Skip to main content
Log in

Functional Compensation in a Honey bee’s Damaged Tongue while Dipping Nectar

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A honey bee has to visit 3000 flowers to produce one-gram of honey. A honey bee’s hairy tongue dips at an average frequency of 5 Hz, and its glossal hairs erect rhythmically, performing like an opening and closing umbrella to trap the nectar. Dipping by a honey bee tongue is a typical micro-fluidic transport with a low Reynolds number. The high intensify of feeding activities inevitably damage on the fragile tongue structure. We found that that in nature, honey bees with incomplete tongue tips can still load the nectar with hairs erected. Furthermore, the hairs deploy more to form a larger umbrella-like configuration, and the dipping frequency augments when tongues are damaged on the tips, possibly compensating for the nectar intake loss caused by structural damage. Here we examine by experiments and modeling the functional compensation facilitated by the compliant mechanisms in the honey bee tongue. We put forward a fluidic transport model to evaluate nectar intake rate in a damaged tongue, considering variation in hair erection angle and dipping frequency. Theoretical analysis indicates that both mechanisms compensate for nectar intake loss caused by damaged tongue. The findings suggest a new mechanism for functional compensation in flower-visiting insects that may prove useful in engineering applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alam MS, Jenkins CH (2005) Damage tolerance in naturally compliant structures. Int J Damage Mech 14:365–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Wu J, Yan S (2015) Switchable wettability of the honey bee's tongue surface regulated by erectable glossal hairs. J Insect Sci 15:164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crompton AW, Musinsky C (2011) How dogs lap: ingestion and intraoral transport in Canis familiaris. Biol Lett 7:82–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein M, Herzog W (2003) Aspects of skeletal muscle modeling. Philos T R Soc B 358:1437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gai K (2013) Wing damage effect on Dragonfly's aerodynamic performance during takeoff. Wright State University, Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper CJ, Swartz SM, Brainerd EL (2013) Specialized bat tongue is a hemodynamic nectar mop. P Natl Acad Sci 110:8852–8857

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hui CY, Jagota A (2016) Wetting of a partially immersed compliant rod. J Appl Phys 120:195301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurgen T (2008) The buzz about bees: biology of a superorganism. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim W, Bush JWM (2012) Natural drinking strategies. J Fluid Mech 705:7–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim W, Gilet T, Bush JWM (2011) Optimal concentrations in nectar feeding. P Natl Acad Sci 108:16618–16621

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krenn HW, Plant JD, Szucsich NU (2005) Mouthparts of flower-visiting insects. Arthropod Struct Dev 34:1–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SJ, Lee SC, Kim BH (2014) Liquid-intake flow around the tip of butterfly proboscis. J Theor Biol 348:113–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Wu J, Yang Y, Zhu R, Yan S (2015) Drag reduction effects facilitated by microridges inside the mouthparts of honey bee workers and drones. J Theor Biol 389:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay SM (2010) Frequency of injury and the ecology of regeneration in marine benthic invertebrates. Integr Comp Biol 50:479–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linghu Z, Wu J, Wang C, Yan S (2015) Mouthpart grooming behavior in honeybees: kinematics and sectionalized friction between foreleg tarsi and proboscises. J Insect Physiol 82:122–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pflumm W (1985) Influence of nectar-supply rate on the number of flowers visited by a honey bee on each collecting flight. Oecologia 66:207–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pivnick KA, McNeil JN (1985) Effects of nectar concentration on butterfly feeding: measured feeding rates for Thymelicus lineola (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) and a general feeding model for adult Lepidoptera. Oecologia 66:226–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu’er’e D (1999) Fluid coating on a fiber. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 31:347–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramasubramanian MK, Barham OM, Swaminathan V (2008) Mechanics of a mosquito bite with applications to microneedle design. Bioinsp Biomim 3:046001

  • Roh C, Gharib M (2018) Asymmetry in the jet opening: underwater jet vectoring mechanism by dragonfly larvae. Bioinspir Biomim 13:046007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi G, Wu J, Yan S (2017) Drag reduction in a natural high-frequency swinging micro-articulation: mouthparts of the honey bee. J Insect Sci 17:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson J, Riedel IBM (1964) Discharge and manipulation of labial gland secretion by workers of Apis mellifera (L.) (hymenoptera: Apidae). J Entomol. Ser A: Gen Entomol 39:76–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Gu W, Wu Q, Ji A, Dai Z (2010) Morphology and reaction force of toes of geckos freely moving on ceilings and walls. Sci China Technol Sci 6:1688–1693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Zhu R, Yan S (2015) Erection pattern and section-wise wettability of honey bee glossal hairs in nectar feeding. J Exp Biol 218:664–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Shi G, Zhao Y, Yan S (2018) How to dip nectar: optimal time apportionment in natural viscous fluid transport. J Phys D Appl Phys 51:245401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Wu J, Yan S (2014) Effects of erectable glossal hairs on a honey bee's nectar-drinking strategy. Appl Phys Lett 104:263701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Wu J, Zhu R, Li C, Yan S (2017) The honey bee’s protrusible glossa is a compliant mechanism. J Bionic Eng 14:607–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J, Wu J, Yan S (2015) Erection mechanism of glossal hairs during honey bee feeding. J Theor Biol 386:62–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu R, Lv H, Liu T (2016) Feeding kinematics and nectar intake of the honey bee tongue. J Insect Behav 29:325–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Center of Biomedical Analysis of Tsinghua University for theirassistance with specimen processing and SEM image capturing.

Funding

This work was supported by the research grant of Sun Yat-Sen University for Bairen Plan with a contract number of 76,200–18,841,223, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 51905556), and the Open Project of Henan Key Laboratory of Intelligent Manufacturing of Mechanical Equipment, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry (No. IM201904).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YC wrote the manuscript and planned the experiments, and analyzed the data; JW conceived the project and discovered the compensation in the honey bee-damaged tongue and performed the experiments; YY and SY conceived the project and designed the experiments.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yunqiang Yang or Shaoze Yan.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

We have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 240 kb)

ESM 2

(MP4 342 kb)

ESM 3

(MP4 2203 kb)

ESM 4

(MP4 1896 kb)

ESM 5

(MP4 1488 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Y., Wu, J., Yang, Y. et al. Functional Compensation in a Honey bee’s Damaged Tongue while Dipping Nectar. J Insect Behav 33, 71–82 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-020-09747-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-020-09747-9

Keywords

Navigation