Elsevier

Waste Management

Volume 113, 15 July 2020, Pages 379-394
Waste Management

A review of mathematical models for composting

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.06.018Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Comprehensive and exhaustive review of 40 years of composting modelling.

  • Identification of trends in the aim and approach of composting models.

  • Representative overview of composting kinetics, heat balances and mass balances.

  • Complete inventory of kinetic correction functions.

  • In-depth discussion and guiding perspective on future developments in the field.

Abstract

Composting is a valuable method to treat and valorize organic waste. However, the process is defined by its dynamic nature and governed by a multitude of operating parameters. As such, mathematical modelling of the process offers a powerful tool to simulate and predict the variable outcomes of the process, allowing for its optimization. This can include improving efficiency, lowering costs and reducing environmental impact. To aid with the development of future models, we provide an up to date review and assessment on the state of the art of composting modelling. By reviewing 40 years of literature, this review paints the most complete picture of the field to date. This includes an analysis of trends in composting modelling: looking at the type of systems that are targeted, the aim of the models and the approaches to kinetics and mass and heat transfer. Regarding modelling approaches, we explore the fractionation of both substrates and microorganisms, the biological processes that can be included (disintegration, hydrolysis, uptake and death) and their kinetics (first-order, Monod-type), energy balances (biological generation, convection, conduction) and mass balances. We also provide a review of the results of sensitivity analyses performed on composting models, finding that models are most sensitive to microbial growth and death rates, as well as consumption rates and product yields. In the final portion of the review, we identify, explore, and provide guiding recommendations for work on emerging areas and areas requiring development in composting modelling (volume change, pH, maturation, artificial intelligence, etc.).

Introduction

Approximately 50% of the waste generated worldwide is composed of organic matter, generally coming from food, human and animal waste, and garden and wood products (Hoornweg and Bhada-Tata, 2012). Currently, this waste is most often intended for disposal by landfill (Hoornweg and Bhada-Tata, 2012). Landfilling is an environmentally unsustainable method for waste treatment, resulting in contamination of the surrounding land and groundwater, large amounts of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and important spatial requirements (El-Fadel et al., 1997). However, with growing interest in sustainable development and circular economies, industry and governmental leaders are turning their eyes towards biological biomass conversion technologies such as composting to address the waste issue (Walling et al., 2019). This transition has involved the implementation of multiple laws and directives aiming to either limit or ban landfilling, generally classifying it as a last recourse. Examples of this include the Landfill Directive of the European Union (EU) (EU, 1999) that has led to the near elimination of landfilling in countries such as Austria, Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden, and with the recent adoption of the Circular Economy Action Plan that proposes to revise previous legislation to limit landfilling to a maximum of 10% of municipal waste by 2030. Similarly, countries such as Canada have also sought to limit landfilling through national diversion goals and provincial bans currently in place in multiple provinces (CCME, 2014).

Composting is the biological process in which organic matter is aerobically decomposed by bacteria, fungi and worms into compost. The process allows for the reduction of the weight and volume of the residual matter, while simultaneously killing off pathogens and organisms and leading to a value-added product (Hay and Kuchenrither, 1990). The resulting product, i.e. compost, is a humus-like substance that is rich in carbon and nutrients, thus promoting its use as an organic fertilizer or as a soil amendment. As such, compost has been demonstrated to increase the nutrient supply, increase crop yield, decrease soil erosion, and increase soil workability, all the while sequestering carbon and acting as a pesticide against certain insects (Lairon, 2010, Lazcano et al., 2014). There are also the added benefits derived from avoiding landfilling, such as reducing GHG emissions and decreasing soil and groundwater contamination. Furthermore, compost is a generally accepted product by the general population, in contrast to products of other biomass conversion processes, such as the digestate from anaerobic digestion and biochar from pyrolysis and gasification which, for the time being, require work to establish themselves in the eyes of the consumers (Al Seadi and Lukehurst, 2012, Dahlin et al., 2015, Dahlin et al., 2017, Riding et al., 2015, Torrijos, 2016).

To favor the development and implementation of composting processes, mathematical models have been developed for the past few decades. These models aim at furthering our understanding of the processes, consequently reducing the time and energy spent on their optimization and allowing for simulation and assessment of process modifications. Only three reviews have explored the modeling of composting: Hamelers (2004) reviewed the approaches for modelling composting kinetics, notably focusing on the differences between inductive and deductive models. This was followed by Mason (2006) who looked at the structure and kinetic foundations of composting models, paying attention to their simulation capabilities and performance. The more recent review by Li et al. (2013) examined the importance of certain factors and their impact on the composting of food waste, as well as looking at modeling approaches and how models deal with uncertainty. However, since these reviews, there has been significant work in the field of composting modelling, with over 1600 papers having been published on the subject since 2013, more than the amount (1450) published between 1990 and 2010 (based on the Web of Science database).

Given these recent developments and the increasing growth in the field, a new review on the current state of composting modelling could be very beneficial. Therefore, the aim of this review is to examine the state of the art while highlighting areas requiring further development. Section 2 presents the methodology used during the review, as well as general trends identified from the composting literature. Section 3 investigates in detail the mathematical modelling of the composting process, providing a comprehensive overview of the work that has been done in this field by focusing on kinetics, heat and mass balances, and the significance of model parameters, gleaned from an assessment of sensitivity analyses. Section 4 identifies and discuses emerging areas and areas requiring development in the field of composting modelling, while Section 5 provides some concluding remarks.

Section snippets

Material and methods

This review focuses on literature from the beginning of composting modelling to the present day. The choice to consider such a large span of literature instead of basing our work on the previous reviews and completing with more recent information was to provide a truly comprehensive interpretation of the state of composting literature. This is most notably portrayed in Section 3.1 that presents the trends in composting literature and throughout Section 4 on emerging areas and areas requiring

Modelling the composting process

Composting is a process marked by multiple dynamic changes due to diverse and deeply interrelated phenomena. These changes include a characteristic temperature profile, transitioning between mesophilic and thermophilic temperature ranges (also reflected in the change in microbial community), an initial decrease in pH followed by a slow increase due to a release and then consumption of short-chained organic acids, a decrease in mass, free air space (space between particles) and generally

Emerging areas and areas requiring development

Beyond the traditional composting models presented throughout the paper, often seeking to predict degradation, temperature and moisture content, other models have been designed for or have included more niche considerations. This includes prediction of self-ignition of composting piles (Aganetti et al., 2016, Luangwilai et al., 2018, Moraga et al., 2009, Nelson et al., 2003, Sidhu et al., 2006, Zambra et al., 2011, Zambra et al., 2012), pathogen or pollutant destruction/evolution (Gea et al.,

Conclusions

This review aimed at providing a comprehensive and consolidated view of the state of composting modelling, a field that has seen consistent development over the past 40 years. Multiple aspects of composting modelling have been highlighted throughout this review:

  • 1.

    A majority of composting models have sought to combine degradation kinetics with dynamic heat and mass balances in a deterministic fashion to predict temperature, moisture and substrate degradation through time. There has also been a

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work has been carried out at Université Laval, supported financially by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) through the award of an NSERC Discovery Grant (RGPIN-2017-04838) awarded to Céline Vaneeckhaute and an FRQNT doctoral scholarship (138536) for Eric Walling. Céline Vaneeckhaute holds the Canada Research Chair in Resource Recovery and Bioproducts Engineering.

References (199)

  • M.T. Chan et al.

    Reducing nitrogen loss and salinity during ‘struvite’food waste composting by zeolite amendment

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2016)
  • X. Chen et al.

    Protein and carbohydrate drive microbial responses in diverse ways during different animal manures composting

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2019)
  • Y.-X. Chen et al.

    Effects of bamboo charcoal and bamboo vinegar on nitrogen conservation and heavy metals immobility during pig manure composting

    Chemosphere

    (2010)
  • J. Dahlin et al.

    Biogas digestate marketing: Qualitative insights into the supply side

    Resour. Conserv. Recycl.

    (2015)
  • J. Dahlin et al.

    Biogas digestate management: Evaluating the attitudes and perceptions of German gardeners towards digestate-based soil amendments

    Resour. Conserv. Recycl.

    (2017)
  • A. De Guardia et al.

    Characterization and modelling of the heat transfers in a pilot-scale reactor during composting under forced aeration

    Waste Manage.

    (2012)
  • J. Denes et al.

    Numerical simulation of organic waste aerobic biodegradation: a new way to correlate respiration kinetics and organic matter fractionation

    Waste Manage.

    (2015)
  • K. Ekinci et al.

    Effects of feedstock, airflow rate, and recirculation ratio on performance of composting systems with air recirculation

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2006)
  • M. El-Fadel et al.

    Environmental impacts of solid waste landfilling

    J. Environ. Manage.

    (1997)
  • N.A. El Kader et al.

    Turning, compacting and the addition of water as factors affecting gaseous emissions in farm manure composting

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2007)
  • M. Fang et al.

    Co-composting of sewage sludge and coal fly ash: nutrient transformations

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (1999)
  • D. Fangueiro et al.

    Acidification of animal slurry–a review

    J. Environ. Manage.

    (2015)
  • C. Fernández et al.

    A predictor model for the composting process on an industrial scale based on Markov processes

    Environ. Modell. Softw.

    (2016)
  • X. Flores-Alsina et al.

    A plant-wide aqueous phase chemistry module describing pH variations and ion speciation/pairing in wastewater treatment process models

    Water Res.

    (2015)
  • L.T. Fontenelle et al.

    Integrating mixed microbial population dynamics into modeling energy transport during the initial stages of the aerobic composting of a switchgrass mixture

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2011)
  • C. Francou et al.

    Influence of green waste, biowaste and paper–cardboard initial ratios on organic matter transformations during composting

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2008)
  • D.K. Fytanidis et al.

    Numerical simulation of landfill aeration using computational fluid dynamics

    Waste Manage.

    (2014)
  • J. Ge et al.

    Modeling of oxygen uptake rate evolution in pig manure–wheat straw aerobic composting process

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2015)
  • J. Ge et al.

    Particle-scale modeling of oxygen uptake rate during pig manure–wheat straw composting: A new approach that considers surface convection

    Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.

    (2016)
  • T. Gea et al.

    Optimal bulking agent particle size and usage for heat retention and disinfection in domestic wastewater sludge composting

    Waste Manage.

    (2007)
  • E. Giusti et al.

    Fuzzy modelling of the composting process

    Environ. Modell. Softw.

    (2010)
  • W. Gujer et al.

    Activated sludge model no. 3

    Water Sci. Technol.

    (1999)
  • M. Gutiérrez et al.

    Modelling of composting process of different organic waste at pilot scale: Biodegradability and odor emissions

    Waste Manage.

    (2017)
  • X. He et al.

    Modelling for reactor-style aerobic composting based on coupling theory of mass-heat-momentum transport and Contois equation

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2018)
  • C.W. Higgins et al.

    Validation of a new model for aerobic organic solids decomposition: simulations with substrate specific kinetics

    Process Biochem.

    (2001)
  • J. Illa et al.

    Empirical characterisation and mathematical modelling of settlement in composting batch reactors

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2012)
  • Y.-K. Jeong et al.

    A new method for conservation of nitrogen in aerobic composting processes

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2001)
  • J. Kaiser

    Modelling composting as a microbial ecosystem: a simulation approach

    Ecol. Modell.

    (1996)
  • S. Kujawa et al.

    Neural image analysis for maturity classification of sewage sludge composted with maize straw

    Comput. Electron. Agric.

    (2014)
  • F. Lei et al.

    The effect of microbial inoculation and pH on microbial community structure changes during composting

    Process Biochem.

    (2000)
  • Z. Li et al.

    Experimental and modeling approaches for food waste composting: a review

    Chemosphere

    (2013)
  • S.-S. Lim et al.

    Nitrogen, carbon, and dry matter losses during composting of livestock manure with two bulking agents as affected by co-amendments of phosphogypsum and zeolite

    Ecol. Eng.

    (2017)
  • Y.P. Lin et al.

    Modeling of substrate degradation and oxygen consumption in waste composting processes

    Waste Manage.

    (2008)
  • X. Liu et al.

    Evaluation of the correlations between biodegradability of lignocellulosic feedstocks in anaerobic digestion process and their biochemical characteristics

    Biomass Bioenergy

    (2015)
  • T. Luangwilai et al.

    Biological self-heating in compost piles: a Semenov formulation

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (2013)
  • T. Luangwilai et al.

    One-dimensional spatial model for self-heating in compost piles: Investigating effects of moisture and air flow

    Food Bioprod. Process.

    (2018)
  • I. Mason

    An evaluation of substrate degradation patterns in the composting process. Part 2: Temperature-corrected profiles

    Waste Manage.

    (2008)
  • I.G. Mason

    Mathematical modelling of the composting process: a review

    Waste Manage.

    (2006)
  • I.G. Mason et al.

    Physical modelling of the composting environment: a review. Part 1: Reactor systems

    Waste Manage.

    (2005)
  • N. Moraga et al.

    Unsteady 2D coupled heat and mass transfer in porous media with biological and chemical heat generations

    Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.

    (2009)
  • Cited by (42)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text