Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical study of conduction and radiation heat losses from vacuum annulus in parabolic trough receivers

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers in Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Parabolic trough receiver is a key component to convert solar energy into thermal energy in the parabolic trough solar system. The heat loss of the receiver has an important influence on the thermal efficiency and the operating cost of the power station. In this paper, conduction and radiation heat losses are analyzed respectively to identify the heat loss mechanism of the receiver. A 2-D heat transfer model is established by using the direct simulation Monte Carlo method for rarefied gas flow and heat transfer within the annulus of the receiver to predict the conduction heat loss caused by residual gases. The numerical results conform to the experimental results, and show the temperature of the glass envelope and heat loss for various conditions in detail. The effects of annulus pressure, gas species, temperature of heat transfer fluid, and annulus size on the conduction and radiation heat losses are systematically analyzed. Besides, the main factors that cause heat loss are analyzed, providing a theoretical basis for guiding the improvement of receiver, as well as the operation and maintenance strategy to reduce heat loss.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

c r :

Relative velocity

C 0 :

−0.57

C 1 :

6.8/(g·mol−1)

d :

Molecular diameter

I 0 :

First kind zero order modified Bessel function

Kn:

Knudsen number

L :

Characteristic length of the space/mm

M *g :

The molar mass for monatomic gases, 1.4 times the molar mass for diatomic/polyatomic gases

p :

Average pressure of gas in annulus/Pa

\({Q_{\rm{c}}}\prime \) :

Model values of conduction heat transfer rate from absorber tube to glass envelope/(W·m−1)

Qc:

Conduction heat transfer rate from the absorber tube to glass envelope/(W·m−1)

Q cond,abs :

Conduction heat transfer rate through the absorber tube wall /(W·m−1)

Q cond,g :

Conduction heat transfer rate through the glass envelope wall /(W·m−1)

Q loss :

Total heat loss rate from the PTR to the surroundings/(W·m−1)

Q obtain :

Heat obtained by HT/(W·m−1)

Q r :

Radiation heat transfer rate from the absorber tube to glass envelope/(W·m−1)

Q solar :

Solar irradiation rate into the absorber pipe/(W·m−1)

R :

Radius/mm

r :

Heat transfer resistance

T :

Temperature

T0:

273 K

u :

Normal velocity

v :

Tangential velocity

α:

Thermal accommodation coefficient

αt :

Accommodation coefficient of the kinetic energy of the tangential velocity component

αn :

Energy accommodation coefficient of the normal velocity component

εg :

Emissivity of glass envelope

εs :

Emissivity of solar selective coatings

εt :

Relative translational energy

\(\mathcal{R}\) :

Scatter kernel

Λ:

Molecular mean free path/mm

μ:

Viscosity

σ:

Stefan-Boltzmann constant, 5.67×10−8 W/(m2·K4)

σT :

Total cross section

ω:

Viscosity temperature index

abs,o:

Outer surface of absorber tube

g,i:

Inner surface of glass envelope

g,o:

Outer surface of glass envelope

i:

Incident flows

r:

Reflected flows

ref:

When the relative velocity is cr,ref

s:

Surface

References

  1. Espinosa-Rueda G, Navarro Hermoso J, Martínez-Sanz N, Gallas-Torreira M. Vacuum evaluation of parabolic trough receiver tubes in a 50 MW concentrated solar power plant. Solar Energy, 2016, 139: 36–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu J, Lei D, Li Q. Vacuum lifetime and residual gas analysis of parabolic trough receiver. Renewable Energy, 2016, 86: 949–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Daniel P, Joshi Y, Das A K. Numerical investigation of parabolic trough receiver performance with outer vacuum shell. Solar Energy, 2011, 85(9): 1910–1914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lobón D, Valenzuela L, Baglietto E. Modeling the dynamics of the multiphase fluid in the parabolic-trough solar steam generating systems. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 78(78): 393404

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ren Y, Lei D, Wang Z. Experimental analysis of residual gas of vacuum annulus in parabolic through solar receivers. In: AIP Conference Proceedings 2126, 2019, 120017: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  6. He Y, Wang K, Qiu Y, Du B, Liang Q, Du S. Review of the solar flux distribution in concentrated solar power: non-uniform features, challenges, and solutions. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 149: 448–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Reddy K, Balaji S, Sundararajan T. Heat loss investigation of 125 kWth solar LFR pilot plant with parabolic secondary evacuated receiver for performance improvement. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2018, 125: 324–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kearney D, Price H. Chapter 6: Recent Advances in Parabolic Trough Solar Power Plant Technology. Boulder Co American Solar Energy Society Inc, 2005

  9. Kutscher C, Mehos M, Turchi C, Glatzmaier G. Line-focus solar power plant cost reduction plan (milestone report). Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports, 2010

  10. Lei D, Fu X, Ren Y, Yao F, Wang Z. Temperature and thermal stress analysis of parabolic trough receivers. Renewable Energy, 2019, 136: 403–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li J, Wang Z, Lei D, Li J. Hydrogen permeation model of parabolic trough receiver tube. Solar Energy, 2012, 86(5): 1187–1196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Price H, Forristall R, Wendelin T, Lewandowski A, Moss T, Gummo C. Field survey of parabolic trough receiver thermal performance. In: Proceedings of ISEC2006: ASME International Solar Energy Conference, Denver, Colorado, USA, 2006

  13. Prahl C, Röger M, Stanicki B, Hilgert C. Absorber tube displacement in parabolic trough collectors—a review and presentation of an airborne measurement approach. Solar Energy, 2017, 157(157): 692–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ratzel A C, Hickox C E, Gartling D K. Techniques for reducing thermal conduction and natural convection heat losses in annular receiver geometries. Journal of Heat Transfer, 1979, 101(1): 108113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tang Z, Zhao X P, Li Z Y, Tao W Q. Multi-scale numerical analysis of flow and heat transfer for a parabolic trough collector. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 106: 526538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Roesle M, Good P, Coskun V, Steinfeld A. Analysis of conduction heat loss from a parabolic trough solar receiver with active vacuum by direct simulation Monte Carlo. Numerical Heat Transfer, 2012, 62(5): 432–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Burkholder F, Brandemuehl M, Kutscher C, Wolfrum Ed. Heat conduction of inert gas-hydrogen mixtures in parabolic trough receivers. In: ASME 2008, International Conference on Energy Sustainability Collocated with the Heat Transfer, Fluids Engineering, and Energy Nanotechnology Conferences, Jacksonville, Florida, USA, 2008: 449–458

  18. Yu Q, Mi J, Lang Y, Du M, Li S, Yang H, Hao L, Liu X, Jiang L. Thermal properties of high temperature vacuum receivers used for parabolic trough solar thermal power system. Progress in Natural Science: Materials International, 2017, (27): 410–415

  19. Setien E, López-Martín R, Valenzuela L. Methodology for partial vacuum pressure and heat losses analysis of parabolic troughs receivers by infrared radiometry. Infrared Physics & Technology, 2019, 98: 341–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yao F, Lei D, Yu K, Han Y, Yao P, Wang Z, Fang Q, Hu Q. Experimental study on vacuum performance of parabolic trough receivers based on a novel non-destructive testing method. Energies, 2019, 12(23): 4531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kumar D, Kumar S. Simulation analysis of overall heat loss coefficient of parabolic trough solar collector at computed optimal air gap. Energy Procedia, 2017, 109: 86–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lei D, Li Q, Wang Z, Li J, Li J. An experimental study of thermal characterization of parabolic trough receivers. Energy Conversion and Management, 2013, 69(5): 107–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hilgert C, Jung C, Wasserfuhr C, Leon J, Valenzuela L. Qualification of silicone based HTF for parabolic trough collector applications. In: AIP Conference Proceedings 2126, 2019, 080003: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chang C, Sciacovelli A, Wu Z, Li X, Li Y, Zhao M, Deng J, Wang Z, Ding Y. Enhanced heat transfer in a parabolic trough solar receiver by inserting rods and using molten salt as heat transfer fluid. Applied Energy, 2018, 220: 337–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nunes V, Queirós C, Lourenço M, Santos F J V, Nieto de Castro C A. Molten salts as engineering fluids — a review: Part I. Molten alkali nitrates. Applied Energy, 2016, 183: 603–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Muñoz-Anton J, Biencinto M, Zarza E, Díez L E. Theoretical basis and experimental facility for parabolic trough collectors at high temperature using gas as heat transfer fluid. Applied Energy, 2014, 135: 373–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Aguilar R, Valenzuela L, Avila-Marin A L, Garcia-Ybarra P L. Simplified heat transfer model for parabolic trough solar collectors using supercritical CO2. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 196: 807–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Qiu Y, Li M, He Y, Tao W. Thermal performance analysis of a parabolic trough solar collector using supercritical CO2 as heat transfer fluid under non-uniform solar flux. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 115: 1255–1265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu Z, Lei D, Yuan G, Shao J, Zhang Y, Wang Z. Structural reliability analysis of parabolic trough receivers. Applied Energy, 2014, 123: 232–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Forristall R. Heat transfer analysis and modeling of a parabolic trough solar receiver implemented in engineering equation solver. National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO. (US), Technical Report, 2003, NREL/TP-550-34169

  31. Shen C. Rarefied Gas Dynamics. Springer Nature, 2005, 17(5): 9091

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bird G. Molecular Gas Dynamics and the Direct Simulation of Gas Flows. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bird G, Gallis M, Torczynski J, Rader D J. Accuracy and efficiency of the sophisticated direct simulation Monte Carlo algorithm for simulating non-continuum gas flows. Physics of Fluids, 2009, 21(1): 541–546

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Song S, Yovanovich M. Correlation of thermal accommodation coefficient for engineering surfaces. In: Proceedings of the 24th National Heat Transfer Conference and Exhibition, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1987: 107–116

  35. Burkholder F. Transition regime heat conduction of argon/hydrogen and xenon/hydrogen mixtures in a parabolic trough receiver. Dissertation for the Docotoral Degree. Boulder: University of Colorado Boulder, 2011

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2019YFE0102000) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51476165).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dongqiang Lei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lei, D., Ren, Y. & Wang, Z. Numerical study of conduction and radiation heat losses from vacuum annulus in parabolic trough receivers. Front. Energy 16, 1048–1059 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0670-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0670-7

Keywords

Navigation