Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Recent Patents on Nanotechnology

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1872-2105
ISSN (Online): 2212-4020

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Review Article

Nanotechnology and Protection of Intellectual Property: Emerging Trends

Author(s): Jothiratna G.S. Siri*, Chakrawarthige A.N. Fernando and Sembukuttige N.T. De Silva

Volume 14, Issue 4, 2020

Page: [307 - 327] Pages: 21

DOI: 10.2174/1872210514666200612174317

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Technology experts foresee that nanotechnology is the next industrial revolution and it has great potential to bring solutions to many challenges of global relevance in terms of a diverse range of applications. Efficiency-driven economies are transforming into innovation-driven economies where Intellectual Property (IP) plays a pivotal role in achieving a competitive advantage. Whereas industry analysts assert that IP roadblocks will be a severe detriment to the development of nanotechnology due to infringements and high-profile patent battles. Various authors have made a significant effort to analyse the implications of IP on nanotechnology but most of the published literature covers only the years 2000- 2010. Data and insights pertaining to recent developments are lagging behind. Therefore, the objective of this review was to explore cutting-edge empirical evidence towards emerging trends of Intellectual Property protection in nanotechnology, thereby to provide insights aimed at unleashing the full potential of nanotechnology innovation for socio-economic advantage.

Materials and Methods: Patent information over the period 2000 to 2018 was collated and analysed to determine the latest trends. To gain a global perspective, nanotechnology patents issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and nanotechnology patents published in the ‘PatentScope’ of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) were surveyed along with literature in relation to nanotechnology commercialization and litigation.

Results: Our study revealed that worldwide protection of Intellectual Property in nanotechnology has steadily been increasing year-on-year accounting 3.3 million patent applications filed in 2018 in which China and U.S. are dominating. The other main contributors are Japan, Germany Republic of Korea, France and U.K. Asia has emerged as the single region to file more than half of total filings for the first time thus shifting global IP landscape from Europe to Asia. Another notable finding is that there is a significant growth in trademark registration in many of the leading economies. Top five technology fields with high international patenting activity are computer technology, medical technology, digital communication, electrical machinery and pharmaceuticals where computer technology is dominating. More than 90% of the total patents are granted on materials, devices and processes developed as basic building blocks of nanotechnology at laboratory level which sound as more downstream innovations in the short-term. Amid the upward trends in nanotechnology patenting, newly emerging obstacles pose risks to innovation. A key finding of the present study is that the increasing trend of patent litigation almost follows the same path of patent grants indicating a positive correlation. A global prominence of middle-income and low-income countries in patent filing is yet to emerge which foreshadows an IP divide.

Discussions: A secondary market for patent assets is pronounced with many new types of players leading to a high cost of patenting nanotechnology. These trends foreshadow a surge of patent filings in the years to come and the patent offices will be confronted with that ‘surge’ of patent applications of increased complexity and multidisciplinary nature.Patent offices with inadequate efficacy will ultimately produce lowquality patents along with a difficulty to enter into markets and will facilitate exploiting of the IP legal systems to extract rewards for infringement without contributing to innovation or social prosperity of nations.

Conclusion: Insights and recommendations given in this paper will enable nanotechnology researchers, inventors, technopreneurs and investors to understand recent trends and global perspectives on implications of IP in nanotechnology and intensifying IP battle thereby to contemplate and succeed in their roadmaps towards leveraging on nanotechnology.

Keywords: Nanotechnology, intellectual property, patents, innovation, litigation & infringements, nanostructures.

« Previous Next »
Graphical Abstract

[1]
Roco Roco MC, Williams RS, Alivisatos P. Nanotechnology Research DirectionsReport of IWGN Workshop on Vision for Nanotechnology R & D in the Next Decade; 1999 Jan 27-29, Washington, US National Science and Technology Council 1999 Available from: https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a418616.pdf
[2]
Roco MC. The long view of nanotechnology development: The national nanotechnology initiative at 10 years. J Nanopart Res 2011; 13(2): 427-45.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11051-010-0192-z]
[3]
Sparks S. Nanotechnology: Business Applications and Commercialization. 1st ed. Florida: CRC Press 2012; pp. 160-75.
[4]
Chen H, Roco MC, Son J, Jiang S, Larson CA, Gao Q. Global nanotechnology development from 1991 to 2012: Patents, scientific publications, and effect of NSF funding. J Nanopart Res 2013; 15(9): 9-21.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-1951-4]
[5]
Sharrott D, Sayeed HA. Intellectual Property Developments in Biochip Nanotechnology. Nanotechnology Law and Business 2006; 3(1): 20-8.
[6]
Katz E, Riklin A, Heleg-Shabtai V, Willner I, Bückmann AF. Glucose oxidase electrodes via reconstitution of the ApoEnzyme: Tailoring of novel glucose biosensors. Anal Chim Acta 1999; 385: 45-58.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(98)00688-6]
[7]
Ravi Kumar MN. Nano and microparticles as controlled drug delivery devices. J Pharm Pharm Sci 2000; 3(2): 234-58.
[PMID: 10994037]
[8]
Menezes A, Kapoor VJ, Goel VK, Cameron BD, Lu JY. Within a nanometer of your life. Mech Eng 2001; 123(8): 54-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.2001-AUG-3]
[9]
Larkin J, Henley RY, Jadhav V, Korlach J, Wanunu M. Length-independent DNA packing into nanopore zero-mode waveguides for low-input DNA sequencing. Nat Nanotechnol 2017; 12(12): 1169-75.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2017.176] [PMID: 28892102]
[10]
Song W, Anselmo AC, Huang L. Nanotechnology intervention of the microbiome for cancer therapy. Nat Nanotechnol 2019; 14(12): 1093-103.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0589-5] [PMID: 31802032]
[11]
Geppert L. The amazing vanishing transistor act. IEEE Spectr 2002; 39: 28-33.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MSPEC.2002.1038566]
[12]
Hagiya M. From Molecular Computing to Molecular Programming. Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on DNA Based Computers. 2000 June 13-17; Leiden: Netherlands. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer 2001.
[13]
Sahaym U, Norton MG. Advances in the application of nanotechnology in enabling a hydrogen economy. J Mater Sci 2008; 43: 5395-429.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2749-0]
[14]
Toth-Fejel T. Agents, assemblers, and ANTS: Scheduling assembly with market and biological software mechanisms. Nanotechnology 2000; 11: 133-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/11/2/315]
[15]
Requicha AAG, Resch R, Montoya N, Koel BE, Madhukar A, Will P. Toward Hierarchical Nanoassembly. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots & Systems. 1999 Oct 17-21; Kyongju, Korea. Piscataway: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc 1999.
[16]
Bonakdar A, Frankenberger K, Bader MA, Gassmann O. Capturing value from business models: The role of formal and informal protection strategies. Int J Technol Manag 2017; 73(4): 151-75.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2017.083073]
[17]
Bawa R, Bawa SR, Maebius SB, Flynn T, Wei C. Protecting new ideas and inventions in nanomedicine with patents. Nanomedicine 2005; 1(2): 150-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2005.03.009] [PMID: 17292072]
[18]
Naseri R, Davoodi R. Commercialization of Nanotechnology in Developing Countries. 3rd International Conference on Information and Financial Engineering 2011.www.ipedr.com/vol12/70-C162.pdf
[19]
Annual Study of Intangible Asset Market Value Ocean Tomo Available at:. 2017.www.prweb.com/releases/2010/06/prweb4153794.htm
[20]
Hall B, Learner J. The Financing of R&D and Innovation: Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier 2010.
[21]
Moser P. How do patent laws influence innovation? Evidence from nineteenth-century world’s fairs. Am Econ Rev 2005; 95(4): 1214-36.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/0002828054825501]
[22]
Zhang Y, Sulfab M, Fernandez D. Intellectual property protection strategies for nanotechnology. Nanotechnol Rev 2013; 6: 725-42.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2012-0089]
[23]
Wong N. Settlement of Patent Infringement Lawsuit Against Nanoco Technologies for Quantum Dot Technology, BusinessWire. Available at:. www.businesswire.com/news/home/20090723-005313/en/Nanosys-Reaches-Settlement-Patent-Infringement-Lawsuit-Nanoco
[24]
Bawa R, Bawa SR, Maebius SB. Nanotechnology Patent “Gold Rush’. J Intellect Prop Rights 2005; 10: 426-33.www.researchgate.net/.../237762041_The_Nanotechnology_Patent'Gold_Rush
[25]
Bastani B, Fernandez D. Intellectual property rights in nanotechnology. Inform Technol J 2005; 4: 69-74.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/itj.2005.69.74]
[26]
Regalando A. Nanotechnology patents surge as companies vie to stake claim. Wall Street J 2004.
[27]
Harris D, Hermann K, Bawa R, Cleveland JT, O’Neill S. Strategies for resolving patent disputes over nanoparticle drug delivery systems. Nanotechnology Law & Business 2004; 1(4): 21-9.
[28]
Singh KA. Intellectual Property in the nanotechnology economy: trends, patent landscape and the challenges Available at:. www.bioin.or.kr/fileDown.do?seq=3556
[29]
WIPO. Patents. World Intellectual Property Indicators 2018 Geneva: WIPO 2018; 24-33. Available at: . www.wipo.int/edocs/ pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_941_2018.pdf
[30]
WIPO; Long-term trends in filings of PCT applications Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Yearly Review 2019; 8-19. Available at:. 8-19.www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_901_2019.pdf
[31]
Mazumder S, Sarkar D, Puri IK. Nanotechnology Commercialization: Prospects in India. Journal of Materials Science and nanotechnology 2014; 1(4)402. Available at: . www.researchgate.net/ publication/271643922_Nanotechnology_Commercialization_Pros-pects_in_India
[32]
Ganguli P. Commercialization of R&D Results in Nanotechnology: Issues and challenges Critical Issues in Nanotechnology R and D Management: An Asia-Pacific Perspective. New Delhi: APCTT 2014.
[33]
Bessen J, Meurer M. Small Inventors Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk. Princeton: Princeton University Press 2008; pp. 165-86.
[34]
Shapiro C. Navigating the patent thicket: Cross licenses, patent pools, and standard setting. Innov Policy Econ 2000; 1: 119-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/ipe.1.25056143]
[35]
Heller MA, Eisenberg RS. Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science 1998; 280(5364): 698-701.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5364.698] [PMID: 9563938]
[36]
Clarkson G. Objective identification of patent thickets: A Network analytic approachPhD dissertation 2004.
[37]
Hall BH, Helmers C, Graeventiz GV. Technology entry in the presence of patent thicketsWorking Paper 2015; 13-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w21455]
[38]
Dang Y, Zhang Y, Fan L, Chen H, Roco MC. Trends in worldwide nanotechnology patent applications: 1991 to 2008. J Nanopart Res 2010; 12(3): 687-706.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11051-009-9831-7] [PMID: 21170123]
[39]
Shand H, Wetter KJ. Trends in intellectual property rights and nanotechnology: Implication for the global south. J Intellect Prop Rights 2007; 12: 111-7.
[40]
Cohen L, Gurun UG, Kominers SD. Intellectual property and innovation. The growing problem of patent trolling. Science 2016; 352(6285): 521-2.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aad2686] [PMID: 27126027]
[41]
Helmers C. Patent Litigation SystemsEconomic Research Working Paper 2018 Geneva: WIPO 2018; 4-23.
[42]
Greenwald T. Samsung, Intel Back U.S. Regulator’s Suit against Qualcomm. Wall Street Journal 2012.Available at:. www.wsj.com/ articles/samsung-intel-back-u-s-regulators-suit-against-qualcomm-1494638048
[43]
Galiakhmetou R, Giuri P, Munari F. How to enhance patent commercialization- an analysis of patent aggregators in Europe. Int J Innov Manage 2018; 22(4): 1-30.
[44]
Rothwell J, Lobo J, Strumsky D, Muro M. Patenting Prosperity:Invention and Economic Performance in the United Statesand its Metropolitan Areas. Brookings. Available at: 2016.www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/patenting-pros-perity-rothwell.pdf
[45]
Neuhäusler P, Rothengatter O, Frietsch R. Trends in transnational patent filing. Patent applications-structures, trends and recent developments 2018. Berlin. Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation 2018; 6: 28.
[46]
Paradise J. Claiming Nanotechnology: Improving USPTO Efforts at Classification of Emerging Nano-Enabled Pharmaceutical Technologies. Nw J Tech Intell Prop 2012; 10(3): 169.
[47]
Souto EB. Patenting Nanomedicine: Legal aspects, Intellectual Property and Grant opportunities. New York: Springer Heidelberg 2012.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29265-1]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
35
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy