Skip to main content
Log in

Male care status influences the risk-taking decisions in a glassfrog

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Parental care increases offspring survival, but may impose costs by decreasing adult survival or mating opportunities. Because individuals have limited resources, time allocation and risk decisions are expected to vary according to the care status and threat faced by parents. Herein, we evaluated the sources of mortality of clutches of the glassfrog Hyalinobatrachium cappellei and the importance of paternal care for offspring survival. We also compared time allocation patterns and antipredator behavior between attending and non-attending males. Using naturalistic observations and field experiments with different dummy predators, we hypothesized that (1) offspring survival would be positively correlated with paternal care; (2) attending males would spend most of the time caring for the embryos, while non-attending males would spend more time foraging and calling; (3) attending males would prioritize their own survival when facing a high risk of predation, even with negative impacts on offspring survival. Main sources of embryo mortality included predation and dehydration, and offspring survivorship was almost totally dependent on paternal care. Although non-attending males spent more time calling and foraging, attending males also called and were able to attract females and increase their mating success. However, contrary to our prediction, we found that attending males were more risk-tolerant, increasing not only offspring survival but also their mortality risk. Our findings highlight the importance of the predation risk level on parents’ decisions and that the reproductive status may play a significant role in determining antipredator behavior and mating success in glassfrog males.

Significance statement

In species with parental care, parents face a trade-off between investment in current offspring survival and chances of future reproduction. Hence, it is expected that natural selection will favor parents that attend offspring without incurring in higher risk of predation. We investigated time allocation patterns and behavioral responses to different levels of threat in a glassfrog with paternal care. Using field observations and predation experiments, we found that attending and non-attending males of Hyalinobatrachium cappellei behaved differently depending on their care status and level of threat. Males were more likely to tolerate high risks only when they were caring for clutches. We also found that the commitment of males to continue caring resulted in higher offspring survival. Parental care behavior increased not only larvae hatching success, but also matting success of attending males, suggesting that paternal care might be under sexual selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  • Alonzo-Alvarez C, Velando A (2012) Benefits and costs of parental care. In: Royle NJ, Smiseth PT, Kölliker M (eds) The evolution of parental care. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M, Wiklund CG, Rundgren H (1980) Parental defence of offspring: a model and an example. Anim Behav 28:536–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickford DP (2004) Differential parental care behaviors of arboreal and terrestrial microhylid frogs from Papua New Guinea. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:402–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittencourt-Rosa D, Nascimento LA, Dubreuil V, Figueiredo LF, Cassiano JE (2013) Novos dados acerca dos aspectos geográficos e geológicos da área da fazenda São Nicolau e circunvizinhanças-município de Cotriguaçu-MT. XIV EGAL—Encontro dos Geografos da America Latina 04:08–11. Lima, Perú.

  • Blaser J, Sarre A, Poore D, Johnson S (2011) Status of Tropical Forest Management 2011. ITTO Technical Series No 38. International Tropical Timber Organization, Yokohama, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleu J, Gamelon M, Sæther BE (2016) Reproductive costs in terrestrial male vertebrates: insights from bird studies. Proc R Soc B 283:20152600

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bravo LV, Delia J (2015) Maternal care in a glassfrog: care function and commitment to offspring in Ikakogi tayrona. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70:41–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrowes PA (2000) Parental care and sexual selection in the Puerto Rican cave-dwelling frog, Eleutherodactylus cooki. Herpetologica 56:375–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen YH, Yu HT, Kam YC (2007) The ecology of male egg attendance in an arboreal breeding frog, Chirixalus eiffingeri (Anura: Rhacophoridae), from Taiwan. Zool Sci 24:434–440

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YH, Cheng WC, Yu HT, Kam YC (2011) Genetic relationship between offspring and guardian adults of a rhacophorid frog and its care effort in response to paternal share. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:2329–2339

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuang MF, Lee WH, Sun JS, You CH, Kam YC, Poo S (2017) Predation risk and breeding site value determine male behavior and indirectly affect survivorship of their offspring. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 71:122

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman RM, Gross MR (1991) Parental investment theory: the role of past investment. Trends Ecol Evol 6:404–406

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman RM, Gross MR, Sargent RC (1985) Parental investment decision rules: a test in the bluegill sunfish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:59–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Consolmagno RC, Requena GS, Machado G, Brasileiro CA (2016) Costs and benefits of temporary egg desertion in a rocky shore frog with male-only care. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70:785–795

    Google Scholar 

  • Delia J, Cisneros-Heredia DF, Whitney J, Murrieta-Galindo R (2010) Observations on the reproductive behavior of a Neotropical Glassfrog, Hyalinobatrachium fleischmanni (Anura: Centrolenidae). S Am J Herpetol 5:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Delia J, Ramírez-Bautista A, Summers K (2013) Parents adjust care in response to weather conditions and egg dehydration in a neotropical glassfrog. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:557–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Delia J, Ramirez-Bautista A, Summers K (2014) Glassfrog embryos hatch early after parental desertion. Proc R Soc B 281:20133237

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delia J, Bravo LV, Warkentin KM (2017) Patterns of parental care in Neotropical glassfrogs: fieldwork alters hypotheses of sex-role evolution. J Evol Biol 30:898–914

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delia J, Rivera-Ordonez JM, Salazar-Nicholls MJ, Warkentin KM (2018) Hatching plasticity and the adaptive benefits of extended embryonic development in glassfrogs. Evol Ecol 33:37–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake DL, Ranvestel AW (2005) Hyalinobatrachium colymbihpyllum (glass frog). Egg mass defense. Herpetol Rev 36:434

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost DR (2020) Amphibian species of the world: an online reference, version 6.0. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.5531/db.vz.0001 http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html. Accessed 20 Jan 2020

  • Furness AI, Capellini I (2019) The evolution of parental care diversity in amphibians. Nat Commun 10:4709

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil M, Bossert WH (1970) Life history consequences of natural selection. Am Nat 104:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghalambor CK, Peluc SI, Martin TE (2013) Plasticity of parental care under the risk of predation: how much should parents reduce care? Biol Lett 9:20130154

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gosner KL (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross MR (2005) The evolution of parental care. Q Rev Biol 80:37–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon N, Phillott AD, Alford R (2010) Temporal variation in dorsal patterns of juvenile greeneyed tree frogs, Litoria genimaculata (Anura: Hylidae). Herpetol Conserv Biol 5:126–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Klug H, Bonsall MB (2014) What are the benefits of parental care? The importance of parental effects on developmental rate. Ecol Evol 4:2330–2351

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Klug H, Alonzo SH, Bonsall MB (2012) Theoretical foundations of parental care. In: Royle NJ, Smiseth PT, Kölliker M (eds) The evolution of parental care. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 21–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtinen RM, Green SE, Pringle JL (2014) Impacts of paternal care and seasonal change on offspring survival: a multiseason experimental study of a caribbean frog. Ethology 120:400–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Lissåker M, Kvarnemo C (2006) Ventilation or nest defense parental care trade-offs in a fish with male care. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:864–873

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnhagen C (1992) Parental care and predation risk in fish. Ann Zool Fenn 29:227–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahr K, Riegler G, Hoi H (2015) Parental risk management in relation to offspring defence bad news for kids. Proc R Soc B 282:20141670

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mangold A, Trenkwalder K, Ringler M, Hödl W, Ringler E (2015) Low reproductive skew despite high male-biased operational sex ratio in a glass frog with paternal care. BMC Evol Biol 15:181

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto Y, Tawa A, Takegaki T (2011) Female mate choice in a paternal brooding blenny: the process and benefits of mating with males tending young eggs. Ethology 117:227–235

    Google Scholar 

  • McDiarmid RW (1978) Evolution of parental care in frogs. In: Burghardt GM, Bekoff M (eds) The development of behavior: comparative and evolutionary aspects. Garland STPM Press, New York, pp 127–147

    Google Scholar 

  • McDiarmid RW, Altig R (1999) Research: materials and techniques. In: McDiarmid RW, Altig R (eds) Tadpoles: the biology of anuran larvae. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 7–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Noronha JC, Rodrigues DJ (2018) Reproductive behaviour of the glass frog Hyalinobatrachium cappellei (Anura: Centrolenidae) in the Southern Amazon. J Nat Hist 52:207–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega-Andrade HM, Rojas-Soto O, Paucar C (2013) Novel data on the ecology of Cochranella mache (Anura: Centrolenidae) and the importance of protected areas for this critically endangered glassfrog in the Neotropics. PLoS One 8:e8183

    Google Scholar 

  • Ospina-L AM, Navarro-Salcedo P, Rios-Soto JA, Duarte-Marín S, Vargas-Salinas F (2019) Temporal patterns, benefits, and defensive behaviors associated with male parental care in the glassfrog Centrolene savagei. Ethol Ecol Evol (published online. https://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.2019.1682056)

  • Poo S, Bickford DP (2013) The adaptive significance of egg attendance in a south-east Asian tree frog. Ethology 119:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Poo S, Evans TA, Tan MK, Bickford DP (2016) Dynamic switching in predator attack and maternal defence of prey. Biol J Linn Soc 118:901–910

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria http://www.R-project.org/

    Google Scholar 

  • Requena GS, Machado G (2015) Effects of egg attendance on male mating success in a harvestman with exclusive parental care. Behav Ecol 26:926–935

    Google Scholar 

  • Requena GS, Buzatto BA, Martins EG, Machado G (2012) Paternal care decreases foraging activity and body condition, but does not impose survival costs to caring males in a Neotropical arachnid. PLoS One 7:e46701

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ringler E, Pašukonis A, Hödl W, Ringler M (2013) Tadpole transport logistics in a Neotropical poison frog: indications for strategic planning and adaptive plasticity in anuran parental care. Front Zool 10:67

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues DJ, Izzo TJ, Battirola LD (2010) Descobrindo a Amazônia Meridional: Biodiversidade da Fazenda São Nicolau. Pau e Prosa Comunicação Ltda, Mato Grosso, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues AP, Giaretta AA, da Silva DR, Facure KG (2011) Reproductive features of three maternal-caring species of Leptodactylus (Anura: Leptodactylidae) with a report on alloparental care in frogs. J Nat Hist 45:2037–2047

    Google Scholar 

  • Salgado AL, Guayasamin JM (2018) Parental care and reproductive behavior of the minute dappled glassfrog (Centrolenidae: Centrolene peristictum). S Am J Herpetol 13:211–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer LR, Formanowicz DR (1996) A cost of viviparityand parental care in scorpions: reduced sprint speed and behavioural compensation. Anim Behav 51:1017–1024

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A, Bell A, Johnson JC (2004) Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Q Rev Biol 79:241–277

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simon MP (1983) The ecology of parental care in a terrestrial breeding frog from New Guinea. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 14:61–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1989) Trade-offs in life-history evolution. Funct Ecol 3:259–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinhart GB, Sandrene ME, Weaver S, Stein RA, Marschal EA (2004) Increased parental care cost for nest-guarding fish in a lake with hyperabundant nest predators. Behav Ecol 16:427–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Székely T, Cuthill IC (2000) Trade-off between mating opportunities and parental care: brood desertion by female Kentish plovers. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:2087–2092

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilgar V, Kikas K (2009) Is parental risk taking negatively related to the level of brood reduction? An experiment with pied flycatchers. Anim Behav 77:43–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo LF, Sazima I, Haddad CFB (2011) Behavioural defences of anurans: an overview. Ethol Ecol Evol 23:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend DS (1986) The costs of male parental care and its evolution in a Neotropical frog. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:187–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend DS, Stewart MM, Pough FH (1984) Male parental care and its adaptive significance in a neotropical frog. Anim Behav 32:421–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell BG (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971. Aldine, Chicago, pp 136–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1974) Parent-offspring conflict. Am Zool 14:249–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Vági B, Végvári Z, Liker A, Freckleton RP, Székely T (2019) Parental care and the evolution of terrestriality in frogs. Proc R Soc B 286:20182737

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valencia-Aguilar A, Castro-Herrera F, Ramírez-Pinilla MP (2012) Microhabitats for oviposition and male clutch attendance in Hyalinobatrachium aureoguttatum (Anura: Centrolenidae). Copeia 2012:722–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Valencia-Aguilar A, Zamudio KR, Haddad CFB, Bogdanowicz SM, Prado CPA (2020) Show me you care: female mate choice based on egg attendance rather than male or territorial traits. Behav Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/araa051

  • Van Lidth de Jeude TW (1904) Reptiles and batrachians from Surinam. Notes Leyden Museum 25:83–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Vockenhuber EA, Hödl W, Karpfen U (2008) Reproductive behaviour of the glassfrog Hyalinobatrachium valerioi (Anura: Centrolenidae) at the tropical stream Quebrada Negra (La Gamba, Costa Rica). Stapfia 88:335–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Vockenhuber EA, Hödl W, Amézquita A (2009) Glassy fathers do matter: egg attendance enhances embryonic survivorship in the glass frog Hyalinobatrachium valerioi. J Herpetol 43:340–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1966) Natural selection, the cost of reproduction, and a refinement of Lack’s principle. Am Nat 100:687–690

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff members of the Fazenda São Nicolau and the Acervo Biológico da Amazônia Meridional – ABAM, for the logistic support in the field. We are also grateful to Célio F.B. Haddad and Nadya C. Pupin, from the Laboratório de Herpetologia, UNESP-Rio Claro, São Paulo, for providing us the necessary equipment used during the fieldwork. To Roy W. McDiarmid for valuable discussions and two anonymous reviewers provided suggestions that improved the manuscript.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was funded by the São Paulo Research Foundation, FAPESP (grant #2016/05070-5).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AVA and CPAP designed the original research questions. AVA collected field data, performed all statistical analyses, and drafted the manuscript. All authors substantially edited and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anyelet Valencia-Aguilar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Field observations and behavioral experiments were carried out in accordance with the Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour guidelines and the Ethics Committee on Animal Use of the Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rio Claro, São Paulo state, Brazil (protocol number 9457) and the Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio, license number 51479-4).

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Communicated by K. Summers

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valencia-Aguilar, A., de Jesus Rodrigues, D. & Prado, C.P. Male care status influences the risk-taking decisions in a glassfrog. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 74, 84 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-02869-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-02869-2

Keywords

Navigation