Household's willingness to pay for improved solid waste management in Gulelle Sub City, Addis Ababa. Energy Environ Eng. 2019;6(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Obermayr C. Sustainable city management: informal settlements in Surakarta, Indonesia. Cham: Springer International Publishing, AG; 2017.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Kwetey S, Samuel JC, Wilhemina A. Household demand and willingness to pay for solid waste management service in Tuobodom in the Techiman-North District, Ghana. Am J Environ Protect. 2014;2(4):74–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gutberlet J, Kain JH, Nyakinya B, et al. Bridging weak links of solid waste management in informal settlements. J Environ Dev Policy Rev. 2017;26(1):106–31.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zapata Campos MJ, Zapata P. Switching Managua on! Connecting informal settlements to the formal city through household waste collection. Environ Urban. 2013;25(1):1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Omollo WO. Solid waste management in the informal settlements: a land use planning perspective. World Environ. 2019;9(1):19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Benna U, Benna I. Urbanization and its impact on socio-economic growth in developing regions. IGI Global; 2017.

  20. Areola AA, Gwebu TD, Sebego RJ. A spatio-temporal analysis of peri-urbanisation in sub-Saharan Africa: a case study from Lobatse, Botswana. Afr Geogr Rev. 2014;33(2):174–201.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kgosiesele E, Zhaohui L. An evaluation of waste management in Botswana: achievements and challenges. J Am Sci. 2010;6(9):144–50.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tirkolaee EB, Mahdavi I, Esfahani MM. A robust periodic capacitated arc routing problem for urban waste collection considering drivers and crew’s working time. Waste Manage. 2018;76:138–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tirkolaee EB, Mahdavi I, Esfahani MM, et al. A robust green location-allocation-inventory problem to design an urban waste management system under uncertainty. Waste Manage. 2020;102:340–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Verma RK, Kumari S, Tiwari RK. Application of remote sensing and GIS technique for efficient urban planning in India. In: Geomatrix conference proceedings. Bombay: IIT Bombay; 2009.

  25. Nunan F, Satterthwaite D. The influence of governance on the provision of urban environmental infrastructure and services for low-income groups. Int Plan Stud. 2001;6(4):409–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tan M, Li X, Xie H, et al. Urban land expansion and arable land loss in China—a case study of Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region. Land Use Policy. 2005;22(3):187–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. CSO. Population and housing census. Gaborone: Government Printer; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Johnson B, Chistensen L. Educational research: quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches. Carlifonia: SAGE Publications; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kumar K. Conducting key Informant Interviews in Developing Countries. Washington: USAID; 198926.

  30. McNeill P. Research methods. London: Taylor and Francis; 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Abul S. Environmental and health impact of solid waste disposal at Mangwaneni dumpsite in Manzini: Swaziland. J Sustain Dev Afr. 2010;12(7):64–78.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wokekoro E, Inyang MP. Waste disposal practices in informal settlements and its impact on health: the case of Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Int J Environ Sci Toxicol Res. 2014;2(2):36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kwailane TT, Gwebu TD, Hambira WL. Challenges of domestic solid waste management: a case study of Lobatse Botswana. Afr Geogr Rev. 2016;35(2):117–33.

    Google Scholar 

  35. GOB. Botswana's strategy for waste management. Gaborone: Government Printers; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kgathi D, Bolaane B. Instruments for sustainable solid waste management in Botswana. Waste Manage Res. 2001;19(4):342–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Oteng-Ababio M, Owusu-Sekyere E, Amoah ST. Thinking globally, acting locally: formalizing informal solid waste management practices in Ghana. J Dev Soc. 2017;33(1):75–98.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Asibey MO, Amponsah O, Yeboah V. Solid waste management in informal urban neighbourhoods. Occupational safety and health practices among tricycle operators in Kumasi, Ghana. Int J Environ Health Res. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2019.1569211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Oduro-Kwarteng S, van Dijk MP. Governance and sustainable solid waste management in Ghana. Urban Gov Realm Complex. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780449685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Simatele D, Etambakonga CL. Scavenging for solid waste in Kinshasa: a livelihood strategy for the urban poor. Habitat Int. 2015;49:266–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Dienel H, Shirazi R, Schrö S. Citizens' participation in urban planning and development in Iran. New York: Taylor and Francis; 2017.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  42. Jha AK, Bloch R, Lamond J. Cities and flooding: a guide to integrated urban flood risk management for the 21st century. Washington: World Bank; 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  43. Gebreeyosus MA. Urban dwellers and solid waste management plans: a case study of sekected towns in Afar regional state, Eithiopia. Cogent Environ Sci. 2018;4(1):1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nametso D. Phonchi-Tshekiso.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Phonchi-Tshekiso, N.D., Mogomotsi, P.K., Mogomotsi, G.E.J. et al. A qualitative assessment of solid waste management in Peleng township in Lobatse, Botswana considering spatial aspects. Waste Dispos. Sustain. Energy 2, 219–230 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42768-020-00042-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42768-020-00042-z

Keywords

Navigation