Abstract
Energy efficiency analysis has been presented recently to minimize the energy consumption of buildings by designing the optimal structural parameters. Because of uncertain parameters incorporated in the energy analysis of a building, computationally effective methods are needed to model the uncertainties in the analysis. In this paper, a probabilistic multi-objective optimization method is proposed based on the statistical methods, i.e., the empirical rule method and two-point estimate method, for analyzing the energy efficiency in buildings. The energy consumption density and thermal discomfort function of residents are considered as the objective functions of the optimization problem. The model of a 12-story commercial building is used to examine the proposed method. Probabilistic methods are compared with the deterministic one to show the effect of considering uncertainties on the results. According to the results, there is a substantial difference between the optimal values of the building’s parameters by applying probabilistic and deterministic methods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alavi SA, Ahmadian A, Aliakbar-Golkar M (2015) Optimal probabilistic energy management in a typical micro-grid based-on robust optimization and point estimate method. Energy Convers Manag 95:314–325
Allouhi A, El Fouih Y, Kousksou T, Jamil A, Zeraouli Y, Mourad Y (2015) Energy consumption and efficiency in buildings: current status and future trends. J Clean Prod 109:118–130
Amiri SS, Mottahedi M, Asadi S (2015) Using multiple regression analysis to develop energy consumption indicators for commercial buildings in the US. Energy Build 109:209–216
Bamdad K, Cholette ME, Guan L, Bell J (2018) Building energy optimisation under uncertainty using ACOMV algorithm. Energy Build 167:322–333
Bordbari MJ, Seifi AR, Rastegar M (2018) Probabilistic energy consumption analysis in buildings using point estimate method. Energy 142:716–722
Bucking S (2016) Optimization under economic uncertainty using a net zero energy commercial office case study. ASHRAE Trans 122(1):444
Cecconi FR, Manfren M, Tagliabue LC, Ciribini ALC, De Angelis E (2017) Probabilistic behavioral modeling in building performance simulation: a Monte Carlo approach. Energy Build 148:128–141
Celarec D, Dolšek M (2013) The impact of modeling uncertainties on the seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete frame buildings. Eng Struct 52:340–354
Chari A, Xanthos S, Christodoulou SEJEE (2017) Stochastic assessment of the energy performance of buildings. Energ Effic 10(6):1573–1591
Cheng Q, Wang S, Yan C, Xiao F (2017) A probabilistic approach for the uncertainty-based optimal design of chiller plants in buildings. Appl Energy 185:1613–1624
Crawley DB, Hand JW, Kummert M, Griffith BT (2008) Contrasting the capabilities of building energy performance simulation programs. Build Environ 43(4):661–673
Deb K, Agrawal S, Pratap A, Meyarivan T (2000) A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. In: International conference on parallel problem solving from nature, 2000, Springer, Berlin, pp 849–858
Delgarm N, Sajadi B, Delgarm S, Kowsary F (2016a) A novel approach for the simulation-based optimization of the buildings energy consumption using NSGA-II: a case study in Iran. Energy Build 127:552–560
Delgarm N, Sajadi B, Kowsary F, Delgarm S (2016b) Multi-objective optimization of the building energy performance: a simulation-based approach by means of particle swarm optimization (PSO). Appl Energy 170:293–303
Department of Energy (DOE) (2017) Commercial Reference Buildings. https://energy.gov/eere/buildings/commercial-reference-buildings. Accessed December 2017
Fanger PO, Toftum J (2002) Extension of the PMV model to non-air-conditioned buildings in warm climates. Energy Build 34(6):533–536
Hahn GJ, Shapiro SS (1967) Statistical models in engineering. Wiley, New York
Hopfe CJ, Emmerich MT, Marijt R, Hensen J (2012). Robust multi-criteria design optimization in building design. In: Proceedings of building simulation and optimization, Loughborough, UK, 118–125
Hörner M, Lichtmeß MJEE (2018) Energy performance of buildings: a statistical approach to marry calculated demand and measured consumption. Energy Effic 12:139–155
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 7730 (1994) Moderate thermal environments determination of the PMV and PPD indices and specification of the conditions for thermal comfort. https://www.iso.org/standard/14567.html. Accessed Nov 2019
Ioannou A, Itard L (2015) Energy performance and comfort in residential buildings: sensitivity for building parameters and occupancy. Energy Build 92:216–233
Junghans L, Darde N (2015) Hybrid single objective genetic algorithm coupled with the simulated annealing optimization method for building optimization. Energy Build 86:651–662
Kibert CJ (2016) Sustainable construction: green building design and delivery. Wiley, New York
Krarti M (2016) Energy audit of building systems: an engineering approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Lee TW, Kwak BM (1987) A reliability-based optimal design using advanced first-order second-moment method. J Struct Mech 15(4):523–542
Liel AB, Haselton CB, Deierlein GG, Baker JW (2009) Incorporating modeling uncertainties in the assessment of seismic collapse risk of buildings. Struct Saf 31(2):197–211
Limpert E, Stahel WA (2011) Problems with using the normal distribution–and ways to improve the quality and efficiency of data analysis. PLoS ONE 6(7):e21403
Manfren M, Aste N, Moshksar R (2013) Calibration and uncertainty analysis for computer models–a meta-model based approach for integrated building energy simulation. Appl Energy 103:627–641
Murray SN, Walsh BP, Kelliher D, O’Sullivan D (2014) Multi-variable optimization of thermal energy efficiency retrofitting of buildings using static modeling and genetic algorithms–a case study. Build Environ 75:98–107
Nguyen A-T, Reiter S, Rigo P (2014) A review on simulation-based optimization methods applied to building performance analysis. Appl Energy 113:1043–1058
Standard ASHRAE (2013) Standard 55–2013: thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and air-conditioning Engineers Inc, Atlanta
Stremel JP, Jenkins R, Babb R, Bayless W (1980) Production costing using the cumulant method of representing the equivalent load curve. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst 5:1947–1956
Sun S, Kensek K, Noble D, Schiler M (2016) A method of probabilistic risk assessment for energy performance and cost using building energy simulation. Energy Build 110:1–12
Tagliabue LC, Manfren M, Ciribini ALC, De Angelis E (2016) Probabilistic behavioral modeling in building performance simulation—the Brescia eLUX lab. Energy Build 128:119–131
Taleghani M, Tenpierik M, Kurvers S, Van Den Dobbelsteen A (2013) A review into thermal comfort in buildings. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 26:201–215
Van Gelder L, Janssen H, Roels S (2014) Probabilistic design and analysis of building performances: methodology and application example. Energy Build 79:202–211
Wright J, Alajmi A (2016) Efficient genetic algorithm sets for optimizing constrained building design problem. Int J Sustain Built Environ 5(1):123–131
Yang Z, Becerik-Gerber B (2015) A model calibration framework for simultaneous multi-level building energy simulation. Appl Energy 149:415–431
Yu W, Li B, Jia H, Zhang M, Wang D (2015) Application of the multi-objective genetic algorithm to optimize energy efficiency and thermal comfort in building design. Energy Build 88:135–143
Zangheri P, Armani R, Pietrobon M, Pagliano LJEE (2018) Identification of cost-optimal and NZEB refurbishment levels for representative climates and building typologies across Europe. Energ Effic 11(2):337–369
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bordbari, M.J., Rastegar, M. & Seifi, A.R. Probabilistic Energy Efficiency Analysis in Buildings Using Statistical Methods. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Electr Eng 44, 1133–1145 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40998-019-00288-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40998-019-00288-2