Abstract
Although the drying processes have an important place in the textile industry in terms of drying or various textile finishing applications, they are considered as an expensive process in terms of energy and time consumed. Therefore, it is of great importance to simulate with mathematical models the drying behavior of a stenter (ram machine), one of the most preferred convection dryers in the textile industry. For this purpose, in this study, modeling was attempted of the drying behavior of 67 % Cotton + 33 % Polyester containing Thessaloniki knit fabrics, using experimental data obtained from drying processes performed in 9 different drying operations in a 10-chamber hot oil-heated stenter and 12 different empirical and semi-empirical thin-layer models that are frequently used in the literature. R2 values from regression analysis were evaluated as the primary factor in the model fit selection. According to the results obtained, it was understood that the Diffusion Approach model with R2 values ranging from 0.9991 to 0.9999, Two Term Model with R2 values ranging from 0.9995 to 0.9999, and the Modified Henderson and Pabis model with R2 values ranging from 0.9995 to 0.9999 gave the most appropriate results upon simulating drying behavior. In this regard, this study, which contains explanatory information on the drying behavior in a stenter, is thought to be useful to researchers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Karakoca, Determination of Temperature Area in the Yarn Coil Drying Process by Finite Difference Method, MSc. Thesis (Namık Kemal University, Tekirdağ, 2017, In Turkish)
A.S. Mujumdar, Handbook of Industrial Drying, Marcel Dekker, Handbook of Industrial Dryıng, (Inc. New York and Basel, 1995), pp. 1987
R.T. Ogulata, F. D. Kadem, E. Koc, Drying methods and machines in textile, (IV. National Plumbing Engineering Congress and Exhibition, 4-7 November, Izmir, Turkey, 1999), pp. 803–809
I. Tarakcioglu, Textile Finishing and Machines (Aegean University Textile Faculty Publications; Izmir, Turkey, 1996)
J. Ribeiro, J.M.P. Ventura, Dry. Technol. 13, 239 (1995)
H.S. Lee, W.W. Carr, H.W. Beckham, J. Leisen, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 45, 357 (2002)
M.M. Hussain, I. Dincer, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 46, 4033 (2003)
C. Dietl, E.R.F. Winter, R. Viskanta, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 41, 3611 (1998)
R.M. Santos, J.W.P.L. Ianos, M.B. Quadri, I.C.C. Rocha, Dry. Technol. 33, 37 (2015)
G.B. Cinar, H. Ceylan, Therm. Science (2019). https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI190510336C
A.E. Akan, D.B. Özkan, Dry. Technol. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2019.1662436
A.E. Akan, D.B. Özkan, Therm. Science (2018). https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI180315244A
G. Johann, E.A. Silva, O.C. Motta Lima, N.C. Pereira, Br. J. Chem. Eng. 31, 959 (2014)
A. Cay, G. Gurlek, N. Oglakcioglu, Dry Technol. 34, 509 (2017)
J.W.P. Llanos, R.M. Santos, M.B. Quadri, I.O. Martins, Textile Res. J. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517520918231
Portable gas analyser device properties, http://www.mastertools.com.br/download_catalogo/testo%20454.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2020
Fabric moisture measurement device properties, https://www.hans-schmidt.com/en/produkt-details/textile-moisture-meter-dht-3/. Accessed 26 May 2020
Hygro thermometer properties, https://www.testo.com/en-TH/testo-635-1/p/0560-6351. Accessed 26 May 2020
Fabric surface temperature measurement device properties, https://www.testo.com/en-ID/testo-176-t4/p/0572-1764. Accessed 26 May 2020
Precision scales properties, https://www.terazideposu.com/urun/fly-300-gr-0-001-gr-hassas-terazi. Accessed 26 May 2020
Drying-oven properties, http://elektro-mag.com/en/product/m-3025-p1. Accessed 26 May 2020
Circular sample cutter properties, https://devotrans.com/round-shaped-sample-cutter-dvt-d100.html. Accessed 26 May 2020
Thermal camera properties, https://static-int.testo.com/media/75/8b/e1f9f7a7efac/testo-875-Data-sheet.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2020
Y.A. Cengel, J.M. Cimbala, Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics and Applications, (Guven Publishing House, Translated by, T. Engin, Izmir, Turkey 2012)
C.J. Geankoplis, Transport processes and separation process principles, 4th edn. (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2011). [Translate by S. Yapıcı]
V.T. Karathanos, J. Food Eng. 39, 337 (1999)
P.W. Westerman, G.M. White, I.J. Ross, Trans. ASAE 16, 1136 (1973)
G.E. Page, Factors influencing the maximum of air drying shelled corn in thin layer. USA (Prude University, Prude, 1949)
D.G. Overhults, H.E. White, H.E. Hamilton, I.J. Ross, Trans. ASAE 16, 112 (1973)
S.M. Henderson, S. Pabis, J. Agric. Eng. Res. 6, 169 (1961)
O. Yaldiz, C. Ertekin, Dry. Technol. 19, 583 (2001)
M. S. Rahman, O. Perera, C. The baud, Food Int. Res., 30, 485 (1998)
O. Yaldiz, C. Ertekin, H.I. Uzun, Energy 26, 457 (2001)
C.Y. Wang, R.P. Singh, ASAE Paper No: 78-3001, (1978)
L.R. Verma, R.A. Bucklin, J.B. Endan, F.T. Wratten, Trans. ASAE 28, 296 (1985)
A. Midilli, H. Kucuk, Z. Yapar, Dry. Technol. 20, 1503 (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akan, A.E., Ünal, F. Thin-Layer Drying Modeling in the Hot Oil-Heated Stenter. Int J Thermophys 41, 114 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-020-02692-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-020-02692-x