Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Genetic diversity analysis for narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) by SSR markers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) is used as grain legumes, fodder for livestock and green manure in the world and has a great potential to be developed as a new crop in China. In this study, we assessed the genetic diversity among a set of 109 newly introduced accessions of narrow-leafed lupin using 76 genomic SSR markers. Data analysis suggested that the average gene diversity index and average polymorphism information content (PIC) were 0.4758 and 0.4328, respectively. The mean allele number per loci (Na) was 6.3816. The population structure analysis identified two subgroups based on delta K (ΔK) values. This result is in accordance with that of a PCA. The AMOVA analysis showed that most of molecular variance were within population. These results will be useful to guide the genetic improvement of the narrow-leafed lupin crop in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yang H, Tao Y, Zheng Z, Zhang Q, Zhou G, Sweetingham MW, Howieson JG, Li C (2013) Draft genome sequence, and a sequence-defined genetic linkage map of the legume crop species Lupinus angustifolius L. PLoS ONE 8(5):e64799

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kroc M, Koczyk G, Święcicki W, Kilian A, Nelson MN (2014) New evidence of ancestral polyploidy in the Genistoid legume Lupinus angustifolius L. (narrow-leafed lupin). Theor Appl Genet 127(5):1237–1249

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. French RJ, Buirchell BJ (2005) Lupin: the largest grain legume crop in Western Australia, its adaptation and improvement through plant breeding. Aust J Agric Res 56(11):1169–1180

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hane JK, Ming Y, Kamphuis LG, Nelson MN, Garg G et al (2017) A comprehensive draft genome sequence for lupin (Lupinus angustifolius), an emerging health food: insights into plant-microbe interactions and legume evolution. Plant Biotechnol J 15(3):318–330

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Drummond CS, Eastwood RJ, Miotto ST, Hughes CE (2012) Multiple continental radiations and correlates of diversification in Lupinus (Leguminosae): testing for key innovation with incomplete taxon sampling. Syst Biol 61(3):443–460

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee YP, Mori TA, Sipsas S, Barden A, Puddey IB et al (2006) Lupin-enriched bread increases satiety and reduces energy intake acutely. Am J Clin Nutr 84(5):975–980

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gladstones JS, Atkins CA, Hamblin J (1998) Lupins as crop plants. Field Crop Abstr 23:123–148

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lambers H, Clements JC, Nelson MN (2013) How a phosphorus-acquisition strategy based on carboxylate exudation powers the success and agronomic potential of lupines (Lupinus, Fabaceae). Am J Bot 100(2):263–288

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Aïnouche A, Bayer RJ, Misset MT (2004) Molecular phylogeny, diversification and character evolution in Lupinus (Fabaceae) with special attention to Mediterranean and African lupines. Plant Syst Evol 246(3–4):211–222

    Google Scholar 

  10. Plitmann U (1981) Evolutionary history of the Old World Lupines. Taxon 30(2):430–437

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kłos P, Poreba E, Springer E, Lampart-Szczapa E, Goździcka Józefiak A (2010) Identification of a specific IgE-binding protein from narrow-leafed lupin (L. Angustifolius) seeds. J Food Sci 75(1):H39–H43

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Berger JD, Buirchell BJ, Luckett DJ, Palta JA, Ludwig C et al (2012) How has narrow-leafed lupin changed in its 1st 40 years as an industrial, broad-acre crop? A G × E-based characterization of yield-related traits in Australian cultivars. Field Crops Res 126:152–164

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mousavi-Derazmahalleh M, Bayer PE, Nevado B, Hurgobin B, Filatov D, Kilian A, Kamphuis LG, Singh KB, Berger JD, Hane JK, Edwards D, Erskine W, Nelson MN (2018) Exploring the genetic and adaptive diversity of a pan-Mediterranean crop wild relative: narrow-leafed lupin. Theor Appl Genet 131(4):887–901

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Sońta M, Batorska M, Więcek J, Rekiel A (2020) Performance results and concentrations of biochemical indices and mineral elements in blood serum of fatteners fed diets containing mixtures of raw seeds of pea (Pisum sativum L.) or blue lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.). Animals 10(5):858

    Google Scholar 

  15. Abraham EM, Ganopoulos I, Madesis P et al (2019) The use of lupin as a source of protein in animal feeding: genomic tools and breeding approaches. Int J Mol Sci 20(4):851

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ruiz-López MA, Barrientos-Ramírez L, García-López PM et al (2019) Nutritional and bioactive compounds in mexican lupin beans species: a mini-review. Nutrients 11(8):1785

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Clements J, Galek R, Kozak B, Michalczyk DJ, Sawicka-Sienkiewicz E, Stawiński S, Zalewski D (2014) Diversity of selected Lupinus angustifolius L. genotypes at the phenotypic and DNA Level with respect to microscopic seed coat structure and thickness. PLoS ONE 9(8):e102874

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Foley RC, Gao LL, Spriggs A, Soo LY, Goggin DE, Smith PM, Atkins CA, Singh KB (2011) Identification and characterisation of seed storage protein transcripts from Lupinus angustifolius. BMC Plant Biol 11:59

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Berger JD, Buirchell BJ, Luckett DJ, Nelson MN (2012) Domestication bottlenecks limit genetic diversity and constrain adaptation in narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.). Theor Appl Genet 124(4):637–652

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen Y, Shan F, Nelson MN, Siddique KH, Rengel Z (2016) Root trait diversity, molecular marker diversity, and trait-marker associations in a core collection of Lupinus angustifolius. J Exp Bot 67(12):3683–3697

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Moore SS, Sargeant LL, King TJ, Mattick JS, Georges M, Hetzel DJ (1991) The conservation of dinucleotide microsatellites among mammalian genomes allows the use of heterologous PCR primer pairs in closely related species. Genomics 10(3):654–660

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zheng X, Cheng T, Yang L et al (2019) Genetic diversity and DNA fingerprints of three important aquatic vegetables by EST-SSR markers. Sci Rep 9(1):14074

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kumar M, Choi JY, Kumari N, Pareek A, Kim SR (2015) Molecular breeding in Brassica for salt tolerance: importance of microsatellite (SSR) markers for molecular breeding in Brassica. Front Plant Sci 6:688

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu Q, Song Y, Liu L, Zhang M, Sun J, Zhang S, Wu J (2015) Genetic diversity and population structure of pear (Pyrus spp.) collections revealed by a set of core genome-wide SSR markers. Tree Genet Genom 11(6):128

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chen C, Xiao L, Li X, Du D (2018) Comparative mapping combined With map-based cloning of the Brassica juncea genome reveals a candidate gene for multilocular rapeseed. Front Plant Sci 9:1744

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Fu XQ, Yang FX, Lu XK, Wang XG, Yang BX, Liu FJ, Liu Y, Peng J (2017) Molecular identification of variety purity in a cotton hybrid with unknown parentage using DNA-SSR markers. Genet Mol Res. https://doi.org/10.4238/gmr16039799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaldate R, Rana M, Sharma V, Hirakawa H, Kumar R et al (2017) Development of genome-wide SSR markers in horsegram and their use for genetic diversity and cross-transferability analysis. Mol Breed 37(8):103

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB (1983) A plant DNA minipreparation: Version II. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1:19–21

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Suzana M, Rahimah AR, Maizura I, Singh R (2015) A simple and rapid protocol for isolation of genomic DNA from oil palm leaf tissue. J Oil Palm Res 27(3):282–287

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang H, Jian J, Li X, Renshaw D, Clements J, Sweetingham MW, Tan C, Li C (2015) Application of whole genome re-sequencing data in the development of diagnostic DNA markers tightly linked to a disease-resistance locus for marker-assisted selection in lupin (Lupinus angustifolius ). BMC Genom 16(1):660

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jarman SN (2004) Amplicon: software for designing PCR primers on aligned DNA sequences. Bioinformatics 20(10):1644–1645

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pauthenier C, Faulon JL (2014) PrecisePrimer: an easy-to-use web server for designing PCR primers for DNA library cloning and DNA shuffling. Nucleic Acids Res 42(W1):W205–W209

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. da Maia LC, Palmieri DA, de Souza VQ, Kopp MM, de Carvalho FI, Costa de Oliveira A (2008) SSR locator: tool for simple sequence repeat discovery integrated with primer design and pcr simulation. Int J Plant Genom. https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/412696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Marjanović D, Bakal N, Kovacević L, Hodzić M, Haverić A, Haverić S, Ibrulj S, Durmić A (2006) Optimisation of forensic genetics procedures used in disputed paternity testing: adjustment of the PCR reaction volume. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 6(2):76–81

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Wittig I, Schägger H (2005) Advantages and limitations of clear-native PAGE. Proteomics 5(17):4338–4346

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu K, Muse SV (2005) PowerMarker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics 21(9):2128–2129

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Razavi FE, Zarban A, Hajipoor F, Naseri M (2017) The allele frequency of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 in the Southern Khorasan population. Res Pharm Sci 12(3):211–221

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14(8):2611–2620

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Niu S, Song Q, Koiwa H et al (2019) Genetic diversity, linkage disequilibrium, and population structure analysis of the tea plant (Camellia sinensis) from an origin center, Guizhou plateau, using genome-wide SNPs developed by genotyping-by-sequencing. BMC Plant Biol 19(1):328

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Gronau I, Moran S (2007) Optimal implementations of UPGMA and other common clustering algorithms. Inf Process Lett 104(6):205–210

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M (1994) MEGA: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software for microcomputers. Comput Appl Biosci 10(2):189–191

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evolut 30(12):2725–2729

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. de Jager D, Swarts P, Harper C, Bloomer P (2017) Friends and family: a software program for identification of unrelated individuals from molecular marker data. Mol Ecol Resour 17(6):e225–e233

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEX 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update. Bioinformatics 28(19):2537–2539

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Nei M (1983) Genetic Polymorphism and the role of mutation in evolution. In: Nei M, Kohen RK (eds) Evolution of gene and proteins. Sinaver Associates, Sunderlans, pp 165–190

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the financial support from National Infrastructure for Crop Germplasm Resources project from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (NICGR2018), the international cooperation projects (2016-X16 and 2017YFE0105100), and also supported by Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program (ASTIP) in CAAS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China

    Yishan Ji, Rong Liu, Yuning Huang, Dong Wang, Guan Li, Md. Mosiur Rahman, Hongyan Zhang, Chenyu Wang, Mengwei Li, Tao Yang & Xuxiao Zong

  2. USDA-ARS Western Regional Plant Introduction Station (WRPIS), Pullman, WA, USA

    Jinguo Hu

  3. Pulses Research Center, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur, Bangladesh

    Md. Mosiur Rahman

Authors
  1. Yishan Ji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jinguo Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuning Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Guan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Md. Mosiur Rahman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hongyan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Chenyu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Mengwei Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Tao Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Xuxiao Zong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

TY and XXZ designed experiment and prepared the manuscript, YSJ conducted experiments and analyzed data, RL and YNH prepared all the seeds of plant material, JGH and MMR revised the manuscript, DW, GL and HYZ extracted DNA, CYW and MWL assisted in SSR genotyping.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tao Yang or Xuxiao Zong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Research involving human and animal rights

No human participants or animals were involved in this research.

Informed consent

This manuscript is original and submitted with the consent of all authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ji, Y., Liu, R., Hu, J. et al. Genetic diversity analysis for narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) by SSR markers. Mol Biol Rep 47, 5215–5224 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-020-05596-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-020-05596-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation