Solution to critical suction pressure of penetrating suction caissons into clay using limit analysis
Introduction
Suction caissons have become the preferred foundation for offshore platforms or wind turbines due to their competitive technical and economic advantages over other foundations like driven piles [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. A suction caisson initially penetrates the seabed under its self-weight, and then the encased water is gradually pumped out, producing downward suction pressure to drive it to the desired depth. During suction-assisted penetration, the suction pressure inside the caisson must be higher than the required suction pressure (pre) to overcome the total penetration resistance consisting of skin frictions along the inside (Fi) and outside (Fo) of the skirt wall and the bearing capacity at the skirt-tip (Ft) [8], [9], [10], [11]. According to Fig. 1(a), by using limit equilibrium theory in the vertical direction, the required suction pressure for caisson installation can be expressed by
Meanwhile, the suction pressure should be lower than the critical suction pressure (pcr) in order to avoid the reverse bearing capacity failure at the skirt-tip level. Otherwise, soil flows into the caisson cavity, leading to higher soil plug heave that prevents the caisson from penetrating to the desired depth [[8], [9], [10], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]]. Consequently, to minimize the soil plug heave, the reverse bearing capacity failure should be avoided near the skirt-tip. As recommended by Andersen et al. [8], House et al. [12], Li et al. [15], and Randolph et al. [17], the critical suction pressure can be calculated in terms of the free body of soil plug. From Fig. 1(b), it has
By considering a general reverse bearing capacity failure of soil at the skirt-tip level, Ncr was recommended to vary from 6.2 to 9.0 [8, 18], 7.0 to 9.0 [9], and 5.14 to 7.5 [15]. However, these researchers did not consider the effect of the local reverse bearing capacity failure near the skirt-tip on the soil plug heave. House et al. [12] pointed out that the experimental data indicated the critical penetration depth before soil plug failure is somewhat lower than that obtained from Eq. (2). Guo et al. [18] concluded that all the soil displaced by the skirt wall flows inwards during suction-assisted penetration, and even more volume of soil would enter the caisson cavity before the general reverse bearing capacity failure occurs at the skirt-tip level. They also indicated that the reverse bearing capacity failure may be progressive due to the water pumping continuously. Houlsby et al. [10] presented a simplified design procedure to determine the critical suction pressure based on the local reverse bearing capacity failure mechanism at the skirt-tip level. However, they did not take the effects of adhesion factors (αi) and (αo) on the local reverse bearing capacity failure mechanism into consideration. They assumed that the downward skin friction inside the caisson results in a uniform increase of vertical stress and the downward skin friction outside the caisson is carried by constant stress over an annulus with inner (Do) and outer diameters (mDo). Since the downward skin friction enhances the vertical stress in the vicinity of the skirt wall, the equivalent overburden at the skirt-tip level outside the caisson may vary from γ'h at an infinite position to a maximum at the skirt wall surface (Do), as shown in Fig. 1(d). Additionally, due to the reverse effect of the suction pressure, the vertical stress within the soil plug is reduced, and the equivalent overburden at the skirt-tip level inside the caisson is lower than that outside the caisson. The difference in equivalent overburdens between outside and inside the caisson in excess of Ncrsu causes the local reverse bearing capacity failure near the skirt-tip, as shown in Fig. 1(d), which is affirmed by House et al. [12] and Guo et al. [18].
This paper presents a theoretical study on the critical suction pressure that motivates the local reverse bearing capacity failure near the skirt-tip when the difference in equivalent overburdens between outside and inside the caisson exceeds Ncrsu. The equivalent overburdens at the skirt-tip level inside and outside the caisson necessitate predicting the critical suction pressure, which will be calculated in Section 2. In Section 3, Ncr of the local reverse bearing capacity failure near the skirt-tip will be derived using the limit analysis involving αi and αo. It should be noted that the critical penetration depth can be achieved when the critical suction pressure equals the required suction pressure by Eq. (1), which will be validated in Section 4.
Section snippets
Estimation of equivalent overburden at the skirt-tip level
According to Houlsby et al. [10], the equivalent overburden inside caisson at the skirt-tip level can be adapted to be
However, it is more difficult to obtain the relevant equivalent overburden outside the caisson by using a theoretical method. Because the downward skin friction on the outside of the skirt wall will enhance the stress in the vicinity of the caisson which is difficult to calculate [10], we had to use the finite element (FE) method to solve such a problem. The
Determination of the critical suction
As mentioned previously, the local reverse bearing capacity failure initiates near the skirt-tip (Fig. 7). Thus, the displacement pattern of the clay within the failure region may closely approximate a plane strain problem as the skirt walls with diameter to thickness ratio Do/t >100 are generally very thin [12, 17]. Then, under the plain-strain condition the limit equilibrium differential equations of the slip-line can be obtained in terms of the stress equilibrium and yield criterion. In
Verification with measured data
Generally, as suggested by Andersen et al. [9], the clay along inside and outside of the skirt wall is assumed to be remoulded as the skirt wall penetrates seabed. The undrained shear strength of the remoulded zone is determined either from direct measurements of the strength of remoulded samples, or the intact shear strength divided by the sensitivity, i.e. αSu, where α equals the inverse of the sensitivity, St. Nevertheless, it should be noted that if the steel surface of caisson is painted
Conclusions
The local reverse bearing capacity failure near the skirt-tip may be mobilized before the general reverse bearing capacity failure at the skirt-tip level, leading to an excessive soil plug heave inside the caisson that prevents the caisson from penetrating to the designed depth. This paper presents a theoretical research on determining the critical suction pressure that causes the local reverse bearing capacity failure near the skirt-tip where the effects of adhesion factors (αi) and (αo) on
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Yuqi Wu: Data curation, Software, Validation, Writing - original draft. Yu Zhang: Writing - review & editing. Dayong Li: Conceptualization, Methodology.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:
Acknowledgements
This study was financially supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51879044, 51639002) and SDUST Research Fund (Grant No. 2015KYJH104).
References (33)
- et al.
Experimental study on installation of hybrid bucket foundations for offshore wind turbines in silty clay
Ocean Eng.
(2016) - et al.
Prototype testing for the partial removal and re-penetration of the mooring dolphin platform with multi-bucket foundations
Marine Struct.
(2018) - et al.
Suction caisson installation in sand with isotropic permeability varying with depth
Applied Ocean Res.
(2013) - et al.
Model tests on installation techniques of suction caissons in a soft clay seabed
Appl. Ocean Res.
(2012) - et al.
Suction caisson foundations for offshore wind turbines
Wind Eng.
(2002) - et al.
Foundations for offshore wind turbines, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London
Series A
(2003) - et al.
Fuzzy modeling of holding capacity of offshore suction caisson anchors
Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech
(2017) - et al.
Determination of maximum penetration depth of suction caissons in sand
KSCE J. Civil Eng.
(2018) - et al.
Theoretical studies on penetration resistance of suction caisson in clay
Marine Georesour. Geotechnol.
(2019) - et al.
Foundation design of skirted foundations and anchors in clay
Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference
(1999)
Suction anchors for deep water applications
Proceedings of the International Symposium On Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics (ISFOG)
Design procedures for installation of suction caissons in clay and other materials
Proc. Inst. Civil Eng.-Geotech. Eng.
Modeling the installation of stiffened caissons in over consolidated clay
Limiting aspect ratio for suction caisson installation in clay
Suction anchor piles for the Na kika FDS mooring system. Part2: installation performance
Field validation of soil friction transition during suction pile installation
Int. J. offshore Polar Eng.
Cited by (15)
Analysis of bucket foundation installation in clay considering soil large deformation
2023, Ocean EngineeringCombined bearing capacity of bucket foundations in soft-over-stiff clay
2022, Applied Ocean ResearchCitation Excerpt :Commonly, grout is injected to fill the gap between the top plate and soils to further improve the suction. With increasing interest on bucket foundations, some researches have been conducted to investigate bearing capacities, including analytical derivation (Houlsby and Byrne, 2004; Wu et al., 2020), field trials and prototype experiments (Cassidy et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2020; Vicent et al., 2019). Owing to low cost and high efficiency, numerical modeling method is an emerging approach to obtain the ultimate bearing capacities of offshore foundations (Chen et al., 2020; Zhang and Andersen, 2019).
Experimental studies on suction-assisted installation of the modified suction caisson in dense sand
2022, Applied Ocean ResearchCitation Excerpt :Besides, Wu et al. (2018, 2019) proposed modified slip-line field methods to estimate the penetration resistance during suction-assisted installation in sand and clay. Furthermore, limit analysis was carried out to determine the critical suction during installation in clay (Wu et al., 2020). To improve the bearing capacity of a regular suction caisson, the modified suction caisson (MSC), which adds a short external structure outside the regular suction caisson, has been proposed (shown in Fig. 1).
Penetration Tests of Multi-Bucket Foundation in Sand for Offshore Wind Turbines
2023, Journal of Ocean University of China