Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Soviet genetics and the communist party: was it all bad and wrong, or none at all?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The history of genetics and the evolutionary theory in the USSR is multidimensional. Only in the 1920s after the October Revolution, and due in large part to that Revolution, the science of genetics arose in Soviet Russia. Genetics was limited, but not obliterated in the second half of the 1950s, and was restored in the late 1960s, after the resignation of Nikita S. Khrushchev. In the subsequent period, Soviet genetics experienced a resurgence, though one not as successful as geneticists would have liked. The Communist party bodies interfered constantly, but with different consequences for the development of genetics than when the earlier periods. The main troubles for Soviet genetics occurred during the unique, well-known, most contradictory, and tragic Stalinist period. The start date for the defeat of genetics is also known—August, 1948. In the social history of science and especially in the history of evolutionary biology (including genetics) it is natural, necessary, and even expected to adopt an evolutionary approach. In particular, historians of science need to consider and explain the evolution and dependence of Soviet science in regards to the evolution of Soviet society, the Soviet state, and the Communist party. This evolutionary perspective reflects the standards of evolutionary biology, evolutionary macrosociology, and also the history of science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aleksandrov, V. Y. (1992). Trudnye gody sovetskoi biologii [Difficult years of the Soviet biology]. Saint-Petersburg: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altukhov, Yu, & Zakharov, I. (1989a). Vsesouznoe soveshanie “O sostoyanii i perpektivakh razvitiya genetiki v SSSR [all-union meeting “on the state and prospects of genetics development in the USSR”]. Genetika [Russian Journal of Genetics],25, 962–966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altukhov, Yu, & Zakharov, I. (1989b). Vsesouznoe soveshanie “O sostoyanii i perpektivakh razvitiya genetiki v SSSR [all-union meeting “on the state and prospects of genetics development in the USSR”]. Genetika,5, 962–966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anokhin, M. (2014). Nakormivshie lozh’u [Fed with a lie]. Literaturnaya gazeta, February 4.

  • Arronet, N. I., & Lebedev, D. V. (Eds.). (2001). Vladimir Yakovlevich Aleksandrov. Biolog, myslitel’, boets = Vladimir Ya. Alexandrov. Scientist, thinker, fighter. Saint-Petersburg: Lubavich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belevsky, O. A. (2010). Vseobshee i osobennoe v russkoi revolutsii [General and special in the Russian revolution], In: IX Plekhanovsky readings. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, 1922–1991: historical deadlock or prospect of historical development? (pp. 20–24) Saint-Petersburg: RNB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borinskaya, A., Ermolaev, A., & Kolchinsky, E. (2019). Lysenkoism against genetics: the meeting of the Lenin all-union academy of agricultural sciences of August 1948. Its Background, Causes, and Aftermath, Genetics,212(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brzhezinsky, Z. (1989). The grand failure: the birth and death of communism in the twentieth century. New York: Scribner’s sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuikov, A. (2012). Piterskie zhuliki stavyat krest na velikom russkom nasledii [Peter crooks put a cross on the great Russian heritage]. Argumenty nedeli, November 15.

  • Chuikov, A., & Govorov, O. (2019). Period poluraspada RAN. Akademiya. Cpustya shest’ let posle prigovora. [Half-value period of RAS. Academy. Six years after the sentence]. Argumenty nedeli,24, June 26.

  • Cohen, S. (2011). “Vopros voprosov”: pochemu ne stalo Sovetskogo Souza? [“Question of questions”: why Soviet Union has disappeared?]. Moscow: AIRO-XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • deJong-Lambert, W., & Krementsov, N. L. (Eds.). (2017). The Lysenko controversy as a global phenomenon genetics and agriculture in theSoviet Union and beyond (Vol. 1–2). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Dobzhansky, Th. (1955). The crisis in Soviet biology. In: E. J. Simmons (Ed.), Continuity and change and soviet thought (pp. 329–346). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolgosheva, A. (2018). Ne reformirovat’ li reformy? [Whether not to reform reforms?]. Sankt-Peterburgskie vedomosti, December 7.

  • Dubinin, N. P. (1947). Work of Soviet biologists: Theoretical genetics. Science, 105, 109–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epshtein, D. B. (2011). Sotsializm, chastnaya sobstvennost’ i demokratiya [Socialism, private property and democracy]. Svobodnaya Mysl’,10(11), 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epshtein, D. B. (2015). Sotsializm XXI veka: voprosy teorii i otsenki opyta SSSR [Socialism of the XXI century: issues of theory and assessment of the estimation of the USSR]. Moscow: LENAND.

  • Epshtein, D. B. (2017). O sotsialisticheskom kharaktere Oktyabr’skoi revolutsii i nalichii predposylok dlya stroitel’stva sotsializma [About socialist character of the October revolution and existence of prerequisites for construction of socialism]. In: Great Russian revolution of 1917: project of alternative historical development XII Plekhanovsky readings (pp. 62–67). Saint-Petersburg: RNB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erisman, F. (1900). Smertnost’ [Mortality]. In Encyclopedic Dictionary (pp. 500–519). Saint-Petersburg: I.A. Efron, XXX.

  • Fure, F. (1998). Proshloe odnoi illuzii [The past of one illusion]. Moscow: Ad Marginem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazko, V. I. (2005). Nikolai Ivanovich Vavilov i ego vremya. Khronika tekushikh sobytii [Nikolai Ivanovich Vavilov and his time. Current Events Chronicle]. Kiev: izd-vo PA NOVA.

  • Glazko, V. I. (2013). Nikolai Ivanovich Vavilov i ego vremya: Put’na Olimp (Khronika sozdaniya i raspada SSSR)[Nikolai Ivanovich Vavilov and his time: the way to olympus (chronicle of the creation and collapse of the USSR)]. Moscow: OOO “Izd-voNeft’ i gaz”.

  • Glazko, V. I. (2014). Nikolai Ivanovich Vavilov i ego vremya: Velikii perelom—put’ na Golgofu (Khronika sozdaniya i raspada SSSR). [Nikolai Ivanovich Vavilov and his time: the great turn is the way to calvary (chronicle of the creation and collapse of the USSR. Guilty of death)]. Moscow: OOO “Izd-voNeft’ i gaz”.

  • Glazko, V. I. (2017). Nikolai Vavilov. Zhizn’ kak sluzhenie Rodine [Nikolai Vavilov. Life as a service to the Motherland. Vol. 1. 1935–1939]. Moscow: Kurs.

  • Glazko, V. I. (2018). Nikolai Vavilov. Zhizn’ kak sluzhenie Rodine [Nikolai Vavilov. Life as a service to the Motherland. Vol. 2. 1940–1943]. Moscow: Kurs.

  • Glazko, V. I., Cheshko V, F. (2009). Avgust—48. Uroki proshlogo (nauchnoe killerstvo, k istorii sovetskoi genetiki, k fenomenu raspada SSSR) [August—48. lessons of the past. (Scientific killery, to the history of Soviet genetics, to the phenomenon of the collapse of the USSR)]. Moscow: RGAU-MSKHA.

  • Golubovsky, M. D. (2015). Genetika i prizrak Lysenko [Geneticist and Lysenko’s ghost]. Priroda,103(6), 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordin, M. D. (2012). How Lysenkoism became pseudoscience: Dobzhansky to Velikovsky. Journal of the History of Biology,45, 443–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, L. (2016) Lysenko’s Ghost. Epigenetics and Russia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.

  • Hanson, Ph. (2014). The rise and fall of the soviet economy: an economic history of theUSSRfrom 1945–1991. London—New York: Routledge.

  • Inge-Vechtomov, S. G. (2007). “Ne proigryvaite vyigryshnykh partii”. K 100-letiu M.E. Lobasheva [“Don’t lose winning games”. To the 100th anniversary of M.E. Lobashev]. Genetika,10, 1287–1298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inge-Vechtomov, S. G. (2009). Pervaya kafedra genetiki v Rossii (1919–2009) [First department of genetics in Russia (1919–2009)], Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 3. Biologiya,4, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inge-Vechtomov, S. G. (2016). Pervaya kafedra genetiki v Rossii [The first department of Genetics in Russia]. Pisma v Vavilovskii Zhurnal. https://www.bionet.nsc.ru/vogis/download/history_of_Genetics/appx_5.pdf.

  • Inge-Vechtomov, S. G. (Ed.), (2019). Genetika vchera I segodnya (k 100-letiu kafedry genetiki I biotekhnologii Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Genetics yesterday and today (To the 100th anniversary of the Department of Genetics and Biotechnology of St. Petersburg State University)]. Saint-Petersburg: Eko-Vektor Ai-Pi.

  • Inge-Vechtomov, S. G., Tikhomirova, M. M., & Kaidanov, L. Z. (1997). Mikhail Efimovich Lobashev (k 90-letiu so dnya rozhdeniya [Mikhail Efimovich Lobashev (to the 90th anniversary of birth)]. Genetika,33(10), 1450–1454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iogansen, Niel. (2015). Trofim Lysenko: genii ili sharlatan [Trofim Lysenko: genius or charlatan?], Kultura, July 2.

  • Iroshnikov, A. I. (2004). K voprosy ob Arakcheyshchine v nauke (stranitsy istorii: Pochemy I.V. Stalin sanktsionoroval kritiky T.D. Lysenko, a N.S. Khrushchev vozvratil ego na p’edestl?!) [To the question of Arakcheyshchina in Science (history pages: Why did I.V. Stalin authorize criticism of T.D. Lysenko, and N.S. Khrushchev returned him to the pedestal?!)]. https://www.bionet.nsc.ru/vogis/vestnik.php?f=2004&p=28_5

  • Iz istorii bor’by s lysenkovshinoi [From the history of fight against a lysenkoism]. (1991). Isvestiya TsK KPSS, 3(4), 25–141, 3(6), 157–173.

  • Ivanov, Y u M. (1997). Ocherki teorii ipraktiki totalitarnogo sotsializma [Sketches of the theory and practice of totalitarian socialism]. Moscow: MFF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov-Allilyev, S., & Less, A. (2018). V Minsel’khoze “preklonili golovy” pered Lysenko I nazvali ego velikim uchenym [In the ministry of agriculture “bent heads” before Lysenko and called him a great scientist]. https://indicator.ru/news/2018/04/06/v-dume-lysenko-nazvali-velikim-uchenym/.

  • Kagarlitsky, B Yu. (2005). Marksizm: ne rekomendovano dlya obucheniya [Marxism: it isn’t recommended for learning]. Moscow: Algoritm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiran, R., & Kenni, T. (2009). Prodavshie sotsializm: Tenevaya ekonomika v SSSR [Sold socialism: Shadow economy in theUSSR]. Moscow: Algoritm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolchinsky, E. I. (2015a). N.I. Vavilova raspinaut vnov’ [N.I. Vavilov is crucified again]. Politicheskaya kontseptologiya,1, 272–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolchinsky, E. I. (2015b). Publichnyi donos kak sposob “nauchnykh diskussi” [Public denunciation as way of “scientific discussions”]. Politicheskaya Kontseptologiya,1, 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolchinsky, E. I. (2018). N. I. Vavilov I T. D. Lysenko v prostranstve istoriko-nauchnykh diskussii [N. I. Vavilov and T.D. Lysenko in the space of historical and scientific discussions]. Priroda,1, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolchinsky, E. I., Kutschera, U., Hossfeld, U., & Levit, G. S. (2017). Russia’s new Lysenkoism. Current Biology,27, R1042–R1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolganov, A. I. (2009). Sovremennyi sotsializm. Marksistskaya versiya [Modern socialism. Marxist version]. Alternativy,18(4), 62–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolganov, A. I. (2011). Chto takoe sotsializm? Marksistskaya versiya [What is socialism? Marxist version]. Moscow: LIBRIKOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konashev, M. B. (2016a). Sovetskie genetiki i “sotsial’naya istoriya nauki” [Soviet geneticists and “social history of science”]. Sotsiologiya Nauki i Tekhniki,8(4), 32–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konashev, M. B. (2016b). Ob odnoi khronike v dvykh knigakh. Rets. na kniki: Glazko V. I. Nikolai Ivanovich Vavilov i ego vremya: Put’ na Olimp (Khronika sozfdaniya i raspada SSSR). M., 2013; Nikolai Ivanovich Vavilov i ego vremya: Velikii perelom—put’ na Golgofu (Khronika sozfdaniya i raspada SSSR. Povinnye v smerti). M., 2014. [About one chronicle in two books. Rets. On books: Glazko V. I. Nikolai Ivanovich Vavilov and his time: the way to olympus (chronicle of creation and collapse of the USSR). M, 2013; Nikolai Ivanovich Vavilov and his time: the great fracture is the way to calvary (chronicle of the creation and collapse of the USSR. Guilty in death). M., 2014]. Studies in the History of Biology,8, 121–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konashev, M. B. (2017). “Sinteticheskaya teoriya evolutsitsii” i problema al’ternativ istoricheskogo razvitiya [“The synthetic theory of evolution” and problem of alternatives of historical development]. In: Great Russian revolution of 1917: project of alternative historical development XII Plekhanovsky readings (pp. 293–301). Saint-Petersburg: RNB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kononkov, P. F. (2013). O razvitii biologicheskikh i sel’skokhozyaistvennykh nauk v Rossii v sovetskii i postsovetskii periody [About development of biological and agricultural sciences inRussiaduring the Soviet and Post-Soviet periods]. Moscow: Luch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krementsov, N. L. (1996a). “Amerikanskaya pomosh” v sovetskoi genetiki: 1945–1947 [“Amarican help” in Soviet genetics: 1945–1947]. Voprosy Istorii Estestvoznaniya i Tekhniki,16(3), 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krementsov, N. L. (1996b). A “second front” in Soviet genetics: the international dimension of the Lysenko controversy, 1944–1947. Journal of the History of Biology,29, 229–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krementsov, N. L. (2005). International science between the world wars. The case of genetics. London—New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levina, E. S. (1999). Nauka pod pressingom sistemy: istoriya nesostoyavshegosya v Moskve Mezhdunarodnogo kogrsessa (1935–1938 gg.) [Science under the pressure of the system: the history of the failed International Genetic Congress in Moscow (1935–1938)], In IIET RAN. Godichnaya nauchnaya konferentsiay 1968 [IIET RAS. Annual Scientific Conference 1998] (pp. 196–201). Moscow: IIET RAN.

  • Libin, I. J., Kudrjavcev, M., & Olejnik, T. (2014). The reform of the Russian academy of science: possible causes and consequences of the reform—or whom the bell tolls. Moscow Padova: IAAC EuroMedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loshakov, V. G. (2008). Nikolai Ivanovich Vavilov i ego vremya [Nikolai Ivanovich Vavilov and his time]. Isvestiya TSKHA,130(1), 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyapunova, N. A., & Bogdanov, Y u F (Eds.). (2005). Prokof’eva-Bel’govskaya. Portret na fome khromosom [Prokof’eva-Bel’govskaya. Portrait against the background of chromosomes]. Moscow: Nauch. mir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mar’ina, V. V. (Ed.). (2002). Totalitarizm. Istoricheskii opyt Vostochnoi Evropy. “Demokraticheskoe intermetstso” s kommunisticheskim finalom [Totalitarianism: historical experience of Eastern Europe. “The democratic intermezzo” with the communistic final]. Moscow: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslov, A. N. (Ed.). (2008). Trofim Denisovich Lysenko—sovetskii agronom, biolog, selektsioner: k 110-letiu so dnya rozhdeniya (1898–1976 gg.) [Trofim Denisovich Lysenko—Soviet agronomist, biologist, selectionist: to the 110th anniversary of the birth of T. D. Lysenko (1898–1976)]. Moscow: Samoobrazovanie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medvedev, R. A. (2006). Sotsializm v SSSR? [Socialism in the USSR?]. Moscow: Kraft+.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medvedev, Z h A, & Medvedev, R. A. (2012). Nikita Khrushchev [Nikita Khrushchev]. Moscow: Vremya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikhailov, A. I. (2016). Mirosistemnyi analiz raspada SSSR [Worl-system analysis of the collapse of the USSR]. Al’ternativy,15(3), 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishnev, V. G. (2011). O mrachnykh stranitsakh istoii rossiskoi biologii (1930–1980 gg.) [About the dark pages of the history of Russian biology (1930–1980)]. Ekosistemy, ikh Optimizatziya i Okhrana,4, 188–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitrofanov, V. G. (Ed.). (2003). Iosif Abramovich Rapoport, 2-e izd. [Iosif Abramovich Rapoport—scientist, warrior, citizen: essays. memoirs. materials. 2nd ed.]. Moscow: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muronets, V. (2014). Svoevremennaya nepravil’naya kniga o Lysenko [Timely wrong book about Lysenko]. Troitskii Variant,24(168), 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nekipelov, A. D. (2005). Legko li poimat’ chernuiu koshku v temnoi komnate, dazhe esliona tam est’? [Is it easy to catch a black cat in the dark room even if the cat is there?]. Obshestvennye Nauki i Sovremennost’,29(4), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikonova, N. I. (2006). Sotsial’naya struktura sovetskogo obshestva v 1965–1985 gg. [Social structure of the Soviet society in 1965–1985]. Problemy Sovremennoi Ekonomiki,4(1), 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onikov, L. A. (1996). KPSS: anatomiya raspada: vzglyad iznutri apparata TSK KPSS [CPSU: disintegration anatomy: a look from within the office of the Central Committee]. Moscow: Respublika.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrovsky, A. V. (2011). Sushestvoval li sotsializm v SSSR? [Was there socialism in the USSR?]. Alternativy,10(4), 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovchinnikov, N. V. (2010). Akademik Trofim Denitsovich Lysenko: zhiz’n’ i tvorchestvo [Academician Trophim Denisovich Lysenko: life and creativity]. Moscow: Luch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovchinnikov, N. V. (2018). Akademik Trofim Denitsovich Lysenko: zhiz’n’ i tvorchestvo [Academician Trophim Denisovich Lysenko: life and creativity] (2nd ed.). Moscow: Luch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panuta, I. N. (2010). Klassovaya priroda SSSR i prichiny porazheniya stroitel’stva sotsializma [Class nature of the USSR and reason of defeat of the construction of socialism]. In: IX Plekhanovsky readings. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, 1922–1991: historical deadlock or prospect of historical development? (pp. 71–76). Saint-Petersburg: RNB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrovsky, B. V., Burgasov, P. N., Lidov, I. P., Stochik, A. M. (1977). SSSR. Zdravookhranenie [the USSR. health care], In: Bol’shaya sovetskaya entsiklopediya (pp. 271–276). Vol. 24. Book II. Moscow: BSE.

  • Pevzner, Y a A. (1999). Krakh kommunizma i sovremennye obshestvennye othosheniya [Crash of communism and modern public relations]. Moscow: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pletnikov, Y u K. (2000). Budushee—sotsializm: novye cherty sovremennoi epokhi [The future—socialism: new features of a modern era]. Moscow: Bylina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pokrovsky, V. (1897). Naselenie [Population]. In: Encyclopedic Dictionary (pp. 615–638). Saint-Petersburg: I.A. Efrton, XXA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polishuk, A. M. (2010). Meditsynskaya genetika v Rossii [Medical genetics in Russia]. Khimiya i Zhizn’-XXI Vek,2, 44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokofieva-Belgovskaya, A. A. (2002). Moya zhizn’ i khromosomy [My life and chromosomes]. Chelovek,9(3), 135–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reznik, S. E. (2017). Eta korotkaya zhizn’. Nikolai Vavilov i ego vremya [This brief life. Nikolai Vavilov and his time] Moscow: Zakharov.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll-Hansen, N. (2005). The lysenko effect. The Politics of Science. New York: Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll-Hansen, N. (2013). The current relevance of Lysenkoism. Metascience,22(3), 621–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shubin, A. V. (1996). SSSR i rezhimy “narodnyzk demokratii” [USSR and regimes of “national democracies”]. In: Totalitarianism. From history of ideologies, movements, regimes and their overcoming (pp. 381–401). Moscow: PIM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skidel’sky, R. (1998). Doroga ot rabstva [The road from slavery]. Moscow: Ad Marginem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonin, A. S. (2000). “Delo” Zhebraka i Dubinina [“The Affair” of Zhebrak and Dubinin]. Voprosy Istorii Estestvoznaniya i Tekhniki,20(1), 34–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soyfer, V. N. (1994). Lysenko and the tragedy of soviet science. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soyfer, V. N. (2002). Vlast’ i nauka. Istoriya razgroma genetiki v SSSR. 4-e izd. [Power and science. History of the defeat of genetics in the USSR. 4rd ed]. Moscow: CherRo.

  • Soyfer, V. N. (2006). Ten’ Lenina ego usynovila... = Lenin’s ghost adopted him... M. Moscow: CherRo.

  • Soyfer, V. N. (2011). Ochen’ lichnaya kniga [Very personal book]. Novosibirsk: Infolio-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroeva, O. G. (Ed.). (2004). Boris L’vovich Astaurov: Ocherki, vospominaniya, pis’ma, materialy [Boris L’vovich Astaurov: Essays, memories, letters, materials]. Moscow: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroeva, O. G. (2009). Iosif Abramovich Rapoport, 1912–1990 [Iosif Abramovich Rapoport, 1912–1990]. Moscow: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumnyi, V. K. (2002). Dmitrii Konstantinovich Belayev: kniga vospominaniy [Dmitrii Konstantinovich Belayev: Book of memoirs], Novosibirsk: Izd-vo SO RAN Fil “Geo”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumnyi, V. K. (2013). Etudy po istorii genetiki [Etudes on the history of genetics]. Vavilovskii Zhurnal Genetiki i Selektsii,4(2), 782–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surganov, V. S. (1977). SSSR. Ekonomika. Obshaya kharakteristika. [USSR. Economy. General characteristic], In: Bol’shaya sovetskaya entsiklopediya (Vol. 2, Part. 2, p. 203). Moscow: BSE.

  • Theodosius Dobzhansky Papers. (1976). American Philosophical Societ Library APSL. B:D65 Th. Dobzhansky Papers.

  • Torgashev, A., Tarasevich, G., Leibin, V. (2013). Velikaya akademicheskaya voina [Great academic war], Russkii reporter,26.

  • Tuzov, V. V. (2010). SSSR—do sroka rozhdennoe ditya istorii [The USSR—child of history the born to term]. In IX Plekhanovsky readings. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, 1922–1991: historical deadlock or prospect of historical development? (pp. 76–80). Saint-Petersburg: RNB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ya, A. (1893). Golod kak obshestvennoe bedstvie [Famine as public disaster]. In Encyclopedic Dictionary (Vol IX, pp. 102–104). Saint-Petersburg: I.A. Efron.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yakuskin, N., & Litoshenko, D. (1913). Golod kak sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoe yavlenie [Famine as social and economic phenomenon]. In F. A. Brokgauz i I.A. Efron (Eds.), New Encyclopedic Dictionary (Vol 14, pp. 39–46). Saint-Petersburg.

  • Zakharov-Gezekhus, I. A. (2003) Genetika v XX veke. Ocherki po istorii genetiki [Genetics in the 20th century. Essays on the History of Genetics], Mosvow: Nauka.

  • Zakharov, I. K., Shumny, V. K. (2003). Ot redaktsii. K 15-letiu soveshaniya “O sostoyanii i perspektivakh razvitiya genetiki v SSSR [Preface of the editors. To the 15th anniversary of the meeting “On the state and prospects of the development of genetics in the USSR”]. Vestnik VOGiS,26, 1.

  • Zakharov-Gezekhus, I. A. (2011). O popytkakh reabilitatsii lysenkovshiny [About attempts of rehabilitation of a lysenkovshchina]. Istoriko-Biologicheskie Issledovaniya,3(2), 124–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhebrak, A. R. (1945). Soviet biology. Science, 102, 357–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhivotovsky, L. A. (2014). Neizvestnyi Lysenko [Unknown Lysenko]. Moscow: Tovarishestvo nuachnykh izdanii KMK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhivotovsky, L. A. (2016). Neizvestnyi Lysenko: esse. 2-e izd. [Unknown Lysenko: essay], Moscow: Tovarishestvo nuachnykh izdanii KMK.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. St. Petersburg Branch of the Institute of the History of Science and Technology Named After S.I. Vavilov, Saint-Petersburg, Russia

    Mikhail Konashev

Authors
  1. Mikhail Konashev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikhail Konashev.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Konashev, M. Soviet genetics and the communist party: was it all bad and wrong, or none at all?. HPLS 42, 27 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-020-00323-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-020-00323-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation