Skip to main content
Log in

Qualitative analysis of edible oil oxidation using an olfactory machine

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Oil oxidation is an undesirable series of chemical reactions involving oxygen that degrades the quality of an oil. Oxidation eventually produces rancidity in oil, with accompanying off-flavors and smells. An electronic nose was used in this study to detect the adulterations in edible oils. The acidity, peroxide, anisidine and Totox values of the edible oil samples were measured according to the official American Oil Chemist Society (AOCS) standard. The results were analyzed using cluster analysis, principal component analysis, support vector machine, quadratic discriminant analysis, and Partial least squares regression technique. In the sensor array, the TGS2602, and MQ136 sensors had the highest values of the Loudness coefficient and the MQ9, TGS822, TGS813, and TGS2620 had the lowest values. Based on the results obtained, the accuracy of the three methods; Support vector machine (SVM), Quadratic discriminant analysis and Partial least squares were 97%, 98.33%, and 100%, respectively. The results for the linear vector kernel support machine, training accuracy and validation for C-SVM and Nu-SVM were 98, 97, 97 and 95%, respectively. The results also indicated that the proposed method can be used as an alternative to the official AOCS methods to innovatively detect the edible oil oxidation with high accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y.M. Yang, K.Y. Han, B.S. Noh, Analysis of lipid oxidation of soybean oil using the portable electronic nose. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 9, 146–150 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Xu et al., A novel method for qualitative analysis of edible oil oxidation using an electronic nose. Food Chem. 202, 229–235 (2016)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Armenta, S. Garrigues, M. de la Guardia, Determination of edible oil parameters by near infrared spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 596, 330–337 (2007)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. M.Y. Talpur et al., A simplified FTIR chemometric method for simultaneous determination of four oxidation parameters of frying canola oil. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 149, 656–661 (2015)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. S.A. Fatemi Heydarabad et al., Design, development and evaluation of a single-task electronic nose rig for assessing adulterated hydrosols. J. Food Meas. Charact. 13(1), 107–120 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.W. Gardner, P.N. Bartlett, A brief history of electronic noses. Sens. Actuators B 18(1–3), 210–211 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Majchrzak et al., Electronic noses in classification and quality control of edible oils: a review. Food Chem. 246, 192–201 (2018)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. A.D. Wilson, M. Baietto, Applications and advances in electronic-nose technologies. Sensors 9(7), 5099–5148 (2009)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Loutfi et al., Electronic noses for food quality: a review. J. Food Eng. 144, 103–111 (2015)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. X. Tian, J. Wang, S. Cui, Analysis of pork adulteration in minced mutton using electronic nose of metal oxide sensors. J. Food Eng. 119(4), 744–749 (2013)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Aparicio et al., Detection of rancid defect in virgin olive oil by the electronic nose. J. Agric. Food Chem. 48, 853–860 (2000)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. M.E. Escuderos et al., Edible and nonedible olive oils discrimination by the application of a sensory olfactory system based on tin dioxide sensors. Food Chem. 136(3), 1154–1159 (2013)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. H.L. Gan et al., Monitoring the storage stability of RBD palm olein using the electronic nose. Food Chem. 89, 271–282 (2005)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Y.G. Martın et al., Electronic nose based on metal oxide semiconductor sensors and pattern recognition techniques: Characterisation of vegetable oils. Anal. Chim. Acta 449(1), 69–80 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Pacioni et al., Composition of commercial truffle flavored oils with GC–MS analysis and discrimination with an electronic nose. Food Chem. 146, 30–35 (2014)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. M.S. Cosio et al., Evaluation of different storage conditions of extra virgin olive oils with an innovative recognition tool built by means of electronic nose and electronic tongue. Food Chem. 101, 485–491 (2007)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. M.J. Lerma-Garcia et al., Metal oxide semiconductor sensors for monitoring of oxidative status evolution and sensory analysis of virgin olive oils with different phenolic content. Food Chem. 117(4), 608–614 (2009)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Mildner-Szkudlarz, H.H. Jelen, R. Zawirska-Wojtasiak, The use of electronic and human nose for monitoring rapeseed oil autoxidation. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 110, 61–72 (2008)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Y. Yin, Y. Zhao, A feature selection strategy of E-nose data based on PCA coupled with Wilks Λ-statistic for discrimination of vinegar samples. J. Food Meas. Charact. 13(3), 2406–2416 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Y. Wang et al., Identification and analysis of the flavor characteristics of unfermented stinky tofu brine during fermentation using SPME-GC–MS, e-nose, and sensory evaluation. J. Food Meas. Charact. 14(1), 597–612 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. Zhiyi et al., Electronic nose system fabrication and application in large yellow croaker (Pseudosciaena crocea) fressness prediction. J. Food Meas. Charact. 11(1), 33–40 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. H. Zheng et al., Study of spinyhead croaker (Collichthys lucidus) fat content forecasting model based on electronic nose and non-linear data resolution model. Food Anal. Methods 12(9), 1927–1937 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. E. Mirzaee-Ghaleh et al., Identification of fresh-chilled and frozen-thawed chicken meat and estimation of their shelf life using an E-nose machine coupled fuzzy KNN. Food Anal. Methods 13(3), 678–689 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. Liu et al., Bionic electronic nose based on MOS sensors array and machine learning algorithms used for wine properties detection. Sensors 19(1), 45 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  25. J.-Y. Nie et al., Screening and evaluation of radical scavenging active compounds in the essential oil from Magnolia biondii Pamp by electronic nose coupled with chemical methodology. Ind. Crops Prod. 144, 112060 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  26. S. Buratti et al., E-nose, e-tongue and e-eye for edible olive oil characterization and shelf life assessment: a powerful data fusion approach. Talanta 182, 131–141 (2018)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. F. Ayari et al., Using an E-nose machine for detection the adulteration of margarine in cow ghee. J. Food Process Eng. 41(6), e12806 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  28. F. Ayari et al., Detection of the adulteration in pure cow ghee by electronic nose method (case study: sunflower oil and cow body fat). Int. J. Food Prop. 21(1), 1670–1679 (2018)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. T.C. Pearce, S.S. Schiffman, H.T. Nagle, Handbook of Machine Olfaction: Electronic Nose Technology (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2003), pp. 33–53

    Google Scholar 

  30. J.W. Gardner et al., The prediction of bacteria type and culture growth phase by an electronic nose with a multi-layer perceptron network. Meas. Sci. Technol. 9(1), 120 (1998)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. K. Arshak et al., A review of gas sensors employed in electronic nose applications. Sens. Rev. 24(2), 181–198 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  32. J.Y. Huang et al., Cluster and discriminant analysis of electrochemical noise data. Electrochim. Acta 53, 680–687 (2007)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Z. Haddi et al., Electronic nose and tongue combination for improved classification of Moroccan virgin olive oil profiles. Food Res. Int. 54, 1488–1498 (2013)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. M. Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti et al., From simple classification methods to machine learning for the binary discrimination of beers using electronic nose data. Eng. Agric. Environ. Food 8(1), 44–51 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  35. T. Ye et al., Can odors of TCM be captured by electronic nose? The novel quality control method for musk by electronic nose coupled with chemometrics. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 55(5), 1239–1244 (2011)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. X.-W. Huang et al., Determination of pork spoilage by colorimetric gas sensor array based on natural pigments. Food Chem. 145, 549–554 (2014)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. M. Esteki et al., Chromatographic fingerprinting with multivariate data analysis for detection and quantification of apricot kernel in almond powder. Food Anal. Methods 10, 3312–3320 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  38. A. Sanaeifar et al., Application of MOS based electronic nose for the prediction of banana quality properties. Measurement 82, 150–114 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  39. F. Mabood et al., Applications of FT-NIRS combined with PLS multivariate methods for the detection & quantification of saccharin adulteration incommercial fruit juices. Food Addit. Contam. 35(6), 1052–1060 (2018)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. P. Geladi, B.R. Kowalski, Partial least-squares regression: a tutorial. Anal. Chim. Acta 185(6), 1–17 (1986)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. H. Karami et al., Using PSO and GWO techniques for prediction some drying properties of tarragon (Artemisia dracunculus L.). J. Food Process Eng. 41(8), e12921 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  42. M. Kaveh, H. Karami, A. Jahanbakhshi, Investigation of mass transfer, thermodynamics, and greenhouse gases properties in pennyroyal drying. J. Food Process Eng. e13446.

  43. F. Shahidi, Y. Zhong, Lipid Oxidation: Measurement Methods, Bailey’ s Industrial Oil and Fat Prodicts, 6th edn, vol. 6. (Canada, John’s New Foundland, Canada, 2005), pp. 357–80

    Google Scholar 

  44. AOCS, AOCS Official Method Cd 3a–63 Acid Value Method. Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the AOCS (American Oil Chemists’ Society, Champaign, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  45. J. Bonilla et al., Edible films and coatings to prevent the detrimental effect of oxygen on food quality: possibilities and limitation. Food Eng. 110, 208–213 (2012)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. N.T. Semb, Analytical Methods for Determination of the Oxidative Status in Oils, ed. by t.e.N. NTNUTrondheim (Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2012). pp. 1–61.

  47. F. Shahidi, U.N. Wanasundara, Food lipids: chemistry, nutrition, and biotechnology, in Methods for Measuring Oxidative Rancidity in Fats and Oils, ed. by C.C. Akoh, D.B. Min (Marcel Dekker, New York, 2002), pp. 465–482

    Google Scholar 

  48. ISIRI, Blend Oil- Specifications (Institute of Standards and Industrial Research of Iran, Tehran, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  49. H. Zheng et al., Study of sensitivity evaluation on ridgetail white prawn (Exopalaemon carinicauda) quality examination methods. Int. J. Food Prop. 22(1), 942–951 (2019)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. C. Shao et al., Ridgetail white prawn (Exopalaemon carinicauda) K value predicting method by using electronic nose combined with non-linear data analysis model. Food Anal. Methods 11(11), 3121–3129 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  51. J. Li et al., Design of A portable electronic nose system and application in K value prediction for large yellow croaker (Pseudosciaena crocea). Food Anal. Methods 9(10), 2943–2951 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  52. H. Men et al., Data fusion of electronic nose and electronic tongue for detection of mixed edible-oil. J. Sens. 2014, 7 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  53. A. Oussama et al., Detection of olive oil adulteration using FT-IR spectroscopy and PLS with variable importance of projection (VIP) scores. J. Am. Oil. Chem. Soc. 89, 1807–1812 (2012)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. M. Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti et al., Temperature modulation of electronic nose combined with multi-class support vector machine classification for identifying export caraway cultivars. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 138, 134–139 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  55. M. Tohidi et al., Identification of trace amounts of detergent powder in raw milk using a customized low-cost artificial olfactory system: a novel method. Measurement 124, 120–129 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  56. J. Olsson et al., Detection and quantification of ochratoxin A and deoxynivalenol in barley grains by GC-MS and electronic nose. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 72(3), 203–214 (2002)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. I.R. Donis-González et al., Assessment of chestnut (Castanea spp.) slice quality using color images. J. Food Eng. 115, 407–414 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  58. V. Mohammadi, K. Kheiralipour, M. Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti, Detecting maturity of persimmon fruit based on image processing technique. Sci. Hortic. 184, 123–128 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  59. M. Tohidi et al., Development of a metal oxide semiconductor-based artificial nose as a fast, reliable and non-expensive analytical technique for aroma profiling of milk adulteration. Int. Dairy J. 77, 38–46 (2018)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Q. Chen et al., Discrimination of green tea quality using the electronic nose technique and the human panel test, comparison of linear and nonlinear classification tools. Sens. Actuators B: 159(1), 294–300 (2011)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. B. Nouri, S.S. Mohtasebi, A. Jahanbakhshi, Application of an olfactory system to detect and distinguish bitter chocolates with different percentages of cocoa. J. Food Process Eng 42(7), e13248 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  62. B. Nouri, S.S. Mohtasebi, S. Rafiee, Quality detection of pomegranate fruit infected with fungal disease. Int. J. Food Prop. 23(1), 9–21 (2020)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. G. Billek, Quality assessment of used frying fats. A comparison of four methods. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 55, 728–32 (1978)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Mr. Farshad Karami (Research and Development Manager at Mahidasht Kermanshah Vegetable Oil Agricultural Industrial) for chemical tests and for useful discussions.

Funding

The University of Mohaghegh Ardabili supported this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mansour Rasekh or Esmaeil Mirzaee-Ghaleh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karami, H., Rasekh, M. & Mirzaee-Ghaleh, E. Qualitative analysis of edible oil oxidation using an olfactory machine. Food Measure 14, 2600–2610 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-020-00506-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-020-00506-0

Keywords

Navigation