Abstract
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are emerging as the new trend for modern higher education institutions. Student acceptance is viewed as the key determinant for the success of MOOCs. This study intends to examine factors influencing higher education students’ behavioral intention to adopt MOOCs. Thus, this study proposes the use of a modified Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Data is collected via an online survey from a sample of 403 participants in Jordan. Structural equation modeling (SEM) is used to assess the accuracy of the research model. The results reveal that 1) students’ behavioral intention to adopt MOOCs is positively affected by the perceived ease of use and by the perceived usefulness, 2) self-regulated learning has both a negative direct and indirect (through perceived usefulness) influence on behavioral intention, 3) computer self-efficacy and perceived convenience have positive indirect effects on behavioral intention through the perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, and 4) learning tradition has a negative indirect effect on behavioral intention through self-regulated learning. Based on the results, various implications (both practical and theoretical), and suggestions for future research, have been highlighted.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abu-Shanab, E., & Musleh, S. (2018). The adoption of massive open online courses: Challenges and benefits. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 13(4), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.2018100104.
Aharony, N., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2016). Students’ perceptions on MOOCs: An exploratory study. Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Life Long Learning, 12, 145–162. https://doi.org/10.28945/3540.
Al-Adwan, A., & Khdour, N. (2020). Exploring student readiness to MOOCs in Jordan: A structural equation Modelling approach. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19, 223–242. https://doi.org/10.28945/4542.
Al-Adwan, A., & Smedley, J. (2012). Implementing e-learning in the Jordanian higher education system: Factors affecting impact. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 8(1), 121–135 https://www.learntechlib.org/p/188017/.
Al-Adwan, A., Al-Adwan, A., & Smedley, J. (2013). Exploring student’s acceptance of e-learning using technology acceptance model in Jordanian universities. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 9(2), 4–18.
Al-Adwan, A., Al-Adwan, A., & Berger, H. (2018a). Solving the mystery of mobile learning adoption in higher education. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 16(1), 24–49. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMC.2018.088271.
Al-Adwan, A., Al-Madadha, A., & Zvirzdinaite, Z. (2018b). Modeling students’ readiness to adopt mobile learning in higher education: An empirical study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 19(1), 221–224. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3256.
Al-Gahtani, S. (2016). Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation: A structural equation model. Applied Computing and Informatics, 12(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2014.09.001.
Al-Rahmi, W., Yahaya, N., Alamri, M., Alyoussef, I., Al-Rahmi, A., & Kamin, Y. (2019). Integrating innovation diffusion theory with technology acceptance model: Supporting students’ attitude towards using a massive open online courses (MOOCs) systems. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1629599.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A Social Cognitive Theory. (Printice Hall, NJ.
Bazelais, P., Doleck, T., & Lemay, D. J. (2018). Investigating the predictive power of TAM: A case study of CEGEP students’ intentions to use online learning technologies. Education and Information Technologies, 23(1), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9587-0.
Bere, A., & Rambe, P. (2013, June). Extending technology acceptance model in mobile learning adoption: South African University of Technology students’ perspectives’. In International Conference on e-Learning (pp. 52-61). Academic conferences international limited.
Bredahl, L. (2001). Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified food–results of a cross-national survey. Journal of Consumer Policy, 24(1), 23–61. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010950406128.
Brown, L. (1989). The strategic and tactical implications of convenience in consumer product marketing. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 6, 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000002550.
Calonge, D., Shah, M., Riggs, K., & Connor, M. (2019). MOOCs and upskilling in Australia: A qualitative literature study. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1687392. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1687392.
Che, X., Luo, S., Wang, C., & Meinel, C. (2016). An attempt at MOOC localization for Chinese-speaking users. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(2), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2016.v6.665.
Chen, I. (2017). Computer self-efficacy, learning performance, and the mediating role of learning engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 362–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.059.
Chen, S., Shing-Han, L., & Chien-Yi, L. (2011). Recent related research in technology acceptance model: A literature review. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 1(9), 124–127.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.
EdX. (2013). Queen Rania Foundation partners with edX to create first MOOC portal for the Arab world. https://www.edx.org/press/queen-rania-foundation-partners-edx
Fianu, E., Blewett, C., Ampong, G., & Ofori, K. (2018). Factors affecting MOOC usage by students in selected Ghanaian universities. Education in Science, 8(2), 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020070.
Fook, C., Razak, A., Alias, N., & Narasuman, S. (2017). Students’ readiness and competence in MOOCs in higher education: A case study. Man in India, 97(24), 93–101.
Fornell, G., & Larcker, F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104.
Gameel, B., & Wilkins, K. (2019). When it comes to MOOCs, where you are from makes a difference. Computers & Education, 136(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.014.
Gao, S., & Yang, Y. (2016). An empirical study on users' adoption of MOOCs from the perspective of the institutional theory. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organizations, 16(4), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNVO.2016.081654.
Gardner, J., & Brooks, C. (2018). Student success prediction in MOOCs. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 28(2), 127–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-018-9203-z.
Gutiérrez-Rojas, I., Alario-Hoyos, C., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Leony, D., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2014). Scaffolding self-learning in MOOCs. Proceedings of the European MOOC Stakeholder Summit, 2014, 43–49.
Hair, J., Risher, J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
Handoko, E., Gronseth, S. L., McNeil, S. G., Bonk, C. J., & Robin, B. R. (2019). Goal setting and MOOC completion: A study on the role of self-regulated learning in student performance in massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 20(3), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.4270.
Hasan, H. (2006). Effectiveness of computer training: The role of multilevel computer self-efficacy. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 18(1), 50–68. https://doi.org/10.4018/joeuc.2006010103.
Henseler, J., Ringle, M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, A. (2016). Using PLS path modelling in new technology research: Updated guide-lines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382.
Hsu, J., Chen, C., & Ting, P. (2018). Understanding MOOC continuance: An empirical examination of social support theory. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(8), 1100–1118. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1446990.
Jansen, D., & Schuwer, R. (2015). Institutional MOOC strategies in Europe. https://cpbuse1.wpmucdn.com/blog.stcloudstate.edu/dist/d/10/files/2015/03/Institutional_MOOC_strategies_in_Europe-2hp8ug8.pdf
John, S. (2013). Influence of computer self-efficacy on information technology adoption. International Journal of Information Technology, 19(1), 1–13.
Joo, Y., So, H., & Kim, N. (2018). Examination of relationships among students' self-determination, technology acceptance, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use K-MOOCs. Computers & Education, 122, 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.003.
Kanwal, F., & Rehman, M. (2017). Factors affecting e-learning adoption in developing countries–empirical evidence from Pakistan’s higher education sector. IEEE Access, 5, 10968–10978. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2714379.
Kinshuk, N., Cheng, I., & Chew, S. (2016). Evolution is not enough: Revolutionizing current learning environments to smart learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 561–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0108-x.
Kleijnen, M., Lee, N., & Wetzels, M. (2009). An exploration of consumer resistance to innovation and its antecedents. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(3), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.02.004.
Klobas, J. E., Mackintosh, B., & Murphy, J. (2014). The anatomy of MOOCs. In Massive Open Online Courses (pp. 11-32). Routledge.
Kop, R. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.882.
Lan, M., & Hew, K. F. (2020). Examining learning engagement in MOOCs: A self-determination theoretical perspective using mixed method. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-0179-5.
Lee, J. (2010). Online support service quality, online learning acceptance, and student satisfaction. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.08.002.
Lehmann, T., Hähnlein, I., & Ifenthaler, D. (2014). Cognitive, metacognitive and motivational perspectives on preflection in self-regulated online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.051.
Ma, L., & and Lee, C. (2018). Investigating the adoption of MOOC s: A technology–user–environment perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12314.
Ma, L., & Lee, C. S. (2020). Drivers and barriers to MOOC adoption: Perspectives from adopters and non-adopters. Online Information Review, 44, 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-06-2019-0203.
Marakas, G., Yi, M., & Johnson, R. (1998). The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 126–163. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.2.126.
Mulik, S., Yajnik, N., & Godse, M. (2016). Determinants of acceptance of massive open online courses, in 2016 IEEE eighth international conference on Technology for Education (T4E), (Mumbai, India), pp. 124–127. https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2016.032.
Onah, D. F., & Sinclair, J. (2016, September). Exploring learners’ strategies of self-regulated learning abilities in a novel MOOC Platform: eLDa. In 23rd Annual Conference of the Association for Learning Technology (ALT2016), University of Warwick, United Kingdom (pp. 6–8). http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/79748/
Rai, L., & Chunrao, D. (2016). Influencing factors of success and failure in MOOC and general analysis of learner behavior. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(4), 262–268. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2016.v6.697.
Ram, S., & Sheth, N. J. (1989). Consumer resistance to innovation: The marketing problem and its solution. The Journal of Consumer Marketing., 6(2), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000002542.
Ringle, C., Da Silva, G., & Bido, D. (2014). Structural Equation Modeling with the Smartpls. Brazilian Journal of Marketing, 13(2), 57–73 https://ssrn.com/abstract=2676422.
Roller-Wirnsberger, R., Zitta, S., Herzog, C., Dornan, H., Lindner, S., Rehatschek, H., ... & Tap, L. (2019). Massive open online courses (MOOCs) for long-distance education in geriatric medicine across Europe. European Geriatric Medicine, 10(6), 989–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-019-00252-7.
Sallam, M. (2017). A review of MOOCs in the Arab world. Creative Education, 8(04), 64–573. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2017.84044.
Salloum, A., Alhamad, A., Al-Emran, M., Monem, A., & Shaalan, K. (2019). Exploring Students’ Acceptance of E-Learning Through the Development of a Comprehensive Technology Acceptance Model. IEEE Access, 7, 128445–128462. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939467.
Shah, D. (2018). Year of MOOC-based degrees: A review of MOOC stats and trends in 2018. Class Central (2018). https://www.classcentral.com/report/moocs-stats-and-trends-2018/
Shao, Z. (2018). Examining the impact mechanism of social psychological motivations on individuals’ continuance intention of MOOCs. Internet Research, 28(1), 232–250. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-11-2016-0335.
Sokolik, M. (2014). 2 what constitutes an effective language MOOC?. In E. Martín-Monje & Elena Bárcena (Eds.), Language MOOCs (pp. 16–32). Sciendo Migration. https://doi.org/10.2478/9783110420067.2.
Subramaniam, T., Suhaimi, N., Latif, A., Abu Kassim, Z., & Fadzil, M. (2019). MOOCs Readiness: The Scenario in Malaysia. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 20(3), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i3.3913.
Tao, D., Fu, P., Wang, Y., Zhang, T., & Qu, X. (2019). Key characteristics in designing massive open online courses (MOOCs) for user acceptance: An application of the extended technology acceptance model. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1695214.
Urbach, N., & Ahlemann, F. (2010). Structural equation modeling in information systems research using partial least squares. Journal of Information Technology, Theory and Applications, 11(2), 5–40 https://aisel.aisnet.org/jitta/vol11/iss2/2.
Vululleh, P. (2018). Determinants of students’ e-learning acceptance in developing countries: An approach based on structural equation modeling (SEM). International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 14(1), 141–151.
Wong, J., Baars, M., Davis, D., Van Der Zee, T., Houben, G., & Paas, F. (2019). Supporting self-regulated learning in online learning environments and MOOCs: A systematic review. International. Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(4–5), 356–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1543084.
Wu, B., & Chen, X. (2017). Continuance intention to use MOOCs: Integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and task technology fit (TTF) model. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.028.
Yang, H., & Su, C. (2017). Learner behavior in a MOOC practice-oriented course: In empirical study integrating TAM and TPB. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 18(5), 35–63. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.2991.
Zhou, M. (2016). Chinese university students’ acceptance of MOOCs: A self-determination perspective. Computers & Education, 92(1), 194–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.012.
Zhu, M., Bonk, C. J., & Doo, M. Y. (2020). Self-directed learning in MOOCs: Exploring the relationships among motivation, self-monitoring, and self-management. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09747-8.
Zimmerman, B. (2015). Self-regulated learning: Theories, measures, and outcomes, international encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, ed. J. Wright (Elsevier, Oxford, 2015), pp.541-546. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26060-1.
Acknowledgments
Many thanks to the faculty members of Electronic Business and Management Information Systems departments at Al Ahliyya Amman University for their supports. Furthermore, special thanks to Dr. Maher Al-Horani for his endless support, inspiration, and encouragement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares that there is no conflict of interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Construct | Items | Reference |
|---|---|---|
Perceived Usefulness (PU) | PU1: “I believe MOOCs will improve my learning performance”. | Wu and Chen (2017); Hsu et al. (2018) |
PU2: “The learning mechanism of MOOCs platform should be in line with my need”. | ||
PU3: “The learning operation of MOOCs platform in line with my need”. | ||
PU4: “Using MOOCs will enhance my learning effectiveness”. | ||
Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) | PEOU1: “It will be easy for me to use MOOCs platform”. | Tao et al. (2019); Yang and Su (2017) |
PEOU2: “find it easy to get MOOCs platform to do what I want it to do”. | ||
PEOU3: “It is easy for me to become skillful at using MOOCs platform”. | ||
PEOU4: “Using the MOOCs platform will not require a lot of my mental effort”. | ||
Computer Self-efficacy (CSE) | CSE1: “I have the confidence to learn a variety of computer skills”. | Hsu et al. (2018) |
CSE2: “For me the computer is easy to use”. | ||
CSE3: “It is not difficult for me to operate a computer skillfully”. | ||
CSE4: “It was easy for me to use a computer to do what I wanted to do”. | ||
Perceived Convenience (PEC) | PEC1: “MOOCs platform will allow me to engage with peers and instructors at any time”. | Hsu et al. (2018); Bere and Rambe (2013) |
PEC 2: “MOOCs platform will be convenient for academic engagement purposes”. | ||
PEC3: “MOOCs platform can make me easily carry out the online learning”. | ||
PEC4: “MOOCs platform will let me catch the learning information in real-time”. | ||
Learning Tradition (LTR) | LTR1: “I prefer tradition ways of learning”. | Ma and Lee (2020); Ma and Lee (2018) |
LTR2: “I prefer r traditional teaching methods with instructors”. | ||
LTR3: “I prefer face-to-face communication with my instructors and peers”. | ||
Behavior Intention (BEI) | BEI1: “Using MOOCs for acquiring knowledge is something I would do in the future”. | Yang and Su (2017); Gao and Yang (2016) |
BEI2: “I intend to use MOOCs for my learning needs”. | ||
BEI3: “I will be enthusiastic about participating in MOOCs”. |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Al-Adwan, A.S. Investigating the drivers and barriers to MOOCs adoption: The perspective of TAM. Educ Inf Technol 25, 5771–5795 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10250-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10250-z