Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Algorithm for fairness in schedule lengths of sink-rooted trees in multi-sink heterogeneous wireless sensor networks

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sensor networks are used for observing some region of interest. Sensors sense different physical quantities and send to base station or sink. The tree based networks with TDMA as MAC protocol are preferable because of simplicity of tree and guaranteed data access in TDMA. Often sensor networks are multi-sink and multi-attribute networks. Multi-sink network means more than one sinks are present and so multiple sink-rooted trees are formed. When more than one types of nodes are deployed in the network, the network is known as heterogeneous network or multi-attribute network. Sometimes node density or heterogeneity is not uniform across entire network. As a result of non-uniform node distribution or non-uniform heterogeneity distribution, schedule lengths of sink-rooted trees are very different. Nodes part of trees with small schedule length will get more frequent transmission turns compared to those which belong to trees with large schedule length. To ensure fairness in terms of transmission opportunities, it is desired that schedule lengths should be balanced. In this work, an algorithm named as Schedule Length Balancing for Multi-sink HeTerogeneous networks (SLBMHT) is presented to balance schedule lengths. The SLBMHT algorithm is evaluated through simulations. It is found that the SLBMHT algorithm results in 8–56% reduction in schedule length difference of trees. It also results in 2–17% energy savings during data transmission phase. Only demerit is increase in control overhead. But as resulting increase in energy consumption is not much, it is overcome by savings in data energy consumption. Thus network lifetime is likely to increase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang F (2011) Networked wireless data collection: issues, challenges and approaches. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 13(4):673–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ren F et al (2012) Attribute-aware data aggregation using potential-based dynamic routing in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 14(5):881–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vasavada T, Srivastava S (2017) Schedule length balancing for aggregated convergecast in multiple sinks wireless sensor networks. In: IEEE regions 10 symposium (TENSYMP), Cochin, India

  4. Vasavada T, Srivastava S (2016) Distributed scheduling and tree formation for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. In: IEEE international conference on advanced networking and telecommunication systems (ANTS), Bangalore, India

  5. Bagga M et al (2015) Distributed low latency data aggregation scheduling in wireless sensor networks. ACM Trans Sens Netw 11(3):1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang C et al (2015) Load-balancing routing for wireless sensor networks with multiple sinks. In: 12th IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery (FSKD), Zhangjiajie, China

  7. Sia YK et al (2014) Spanning multi-tree algorithms for load balancing in multi tree wireless sensor networks with heterogeneous traffic generating nodes. In: International conference on frontiers of communications. networks and applications, Malaysia

  8. Wang C et al (2009) A load balanced routing algorithm for multi sink wireless sensor network. In: IEEE international conference on communication software and networks (ICCSN), Macau, China

  9. Wu C et al (2008) A novel load balanced and lifetime maximization routing protocol in wireless sensor networks. In: IEEE vehicular technology conference, Singapore

  10. Eghbali AN et al (2009) An energy efficient load-balanced multi-sink routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. In: 10th IEEE international conference on telecommunications, Zagreb, Croatia

  11. Jiang H et al (2014) Energy optimized routing algorithm in multi sink wireless sensor networks. Int J Appl Math Inf Sci 8(1):349–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yu B et al (2011) Minimum time aggregation scheduling in multi-sink sensor networks. In: 8th annual IEEE communications society conference on sensor, mesh and ad hoc communications and networks, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

  13. Carlos-Mancilla M et al (2014) An efficient reconfigurable ad-hoc algorithm for multi-sink wireless sensor networks. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 13(9):1–26

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bhattacharjee S et al (2017) Energy efficient multiple sink placement in wireless sensor network. In: 4th international conference on networking, systems and security (NSysS), Bangladesh, Dhaka

  15. Bose P et al (2017) Bacteria foraging algorithm based optimal multi sink placement in wireless sensor networks. J Intell Syst 27(4):609–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tejas Vasavada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vasavada, T., Srivastava, S. Algorithm for fairness in schedule lengths of sink-rooted trees in multi-sink heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Int. j. inf. tecnol. 12, 1117–1132 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-020-00490-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-020-00490-0

Keywords

Navigation