Abstract
In order to research the energy absorption characteristics of high-strength steels in vehicles, the single-hat thin-walled structural components were made from quenching and partitioning (Q&P) steel and dual-phase (DP) steel so as to understand the differences and superiority in the energy absorption characteristics of various types of steel in the energy-absorbing box of current vehicles. Crushing experiments were performed with a testing machine equipped with a high-speed camera. The energy absorption mechanism of the two steels was investigated by means of transmission electron microscopy and electron back-scattered diffraction. The results showed that the energy absorption capacity of Q&P steel is better than that of DP steel, which can be observed from the different compression distances of the single-hat thin-walled structure. The major contribution in energy absorption of Q&P steel comes from the internally retained austenite-to-martensite transformation. The amount of retained austenite substantially reduces at the crushed part with large deformation. On the other hand, while there is a large amount of dislocation and quantity of plug in the crushed DP steel part, the energy stays inside the material without dissipating.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hosseini S M and Shariati M. Thin-Walled Struct125 (2018) 259.
Kohar C P, Mohammadi M, Mishra R K, et al., Thin-Walled Struct93 (2015) 64.
Kohar C P, Cherkaoui M, El Kadiri H, et al., Int J Plast84 (2016) 224.
Daamen M, Güvenc, O, Bambach M, et al., CIRP Ann Manuf Technol63 (2016) 265.
Song X, Sun G, and Li Q, Thin-Walled Struct109 (2016) 132.
Wierzbicki T and Abramowicz W. J Appl Mech50 (1983) 727.
Wierzbicki T, Int J Impact Eng1 (1983) 157.
Abramowicz W and Jones N. Int J Impact Eng2 (1984) 263.
Tarigopula V, Langseth M, Hopperstad O S, et al. Int J Impact Eng32 (2006) 847.
Duan L, Du Z P, Jiang H B, et al., Thin-Walled Struct144 (2019) 1.
Reddy S, Abbasi M, and Fard M, Thin-Walled Struct94 (2015) 56.
Gan N, Yao S, Dong H, et al. Thin-Walled Struct122 (2018) 147.
Xu F, Sun G, Li G, et al. Steel Construct74 (2014) 12.
Varbai B, Sommer C, Szabó M, et al., Thin-Walled Struct142 (2019) 64.
Lee S and De Cooman B C, Metall Mater Trans A45 (2014) 6039.
Cai Z H, Ding H, Misra R D K, et al., Mater Sci Eng A595 (2014) 86.
Ghoushji M J, Reza A, Zulkifli R, et al. Iran Polym J27 (2018) 563.
Baroutaji A, Sajjia M, and Olabi A G. Thin-Walled Struct118 (2017) 137.
Kohar C P, Mohammadi M, Mishra R K, et al., Thin-Walled Struct93 (2015) 64.
Zhenli M, Di T, Aimin Z, et al., Steel Res Int83 (2012) 346.
Hu X H, Sun X, Jr L G H, et al., Acta Mater232 (2017) 230.
Li S, Zou D, Xia C, et al., Steel Res Int87 (2016) 1302.
Funding
This work was supported by Program of High-end CNC Machine Tools and Basic Manufacturing Equipment [number 2019ZX04002030]; the State Key Research and Development Program of China under Grant [number 2016YFB0101605].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, D., Xu, M. & Mi, Z. Energy Absorption Mechanism of High-Strength Q&P and DP Steel Thin-Walled Structures. Trans Indian Inst Met 73, 1999–2006 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-020-02008-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-020-02008-5