Abstract
Reliable estimation of return period values of extreme precipitation at ungauged locations is considered to be a key exercise in hydrometeorological studies. This study aims to identify an accurate approach in producing spatial maps (i.e. ungauged estimation) of extreme precipitation for any return period within a region. The study compares the following approaches: interpolation of summary of data as represented by L-moments, interpolation of parameters of an extreme value distribution and interpolation of return period quantile value. Several interpolation schemes are considered; however, the aim is to evaluate schemes that employ secondary data. The schemes compared are ordinary kriging, kriging with external drift (KED) and a more traditional, inverse distance weighting. The secondary data namely elevation, satellite based mean annual precipitation (MAP), distance from nearest coast (CD) and geographical coordinates are incorporated in the KED system. Annual maximum 1-day precipitation series at 76 gauging stations from the region of East China have been used to assess the performance. The generalized extreme value (GEV) distribution, appropriate for the study region, with the method of L-moments is used to analyze the frequency of extreme precipitation. It is found that either the approach of interpolating parameters of GEV distribution or L-moments should be the natural choice for estimating design value at any return period. However, in terms of error statistics the approach of interpolating parameters has given a lower RMSE value compared to the approach of interpolating L-moments. The approach of quantile interpolation performed worst and should not be used in practice in interpolating return period values. The KED is recognized as the most appropriate interpolation scheme when a significant covariate is identified. The MAP appears to be a suitable covariate in most cases when interpolating L moments (1st and 2nd L-moment) or GEV parameters (location and scale parameter). There is no spatial dependence identified for L-skewness or shape parameter of GEV distribution and in the future one should concentrate on how a superior spatial model can be identified in this context.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bonnin G, Martin D, Lin B et al (2006) NOAA Atlas 14: precipitation-frequency atlas of the United States. Silver Spring, Maryland
Bookhagen B (2013) High resolution spatiotemporal distribution of rainfall seasonality and extreme events based on a 12-year TRMM time series. http://www.geog.ucsb.edu/~bodo/TRMM/index.php. Accessed Sept 2019
Bostan PA, Heuvelink GBM, Akyurek SZ (2012) Comparison of regression and kriging techniques for mapping the average annual precipitation of Turkey. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 19:115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2012.04.010
Burn DH (1990) Evaluation of regional flood frequency analysis with a region of influence approach. Water Resour Res 26:2257–2265
Carreau J, Neppel L, Arnaud P, Cantet P (2013) Extreme rainfall analysis at ungauged sites in the South of France: comparison of three approaches. Journal de la Société Française de Statistique 154:119–138
Ceresetti D, Ursu E, Carreau J et al (2012) Evaluation of classical spatial-analysis schemes of extreme rainfall. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:3229–3240. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3229-2012
Chappell A, Renzullo LH, Raupach TJ, Haylock M (2013) Evaluating geostatistical methods of blending satellite and gauge data to estimate near real-time daily rainfall for Australia. J Hydrol 493:105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.024
Coles S (2001) An Introduction to statistical modeling of extreme values. Springer, Bristol
Core Team R (2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Cunnane C (1988) Methods and merits of regional flood frequency analysis. J Hydrol 100:269–290
Cunnane C (1989) Statistical distributions for flood frequency analysis. Operational Hydrology Report (WMO), Geneva
Dalrymple T (1960) Flood frequency methods. U.S. Geol. Surv. 1543-A, Reston, pp 11–51
Daly C (2006) Guidelines for assessing the suitability of spatial climate data sets. Int J Climatol 26:707–721. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1322
Das S (2016) An assessment of using subsampling method in selection of a flood frequency distribution. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 31:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-016-1318-3
Das S (2017) Performance of region-of-influence approach of frequency analysis of extreme rainfall in monsoon climate conditions. Int J Climatol 37:612–623. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5025
Das S (2018) Extreme rainfall estimation at ungauged sites: comparison between region-of-influence approach of regional analysis and spatial interpolation technique. Int J Climatol. https://doi.org/10.1002/JOC.5819
Das S (2020) Assessing the regional concept with sub-sampling approach to identify probability distribution for at-site hydrological frequency analysis. Water Resour Manage 34:803–817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02475-6
Das S, Cunnane C (2011) Examination of homogeneity of selected Irish pooling groups. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15:819–830. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-819-2011
Das S, Cunnane C (2012) Performance of flood frequency pooling analysis in a low CV context. Hydrol Sci J 57:433–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2012.666635
Das S, Millington N, Simonovic SP (2013) Distribution choice for the assessment of design rainfall for the city of London (Ontario, Canada) under climate change. Can J Civ Eng 40:121–129. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2011-0548
Das S, Zhu D, Cheng CH (2020) A regional approach of decadal assessment of extreme precipitation estimates: a case study in the Yangtze River Basin, China. Pure appl Geophys 177:1079–1093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02354-6
Davison AC, Padoan SA, Ribatet M (2012) Statistical modeling of spatial extremes. Stat Sci 27:161–186. https://doi.org/10.1214/11-STS376
Delbari M, Afrasiab P, Jahani S (2013) Spatial interpolation of monthly and annual rainfall in northeast of Iran. Meteorol Atmos Phys 122:103–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-013-0273-5
Faulkner DS, Prudhomme C (1998) Mapping an index of extreme rainfall across the UK. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 2:183–194. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2-183-1998
Fisher RA, Tippett LHC (1928) Limiting forms of the frequency distribution of the largest or smallest member of a sample. Math Proc Camb Philos Soc 24:180–190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100015681
Frazier AG, Giambelluca TW, Diaz HF, Needham HL (2016) Comparison of geostatistical approaches to spatially interpolate month-year rainfall for the Hawaiian Islands. Int J Climatol 36:1459–1470. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4437
Gaál L, Kyselý J, Szolgay J (2008) Region-of-influence approach to a frequency analysis of heavy precipitation in Slovakia. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 12:825–839. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-12-825-2008
Goovaerts P (2000) Geostatistical approaches for incorporating elevation into the spatial interpolation of rainfall. J Hydrol 228:113–129
Gumbel EJ (1941) The return period of flood flow. Ann Math Stat 12:163–190
Guttman NB, Hosking JRM, Wallis JR (1993) Regional precipitation quantile values for the continental United States computed from L-moments. J Clim 6:2326–2340
Haberlandt U (2007) Geostatistical interpolation of hourly precipitation from rain gauges and radar for a large-scale extreme rainfall event. J Hydrol 332:144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.06.028
Hengl T (2007) A practical guide to geostatistical mapping. Ispra (VA), Italy
Hosking JRM (1990) L-moments: analysis and estimation of distributions using linear combinations of order statistics. J Roy Stat Soc Ser C (Appl Stat) 52:105–124. https://doi.org/10.2307/2345653
Hosking JRM, Wallis JR (1997) Regional frequency analysis: an approach based on L-moments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Institute of Hydrology (1999) Flood estimation handbook, vol 1–5. Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford
Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM (1989) An introduction to applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York
Koutsoyiannis D (2004) Statistics of extremes and estimation of extreme rainfall: I. Theoretical investigation / Statistiques de valeurs extrêmes et estimation de précipitations extrêmes: I. Recherche théorique. Hydrol Sci J 49(4):575–590. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.49.4.575.54430
Kyselý J, Gaál L, Picek J (2011) Comparison of regional and at-site approaches to modelling probabilities of heavy precipitation. Int J Climatol 31:1457–1472. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2182
Li J, Heap AD (2008) A review of spatial interpolation methods for environmental scientists. Geoscience Australia, Canberra
Lloyd CD (2005) Assessing the effect of integrating elevation data into the estimation of monthly precipitation in Great Britain. J Hydrol 308:128–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.10.026
Ly S, Charles C, Degr A (2011) Geostatistical interpolation of daily rainfall at catchment scale: the use of several variogram models in the Ourthe and Ambleve catchments. Belgium. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2259-2011
Micovic Z, Schaefer MG, Barker BL (2017) Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses for stochastic flood hazard simulation. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Noto LV, La Loggia G (2009) Use of L-moments approach for regional flood frequency analysis in Sicily, Italy. Water Resour Manage 23:2207–2229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9378-x
Ouali D, Cannon AJ (2018) Estimation of rainfall intensity–duration–frequency curves at ungauged locations using quantile regression methods. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 32:2821–2836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-018-1564-7
Panthou G, Vischel T, Lebel T et al (2012) Extreme rainfall in West Africa: a regional modeling. Water Resour Res 48:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012wr012052
Papalexiou SM, Koutsoyiannis D (2013) Battle of extreme value distributions: a global survey on extreme daily rainfall. Water Resour Res 49:187–201. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012557
Pebesma EJ (2004) Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package. Comput Geosci 30:683–691
Peel MC, Wang QJ, Vogel RM, McMAHON TA (2001) The utility of L-moment ratio diagrams for selecting a regional probability distribution. Hydrol Sci J 46:147–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626660109492806
Rahman A, Charron C, Ouarda TBMJ, Chebana F (2018) Development of regional flood frequency analysis techniques using generalized additive models for Australia. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 32:123–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-017-1384-1
Reed DW, Faulkner DS, Stewart EJ (1999) The FORGEX method of rainfall growth estimation II: description. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 3:197–203
Shi Y, Song L, Xia Z et al (2015) Mapping annual precipitation across Mainland China in the period 2001–2010 from TRMM3B43 product using spatial downscaling approach. Remote Sens 7:5849–5878. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70505849
Su B, Gemmer M, Jiang T (2008) Spatial and temporal variation of extreme precipitation over the Yangtze River Basin. Quatern Int 186:22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2007.09.001
Svensson C, Jones DA (2010) Review of rainfall frequency estimation methods. J Flood Risk Manag. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318x.2010.01079.x/abstract
Szolgay J, Parajka J, Kohnová S, Hlavčová K (2009) Comparison of mapping approaches of design annual maximum daily precipitation. Atmos Res 92:289–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.01.009
Tabios GQ, Salas JD (1985) A comparative analysis of techniques for spatial interpolation of precipitation. J Am Water Resour Assoc 21:365–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1985.tb00147.x
Verworn A, Haberlandt U (2011) Spatial interpolation of hourly rainfall-effect of additional information, variogram inference and storm properties. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15:569–584. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-569-2011
Vogel RM, Fennessey NM (1993) L moment diagrams should replace product moment diagrams. Water Resour Res 29:1745–1752
Wagner PD, Fiener P, Wilken F et al (2012) Comparison and evaluation of spatial interpolation schemes for daily rainfall in data scarce regions. J Hydrol 464–465:388–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.07.026
Webster R, Oliver MA (2007) Geostatistics for environmental scientists. Wiley, Chichester
Weisse AK, Bois P (2002) A comparison of methods for mapping statistical characteristics of heavy rainfall in the French Alps: the use of daily information. Hydrol Sci J 47:739–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626660209492977
Willmott C (1982) Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 63:1309–1313
Yang T, Shao Q, Hao Z-C et al (2010) Regional frequency analysis and spatio-temporal pattern characterization of rainfall extremes in the Pearl River Basin, China. J Hydrol 380:386–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.11.013
Yin Y, Chen H, Xu C-Y et al (2016) Spatio-temporal characteristics of the extreme precipitation by L-moment-based index-flood method in the Yangtze River Delta region, China. Theor Appl Climatol 124:1005–1022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-015-1478-y
Yin S, Wang Z, Zhu Z et al (2018) Using Kriging with a heterogeneous measurement error to improve the accuracy of extreme precipitation return level estimation. J Hydrol 562:518–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.04.064
Zakaria ZA, Shabri A, Ahmad UN (2012) Regional frequency analysis of extreme rainfalls in the west coast of peninsular Malaysia using partial L-moments. Water Resour Manage 26:4417–4433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0152-8
Zhang X, Srinivasan R (2009) Gis-based spatial precipitation estimation. J Am Water Resour Assoc 45:894–907
Zhang Q, Xu CY, Zhang Z et al (2008) Spatial and temporal variability of precipitation maxima during 1960–2005 in the Yangtze River basin and possible association with large-scale circulation. J Hydrol 353:215–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.11.023
Acknowledgements
The work is primarily funded by NUIST faculty start-up grant (Grant No. 2243141501015) of the first author. Partial assistance is also obtained from a grant of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41671022). Daily precipitation data series were obtained from the National Meteorological Information Center of China Meteorological Administration. Comments and suggestions from three anonymous reviewers are gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Das, S., Zhu, D. & Yin, Y. Comparison of mapping approaches for estimating extreme precipitation of any return period at ungauged locations. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 34, 1175–1196 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-020-01828-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-020-01828-7