Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

Scour at river bend is a complex process involving various parameters. Experiments were conducted in two laboratory flumes having 90° and 180° bends to study the influence of different parameters on scour at bends. Uniform non-cohesive sediments having median diameters varying from 0.28 to 1.18 mm were used as bed materials under different flow conditions. Three different cross-sectional shapes of the bed, namely flat, trapezoidal and parabolic, were used to study the effect of shape on scour. From the experiments, it is found that, at 90° bend, maximum scour and deposition occurred on concave and convex bank, respectively, between 50° and 60° azimuthal sections, whereas for 180° bend, the location was between 130° and 140° sections. Magnitude of scour was maximum for parabolic bed on the concave bank under flooded condition and deposition was maximum for flat bed on convex side. The deposition pattern on trapezoidal and parabolic bed was also different than that of flat bed. Again, for the same shear velocity ratio, the bigger size bed sediment produced larger scour depth but, for the same bed particle size, scour was more for greater approach shear velocity ratio. Further, measured three-dimensional time averaged velocity components before and after the scour on the 180° bend having initial parabolic bed shows the dominance of a spiral flow at the first half of the bend, and cross-flow from concave to convex at lower layer of the second half of the bend. The combined effect of vortex, cross-flow and accelerated flow is responsible for the erosion on the concave bank and deposition on the convex bank.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barbhuiya AK, Dey S (2004) Local scour at abutments: a review. Sadhana. Indian Acad Sci 29(139):449–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbhuiya AK, Talukdar S (2010) Scour and three dimensional turbulent flow fields measured by ADV at a 90° horizontal forced bend in a rectangular channel. Flow Meas Instrum 21(3):312–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanckaert K, de Vriend HJ (2003) Nonlinear modeling of mean flow redistribution in curved open channels. Water Resour Res 39(12):1375–1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanckaert K, de Vriend HJ (2004) Secondary flow in sharp open-channel bends. J Fluid Mech 498(1):353–380

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Blanckaert K, Graf WH (2001) Mean flow and turbulence in open-channel bend. J Hydraul Eng 127(10):835–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanckaert K, Graf WH (2004) Momentum transport in sharp open-channel bends. J Hydraul Eng 130(3):186–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiew YM (1995) Mechanics of riprap failure at bridge piers. J Hydraul Eng 121(9):635–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David SB, Charles ME, Chester CW (1997) The WES stream investigation and streambank stabilization handbook. U.S. Army Engineer waterways experiment station (WES).Vicksburg, Mississippi

  • Dey S, Barbhuiya AK (2004) Clear water scour at abutments. Water Manag J 157(2):77–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich WE, Whiting PJ (1989) Boundary shear stress and sediment transport in river meanders of sand and gravel. In: Ikeda S, Parker G (eds) River Meandering, water resources monograph series, vol 12. American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, pp 1–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelund F (1974) Flow and bed topography in channel bends. J Hydr Div 100(HY11):1631–1648

    Google Scholar 

  • Garde RJ, Subramanya K, Nambudripad KD (1961) Study of scour around spur-dikes. J Hydraul Div Am Soc Civ Eng 87:23–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill MA (1972) Erosion of sand beds around spur-dikes. J Hydraul Div Am Soc Civ Eng 98:1587–1602

    Google Scholar 

  • Goring DG, Nikora VI (2002) Despiking acoustic Doppler velocimeter data. J Hydraul Eng 128(1):117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda S, Yamasaka M, Chiyoda M (1987) Bed topography and sorting in bends. J Hydraul Eng 113(2):190–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson EC, Rennie CD, Townsend RD (2013) 3D flow and sediment dynamics in a laboratory channel bend with and without stream barbs. J Hydraul Eng 139(2):154–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannesson H, Parker G (1989) Secondary flow in mildly sinuous channel. J Hydraul Eng 115(3):289–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandasamy JK (1989) Abutment scour. Rep. No. 458, School of Engineering, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

  • Mockmore C (1943) Flow around bends in stable channels. Trans ASCE 3:334

    Google Scholar 

  • Odgaard AJ (1982) Bed characteristics in alluvial channel bends. J Hydraul Div Am Soc Civ Eng 108(11):1268–1281

    Google Scholar 

  • Roca M, Martin-Vide JP, Blanckaert K (2007) Reduction of bend scour by an outer bank footing: footing design and bedtopography. J Hydraul Eng 133(2):139–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozovskii IL (1957) Flow and water in bends of open channels. Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSr, The Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, Israel

  • Rozovskii IL (1961) Flow of water in bends of open channels. The Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, Israel

  • Ruther N, Olsen NR (2005) Three-dimensional modeling of sediment transport in a narrow 90° channel bend. J Hydraul Eng 131(10):917–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting H (1979) Boundary layer theory. McGraw-Hill Book Co, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shukhry A (1949) Flow around bends in an open flume. J Hydraul Div ASCE 75:713

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontek Inc (2001) ADV operation manual, 1st edn. Sontek Inc., San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Struiksma N, Olesen KW, Flokstra C, de Vriend HJ (1985) Bed deformation in curved alluvial channels. J Hydraul Res 23(1):57–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Termini D (2009) Experimental observations of flow and bed processes in large-amplitude meandering flume. J Hydraul Eng 135(7):575–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson J (1876) On the origin and winding of rivers in alluvial plains, with remarks on flow around bends in pipes. Proc R Soc London 25:5

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl TL (2000) Analyzing ADV data using Win ADV. In: Proceedings, joint conference on water resources engineering and water resources planning & management, Minneapolis, pp 1–10

  • Whiting PJ, Dietrich WE (1993) Experimental studies of bed topography and flow patterns in large-amplitude meanders: 1. Observ Water Resour Res 29(11):3605–3614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalin MS, Ferreira da Silva AM (2001) Fluvial processes, IAHR Monograph. Balkema, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Yen BC (1965) Characteristics of subcritical flow in a meandering channel. (Doctoral desertation). Retrieved from University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding provided by the Department of Science and Technology (DST), Govt. of India, vide DST No: SR/S3/MERC/095/2008 is appreciated. The experiments for this study were conducted at the NIT Silchar, Assam, India. The authors are grateful for the support provided by the staff.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. K. Barbhuiya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Biswas, P., Barbhuiya, A.K. Scour at River Bend: A Parametric Study. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 44, 1001–1021 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-020-00414-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-020-00414-9

Keywords

Navigation