Parsing for Position
Abstract
Abstract. Monitoring tasks have long been employed in psycholinguistics, and the end-of-clause effect is possibly the better-known result of using this technique in the study of parsing. Recent results with the tone-monitoring task suggest that tone position modulates cognitive load, as reflected in reaction times (RTs): the earlier the tone appears in a sentence, the longer the RTs. In this study, we show that verb position is also an important factor. In particular, changing the time/location at which verb–noun(s) dependencies are computed during the processing of a sentence has a clear effect on cognitive load and, as a result, on the resources that can be devoted to monitoring and responding to a tone. This study is based on two pieces of evidence. We first report the acceptability ratings of six word orders in Spanish and then present monitoring data with three of these different word orders. Our results suggest that RTs tend to be longer if the verb is yet to be processed, pointing to the centrality of a sentence’s main verb in parsing in general.
References
(1969). Syntactic structure modifies attention during speech perception and recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21(3), 280–290. 10.1080/14640746908400223
(2019). Raincloud plots: A multi-platform tool for robust data visualization. Wellcome Open Research, 4(63), 1–40. 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15191.1
(2005). Frecuencias del Español. Diccionario y estudios léxicos y morfológicos. Madrid, Spain: Editorial Universitas.
(2013). Additive effects of word frequency and stimulus quality: The influence of trial history and data transformations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1563–1571. 10.1037/a0032186
(2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278. 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
(2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
(1975). Detection of a nonlinguistic stimulus is poorest at the end of a clause. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 4(1), 1–7. 10.1007/bf01066985
(1979). Monitoring sentence comprehension. In W. E. CooperE. C. T. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett (pp. 113–134). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
(2013). EsPal: One-stop shopping for Spanish word properties. Behavioral Research Methods, 45(4), 1246–1258. 10.3758/s13428-013-0326-1
(1993). Sobre el orden de palabras en español. Dicenda, 11, 113–152.
(2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116–124. 10.3758/bf03195503
(1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6, 291–325. 10.1016/0010-0277(78)90002-1
(1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1–76. 10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00034-1
(2019). emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.3.5. [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria: CRAN. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/emmeans/emmeans.pdf
(2018). Disentangling perceptual and psycholinguistic factors in syntactic processing: Tone monitoring via ERPs. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 1125–1140. 10.3758/s13428-017-0932-4
. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria: R Core Team. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
(2000). LEXESP. Léxico informatizado del español. Barcelona: Edicions Universitat de Barcelona.
(2001). Sentence comprehension. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
