Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How Human Head Transplantation Could Alter the Legal Definition of Death

  • DISCUSSIONS
  • Published:
Neurophysiology Aims and scope

In 2013, Surgical Neurology International published a protocol for the GEMINI procedure, the world’s first human head transplant surgery. With the assumption that head transplants are possible in the future, we introduce a legal thought experiment that calls the current criteria of death under the United States UDDA into question. Utilizing case law and examples of contemporary medical interventions, we analyze how neurological and circulatory systems can be reversed and challenge the UDDA criteria of death. We favor the definition of death that includes the irreversibility of the brain and brainstem, but recommend the Uniform Law Commission strike irreversible respiratory and circulatory functions as indicators of death. We also recommend that a congressional bill should be proposed for the definition of death, allowing Article Six to supersede the current legal landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Uniform Law Commission. “Legislative Fact Sheet – Determination of Death Act,” https://www.uniformlaws.org/HigherLogic/System/DownloadDocumentFile.ashx?DocumentFileKey=341343fa-1efe-706c-043a-9290fdcfd909&forceDialog=0. (1980).

  2. D. Barmakian, “Uniform Laws and Model Acts,” Harvard Law School Library. https://guides.library.harvard.edu/law/unifmodelacts. (2018).

  3. Uniform Law Commission. “Determination of Death Act,” https://www.uniformlaws.org/committees/community-home?CommunityKey=155faf5d-03c2-4027-99ba-ee4c99019d6c. (2019).

  4. S. Canavero, “HEAVEN: The head anastomosis venture Project outline for the first human head transplantation with spinal linkage (GEMINI),” Surg. Neurol. Int., 4, Suppl. 1, 335–342 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. X. Ren and S. Canavero, “Human head transplantation. Where do we stand and a call to arms,” Surg. Neurol. Int.,7, 11 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. C. C. Guthrie, Blood Vessel Surgery and Its Applications, UK Arnold, London (1912).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Roach, The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers, WW Norton and Company, New York (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. J. White, “Hypothermic preservation and transplantation of brain,” Resuscitation,4, No. 3, 197–210 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R. J. White, L. R. Wolin, L. C. Massopust Jr, et al., “Primate cephalic transplantation: neurogenic separation, vascular association,” Transplant. Proc., 3, No. 1, 602–604 (1971).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. F. L. Delmonico, “The concept of death and deceased organ donation,” Int. J. Organ Transplant. Med., 1, No. 1, 15–20 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. W. H. Sweet, “Brain death,” N. Engl. J. Med., 299, No. 8, 410–412 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fonseca v. Smith; Life Legal Defense Foundation, Plaintiffs, v Karen Smith, M.D., No. 2 16-cv-00889-KJM-EFB; E.D. Cal (2017).

  13. Fonseca v Kaiser Permanente Med. Ctr. Roseville; 222 F. Supp. 3d 850; E.D. Cal (2016).

  14. H. C. Black, Black’s Law Dictionary (4th Edition), West Publishing Company, Minnesota (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. K. Beecher, “A definition of irreversible coma. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to examine the definition of brain death,” JAMA, 205, No. 6, 337–340 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. B. A. Garner, Black’s Law Dictionary (11th Edition), Thomson Reuters, Ontario (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. Pallis, On the Brainstem Criterion of Death, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Maryland, pp. 93–100 (1999).

  18. C. Shamlin, Defining Death: A Report on the Medical, Legal and Ethical Issues in the Determination of Death, U.S. Government Printing Office (1981).

  19. In re Bowman; In the Matter of the Welfare of William Matthew Bowman, 617 P.2d 731; 94 Wash. 407 (1980).

  20. L. C. Griffin, and J. H. Krause, Practicing Bioethics Law, West Academic, Minnesota, pp. 524-528 (2016).

  21. B. Nipper, “Legislating death: A review and proposed refinement of the uniform determination of death act,” Houston. J. Health Law Policy,17, 429 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  22. In re Guardianship of Hailu; In the Matter of Guardianship of Person and Estate of Hailu, 131 Nev. Adv. Op. 89 (2015).

  23. C. E. Wasmuth Jr., “The concept of death,” Ohio State Law J., 30, 32 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. L. Bernat, C. M. Culver, and B. Gert, “Defining death in theory and practice,” Hastings Cent. Rep., 12, No. 1, 5–8 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Choi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, P., Pirzada, N. How Human Head Transplantation Could Alter the Legal Definition of Death. Neurophysiology 52, 89–92 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-020-09855-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-020-09855-4

Keywords

Navigation