Elsevier

Geothermics

Volume 88, November 2020, 101893
Geothermics

Multi-criteria decision support for geothermal resources exploration based on remote sensing, GIS and geophysical techniques along the Gulf of Suez coastal area, Egypt

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2020.101893Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The new integrated approach using remote sensing, geophysical methods and GIS defines the most promising geothermal sites.

  • The Geothermal Potential Model (GPM) developed based on Weight of evidence and information valueanalyses.

  • The geophysical data used to support information about structural setting controlling the geothermal system.

  • Multi-criteria Decision support for geothermal resources exploration along the Gulf of Suez coastal area, Egypt.

Abstract

The spatial prediction of geothermal sites along the Gulf of Suez coastal area, is an essential goal as an attempt for the development of renewable energy sources in Egypt. Remote sensing, geophysical methods and Geographic Information System (GIS) were integrated to appraise the promising geothermal zones. Hot-springs and wells data were collected initially in database for modeling the potential zones through the Bayesian statistical approach. Multi-source datasets were selected to derive factor layers indicating the distribution of geothermal energy such as topographic and geologic maps, Bouguer gravity anomaly and aeromagnetic reduced-to-the-pole maps, seismic data, satellite images, earthquake activities, and Bottom Hole Temperature (BHT) from oil and gas wells. Eight evidence layers were derived, analyzed, and integrated in a GIS platform to develop a Geothermal Potential Model (GPM). The representative ranks and weights were estimated to the spatial evidence layers and their classes respectively based on information value (IV) and weights-of-evidence (WoE) analyses. The eight evidence layers include proximity to major fault, lineaments density, land surface temperature, density of seismic activities, heat flow, temperature gradient at different depths, Curie point depth, and Bouguer anomaly. A geothermal potential map was created and classified the study area into five relatively zones, varied from very poor to very good potential. The very good potential sites are distributed mainly in the highly deep-structured and permeable lithologies. The new promising sites are expected to be in Ras Matarma, Ras Badran, Abu Rudies, Belayim, Abu Durba, El-Tur and some sites in southwestern shoreline of Gulf of Suez. The geothermal potential map was correlated and tested against the distribution of thermal wells and hot-springs. The holistic integrated approach suggests an innovative technique to design management plan and development actions along Gulf of Suez coastal area.

Introduction

Geothermal energy is one of the important energy resources that can contribute electricity production in an efficient way (Morgan et al., 1983), and support Egypt's energy demands in a clean way (Boulos and Wood, 1990). The geothermal energy represents the urgent renewable energy expanding electricity generation capacity and covering energy requirements for development plans (Hosney, 2000). Impacts of geothermal resources on development actions attract concern for researchers and local governments (Swanberg, 1983; Abdel Zaher et al., 2011a; Lashin, 2013, 2015; Mohamed et al., 2015; Chandrasekharam et al., 2016; Atef et al., 2016; Abdel Zaher et al., 2018a, 2018b). A large amount of quantitative data and processing techniques are required to evaluate locations of geothermal resources and their socio-economic implications (Astolfi et al., 2011; Abdel Zaher et al., 2014; Atef et al., 2016). Worldwide studies considered the spatial assessment of geothermal potential to expand management policy (Coolbaugh et al., 2005; Noorollahi et al., 2007, 2008; Yousefi et al., 2010). Since the last decades, the policy-makers focus on increasing energy resources to support its economic development (Yousefi et al., 2010). The geothermal energy resources in Egypt can be controlled by structural and tectonic system or by depositional system of the different stratigraphic units (Morgan et al., 1983). Several hot-springs are in the Red Sea and its Gulfs rift which represent structurally controlled source (Abdel Zaher et al., 2011b). In addition, many hot-springs exist in the Western desert which represent depositional controlled source (Abdel Zaher et al., 2018a). Several new data sources indicated that temperatures more than 150 °C, may be in the coastal zone reservoir along Red Sea and Gulf of Suez at a depth of 4 km and deeper (Abdel Zaher et al., 2014; Atef et al., 2016). Temperatures of Red Sea floor increase sharply toward central axis generating regional heat flow anomaly along the Red Sea and Gulf of Suez margins. The high heat flow anomaly indicates the high potential for geothermal energy along the Red Sea and Gulf of Suez coastal zones (Boulos and Wood, 1990; Lashin, 2007; Lashin and Al Arifi, 2010; Abdel Zaher et al., 2018a). Hence, the spatial prediction of geothermal potential is particularly significant due to the socio-economic impacts and for management of sustainability along the Gulf of Suez coastal area (GOSCA).

Remote sensing (RS) techniques were extremely used for the evaluation of geothermal resources (Coolbaugh et al., 2005; Noorollahi et al., 2007, 2008; Calvin et al., 2015; Nishar et al., 2016). Digital image processing was utilized to extract drainage pattern, to estimate surface heat losses, and to identify zones fitting the criteria of hot-spring sites using the analysis of thermal bands (Donegan and Flynn, 2004; Haselwimmer et al., 2011; Kaiser and Ahmed, 2013). Enhanced Thematic Mapper (ETM + 7), Operational Land Imager (OLI-8) and TIRS Landsat satellite images were selected recently to estimate land surface temperature (Elfinurfadri et al., 2017; Cristóbal et al., 2018; Hang and Rahman, 2018; El Bouazouli et al., 2019). The Landsat satellite images were coupled with magneto-telluric (MT) measurements to assess a surface indicator of geothermal energy (Yuliang and Yongming, 2008). The integrated RS and GIS approach has been adopted in several researches as the most influential technology for the geospatial assessment and handling of geothermal resources (Coolbaugh et al., 2007; Kratt et al., 2009; Sadeghi and Khalajmasoumi, 2015). However, few researchers around the world supports spatial prediction of geothermal favorability combining datasets such as satellite image processing, and geophysical methods such as well logs, self-potential, geo-electrical, gravity, magnetic, and thermal methods (Prol-Ledesma, 2000; Carranza et al., 2008; Abdel Zaher et al., 2014; Hinz et al., 2015; Abdel Zaher et al., 2018a; Shirani et al., 2019). None of the studies has been applied an integrated methodology based on well logs, seismic profiles, gravity and magnetic data, earthquake activities, and satellite images to develop a conceptual model that delineates geothermal potential sites through the Bayesian statistical analysis.

Applications of geophysical methods are commonly used for the exploration of geothermal resources (Hersir and Björnsson, 1991; Lund, 2003; Abdel Zaher et al., 2014; Shirani et al., 2019). The geophysical methods are applied widely to support information about temperature and fluid content of the rocks, aquifer locations, structural setting controlling aquifers, and general properties of the geothermal system (Keary and Brooks, 1992; Abdel Zaher et al., 2011a; Hsieh et al., 2014; Kana et al., 2015). In this study, several direct and indirect geophysical methods are selected to explore the geothermal reservoirs. The direct methods are considered the most successful and include well logs, and thermal methods (Hersir and Björnsson, 1991; Lund, 2003; Abdel-Fattah et al., 2020). The indirect methods comprise magnetic proper ties, density and seismic reflection which are usually used to explore the structural setting and physical characteristics of the host rock (Bodvarsson, 1970; Georgsson, 2009; Abdel-Fattah et al., 2015, 2018). Seismic reflection tool is selected in this study as a powerful and essential pre-requisite to assess the possibility of geothermal sites and to reduce the risk associated with expensive drilling wells. None of previously studies has been used seismic geothermal exploration.

GIS is a powerful technique to incorporate multi-datasets and evaluate any wealthy environment exposing to natural resources (Ondreka et al., 2007; Noorollahi et al., 2015; Abuzied and Alrefaee, 2017; Abdel Zaher et al., 2018b). Several studies have been achieved by different methods to assess geothermal energy using GIS (Coolbaugh et al., 2007; Kratt et al., 2009; Abdel Zaher et al., 2011a; Noorollahi et al., 2015). These studies vary from rule-based systems to empirical process-based systems (Coolbaugh and Shevenell, 2004; Moghaddam et al., 2013; Sadeghi and Khalajmasoumi, 2015; Yalcin and Gul, 2017). Several GIS models have been applied for evaluating geothermal potentiality in different areas around the world (Coolbaugh and Shevenell, 2004; Moghaddam et al., 2013; Moghaddam et al., 2014; Sadeghi and Khalajmasoumi, 2015; Abdel Zaher et al., 2018b). Hence, the GIS has been used in this study to integrate multi-datasets and delineate geothermal potential zones. The bivariate statistical analysis is one of GIS statistical models where the distribution analysis defines potential zones from different data sources, and hence suggests information on the relation between natural resources and their causative factors (Abuzied, 2016; Abuzied and Pradhan, 2020). The bivariate statistical analysis includes several methods such as information value (IV) method (Van Westen et al., 1997), logistic regression (Saha et al., 2005), weights-of-evidence (WoE) analysis (Jebur et al., 2014) and frequency ratio (FR) method (Abuzied and Alrefaee, 2018). The bivariate statistical analysis is the logical analytical model where the defined potential zones contribute to adopt the numerical weights and ranks (Abuzied and Alrefaee, 2018). Therefore, the IV and WoE statistical analyses were selected in this study to respectively assign ranks for factor contributed geothermal potential and weights for their classes.

Section snippets

Study area characteristics

The Gulf of Suez coastal area (GOSCA) lies between the western corner of Sinai Peninsula and the northeastern side of Nile River (Fig. 1). Gulf of Suez represents the northern branch of the great East African Rift System. The study area extends between latitudes 27° 50´ 25˝ to 29° 54´ 55˝ N and longitudes 32° 0´0˝ to 33° 50´ 54˝ E with a total area 51,200 km2 (Fig. 1). The topography of the study area varies from gentle terrains to steep mountains, sloping gradually towards coastal zones. The

Data and methods

In order to define favorable sites of geothermal energy resources, a holistic integrated approach was taken considering geological, geomorphological, and hydrological characteristics of the GOSCA (Fig. 3). The modeling workflow was explained by the flow chart (Fig. 3) which displays the several datasets driving from the following sources:

  • Different geological maps of Egypt (Conoco, 1987; EGSMA, 1994) were selected to determine different lithological units (Fig. 2) and define the training classes

Results

The holistic integrated approach applied in this study, adds the commonsensical model expecting the new geothermal sites in the Gulf of Suez coastal area. The geophysical analysis supports the development of the GPM to create geothermal potential map (Fig. 17). The spatial mapping of geothermal potential sites was accomplished by integrating the evidence layers using weight of evidence and information value statistical analysis. The geothermal potential map classified the study area into

Discussion

The tectonic evolution of Red Sea and its Gulfs contributes mainly in the construction of geothermal reservoirs in the study area. The spatial distribution of geothermal sites was evaluated through a time of several processes to predict carefully the availability of different sites for geothermal resource. Different GPM factors reveal a strong contribution in the possibility of geothermal resources along Gulf of Suez shoreline (Table 1).

Conclusion

The study suggests the holistic integrated approach to develop the commonsensical model expecting the new geothermal sites in the Gulf of Suez coastal area. The geothermal potential map was created by integrating several evidence layers based on WoE and IV statistical analysis. The geothermal potential map reveals the most promising sites for geothermal reservoir. The favorable sites are distributed in areas where the surficial outcropped lithologies are highly structured and permeable. The

Declaration of Competing Interest

None.

Acknowledgements

The authors greatly thank the Gulf of Suez Petroleum Company (GUPCO), the Egyptian General Petroleum Corporation (EGPC), the Belayim Petroleum Company (PETROBEL), and the British Petroleum Company (BPC) for providing BHT well data and seismic profiles along the study area. The authors want to express their appreciation to Prof. Christopher Bromley, Prof. Younes Noorollahi, and Dr. Mohamed Abdel Zaher for their fruitful recommendations and constructive criticism on an earlier draft of the

References (107)

  • M. Astolfi et al.

    Technical and economical analysis of a solar–geothermal hybrid plant based on an Organic Rankine Cycle

    Geothermics

    (2011)
  • H. Atef et al.

    The contribution of gravity method in geothermal exploration of southern part of the Gulf of Suez–Sinai region, Egypt

    Nriag J. Astron. Geophys.

    (2016)
  • A. Badawy et al.

    The Sinai subplate and tectonic evolution of the northern Red Sea region

    J. Geodyn.

    (1999)
  • W.M. Calvin et al.

    Remote sensing of geothermal-related minerals for resource exploration in Nevada

    Geothermics

    (2015)
  • E.J.M. Carranza et al.

    Selection of coherent deposit-type locations and their application in data-driven mineral prospectivity mapping

    Ore Geol. Rev.

    (2008)
  • M.F. Coolbaugh et al.

    Detection of geothermal anomalies using advanced spaceborne thermal emission and reflection radiometer (ASTER) thermal infrared images at Bradys Hot Springs, Nevada, USA

    Remote Sens. Environ.

    (2007)
  • S.J. Donegan et al.

    Comparison of the response of the Landsat 7 enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus and the Earth Observing-1 Advanced Land Imager over active lava flows

    J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res.

    (2004)
  • A. El Bouazouli et al.

    Remote sensing contribution to the identification of potential geothermal deposits: a case study of the Moroccan Sahara

    Mater. Today Proc.

    (2019)
  • S. Elbarbary et al.

    Curie point depth, heat flow and geothermal gradient maps of Egypt deduced from aeromagnetic data

    Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.

    (2018)
  • G. Foulger

    Geothermal exploration and reservoir monitoring using earthquakes and the passive seismic method

    Geothermics

    (1982)
  • H.T. Hang et al.

    Characterization of thermal environment over heterogeneous surface of National Capital Region (NCR), India using LANDSAT-8 sensor for regional planning studies

    Urban Clim.

    (2018)
  • H.H. Hsieh et al.

    Curie point depth from spectral analysis of magnetic data in Taiwan

    J. Asian Earth Sci.

    (2014)
  • M.N. Jebur et al.

    Optimization of landslide conditioning factors using very high-resolution airborne laser scanning (LiDAR) data at catchment scale

    Remote Sens. Environ.

    (2014)
  • M.F. Kaiser et al.

    Optimal thermal water locations along the Gulf of Suez coastal zones, Egypt

    Renew. Energy

    (2013)
  • S.M. Khalil et al.

    Extensional fault-related folding, northwestern Red Sea, Egypt

    J. Struct. Geol.

    (2002)
  • J.W. Lund

    Direct-use of geothermal energy in the USA

    Appl. Energy

    (2003)
  • H.G. Miller et al.

    Potential field tilt—a new concept for location of potential field sources

    J. Appl. Geophy.

    (1994)
  • N. Mishra et al.

    Continuous calibration improvement in solar reflective bands: landsat 5 through Landsat 8

    Remote Sens. Environ.

    (2016)
  • M.K. Moghaddam et al.

    Spatial data analysis for exploration of regional scale geothermal resources

    J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res.

    (2013)
  • M.K. Moghaddam et al.

    Spatial analysis and multi-criteria decision making for regional-scale geothermal favorability map

    Geothermics

    (2014)
  • B. Neuhäuser et al.

    Landslide susceptibility assessment using “weights-of-evidence” applied to a study area at the Jurassic escarpment (SW-Germany)

    Geomorphology

    (2007)
  • A. Nishar et al.

    Thermal infrared imaging of geothermal environments and by an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV): a case study of the Wairakei–tauhara geothermal field, Taupo, New Zealand

    Renew. Energy

    (2016)
  • Y. Noorollahi et al.

    GIS model for geothermal resource exploration in Akita and Iwate prefectures, northern Japan

    Comput. Geosci.

    (2007)
  • Y. Noorollahi et al.

    GIS integration model for geothermal exploration and well siting

    Geothermics

    (2008)
  • J. Ondreka et al.

    GIS-supported mapping of shallow geothermal potential of representative areas in south-western Germany-Possibilities and limitations

    Renew. Energy

    (2007)
  • R.M. Prol-Ledesma

    Evaluation of the reconnaissance results in geothermal exploration using GIS

    Geothermics

    (2000)
  • B. Sadeghi et al.

    A futuristic review for evaluation of geothermal potentials using fuzzy logic and binary index overlay in GIS environment

    Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.

    (2015)
  • J. Storey et al.

    A note on the temporary misregistration of Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) and Sentinel-2 Multi Spectral Instrument (MSI) imagery

    Remote Sens. Environ.

    (2016)
  • A. Tanaka et al.

    Curie point depth based on spectrum analysis of the magnetic anomaly data in East and Southeast Asia

    Tectonophysics

    (1999)
  • A.M. Abdallah et al.

    Remark on the geomorphology of the Sinai Peninsula and its associated rock

    Egypt. Geol. Surv., Egypt.

    (1976)
  • M. Abdel Zaher et al.

    Assessment of low-temperature geothermal resource of Hammam faraun hot spring hot-spring, Sinai Peninsula, Egypt

  • M.I. Abdel-Fattah et al.

    Diacritical seismic signatures for complex geological structures: case studies from Shushan Basin (Egypt) and Arkoma Basin (USA)

    Int. J. Geophys.

    (2014)
  • M. Abdel-Fattah et al.

    Seismic interpretation of the Aptian Alamein dolomite in the Razzak oil field, Western desert

    Egypt. Arabian Journal of Geosciences

    (2015)
  • S.M. Abuzied

    Groundwater potential zone assessment in Wadi Watir area, Egypt using radar data and GIS

    Arab. J. Geosci.

    (2016)
  • S.M. Abuzied et al.

    Mapping of groundwater prospective zones integrating remote sensing, geographic information systems and geophysical techniques in El-Qaà Plain area, Egypt

    Hydrogeology. J.

    (2017)
  • S.M. Abuzied et al.

    Spatial prediction of landslide susceptible zones in El-Qaá area, Egypt, using an integrated approach based on GIS statistical analysis

    Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ.

    (2018)
  • S.M. Abuzied et al.

    Geospatial hazard modeling for the delineation of flash flood-prone zones in Wadi Dahab basin, Egypt

    J. Hydroinf.

    (2019)
  • S.M. Abuzied et al.

    Hydro-geomorphic assessment of erosion intensity and sediment yield initiated debris-flow hazards at Wadi Dahab Watershed, Egypt

    Georisk Assess. Manag. Risk Eng. Syst. Geohazards

    (2020)
  • S.M. Abuzied et al.

    Geospatial susceptibility mapping of earthquake-induced landslides in Nuweiba area, Gulf of Aqaba

    Egypt. J. Mt. Sci.

    (2016)
  • S.M. Abuzied et al.

    Application of remote sensing and spatial data integrations for mapping porphyry copper zones in Nuweiba area, Egypt

    Int. J. Signal Process. Syst.

    (2016)
  • Cited by (46)

    • High-temperature hydrothermal resource exploration and development: Comparison with oil and gas resource

      2023, Gondwana Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, more attention is paid to the parameters of reservoir physical properties during the evaluation of oil and gas reserves, while more attention is paid to the distribution of temperature boundary/contour during the assessment of high-temperature hydrothermal energy resources. Exploration is the first step to ensure the successful development of geothermal resources, and its goal is to identify geothermal resources and obtain as much geological information as possible to serve the subsequent geothermal exploitation [Abuzied et al., 2020]. The process and methods of geothermal exploration are shown in Table 4.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text