Elsevier

Extreme Mechanics Letters

Volume 39, September 2020, 100839
Extreme Mechanics Letters

Extracting non-linear viscoelastic material properties from violently-collapsing cavitation bubbles

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2020.100839Get rights and content

Abstract

Determination of high strain-rate constitutive material parameters from highly compliant, non-linear materials including hydrogels and soft tissues remains a significant challenge. To address this challenge we recently developed a laser-based Inertial Microcavitation Rheometry (IMR) technique, capable of constitutively characterizing soft materials at ultra-high strain-rates (O(103)O(108)s1). This technique utilizes spatially-focused, and temporally-resolved, single cavitation bubbles in conjunction with a theoretical framework for determining the non-linear viscoelastic material properties of the surrounding soft material.

Here, by advancing our spatiotemporal imaging capability and tracking the motion of native material features close to the inertially cavitating bubble, we find significant deviation from the IMR predicted material displacements at a critical material Mach number of 0.08, marking the transition to violent collapse. Interestingly, this critical Mach number appears to be almost independent of the material properties of the surrounding hydrogel. We show that through proper temporal resolution of the cavitation dynamics, all of the highly nonlinear viscoelastic properties of the surrounding material can still be uniquely determined from just the first expansion and collapse cycle alone, as long as the local Mach number is below the critical threshold. Furthermore, we show that the inclusion of a higher order strain stiffening term on the rate-dependent non-linear spring can lead to better estimation of the material properties and full recovery of the equilibrium shear modulus, which was not possible with previous nonlinear neo-Hookean Kelvin–Voigt model formulations. Thus, the developments presented here significantly expand the applicability and robustness of IMR for accurately determining the rate-dependent, finite deformation constitutive behavior of soft materials.

Introduction

Cavitation is a common phenomenon found in many biological and engineering systems, from the prey-stunning capacity of the snapping shrimp to cavitation erosion on metallic pumps and propellers, to cavitation induced cell and tissue damage [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. When harnessed carefully, focused, energy-driven cavitation can be a very beneficial tool in a wide array of surgical, medical, and materials applications including: tissue phantom, laser surgery, lithotripsy, DNA injection and more recently, high to ultra-high strain-rates soft material characterization [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15].

In particular, laser-based Inertial Microcavitation Rheometry (IMR), a new technique we recently developed, can provide a robust experimental approach for characterizing highly compliant materials at large strains (up to 1000% strain) and ultra-high strain-rates (O(103)O(108)s1) [15]. Here, a single isolated spherical bubble is induced within a viscoelastic medium through a spatially-focused, pulsed laser [16] while real-time, ultra high-speed videography is employed for recording the subsequent bubble expansion–collapse cycles. Due to the dependency of the bubble dynamics on the mechanical properties of the surrounding medium, the viscoelastic properties of the material can be determined by analyzing the temporal evolution of the bubble radius within a relevant framework of associated governing equations of inertial cavitation [15], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21].

While at small to moderate material stretches (e.g., 1< λ <6) the material surrounding the cavitating bubble remains primarily viscoelastic, higher stretch ratios can introduce a new host of additional physical phenomena. These include, but are not limited to, significant strain stiffening and inelastic material effects (e.g., material damage, plasticity, combustion, etc.) as the local, material Mach number exceeds M0.1, a condition of violent collapse.

The natural occurrence and physics of violent bubble collapse have been extensively discussed within the fluid mechanics community [7], [22], [23], [24], while here we extend this notion and definition to observations in solid, albeit highly compliant, materials. While it is generally understood that violent collapses bear significant changes in the material’s compressibility and stability of the contracting bubble and surrounding material, direct experimental evidence thereof still remains sparse.

Here by employing ultra-high speed imaging of up to 2 million frames per second, we provide direct experimental evidence that significant inelastic effects can occur during the collapse process in a model system of soft and stiff polyacrylamide (PA) hydrogels with nominal equilibrium shear moduli ranging from a few hundred to a few thousand pascals. By closely tracking native, inherent material features, we find a significant departure in the motion of our fiducial material markers from viscoelastic behavior at a critical collapse Mach number of around 0.08, consistent with the notion of a violent collapse. Yet, we find that as long as the temporal sampling frequency is high enough, i.e., greater than one million frames per second, the non-linear viscoelastic material properties can still be uniquely determined from just the first collapse regime until close to the bubble collapse point.

Furthermore, we show that through the incorporation of an explicit, higher order strain stiffening term in the constitutive response of the surrounding material, the accuracy in the estimated material parameters can be improved while also recovering the quasi-statically determined equilibrium shear modulus.

In sum, this paper provides a new approach for accurately deducing non-linear viscoelastic material properties from violently collapsing cavitation bubbles while providing direct experimental evidence of significant inelastic behavior during and after the initial bubble collapse.

Section snippets

Experimental setup

In our experiments, single cavitation bubbles were generated in polyacrylamide (PA) hydrogels (protocols are summarized in Supplementary Material Section S1) through a single 6 ns pulse from an adjustable 1–25 mJ Q-switched Nd:YAG Minilite II (Continuum, Milpitas, CA) laser platform frequency-doubled to 532 nm [15], [16]. Laser pulses were spatially expanded to fill the back aperture of a Nikon Plan Fluor 20×/0.5 NA imaging objective and were aligned through the back camera port of a Nikon

Results and discussions

For each PA hydrogel, ten individual tests were conducted yielding average maximum and equilibrium radii of 301.72±26.87μm, and 29.41±2.62μm for soft PA, and 330.26±30.36μm, and 46.52±4.28μm for stiff PA, respectively. All resultant bubble radii vs. time curves are normalized in terms of the material stretch ratio, λ (Fig. 3(a); Table 1). Representative radial stretch ratio (λ) versus time (t) curves for each of our soft and stiff PA samples are shown in Fig. 3(a) featuring average maximum

Conclusions

In this paper, we extend our previously developed inertial microcavitation rheometry (IMR) technique to successfully characterize the strain stiffening behavior of soft materials experiencing large material stretches and violent bubble collapse, a condition, featuring significant changes in the material physics upon first collapse. By tracking the displacement motion of naturally-occurring, native material features in the vicinity of the laser-induced cavitation bubble, we identify a critical

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the funding support from the Office of Naval Research, United States (Dr. Timothy Bentley) under grants N000141612872 and N000141712058. We thank Dr. Jonathan Estrada and Prof. David Henann for their helpful discussions.

References (39)

  • BrennenC.E.

    Cavitation in medicine

    Interface Focus

    (2015)
  • WanM. et al.

    Cavitation in Biomedicine

    (2015)
  • BaileyM.R. et al.

    Physical mechanisms of the therapeutic effect of ultrasound (a review)

    Acoust. Phys.

    (2003)
  • HutsonM.S. et al.

    Plasma and cavitation dynamics during pulsed laser microsurgery in vivo

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2007)
  • CherianA.V. et al.

    Pulsed-laser-induced damage in rat corneas: time-resolved imaging of physical effects and acute biological response

    J. Biomed. Opt.

    (2008)
  • BlomleyM.J.K. et al.

    Microbubble contrast agents: a new era in ultrasound

    BMJ

    (2001)
  • IbsenS. et al.

    Microbubble-mediated ultrasound therapy: a review of its potential in cancer treatment

    Drug Des. Dev. Ther.

    (2013)
  • LohseD.

    Cavitation physics: Lasers blow a bigger bubble

    Nature

    (1998)
  • YangX. et al.

    A model for the dynamics of gas bubbles in soft tissue

    J. Acoust. Soc. Am.

    (2005)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text