Skip to main content
Log in

Cold tolerance of black spruce, white spruce, jack pine, and lodgepole pine seedlings at different stages of spring dehardening

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding tree vulnerability to freezing temperatures will help resource managers to mitigate the effects of climatic variability. To test the effectiveness of tissue dehardening curves to represent whole seedling responses, we tested the cold tolerance of 4 conifer species to a range of freezing temperatures, − 15, − 25, and − 35 °C in late March, and − 5, − 10, and − 15 °C in early May. Results show that, after a 30-min exposure to freezing temperatures, needle mortality started at − 25 °C in late March (early spring dehardening) before budbreak activation and at − 10 °C in early May (late spring dehardening) when pine buds had flushed and white spruce (Picea glauca) buds had started swelling. Freezing temperatures delayed the timing of budbreak; increased needle, terminal bud, and seedling mortality; and reduced shoot growth and number of top laterals. White spruce and lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) were more sensitive to freezing in terms of needle, terminal bud, and seedling mortality and growth reduction. The effects of March freezing were generally detected in the first year, whereas those of the May freezing were still evident in the second year on the shoot growth of black spruce (Picea mariana) and jack pine (Pinus banksiana). Although they seem relatively hardier based on first year post-freezing assessments (i.e., less immediate physical damage from freezing), black spruce and jack pine may have sustained more internal or physiological shock/damage. Our study results support the use of tissue cold hardiness–forcing temperature relationships to assess the risk of freezing damage for conifer seedlings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

modified from Man et al. 2017a, Fig. 6)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bannister P, Neuner G (2001) Frost resistance and the distribution of conifers. In: Bigras FJ, Colombo SJ (eds) Conifer Cold Hardiness. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 3–21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bella IE, Navratil S (1987) Growth losses from winter drying (red belt damage) in lodgepole pine stands on the east slopes of the Rockies in Alberta. Can J For Res 17:1289–1292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg EE, Chapin FS III (1994) Needle loss as a mechanism of winter drought avoidance in boreal conifers. Can J For Res 24:1144–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigras FJ, Hébert C (1996) Freezing temperatures and exposure times during bud break and shoot elongation influence survival and growth of containerized black spruce (Picea mariana) seedlings. Can J For Res 26:1481–1489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigras FJ, Margolis HA (1997) Shoot and root sensitivity of containerized black spruce, white spruce and jack pine seedlings to late fall freezing. New For 13:29–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigras FJ, Ryyppö A, Lindström A, Stattin E (2001) Cold acclimation and deacclimation of shoots and roots of conifer seedlings. In: Bigras FJ, Colombo SJ (eds) Conifer Cold Hardiness. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrech, pp 57–88

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bigras FJ, Dumais D (2005) Root-freezing damage in the containerized nursery: impact on plantation sites–a review. New For 30:167–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonsal BR, Zhang X, Vincent LA, Hogg WD (2001) Characteristics of daily and extreme temperatures over Canada. J Climate 14:1959–1976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burr KE, Hawkins CDB, L’Hirondelle SJ, Binder WD, George MF, Repo T (2001) Methods for measuring cold hardiness of conifers. In: Bigras FJ, Colombo SJ (eds) Conifer cold hardiness. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 369–401

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cayford JH, Hildahl V, Nairn LD, Wheaton MPH (1959) Injury to trees from winter drying and frost in Manitoba and Saskatchewanin 1958. For Chron 35:282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glerum C (1973) Annual trends in frost hardiness and electrical impedance for seven coniferous species. Can J Plant Sci 53:881–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halfpenny JC, Ozanne RD (1989) Winter: an ecological handbook. Johnson Publishing Company, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Hänninen H (1995) Effects of climatic change on trees from cool and temperate regions: an ecophysiological approach to modelling of bud burst phenology. Can J Bot 73:183–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henson WR (1952) Chinook winds and red belt injury to lodgepole pine in the rocky mountain parks area of Canada. For Chron 28:62–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiratsuka Y, Zalasky H (1993) Frost and other climate-related damage of forest trees in the Prairie Provinces. Forestry Canada, Northwest Region, Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton, AB. Info. Rep. NOR-X-331

  • Holzer K (1969) Cold resistance in spruce. In: Proceedings of the 2nd FAO–IUFRO world consultation on forest tree breeding. Washington, DC. FAO-FO-FTB-69-6/2, pp 597–613

  • Man R, Kayahara GJ, Dang QL, Rice JA (2009) A case of severe frost damage prior to budbreak in young conifers in northeastern Ontario: consequence of climate change? For Chron 85:453–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Man R, Lu P (2010) Effects of thermal model and base temperature on estimates of thermal time to bud break in white spruce seedlings. Can J For Res 40:1815–1820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Man R, Colombo S, Kayahara GJ, Duckett S, Velasquez R, Dang QL (2013a) A case of extensive conifer needle browning in northwestern Ontario in 2012: Winter drying or freezing damage? For Chron 89:675–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Man R, Kayahara GJ, Foley S, Wiseman C (2013b) Survival and growth of eastern larch, balsam fir, and black spruce following 2007 conifer winter browning in northeastern Ontario. For Chron 89:777–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Man R, Colombo S, Lu P, Dang QL (2016) Effects of winter warming on cold hardiness and spring budbreak of four boreal conifers. Botany 94:117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Man R, Lu P, Dang QL (2017a) Cold hardiness of white spruce, black spruce, jack pine, and lodgepole pine needles during dehardening. Can J For Res 47:1116–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Man R, Lu P, Dang QL (2017b) Insufficient chilling effects vary among boreal tree species and chilling duration. Front Plant Sci 8:1354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nienstaedt H, King JP (1969) Breeding for delayed bud break in Picea glauca (Moench) Voss—potential frost avoidance and growth gains. In: Proceedings of the 2nd FAO-IUFRO world consultation on forest tree breeding. Washington, DC. FAO-FO-FTB-69-2/5, pp 61–80

  • Nilsson JE (2001) Seasonal changes in phenological traits and cold hardiness of F1-populations from plus-trees of Pinus sylvestris and Pinus contorta of various geographical origins. Scand J For Res 16:7–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ögren E (2001) Effects of climatic warming on cold hardiness of some northern woody plants assessed from simulation experiments. Physiol Plant 112:71–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly C, Parker WH (1982) Vegetative phenology in a clonal seed orchard of Picea glauca and Picea mariana in northwestern Ontario. Can J For Res 12:408–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park A, Puettmann K, Wilson E, Messier C, Kames S, Dhar A (2014) Can boreal and temperate forest management be adapted to the uncertainties of 21st century climate change? Crit Rev Plant Sci 33:251–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peace TR (1962) Pathology of trees and shrubs, with special reference to Britain. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby JR, Porporato A (2008) Spring frost risk in a changing climate. Geophys Res Lett 35:L12703

    Google Scholar 

  • Robeson SM (2004) Trends in time-varying percentiles of daily minimum and maximum temperature over North America. Geophys Res Lett 31:L04203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robin JK, Susut JP (1974) Red belt in Alberta. Can. For. Serv., Edmonton, AB. Inf. Rep. NOR-X-99.

  • Schär C, Vidale PL, Lüthi D, Frei C, Häberli C, Liniger MA, Appenzeller C (2004) The role of increasing temperature variability in European summer heat waves. Nature 427:332–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Søgaard G, Johnsen Ø, Nilsen J, Junttila O (2008) Climatic control of bud burst in young seedlings of nine provenances of Norway spruce. Tree Physiol 28:311–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Darren Derbowka, Kevin Maloney, John Schnare, Sarah Isherwood, Jessica Mayer, and Jamie Fox of the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF) for their assistance during the study, and Lisa Buse, MNRF, and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. Conifer seedlings were provided by Tree Time Services Inc. /Coast to Coast Reforestation, Alberta, and Millson Forestry Service Inc., Ontario.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rongzhou Man.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Man, R., Lu, P. & Dang, QL. Cold tolerance of black spruce, white spruce, jack pine, and lodgepole pine seedlings at different stages of spring dehardening. New Forests 52, 317–328 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-020-09796-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-020-09796-0

Keywords

Navigation