Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:22:12.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A FRAMEWORK FOR TORSION THEORY COMPUTATIONS ON ELLIPTIC THREEFOLDS

Part of: (Co)homology theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2020

DAVID ANGELES ,
JASON LO  and
COURTNEY M. VAN DER LINDEN
DAVID ANGELES*
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, The Ohio State University, 1958 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH43210, USA
JASON LO
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, California State University, Northridge, 18111 Nordhoff Street, Northridge, CA91330, USA e-mail: jason.lo@csun.edu
COURTNEY M. VAN DER LINDEN
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, California State University, Northridge, 18111 Nordhoff Street, Northridge, CA91330, USA e-mail: courtney.vanderlinden.727@my.csun.edu
*
e-mail: angeles.6@osu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We give a list of statements on the geometry of elliptic threefolds phrased only in the language of topology and homological algebra. Using only notions from topology and homological algebra, we recover existing results and prove new results on torsion pairs in the category of coherent sheaves on an elliptic threefold.

Keywords

torsion pairtorsion theoryt-structureelliptic threefold

MSC classification

Primary: 14F05: Sheaves, derived categories of sheaves and related constructions
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 110 , Issue 2 , April 2021 , pp. 175 - 193
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2020 Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Communicated by D. Chan

Partially supported by NSF-DMS 1247679 grant PUMP: Preparing Undergraduates through Mentoring towards PhD’s.

References

Bartocci, C., Bruzzo, U. and Hernández-Ruipérez, D., Fourier–Mukai and Nahm Transforms in Geometry and Mathematical Physics, Progress in Mathematics, 276 (Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 2009).Google Scholar
Bridgeland, T. and Maciocia, A., ‘Fourier–Mukai transforms for K3 and elliptic fibrations’, J. Algebraic Geom. 11 (2002), 629–657.Google Scholar
Diaconescu, D.-E., ‘Vertical sheaves and Fourier–Mukai transform on elliptic Calabi–Yau threefolds’, Commun. Number Theory Phys. 10 (2016), 373–431.Google Scholar
Happel, D., Reiten, I. and Smalø, S. O., Tilting in Abelian Categories and Quasitilted Algebras, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, 575 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1996).Google Scholar
Huybrechts, D., Fourier–Mukai Transforms in Algebraic Geometry, Oxford Mathematical Monographs (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2006).Google Scholar
Liu, W., Lo, J. and Martinez, C., ‘Fourier–Mukai transforms and stable sheaves on Weierstrass elliptic surfaces’, Preprint, 2019, arXiv:1910.02477 [math.AG].Google Scholar
Lo, J., ‘t-structures on elliptic fibrations’, Kyoto J. Math. 56(4) (2016), 701–735.Google Scholar
Lo, J., ‘Fourier–Mukai transforms of slope stable torsion-free sheaves and stable 1-dimensional sheaves on Weierstrass elliptic threefolds’, Preprint, 2017, arXiv:1710.03771 [math.AG].Google Scholar
Lo, J., ‘Fourier–Mukai transforms of slope stable torsion-free sheaves on a product elliptic threefold’, Adv. Math. 358 (2019), 106846.Google Scholar
Lo, J. and Zhang, Z., ‘Preservation of semistability under Fourier–Mukai transforms’, Geom. Dedicata 193(1) (2018), 89–119.Google Scholar
Neeman, A., Triangulated Categories, Annals of Mathematics Studies, 148 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2014).Google Scholar
Polishchuk, A., ‘Constant families of t-structures on derived categories of coherent sheaves’, Mosc. Math. J. 7 (2007), 109–134.Google Scholar
Weibel, C. A., An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 38 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).Google Scholar