Skip to main content
Log in

Formation and Stability of Carbon Dioxide Nanobubbles for Potential Applications in Food Processing

  • Published:
Food Engineering Reviews Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bulk nanobubbles (NBs) are ultrafine gas-filled cavities at nanoscale size possessing unique properties which can provide promising benefits to food product quality and processability. This work aimed to investigate the formation and stability of CO2 bulk NBs in water for intended applications in food processing. The NBs were generated by injecting CO2 gas at 300, 350 and 400 kPa pressures to deionised water pumped at 100 and 200 kPa through a commercial NB generator. Size measurement via dynamic light scattering (DLS) technique indicated that CO2 NBs generated were in the range of 200–500 nm depending on the gas pressures, gas and water flow rate used. Concentration of CO2 in water containing the NBs (~ 2000 ppm) also increased significantly. Zeta potential of the formed NBs varied from − 8 to − 19 mV, indicating their stability in the aqueous medium. Their existence lasted for more than 7 days with a good repeatability of size distribution density, and the pH values of CO2–NB solution were maintained below 4. These findings highlight some new fundamental understandings on the generation and physical characteristics of CO2 NBs, which can have potential applications in food processing that need to be further explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agarwal A, Ng WJ, Liu Y (2011) Principle and applications of microbubble and nanobubble technology for water treatment. Chemosphere 84(9):1175–1180

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ulatowski K, Sobieszuk P, Mróz A, Ciach T (2019) Stability of nanobubbles generated in water using porous membrane system. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 136:62–71

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ushikubo FY, Furukawa T, Nakagawa R, Enari M, Makino Y, Kawagoe Y, Shiina T, Oshita S (2010) Evidence of the existence and the stability of nano-bubbles in water. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 361(1-3):31–37

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Phan KKT, Truong T, Wang Y, Bhandari B (2020) Nanobubbles: Fundamental characteristics and applications in food processing. Trends Food Sci Technol 95:118–130

    Google Scholar 

  5. Uchida T, Oshita S, Ohmori M, Tsuno T, Soejima K, Shinozaki S, Take Y, Mitsuda K (2011) Transmission electron microscopic observations of nanobubbles and their capture of impurities in wastewater. Nanoscale Res Lett 6(295):2–9

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zimmerman WB, Tesař V, Bandulasena HCH (2011) Towards energy efficient nanobubble generation with fluidic oscillation. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 16(4):350–356

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Seddon JR, Lohse D, Ducker WA, Craig VS (2012) A deliberation on nanobubbles at surfaces and in bulk. Chemphyschem 13(8):2179–2187

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ahmed AKA, Sun C, Hua L, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Marhaba T (2018) Generation of nanobubbles by ceramic membrane filters: the dependence of bubble size and zeta potential on surface coating, pore size and injected gas pressure. Chemosphere 203:327–335

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gurung A, Dahl O, Jansson K (2016) The fundamental phenomena of nanobubbles and their behavior in wastewater treatment technologies. Geosyst Eng 19(3):133–142

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Meegoda JN, Aluthgun Hewage S, Batagoda JH (2018) Stability of nanobubbles. Environ Eng Sci 35(11):1216–1227

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghadimkhani A, Zhang W, Marhaba T (2016) Ceramic membrane defouling (cleaning) by air nano bubbles. Chemosphere 146:379–384

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu G, Wu Z, Craig VS (2008) Cleaning of protein-coated surfaces using nanobubbles: an investigation using a quartz crystal microbalance. J Phys Chem C 112:16748–16753

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu Z, Zhang X, Zhang X, Sun J, Dong Y, Hu J (2007) In situ AFM observation of BSA adsorption on HOPG with nanobubble. Chin Sci Bull 52(14):1913–1919

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ahmadi R, Khodadadi DA, Abdollahy M, Fan M (2014) Nano-microbubble flotation of fine and ultrafine chalcopyrite particles. Int J Min Sci Technol 24(4):559–566

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sobhy A, Tao D (2013) Nanobubble column flotation of fine coal particles and associated fundamentals. Int J Miner Process 124:109–116

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ohnari H (2001) Fisheries experiments of cultivated shells using micro-bubbles techniques. J Heat Transfer Soc Jpn 40(160):2–7

    Google Scholar 

  17. Park J, Kurata K (2009) Application of microbubbles to hydroponics solution promotes lettuce growth. Hort Technol 19(1):212–215

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ebina K, Shi K, Hirao M, Hashimoto J, Kawato Y, Kaneshiro S, Morimoto T, Koizumi K, Yoshikawa H (2013) Oxygen and air nanobubble water solution promote the growth of plants, fishes, and mice. PLoS One 8(6):e65339

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen KK (2009) Bathing pool assembly with water full of nano-scale ozone bubbles. US Patent US 7488,416 B2

  20. Campbell GM, Mougeot E (1999) Creation and characterisation of aerated food products. Trends Food Sci Technol 10:283–296

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hepworth NJ, Varley J, Hind A (2001) Characterizing gas bubble dispersions in beer. Food Bioprod Process 79(1):13–20

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zuniga R, Aguilera J (2008) Aerated food gels: fabrication and potential applications. Trends Food Sci Technol 19(4):176–187

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zúñiga RN, Aguilera JM (2009) Structure–fracture relationships in gas-filled gelatin gels. Food Hydrocoll 23(5):1351–1357

    Google Scholar 

  24. Saint-Eve A, Déléris I, Feron G, Ibarra D, Guichard E, Souchon I (2010) How trigeminal, taste and aroma perceptions are affected in mint-flavored carbonated beverages. Food Qual Prefer 21(8):1026–1033

    Google Scholar 

  25. Deotale S, Dutta S, Moses JA, Balasubramaniam VM, Anandharamakrishnan C (2020) Foaming characteristics of beverages and its relevance to food processing. Food Eng Rev 12:229–250

    Google Scholar 

  26. Szerman N, Rao WL, Li X, Yang Y, Vaudagna SR, Zhang DQ (2014) Effects of the application of dense phase carbon dioxide treatments on technological parameters, physicochemical and textural properties and microbiological quality of lamb sausages. Food Eng Rev 7:241–249

    Google Scholar 

  27. Truong T, Palmer M, Bansal N, Bhandari B (2017) Effect of solubilised carbon dioxide at low partial pressure on crystallisation behaviour, microstructure and texture of anhydrous milk fat. Food Res Int 95:82–90

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mangaraj S, Goswami TK, Mahajan PV (2009) Applications of plastic films for modified atmosphere packaging of fruits and vegetables: a review. Food Eng Rev 1:133–158

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. de Lima M, Soares LS, Tosati JV, Lerin LA, de Oliveira JV, Monteiro AR (2014) Application of CO2 in Perna perna Mussel: evaluation of absorption mechanism during soluble gas stabilization (SGS) process. Food Eng Rev 7:250–257

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sterr J, Fleckenstein BS, Langowski HC (2014) The effect of high-pressure processing on tray packages with modified atmosphere. Food Eng Rev 7:209–221

    Google Scholar 

  31. Đorđević V, Balanč B, Belščak-Cvitanović A, Lević S, Trifković K, Kalušević A, Kostić I, Komes D, Bugarski B, Nedović V (2014) Trends in encapsulation technologies for delivery of food bioactive compounds. Food Eng Rev 7:452–490

    Google Scholar 

  32. Phan HT, Phan KKT (2014) Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of Gac oil. J Supercrit Fluids 95:567–571

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gaber MAFM, Tujillo FJ, Mansour MP, Juliano P (2018) Improving oil extraction from canola seeds by conventional and advanced methods. Food Eng Rev 10:198–210

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Saffarionpour S, Ottens M (2017) Recent advances in techniques for flavor recovery in liquid food processing. Food Eng Rev 10:81–94

    Google Scholar 

  35. Torres-Valenzuela LS, Ballesteros-Gómez A, Rubio S (2019) Green solvents for the extraction of high added-value compounds from agri-food waste. Food Eng Rev 12:83–100

    Google Scholar 

  36. Xu B-g, Zhang M, Bhandari B, Sun J, Gao Z (2016) Infusion of CO2 in a solid food: a novel method to enhance the low-frequency ultrasound effect on immersion freezing process. Innovative Food Sci Emerg Technol 35:194–203

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Adhikari BM, Truong T, Bansal N, Bhandari B (2018) Influence of gas addition on crystallisation behaviour of lactose from supersaturated solution. Food Bioprod Process 109:86–97

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Amamcharla J, Li B, Liu Z (2017) Use of micro- and nano-bubbles in liquid processing, United States

  39. Yoshirou O, Mitsuhiko I, Toshiko A (2012) Liquid seasoning, beverages, method of seasoning food, and seasoned dood, Japan, pp 1-7

  40. Bari SD, Robinson AJ (2013) Experimental study of gas injected bubble growth from submerged orifices. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 44:124–137

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wang Q, Zhao H, Qi N, Qin Y, Zhang X, Li Y (2019) Generation and stability of size-adjustable bulk nanobubbles based on periodic pressure change. Sci Rep 9:1118

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Kosasih L, Bhandari B, Prakash S, Bansal N, Gaiani C (2016) Physical and functional properties of whole milk powders prepared from concentrate partially acidified with CO2 at two temperatures. Int Dairy J 56:4–12

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Ahmadi R, Darban AK (2013) Modeling and optimization nano-bubble generation process using response surface methodology. Int J Nanosci Nanotechnol 9(3):151–162

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ahmed AKA, Sun C, Hua L, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Marhaba T, Zhang W (2018) Colloidal properties of air, oxygen, and nitrogen nanobubbles in water: effects of ionic strength, natural organic matters, and surfactants. Environ Eng Sci 35(7):720–727

    Google Scholar 

  45. Afzal MU, Kang IS (2012) A numerical study on bubble detachment from solid wall and formation of jet inside detached bubble. Int J Chem Eng Appl 3:40–43

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Huang J, Sun L, Du M, Mo Z, Zhao L (2018) A visualized study of interfacial behavior of air–water two-phase flow in a rectangular Venturi channel. Theor Appl Mech Lett 8(5):334–344

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kukizaki M (2009) Microbubble formation using asymmetric Shirasu porous glass (SPG) membranes and porous ceramic membranes-a comparative study. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 340:20–32

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Kukizaki M, Goto M (2006) Size control of nanobubbles generated from Shirasu-porous-glass (SPG) membranes. J Membr Sci 281:386–396

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kalbfleisch A, Siddiqui K (2017) The effect of mesh-type bubble breaker on two-phase vertical co-flow. Int J Multiphase Flow 94:1–16

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Kikuchi K, Ioka A, Oku T, Tanaka Y, Saihara Y, Ogumi Z (2009) Concentration determination of oxygen nanobubbles in electrolyzed water. J Colloid Interface Sci 329(2):306–309

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ohgaki K, Khanh NQ, Joden Y, Tsuji A, Nakagawa T (2010) Physicochemical approach to nanobubble solutions. Chem Eng Sci 65(3):1296–1300

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Oh SH, Kim JM (2017) Generation and stability of bulk nanobubbles. Langmuir 33(15):3818–3823

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Fan M, Tao D, Honaker R, Luo Z (2010) Nanobubble generation and its application in froth flotation (part I): nanobubble generation and its effects on properties of microbubble and millimeter scale bubble solutions. Min Sci Technol (China) 20(1):1–19

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Parmar R, Majumder SK (2013) Microbubble generation and microbubble-aided transport process intensification—a state-of-the-art report. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 64:79–97

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Liu S, Kawagoe Y, Makino Y, Oshita S (2013) Effects of nanobubbles on the physicochemical properties of water: the basis for peculiar properties of water containing nanobubbles. Chem Eng Sci 93:250–256

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Demangeat JL (2015) Gas nanobubbles and aqueous nanostructures: the crucial role of dynamization. Homeopathy 104:101–115

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Attard P (2013) The stability of nanobubbles. Eur Phys J Spec Top

  58. Bueno-Tokunaga A, Pérez-Garibay R, Martínez-Carrillo D (2015) Zeta potential of air bubbles conditioned with typical froth flotation reagents. Int J Miner Process 140:50–57

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Duval E, Adichtchev S, Sirotkin S, Mermet A (2012) Long-lived submicrometric bubbles in very diluted alkali halide water solutions. Phys Chem Chem Phys 14:4125–4132

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Ushikubo FY, Enari M, Furukawa T, Nakagawa R, Makino Y, Kawagoe Y, Oshita S (2010) Zeta-potential of micro- and/or nano-bubbles in water produced by some kinds of gases. IFAC Proc Vol 43(26):283–288

    Google Scholar 

  61. Kim JY, Song MG, Kim JD (2000) Zeta potential of nanobubbles generated by ultrasonication in aqueous alkyl polyglycoside solutions. J Colloid Interface Sci 223(2):285–291

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Takahashi M (2005) Potential of microbubbles in aqueous solutions: electrical properties of the gas-water interface. J Phys Chem B 109:21858–21864

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors would like to acknowledge the Australia-China Joint Research Centre in Future Dairy Manufacturing Dairy Innovation Centre - ACSRF48154 (2016-2020) for the PhD scholarships and financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bhesh Bhandari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

• Bulk CO2 nanobubbles (NBs) were generated in deionised water via a commercial NB generator.

• Generating parameters including gas gauge pressure, gas flow and liquid pressure affected the size distribution density and zeta potential (ZP) of formed NBs.

• Concentration of CO2 dissolved in NB-water was impacted by the parameters of generation.

• NBs size distribution changed and ZP absolute values increased during storage time.

• Amount of dissolved CO2 and pH value of NB-water changed during a week of storage period.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Phan, K.K.T., Truong, T., Wang, Y. et al. Formation and Stability of Carbon Dioxide Nanobubbles for Potential Applications in Food Processing. Food Eng Rev 13, 3–14 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12393-020-09233-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12393-020-09233-0

Keywords

Navigation