Editorial
The past and future of The Journal of Strategic Information Systems: A conversation with Bob Galliers

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101612Get rights and content

Abstract

The Journal of Strategic Information Systems (JSIS) was first published in December 1991 by Robert D. (Bob) Galliers, its founding Editor-in-Chief (EiC), following an invitation to establish the journal by Butterworth Heinemann in 1989. Bob invited Sirkka Jarvenpaa to join him as co-Editor-in-Chief in 2000. In 2018, Bob and Sirkka jointly decided it was time, and after three and two decades at the helm respectively, announced they would both step down from their EiC roles at the end of that year. Bob and Sirkka, the Senior Editors and Elsevier endorsed Guy Gable to assume the role of Editor-in-Chief commencing January 2019. In this reflection, Guy interviews Bob Galliers on the ‘changing of the guard’; the journal’s past and future, and the topic of Strategic Information Systems more broadly.

We believe the history of JSIS as reflected in Bob's ruminations is insightful for the Journal's readers and the IS community. From the discussion we learn how an academic journal was guided to success by focusing on the vision, the strategic choices and actions, the team composition and the ability to adapt and lead in a constantly changing environment, where the technology developments challenge organizational structures, markets and society. A set of well-thought through strategic choices, initially made by Bob and later in collaboration with Sirkka and the rest of the editorial team, led the Journal to the top of the research field by gaining respect from scholars in the underlying research areas, i.e., IS management, Strategy and Organization Science.1

Introduction

In this section, we give a brief overview of JSIS, its rationale, history and progress.

Work on developing The Journal of Strategic Information Systems (JSIS) started in the 1989–1990 academic year with Robert D. (Bob) Galliers2, its Founding Editor-in-Chief (EiC), inviting Senior Editors and other colleagues from different regions of the world to form an international editorial team. A call for papers was circulated, and in December 1991 the first issue was published. In 2000, Bob invited Sirkka Jarvenpaa3 to become co-Editor-in-Chief. Following their decision to step down from their EiC roles at the end of 2018, I (Guy Gable) was endorsed by Bob and Sirkka, the Senior Editors, and Elsevier, to assume the role of EiC of JSIS commencing 1 January 2019.

Having now served over a year in the EiC role (with continuing strong support from Bob during that time) I approached Bob seeking his views on the journal’s past and future, and the topic of Strategic Information Systems more broadly. I write this article both as testament to Bob's and Sirkka's contribution to the Information Systems discipline, and as a partial record of this iconic journal. Bob's and Sirkka's contributions have been massive, defining and sustaining. Bob was early to recognise the strategic role information technology could play, in 1987 saying, ‘it appears that the application of information technology is at the threshold of a new era, opening up new opportunities by using the technology strategically for the benefit of organizations and businesses’ (Somogyi and Galliers, 1987, p.40). JSIS has been pivotal in the Information Systems (IS) field in claiming the strategic information systems research domain. This paper is based on an email conversation with Bob and presents a consideration of his and Sirkka's legacy and the achievements of JSIS over the last three decades. Together, Bob and I also speculate on the journal's future challenges.

The journal's direction has changed little since its inception. From the outset through to the middle of 2014, the journal’s mission was …

  • Combining intellectual rigour with practical experience, this international journal integrates academic findings and research with the current experience of executives attempting to get the best out of their investment in information systems. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems emphasizes the need for IT systems to be driven by business requirements and publishes state-of-the-art review and developmental papers from around the world, in addition to case studies drawn from actual experience.

In September 2014, the aims and scope of JSIS were nudged in a slightly new direction …

  • The Journal of Strategic Information Systems focuses on the strategic management, business and organizational issues associated with the introduction and utilization of information systems, and considers these issues in a global context. The emphasis is on the incorporation of IT into organizations' strategic thinking, strategy alignment, organizational arrangements and management of change issues. The journal publishes research from around the world which: • investigate the changing nature of business in the context of emerging IT; • discuss the justification and evaluation of information systems; • discuss the organizational implications of IT; • consider how organizations have been transformed as a result of the astute management and application of IT. […] A transdisciplinary, critical approach/perspective is welcome. Topics covered include: • organizational transformation on the back of IT; • information systems/business strategy alignment; • inter-organizational systems; • global issues and cross-cultural issues; and• the impact and significance of emerging IT

In the first JSIS editorial, Bob stated that, “Information Technology (IT) needs to be taken seriously; its management needs to be integrated into the mainstream activities of executives and we need to do much more in ensuring that IT ‘delivers the goods’ by providing the business and social benefits that we seek from it” (Galliers, 1991, p. 3). Celebrating the 20th anniversary of JSIS in 2012, the special issue editorial summarised achievements up to that time, and reaffirmed the relevance of the journal’s focus despite significant changes in the IT landscape since inception. Achievements included being recognized by the Association for Information Systems (AIS) senior scholars as one of the eight leading journals in the IS field and winning the Anbar Golden Page Award in 1999 for ‘‘Best Research Implications’’ in the Information Management category. Changes included “the advent of the Web; the dot.com bubble burst; the phenomenon of outsourcing and offshoring; the introduction of new information and communication technologies (social media, mobile computing, cloud computing), and the financial crises in Asia, Europe and North America that few predicted” (Galliers et al., 2012, p.85). A further decade later, the importance of strategically aligning IS with organisational prerogatives remains a vital topic (e.g., Marabelli and Galliers, 2017, p.348) and a key concern (Kappelmann et al., 2019).

On most measures, JSIS has performed well across its lifetime. In a recent Viewpoint article by Vidgen et al. (2019) “How well does the Information Systems discipline fare in the Financial Times’ top 50 Journal list?” the AIS Basket-of-eight4 (Bo8) journals stand up well, and JSIS in several respects surprisingly so, given that, unlike the others, it focuses on a particular subset of the field. Vidgen et al. introduce a new journal ranking metric, the HMJ-index, which is an equally weighted combination of journal H-index, median citations/article and Journal Impact Factor (JIF). Based on the HMJ-index, JSIS ranks 34th of the 55 journals in the study (the 55 were the FT50 plus the 5 Bo8 journals not in the FT50). Of the Bo8 - JSIS ranks equal 2nd with JMIS, behind only MISQ. Comparing the JIF of the 55 journals JSIS performs particularly well; it ranked 30th and 2nd amongst the IS journals. Data on the median citations per article of the Bo8 showed that JSIS is also equal 2nd, with EJIS, again behind only MISQ.

Additionally, JSIS papers have regularly featured in the AIS Best Information Systems Publications Awards (https://aisnet.org/page/BestPublicationsAwar):

  • 2019 - Aligning with new digital strategy: A dynamic capabilities approach (Yeow et al., 2018)

  • 2017 - The role of transaction cost economics in information technology outsourcing research: A meta-analysis of the choice of contract type (Schermann et al., 2016)

  • 2014 - From boundary spanning to creolization: A study of Chinese software and services outsourcing vendors (Abbott et al., 2013)

  • 2012 - Firm-level benefits of IT-enabled resources: A conceptual extension and an empirical assessment (Jones, 2019)Nevo and Wade, 2011

  • 2011 - Paradoxical effects of institutionalisation on the strategic awareness of technology in organisations (Baptista et al., 2010).

In 2020, JSIS retains its strong position in the Information Systems field. As I wrote in my first editorial as the new EiC, “The theme in 2019 is ‘steady as she goes’. The new team’s challenge will be remaining on the trajectory established by Bob and Sirkka, with the journal commencing 2019 at a high, with … CiteScore: 3.82; Impact Factor: 4.313; 5 Year Impact Factor: 4.820; Source Normalised Impact per Paper (SNIP): 2.079; SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 1.707; SCImago: Q1; ABDC: A*; and continuing in the AIS basket-of-eight.” (Gable, 2019). In 2020, the CiteScore had risen to 6.26.

Section snippets

The first decade (1990s) – the advent of JSIS

The first issue of JSIS in 1991 included five research articles, dealing with such issues as: information architectures (Bidgood and Jelley, 1991); competitive advantage (Lei and Sobol, 1991); customer-oriented strategic systems (Reich and Huff, 1991), and strategic information systems planning (Ruohonen, 1991). The issue also questioned whether business schools are meeting the challenge of management and IT in the 21st century (Targett, 1991).

  • Q5: In your

The second decade (2000s) – Sirkka joins

Ending its first decade, in the first editorial of 2000 Bob introduced Sirkka Jarvenpaa as the then new joint Editor-in-Chief of JSIS (also introducing other, then new, senior editors – Blake Ives, Michael Vitale and Dorothy Leidner (Galliers and Jarvenpaa, 2000).

  • Q: What was your rationale for teaming with Sirkka as joint Editor-in-Chief, and am I correct in my assessment of your effectiveness together?

  • A: I invited Sirkka to join me given her outstanding record and particular interests that fit

The third decade (2010s) – exploring new phenomenon

In the editorial celebrating the 20th anniversary of JSIS, Galliers et al. (2012) concluded that, “JSIS will continue to have the mission to advance strategic agendas of, and behaviors associated with, information and communication technologies and information management in ever increasing dynamic and high velocity environments. JSIS will continue to improve our understanding of IT strategizing as a practice with its own evolving knowledge bases. It will continue to push the envelope in

The future

In this final section, Bob Galliers and I speculate briefly on the future of the journal and Strategic Information Systems agenda more generally.

Strategizing through IT has long been a ‘hot’ topic” (Marabelli and Galliers, 2017, p.348) and research on Strategic Information Systems will continue to be published in many venues because of its cross-disciplinary nature and the current high ranking of related journals. However, JSIS will continue to provide an opportunity for scholars to focus on

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to the editorial panel that reviewed this submission – Kevin Desouza, Ioanna Constantiou and Carol Hsu. Special thanks to Ioanna for the 2nd paragraph in the abstract. Sincere thanks also to Karen Stark and Sue Nielsen for invaluable assistance with compiling this Viewpoint. Thanks also to Karen for her strong and continuing support with central review of manuscripts, her efforts highly influential on the quality, clarity and integrity of the journal.

References (64)

  • R.D. Galliers et al.

    Datification and its human, organizational and societal effects: The strategic opportunities and challenges of algorithmic decision-making

    J. Strategic Inform. Syst.

    (2017)
  • W.A. Günther et al.

    Debating big data: A literature review on realizing value from big data

    J. Strategic Inform. Syst.

    (2017)
  • D.E. Leidner

    Editorial, special issue on knowledge management and knowledge management systems

    J. Strateg. Inf. Syst.

    (2000)
  • D. Lei et al.

    The cim-is partnership: Integration for competitive advantage

    J. Strategic Inform. Syst.

    (1991)
  • S. Nevo et al.

    Firm-level benefits of it-enabled resources: A conceptual extension and an empirical assessment

    J. Strategic Inform. Syst.

    (2011)
  • S. Newell et al.

    Strategic opportunities (and challenges) of algorithmic decision-making: A call for action on the long-term societal effects of ‘datification’

    J. Strategic Inform. Syst.

    (2015)
  • J. Peppard et al.

    Editorial: Information systems strategy as practice: Micro strategy and strategizing for IS

    J. Strategic Inform. Syst.

    (2014)
  • B.H. Reich et al.

    Customer-oriented strategic systems

    J. Strategic Inform. Syst.

    (1991)
  • M. Ruohonen

    Stakeholders of strategic information systems planning: theoretical concepts and empirical examples

    J. Strategic Inform. Syst.

    (1991)
  • V. Sambamurthy et al.

    JSIS editorial—special issue on “trust in the digital economy”

    J. Strategic Inform. Syst.

    (2002)
  • M. Schermann et al.

    The role of transaction cost economics in information technology outsourcing research: A meta-analysis of the choice of contract type

    J. Strategic Inform. Syst.

    (2016)
  • D. Targett

    The ITBE 2000 initiative: Are business schools meeting the challenge of management and it in the 21st century?

    J. Strategic Inform. Syst.

    (1991)
  • L. Välikangas et al.

    Of managers, ideas and jesters, and the role of information technology

    J. Strategic Inform. Syst.

    (2010)
  • R. Vidgen et al.

    2019/12/01/). Invited Viewpoint: How well does the Information Systems discipline fare in the Financial Times’ top 50 Journal list?

    J. Strateg. Inf. Syst.

    (2019)
  • G. von Krogh

    The communal resource and information systems

    J. Strategic Inform. Syst.

    (2002)
  • A. Yeow et al.

    Aligning with new digital strategy: A dynamic capabilities approach

    J. Strategic Inform. Syst.

    (2018)
  • Ballantine, J. & Galliers, R. D., (2017). New developments in information technology: A call for action. In Quinn, M...
  • J. Baptista et al.

    Paradoxical effects of institutionalisation on the strategic awareness of technology in organisations

    J. Strategic Inform. Syst.

    (2010)
  • D. Cecez-Kecmanovic et al.

    The sociomateriality of information systems

    MIS Quarterly

    (2014)
  • P. Checkland

    Systems Thinking, Systems Practice

    (1981)
  • P. Checkland

    Systems Thinking, Systems Practice: includes a 30-year retrospective

    (1999)
  • X. Deng et al.

    The duality of empowerment and marginalization in microtask crowdsourcing: Giving voice to the less powerful through value sensitive design

    MIS Quarterly

    (2016)
  • Cited by (10)

    • Doing strategic information systems research for public value

      2023, Journal of Strategic Information Systems
    • Ruminations of an Editor-in-Chief

      2022, Journal of Strategic Information Systems
    • Symbolic capital and the basket of 8: What changed after the creation of the basket?

      2021, Decision Support Systems
      Citation Excerpt :

      At its inception in 2007, there were debates on whether the SSB should include six or eight journals. This dispute was settled in 2011 with the official inclusion of JSIS and JIT in the SSB [8,9]. That JIT and JSIS fought to be included in the SSB underscores the perceived importance of inclusion in the SSB.

    • The lifecycle of algorithmic decision-making systems: Organizational choices and ethical challenges

      2021, Journal of Strategic Information Systems
      Citation Excerpt :

      We suggested that IS scholars should join the discussion on the problematic use of these systems by taking advantage of the interdisciplinary background of our community. Since then, IS scholarship has showcased a growing interest in these problems associated with algorithmic decision-making, JSIS being a good example of related articles (cf. Gable 2020; Galliers et al. 2017; Grønsund and Aanestad 2020; Günther et al. 2017; Loebbecke and Picot 2015; Marjanovic and Cecez-Kecmanovic 2017; Markus 2017; Newell and Marabelli 2015). In this viewpoint article we aim to build on past work, including our own (not just our JSIS viewpoint, but also several related studies that we have conducted in recent times) to further discuss issues associated with ADMS.

    • Viewpoint: Information systems research strategy

      2020, Journal of Strategic Information Systems
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    References have been added subsequent to the 'interviews' to provide backup to statements made and also to provide context.

    1

    Sincere thanks to a Senior Editor for this paragraph, suggested during the editorial review process.

    View full text