Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T18:00:15.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Asteroids (Echinodermata) from the Barremian (Lower Cretaceous) of the Agadir Basin, west Morocco

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

Timothy A. M. Ewin
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, South Kensington, London, SW7 5BD, United Kingdom: t.ewin@nhm.ac.uk
Andrew S. Gale
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Burnaby Building, Burnaby Road, Portsmouth, PO1 3QL, United Kingdom: andy.gale@port.ac.uk

Abstract

Abundant new material of articulated asteroids from the Taba Starfish Bed (Lower Cretaceous, Barremian) of the Agadir Basin, western Morocco, allows reappraisal of this important fauna, and the recognition, to date, of five taxa belonging to the Astropectinidae, Odontasteridae, Goniasterididae, Terminasteridae, and Asteriidae. Betelgeusia orientalis Blake and Reboul, 2011 is shown to be a junior synonym of Coulonia platyspina Hess and Blake, 1995, and Dipsacaster africanus Blake and Reboul, 2011 comprises material of C. platyspina and a new odontasterid, here described as Odontaster tabaensis n. sp. Alkaidia megaungula n. sp. is described and its ontogeny and affinities discussed. From this, it is concluded that the Terminasteridae, revised to include the genera Terminaster and Alkaidia, is sister taxon to the extant family Zoroasteridae, and both are placed in the suborder Zorocallina of the Forcipulatida. The Taba fauna is a representative of a distinctive Lower Cretaceous asteroid assemblage that existed in northern Tethys from the Barremian to the Cenomanian and is also well known from the Albian and lower Cenomanian of Texas.

UUID: http://zoobank.org/b2ecdd06-685d-4242-9e49-985f9d7a3cc1

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2020, The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adkins, W.S., and Winton, W.M., 1920, Paleontological correlation of the Fredericksburg and Washita formations in north Texas: University of Texas, Bulletin 1945, 128 p.Google Scholar
Blainville, H.M.D. de, 1830, Dictionnaire des sciences naturelles, suivi d'une biographie des plus célèbres naturalistes par plusieurs professeurs du Jardin du Roi, et des principals écoles, Zoophytes: Paris, F. G. Levrault, 546 p.Google Scholar
Blake, D.B., 1984, The Benthopectinidae (Asteroidea: Echinodermata) of the Jurassic of Switzerland: Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae v. 77, p. 631647.Google Scholar
Blake, D.B., 1987, A classification and phylogeny of post-Palaeozoic sea stars (Asteroidea: Echinodermata): Journal of Natural History, v. 1, p. 481528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, D.B., and Reboul, R., 2011, A new asteroid (Echinodermata) faunule from the Early Cretaceous (Barremian) of Morocco: Journal of Paleontology, v. 85, p. 10211034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, D.B., and Reid, R. III, 1998, Some Albian (Cretaceous) asteroids (Echinodermata) from Texas and their paleobiological implications: Journal of Paleontology, v. 72, p. 512532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, D.B., Halligan, W., and Larson, N.L., 2018, A new species of the asteroid genus Betelgeusia (Echinodermata) from methane seep settings, Late Cretaceous of South Dakota: Journal of Paleontology, v. 92, p. 111.Google Scholar
Breton, G., 1979. Les Astéries du Crétacé de Normandie: Bulletin trimestriel de la Société géologique de Normandie et des amis du Muséum du Havre, v. 65, p. 587.Google Scholar
Brugière, J.G. de, 1791, Tableau encyclopédique et méthodique des trois règnes de la nature: L'helminthogie: Paris, Charles-Joseph Panckoucke, v. 17, 83 p.Google Scholar
Clark, A.M., and Downey, M.E., 1992, Starfishes of the Atlantic: London, Chapman and Hall, 794 p.Google Scholar
Company, M., Sandoval, J., Tavera, J.M., Aouatem, M., and Ettachefini, M., 2008, Barremian ammonite faunas from the Western High Atlas, Morocco—biostratigraphy and paleobiogeography: Cretaceous Research, v. 29, p. 926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downey, M.E., 1970, Zorocallida, new order, and Doraster constellatus, new genus and species, with notes on the Zoroasteridae (Echinodermata; Asteroidea): Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, v. 64, p. 118.Google Scholar
Fau, M., and Villier., L., 2018, Post-metamorphic ontogeny of Zoroaster fulgens Thomson, 1873 (Asteroidea, Forcipulatacea): Journal of Anatomy, v. 233, p. 644665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fell, H.B., 1954, New Zealand fossil Asterozoa 3. Odontaster priscus n. sp. from the Jurassic: Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand, v. 82, p. 817819.Google Scholar
Fisher, W.K., 1905, New starfishes from deep water off California and Alaska: Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries, v. 24, p. 291320.Google Scholar
Forbes, E.A., 1841, A History of British Starfishes and Other Animals of the Class Echinodermata: London, John van Voorst, 267 p.Google Scholar
Gale, A.S., 1987, Phylogeny and classification of the Asteroidea: Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, v. 89, p. 107132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, A.S., 2011a. The phylogeny of post-Paleozoic Asteroidea (Neoasteroidea, Echinodermata): Special Papers in Palaeontology, v. 38, p. 1112.Google Scholar
Gale, A.S., 2011b, Asteroidea (Echinodermata) from the Oxfordian (Late Jurassic) of Savigna, Department du Jura, France: Swiss Journal of Palaeontology, v. 130, p. 6989.Google Scholar
Gale, A.S., and Villier, L., 2013, Mass mortality of an asteriid starfish (Asteroidea: Echinodermata: Forcipulatida): Cretasterias reticulatus n. gen. and n. sp. from the Late Maastrictian (Cretaceous) of Morocco: Palaeontology, V. 56, p. 577588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldring, R., and Stephenson, D.G., 1972, The depositional environment of three starfish beds: Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatschefte, v. 10, p. 611624.Google Scholar
Gray, J.E., 1840, A synopsis of the genera and species of the class Hypostoma (Asterias Linnaeus): Annals and Magazine of Natural History, v. 6, p. 175–184, 275290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, H., 1955, Die fossilen Astropectiniden (Asteroidea). Schweizerische Paläeontologische Abhandlung, Basel, v. 71, p. 1113, 4 pls.Google Scholar
Hess, H., 1970, Schlangensterne und Seesterne aus dem oberen Hauterivien'Pierre Jaune’ von St Blaise bei Neuchâtel: Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, Basel, v. 63, p. 10691091.Google Scholar
Hess, H., 1974, Neue Funde des Seesterns Terminaster cancriformis (Quenstedt) aus Callovien und Oxford von England, Frankreich und Schweiz: Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, v. 67, p. 647659.Google Scholar
Hess, H., and Blake, D. B., 1995, Coulonia platyspina n. sp., an asteroid from the Lower Cretaceous of Morocco: Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, v. 88, p. 777788.Google Scholar
Klein, J.T., 1734, Naturalis dispositio echinodermatum. Accessit lucubratiuncula de aculeis Echinorum Marinorum, cum spicilegio de belemnitis: Gedani [Danzig], Thomas Johan Schreiber, 79 p.Google Scholar
Loriol, P. de, 1873, Description de quelques Astérides du terrain néocomien des environs de Neuchâtel: Mémoires de la Société Scientifique naturelle de Neuchâtel, v. 5, p. 519.Google Scholar
Mah, C. and Foltz, D. L., 2011, Molecular phylogeny of the Valvatacea (Asteroidea: Echinodermata): Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, v. 161, p. 769788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marenzeller, E. von., 1893, Berichte der Commission für Erforschung des östlichen Mittelmeeres. Zoologische Ergebnisse. 1.Echinodermen gesammelt 1890, 1891 und 1892: Wien, Denkschriften Kaiserlichen Akademie Wissenschaften, 127 p.Google Scholar
Perrier, E., 1881, Report on the Results of dredging in the Gulf of Mexico and in the Caribbean Sea, 1877–79, by the United States Coastal Survey Steamer Blake. 14. Description sommaire des espèces nouvelles d'Astéries: Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, v. 9, p. 131.Google Scholar
Perrier, E., 1884, Mémoire sur les étoiles de merrecueillis dans la mer des Antilles et le Golfe de Mexique: Muséum d'HistoireNaturelle Nouvelles Archives, v. 6, p. 127276.Google Scholar
Peyer, B.P., 1945, Beitrage zur Kenntnis von Rhat und Lias: Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, v. 36, p. 303326.Google Scholar
Philippi, A., 1837, Ueber die mit Asterias auranciaca verwandten und verweschselton Asterien der Sicilianschen Kuste: Archiv für Naturgeschichte, v. 3, p. 193194.Google Scholar
Philippi, A., 1870, Neue Seesterne aus Chile: Archiv für Naturgeschichte, v. 36, p. 268275.Google Scholar
Quenstedt, F. A., 1876, Petrefaktenkunde Deutschlands, 1 abt. Echinodermen (Asteriden und Encriniden): Leipzig, L.F. Fues, 742 p.Google Scholar
Sladen, W.P., 1889, Report on the Asteroidea collected by the Challenger. Scientific Reports of the Results of the Voyage of te Challenger: Zoology, v. 30, p. 1894.Google Scholar
Surlyk, F., and Noe-Nygaard, N., 1986, Hummocky cross-stratification from the Lower Jurassic Hasle Formation of Bornholm, Denmark: Sedimentary Geology, v. 46, p. 259273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, C.W., 1873, The Depths of the Sea: London, Macmillan & Co., 527 p.Google Scholar
Verrill, A.E., 1880, Notice of the remarkable marine fauna occupying the outer banks off the southern coast of New England: American Journal of Science, v. 3, p. 390403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verrill, A.E., 1899, Revision of certain genera and species of starfishes with descriptions of new forms: Transactions of the Connecticut Academy, v. 10, p. 145234.Google Scholar
Villier, L., Charbonnier, S., and Riou, B., 2009, Sea stars from Middle Jurassic Lagerstätte of La Voulte-sur-Rhone (Ardèche, France): Journal of Paleontology, v. 83, p. 389398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villier, L., Brayard, A., Bylund, K.G., Jenks, J.F., Escarguel, G., Olivier, N., Stephen, D.A., Vennin, E., and Fara, E., 2018, Superstesaster promissor gen. et sp. nov., a new starfish (Echinodermata, Asteroidea) from the Early Triassic of Utah, USA, filling a major gap in the phylogeny of asteroids: Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, v. 16, p. 395415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar