Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000469

Abstract. Data from two experiments show that the experienced structure of a category (i.e., as having high vs. low variability) modulates the impact of context on evaluative judgments of individual exemplars. Target objects (unfamiliar in Experiment 1 and familiar in Experiment 2) were primed with positive and negative images while varying the number (Experiment 1) or typicity (Experiment 2) of exemplars known from a category prior to the judgment task. The results show that evaluations of object valence were more influenced by valenced context cues in high than in low variability category conditions. These results are taken as evidence that more varied exemplar-based category representations facilitate context effects on stimulus evaluation.

References

  • Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2004). The effects of attitudinal ambivalence on attitude intention behavior relations. In G. HaddockG. R. O. Maio (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the psychology of attitudes (pp. 121–144). Hove, UK: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ashby, F. G., & Gott, R. E. (1988). Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 33–53. 10.1037//0278-7393.14.1.33 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Barsalou, L. W. (1987). The instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 101–140). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Barsalou, L. W. (1989). Intraconcept similarity and its implications for interconcept similarity. In S. VosniadouA. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 76–121). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/cbo9780511529863.006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barsalou, L. W. (1993). Flexibility, structure, and linguistic vagary in concepts: Manifestations of a compositional system of perceptual symbols. In A. F. CollinsS. E. GathercoleM. A. ConwayP. E. Morris (Eds.), Theories of memory (pp. 29–101). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bassili, J. N., & Brown, R. D. (2005). Implicit and explicit attitudes: Research, challenges, and theory. In The handbook of attitudes (pp. 543–574). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bettman, J. R., & Sujan, M. (1987). Effects of framing on evaluation of comparable and noncomparable alternatives by expert and novice consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 141–154. 10.1086/209102 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265–289. 10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bowerman, M., & Choi, S. (2001). Shaping meanings for language: Universal and language – specific in the acquisition of spatial semantic categories. In M. BowermanC. S. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 475–511). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/shaping-meanings-for-language-universal-and-language-specific-in- First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, A. L., Nosofsky, R. M., & Zaki, S. R. (2001). Category variability, exemplar similarity, and perceptual classification. Memory & Cognition, 29, 1165–1175. 10.3758/bf03206386 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Conrey, F. R., & Smith, E. R. (2007). Attitude representation: Attitudes as patterns in a distributed, connectionist representational system. Social Cognition, 25, 718–735. 10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.718 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dasgupta, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2001). On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 800–814. 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.800 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. 10.3758/bf03193146 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229–238. 10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Förster, J., Liberman, N., & Kuschel, S. (2008). The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 579–599. 10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.579 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Fried, L. S., & Holyoak, K. J. (1984). Induction of category distributions: A framework for classification learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 234–257. 10.1037/0278-7393.10.2.234 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Garcia-Marques, L., & Mackie, D. M. (1999). The impact of stereotype-incongruent information on perceived group variability and stereotype change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 979–990. 10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.979 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Garcia-Marques, L., Santos, A. S., Mackie, D. M., Hagá, S., & Palma, T. A. (2017). Cognitive malleability and the wisdom of independent aggregation. Psychological Inquiry, 28, 262–267. 10.1080/1047840X.2017.1373558 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Govan, C. L., & Williams, K. D. (2004). Changing the affective valence of the stimulus items influences the IAT by re-defining the category labels. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 357–365. 10.1016/j.jesp.2003.07.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hahn, U., Bailey, T. M., & Elvin, L. B. C. (2005). Effects of category diversity on learning, memory, and generalization. Memory & Cognition, 33, 289–302. 10.3758/bf03195318 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Hampton, J. A. (2015). Categories, prototypes and exemplars. In N. Riemer (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Semantics (pp. 125–141). New York, NY, US: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315685533-20 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Herr, P. M. (1989). Priming price: Prior knowledge and context effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 67–75. 10.1086/209194 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hintzman, D. L. (1986). “Schema abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411–428. 10.1037/0033-295x.93.4.411 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Homa, D., & Vosburgh, R. (1976). Category breadth and the abstraction of prototypical information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 322–330. 10.1037/0278-7393.2.3.322 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Janczura, G. A., & Nelson, D. L. (1999). Concept accessibility as the determinant of typicality judgments. The American Journal of Psychology, 112, 1–19. 10.2307/1423622 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Joy-Gaba, J. A., & Nosek, B. A. (2010). The surprisingly limited malleability of implicit racial evaluations. Social Psychology, 41, 137–146. 10.1027/1864-9335/a000020 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93(2), 136–153. 10.1037/0033-295x.93.2.136 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Koch, A., Alves, H., Krüger, T., & Unkelbach, C. (2016). A general valence asymmetry in similarity: Good is more alike than bad. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 1171–1192. 10.1037/xlm0000243 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Lambert, A. J., & Wyer, R. S. (1990). Stereotypes and social judgment: The effects of typicality and group heterogeneity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 676–691. 10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.676 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Linville, P. W., Salovey, P., & Fischer, G. W. (1986). Stereotyping and perceived distributions of social characteristics: An application to ingroup-outgroup perception. In J. F. DovidioS. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 165–208). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 1242–1255. 10.1121/1.408177 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Loken, B., Joiner, C., & Peck, J. (2002). Category attitude measures: Exemplars as inputs. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(2), 149–161. 10.1207/s15327663jcp1202_07 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lord, C. G., Desforges, D. M., Ramsey, S. L., Trezza, G. R., & Lepper, M. R. (1991). Typicality effects in attitudebehavior consistency: Effects of category discrimination and category knowledge. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 550–575. 10.1016/0022-1031(91)90025-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lord, C. G., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Attitude Representation Theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 265–343. 10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60275-0 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207–238. 10.1037/0033-295x.85.3.207 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Medin, D. L., & Shoben, E. J. (1988). Context and structure in conceptual combination. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 158–190. 10.1016/0010-0285(88)90018-7 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Michael, E., de Gardelle, V., & Summerfield, C. (2014). Priming by the variability of visual information. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 7873. 10.1073/pnas.1308674111 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification–categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39–57. 10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.39 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Nosofsky, R. M., & Kantner, J. (2006). Exemplar similarity, study list homogeneity, and short-term perceptual recognition. Memory & Cognition, 34, 112–124. 10.3758/bf03193391 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Payne, B. K., Cheng, C. M., Govorun, O., & Stewart, B. D. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277–293. 10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Prada, M., & Garcia-Marques, T. (2006). Normas da valência das imagens do Ficheiro de Imagens Multicategoriais (FIM) [Valence norms of the multicategorial image file]. Laboratório de Psicologia, 4, 109–137. 10.14417/lp.765 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Prada, M., & Ricot, R. (2010). Qual é coisa, qual é ela? Avaliação de valência e familiaridade de imagens de objectos desconhecidos [Valence and familiarity ratings of images of unfamiliar objects]. Laboratório de Psicologia, 8, 151–169. 10.14417/lp.639 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rhodes, M., & Brickman, D. (2010). The role of within-category variability in category-based induction: A developmental study. Cognitive Science, 34, 1561–1573. 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01137.x First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Ribar, R. J., Oakes, L. M., & Spalding, T. L. (2004). Infants can rapidly form new categorical representations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 536–541. 10.3758/bf03196607 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Rips, L. J. (1989). Similarity, typicality, and categorization. In S. VosniadouA. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 21–59). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roth, E. M., & Shoben, E. J. (1983). The effect of context on the structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 346–378. 10.1016/0010-0285(83)90012-9 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rydell, R. J., & Gawronski, B. (2009). I like you, I like you not: Understanding the formation of context-dependent automatic attitudes. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 1118–1152. 10.1080/02699930802355255 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sakamoto, Y., Jones, M., & Love, B. C. (2008). Putting the psychology back into psychological models: Mechanistic versus rational approaches. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1057–1065. 10.3758/mc.36.6.1057 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarz, N. (2007). Attitude construction: Evaluation in context. Social Cognition, 25, 638–656. 10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.638 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1992). Constructing reality and its alternatives: An inclusion/exclusion model of assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment. In L. L. MartinA. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (pp. 217–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sia, T. L., Lord, C. G., Blessum, K. A., Thomas, J. C., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Activation of exemplars in the process of assessing social category attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 517–532. 10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.517 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sloman, S. A. (1994). When explanations compete: The role of explanatory coherence on judgements of likelihood. Cognition, 52, 1–21. 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90002-7 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Stewart, N., & Chater, N. (2002). The effect of category variability in perceptual categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 893–907. 10.1037/0278-7393.28.5.893 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Unkelbach, C., Fiedler, K., Bayer, M., Stegmüller, M., & Danner, D. (2008). Why positive information is processed faster: The density hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 36–49. 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.36 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Vukatana, E., Graham, S. A., Curtin, S., & Zepeda, M. S. (2015). One is not enough: Multiple exemplars facilitate infants’ generalizations of novel properties. Infancy, 20, 548–575. 10.1111/infa.12092 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wahlheim, C. N., & DeSoto, K. A. (2017). Study preferences for exemplar variability in self-regulated category learning. Memory, 25, 231–243. 10.1080/09658211.2016.1152378 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Wahlheim, C. N., Finn, B., & Jacoby, L. L. (2012). Metacognitive judgments of repetition and variability effects in natural concept learning: Evidence for variability neglect. Memory & Cognition, 40, 703–716. 10.3758/s13421-011-0180-2 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Waxman, S. R., & Klibanoff, R. S. (2000). The role of comparison in the extension of novel adjectives. Developmental Psychology, 36, 571–581. 10.1037/0012-1649.36.5.571 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Wisniewski, E. J. (1995). Prior knowledge and functionally relevant features in concept learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 449–468. 10.1037/0278-7393.21.2.449 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Yi, Y. (1993). Contextual priming effects in print advertisements: The moderating role of prior knowledge. Journal of Advertising, 22, 1–10. 10.1080/00913367.1993.10673391 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1–27. 10.1037/h0025848 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Zentall, T. R., Wasserman, E. A., Lazareva, O. F., Thompson, R. K. R., & Rattermann, M. J. (2008). Concept learning in animals. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews, 3, 13–45. 10.3819/ccbr.2008.30002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar