Modelling of the circular edge-clamped interface of a hydraulic pressure energy harvester to determine power, efficiency and bandwidth
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Energy harvesting technologies are a promising alternative to conventional battery technologies since they are able to provide sustainable electric power for low-power electronic devices; these include autonomous wireless sensors and portable electronic devices [1], [2], [3]. Within hydraulic systems, there is an increasing need for continuous monitoring, such as pressure, temperature and vibration, and a desire to reduce cost of battery replacement and management. As a result, the ability to exploit the piezoelectric effect and harvest acoustic pressures from hydraulic pressure ripples has received increasing attention, for applications such as automotive suspension systems [4], [5], [6], industrial pumps [7] and energy-harvesting shock absorbers [8], [9]. Acoustic noise in hydraulics is often an undesirable consequence of the operation of pumps and actuators, and is generated in almost all pressurized fluid systems [10]. Generally, this undesired energy is attenuated using noise filter devices. However, it has been recently shown that by employing hydraulic pressure energy harvesters, the acoustic noise in the fluid can be converted into electrical energy to enable battery-free operation of low-power and self-powered sensor nodes in hydraulic systems [9], [11].
Hydraulic pressure energy harvesters (HPEH) convert acoustic pressure within hydraulic systems into electric energy. Energy conversion is often achieved via axial excitation of a piezoelectric stack through a fluid to mechanical interface. The generated voltage and electrical power of the HPEH is dependent on the amplitude and frequency of the pressure ripple, the dynamic fluid-structure interaction of the interface and the properties of the piezoelectric material. Generally, the dominant frequency components of pressure ripples are relatively low, namely in the range of hundreds of hertz [12], [13], [14], which is typically well below the fundamental resonance frequency of the piezoelectric element, namely in the order of tens of kHz. Therefore, under such ‘off-resonance’ conditions a Helmholtz resonator has been employed in an effort to improve energy harvesting efficiency. The Helmholtz resonator is a commonly used device that amplifies pressures over a narrowband and has been incorporated into acoustic energy harvesting devices to amplify pressure fluctuations and thereby increase the force applied to the piezoelectric stack [15], [16]. However, a traditional Helmholtz resonator needs to be large or the neck needs to be narrow to operate at sufficiently low frequencies. This remains a challenge to accommodate within any energy harvesting system with a small volume, and the need for a narrow neck leads to poor gain. To date, significant effort has been expended to improve the performance of traditional Helmholtz resonator for applications with pressure fluctuations through a variety of approaches, which include the design of the cavity shape [17], [18], modifying the architecture of the resonator neck [19], [20], and adding acoustic materials within the cavity [21].
The fluid to mechanical interface is another important component of a HPEH. The interface acts to convert the acoustic pressure into a mechanical force to deform the piezoelectric stack, while protecting the piezoelectric material from the fluid. The force-coupling behavior and deformation mechanisms at the interface are important factors that determine the output energy, bandwidth and conversion efficiency of the HPEH. Compared to the relatively large number of studies on the structural design of the Helmholtz resonator to improve the energy harvesting efficiency, the fluid to mechanical interface has yet to be studied in detail. The publications to date in this area are restricted to Aranda et al. [22], who analyzed the force transmission efficiency of flat-plate-interfaces for a range of dimensional configurations and pressure loads using finite element simulations. They provided an investigation of the force transmission ratio of two different types of fluid to mechanical interfaces for a flat metal plate and a conventional hydraulic piston, using an experimental setup with tunable ripple frequencies and amplitudes [23], [24]. In their studies, the force transmission efficiency was defined as the ratio of the normal force on the piezoelectric stack to the force acting on the exposed interface area of the harvester. Although the force transmission characteristics of hydraulic pressure energy harvesters, such as frequency and amplitude of the pressure ripple, have been presented for a range of system parameters, the results to date have been restricted to specific experimental HPEH devices. As a result, a general theoretical model and the interface mechanisms of the fluid to mechanical interface are essential to understand the output performance of future HPEH devices and therefore optimize their operation.
In this paper, a new theoretical model of a circular edge-clamped flat plate, and its interface within a HPEH device, is established to study the output electrical energy and energy conversion efficiency of the system. Such a configuration is selected since it is the most commonly used fluid to mechanical interface in the hydraulic piezoelectric harvesters [18], [24]. The force-deflection relationship of a circular edge-clamped flat plate with a central lumped mass attachment is obtained and a cubic hardening nonlinear behavior is observed. The reaction force between the piezoelectric stack and housing is derived. A SDOF lumped-parameter model of the electromechanical coupling system subjected to harmonic excitation is established. The harmonic balance method is used to obtain the solutions. The nonlinear frequency responses resulting from hardening nonlinearities are presented and the input mechanical energy and the output electrical energy of the electromechanical coupled system of a flat plate interface-piezoelectric stack are studied in detail. The expression of energy conversion efficiency of the system, which is defined as the ratio between output electrical energy to input mechanical energy, is then derived. Ultimately, the analysis provides a new generalized model that enables optimization of HPEH output and efficiency.
Section snippets
Model description
The general structure of a hydraulic pressure energy harvester is shown in Fig. 1. A thin metallic flat circular plate, with thickness h and radius R, is used as the fluid to mechanical interface to isolate the fluid from the piezoelectric stack. The piezoelectric stack is located at the center of the circular plate, which acts as the mechanical to electrical transfer component. The hydraulic pressure, p(t), arising from the pressure ripple is applied on the plate, which bends the circular
Dynamic behavior of the electromechanical coupling system
The dynamic behavior of the system is examined in this section. On substituting Eq. (5) and Eq. (16) into Eq. (1), the dynamic equations of the electromechanical coupling system can be written aswhere the force coefficient γ, arising from the housing constraint is expressed as
Substituting Eq. (8) and Eq. (15) into Eq. (19), the force coefficient γ can be rewritten as
For the HPEH, the thickness of the plate
Experimental verification
To validate the performance of the proposed model, experiments were conducted to the circular edge-clamped flat plate interface, as shown in Fig. 11. A thin stainless flat plate was clamped circularly and a piezoelectric stack was located at the center of the plate, whose radius was R = 20 mm. The thickness of the plate is an important parameter determining the system nonlinearity and the compression strain in the piezoelectric stack, as well as the output voltage and power. Accordingly, two
Conclusions
In this paper a new generalized model has been developed for the output electrical energy and energy conversion efficiency of a hydraulic piezoelectric energy harvester based on a flat plate interface with a centered piezoelectric stack. The force-deflection relationship of the electromechanical coupling system has been determined to be a cubic hardening Duffing equation. The reaction force between the piezoelectric stack and the housing has been obtained and is proportional to the pressure
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Huifang Xiao: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - original draft. Haotang Qie: Formal analysis, Software, Validation. Chris R Bowen: Resources, Supervision, Writing - review & editing.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 51775037] and the China Scholarship Council [grant number 201906465020]. The authors would like to thank Nick Gathercole and Stephen Coombes in University of Bath for their help with the measurement setup and evaluation.
References (40)
- et al.
A comprehensive review on vibration energy harvesting: modelling and Realization
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
(2017) - et al.
Analytical modeling and validation of multi-mode piezoelectric energy harvester
Mech. Syst. Sig. Process.
(2019) - et al.
Vibration energy harvesting in automotive suspension system: a detailed review
Appl. Energy
(2018) - et al.
Energy harvesting sensitivity analysis and assessment of the potential power and full car dynamics for different road modes
Mech. Syst. Sig. Process.
(2018) - et al.
Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis of vehicle suspension energy harvesting in frequency domain
J. Adv. Res.
(2020) - et al.
A 500 Hz-wide kinetic energy harvester: outperforming macroscopic electrodynamic arrays with piezoelectric arrays
Mech. Syst. Sig. Process.
(2019) - et al.
Modelling and ride analysis of a hydraulic interconnected suspension based on the hydraulic energy regenerative shock absorbers
Mech. Syst. Sig. Process.
(2019) - et al.
A novel design of a damping failure free energy-harvesting shock absorber system
Mech. Syst. Sig. Process.
(2019) - et al.
A brief review of sound energy harvesting
Nano Energy
(2019) - et al.
An efficient low-frequency acoustic energy harvester
Sens. Actuators, A
(2017)
A comparative study on acoustic damping induced by half-wave, quarter-wave, and Helmholtz resonators
Aerosp. Sci. Technol.
Helmholtz resonator with a spiral neck
Appl. Acoust.
An extended neck versus a spiral neck of the Helmholtz resonator
Appl. Acoust.
On the jump-up and jump-down frequencies of the Duffing oscillator
J. Sound Vib.
On the contact stiffness and nonlinear vibration of an elastic body with a rough surface in contact with a rigid flat surface
Eur. J. Mech. A. Solids
On the efficiency of piezoelectric energy harvesters
Extreme Mech. Lett.
Improved energy harvesting from low-frequency small vibrations through a monostable piezoelectric energy harvester
Mech. Syst. Sig. Process.
A distributed parameter model for the piezoelectric stack harvester subjected to general periodic and random excitations
Eng. Struct.
Piezoelectric and ferroelectric materials and structures for energy harvesting applications
Energy Environ. Sci.
Cited by (17)
Coupling nonlinearities investigation and dynamic modeling of a tristable combined beam rotational energy harvesting system
2023, Mechanical Systems and Signal ProcessingPerformance investigation and parameter identification of inverse variable cross-section energy harvester
2023, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences